JacketFlap connects you to the work of more than 200,000 authors, illustrators, publishers and other creators of books for Children and Young Adults. The site is updated daily with information about every book, author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry. Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers, publishers and fans. Join now (it's free).
Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: television, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 26 - 50 of 499
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: television in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
This morning my husband and I were watching Good Morning America, as we do every morning, when I suddenly decided to check out one of my pet peeves. Between 7:45AM and 7:55AM PST I counted 11 commercials, a segment of the show that was less than one minute long, and then 12 more commercials. Yes people, less than one minute of programming and 24 commercials in a ten minute period!!! It may have been even more, since they run together it is hard to count them. The greed is unbelievable. We are already paying for this programming because we receive it on satellite so why should we be subjected to this?
This is not an attack on Good Morning America, it is all of television broadcasting. Over time they have added more and more commercials to each program until we are now spending more time viewing commercials than we are viewing the program we tuned in to see. I wonder how many people agree that this is excessive? I am so angry that I am thinking of giving up television viewing entirely. It seems to me we are giving up a lot of time and money to be brainwashed by the advertisers who want us to give up even more of our money..
If we adults are being brainwashed by advertisers what about our children? How many ads are they seeing as they watch children's programming? Are they influencing your children or are you? Unfortunately I think the answer is obvious.
How do we combat this? I am open to suggestions. Do we quit watching television? Do we mute all commercials and leave the room? Do we sign a petition to put an end to this? Do we bombard the stations with letters and emails of complaint? Do we contact the FCC with our complaints? What do you think??? Your opinion is requested.
0 Comments on IT IS TIME FOR A REVOLUTION! as of 10/11/2012 2:24:00 PM
Well, that was a long week and a half of new TV, and with not much to show for it in the end. These write-ups represent a small minority of the new shows to premiere this fall--I haven't said anything about the season's new comedies, which run the gamut from terrible (Partners), to underwhelming (Ben and Kate, The Mindy Project), to competent but uninspiring (Go On, Animal Practice), to bizarre
Well, here we are again, in fall pilot season. As has become traditional, we have a drizzle of new shows this week, followed by a deluge next week, so for now I'm fresh and energized enough to write quite a bit about each new show. By next week, I suspect, I'll be a little more punchy.
The Mob Doctor - I try not to be one of those people who assume that cable television is inherently superior
It's really audacious and amazing. I think a lot of people will miss the work that is involved, the story, the Venn diagrams that are being created, the domino effect that characters have with each other in their various episodes. I know what he's doing, and this has never been done on a TV show like this. This makes Lost look like a Spalding Grey monologue. You'll have to watch each episode more than once.
Even if you don’t work in a school media center, I’m guessing your life still tends to run on an academic schedule when you work with teens. So welcome to the new school year! Here’s what I think might be interesting, useful, or intriguing to you and your patrons this month.
If your teens are interested in what’s new in the going green movement, have them look more globally to see what’s going on. In coastal Ecuador, young people from farming families are heading up efforts to save, cultivate, and redistribute heirloom seeds to revitalize the environment and help farmers prosper. Part of an organization called FOCCAHL, 20-year-old Cesar Guale Vasquez travels throughout nearby areas collecting seeds from farmers and also hosts swapping events so that farmers can trade seeds with each other in order to have more vibrant and diverse crops. Now take that for inspiration and add to it your own library’s resources on climate change, farming, and nutrition and plan an interesting program that combines science with activism and see what your advisory board wants to do with it. Many libraries now are creating their own seed libraries, and whether they’re for wildflowers or corn, they can be a great way to bring communities together, get young people to work with older people, and freshen up your local environment while doing your small part to keep the world cleaner and greener.
Matthews, J. (2012). Ecuador’s seed savior. World Ark, May 2012: 10-15.
At the beginning of the school year, many teens are interested in refining or experimenting with their personal style. There is generally no shortage of mainstream fashion and beauty advice in the magazines and books you have in your collection already, but there might be a population you’re missing, and they’re getting bigger and more vocal. While the natural hair trend has been growing for years, the recent O Magazine cover presenting Oprah Winfrey with her hair relaxer-free has sparked a lot of talk. The social news web is blowing up with discussions of hegemony (the prevalence of hair relaxers in the African American community has been linked to unrealistic standards of white beauty), harassment (nearly everyone with natural curls, regardless of race, has experienced strangers touching their hair without asking first), and self image (who decides what’s beautiful, and is it more important to do what you think is pretty on you or to make a political statement with your hair?). Take a look at the reports of the Oprah cover at Sociological Images and Jezebel (it’s worth taking a look at the comments, too, but they’re probably NSFW and can get heated), and then consider hosting a discussion club or making a display of books on beauty. If you’re not sure where to start, I suggest Naturally Curly, one of the premiere websites (with social components, news, and shopping) for natural hair of all textures.
STEM, STEM, STEM. Everybody wants students to engage with science, technology, engineering and math. Federal money is pumped into it. Grants support it. But do teens and tweens care for it? In a study of middle school students, researchers analyzed both boys’ and girls’ wishful identification with scientists on television shows to see what factors influenced positive feelings (possibly indicating an interest in pursuing a science career or hobby). They found that boys were more likely to identify with male scientists and girls with female scientists, which is unsurprising. What was more interesting is that the genre of the television show affected the positive feelings. Scientist characters on dramas were more likely to elicit wishful identification than those on cartoons or educational programs. What can you do with this information? Plenty. For your next film screening, try a drama or documentary that presents scientists in a good light, like Cool It, And the Band Played On, or Einstein and Eddington. If you want to take a crack at those who think that being good at science or math makes you a loser, connect STEM with the things teens already love, like working out, YouTube, and the Web by taking a look at the 35 fittest people in tech, videos by Vi Hart, who turns mathematical concepts and history into snarky audiovisual narratives, or how-tos at Lifehacker.
Steinke, J., et al. (2011). Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Wishful Identification With Scientist Characters on Television. Science Communication, 34(2): 163-199.
Whether you’re in library school or you’ve been working for years, you might find Hack Library School’s new starter kit series interesting, especially their post on services to children. Anyone want to volunteer to write the starter kit for youth services? On a related note, Teen Librarian Toolbox has a post on what to do about all that stuff they don’t teach you in library school (I’m taking notes).
If you’ve been trying to find a way to collaborate with nearby schools, see if you can get an advisory group to have a meeting with local teachers (it might be a good idea to make sure that the teachers are not teachers of the teens in your group so as to encourage openness and honesty) and start a dialogue. The topic? Standardized tests. Students may feel like teachers are against them, while teachers probably feel as if it’s administrators who are forcing them to be uncreative. So how do you get all sides to understand each other when schools are still tied to federal standards? For background information, try the journal Rethinking Schools‘ spring 2012 issue, which featured a special section on standardized tests. After a good discussion, maybe everyone can take fun “standardized tests” on personality types, books, or any other fun topics. Then see if students, teachers, and you can work together and form some sort of coalition that bridges the gaps between inside- and outside-of-school education, engagement, and issues. Start a collaborative blog. Take turns hosting book clubs at different places that feel like home to the different stakeholders in your group. What might be an interesting year-long project is to get everyone in the group to develop their ultimate standardized test to replace the ones they’re taking or proctoring in school. What skills do teachers and students think are most important to have before leaving the K-12 system? What topics do people in the real world need to know? Is it better to test knowledge orally? With essays? With student-led, student-designed creative projects? With their perspectives and your skills with information seeking, along with your vast collections, you should be able to create a really interesting partnership. And if you need more inspiration, check out these roundups of education blogs by both students and teachers, both here and here.
What are your plans for this upcoming academic year? As always, your questions, comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged!
In the beloved tradition of their Star Wars and Green Lantern smash-ups, Robot Chicken is taking on the DCU, and here’s the trailer. Clocking in at 2 minutes, that’s more than 10% of the shows running time, so hopefully some jokes still await.
The special airs September 9th at Midnight on Adult Swim. Voices include: Nathan Fillon, Megan Fox, Alfred Molina, Seth Green, Neil Patrick Harris, Tara Strong, Matt Senreich, Tom Root, Zeb Wells, Clare Grant, Alex Bornstein, Abe Benrubi, and Kevin Schnick as the narrator. Whew!
0 Comments on Robot Chicken DC Special trailer released as of 1/1/1900
The Outhouse hates to see fans suffer like the Browncoats, fanatical fans of Whedon’s popular Firefly, also known as Firebronies, have for the past decade since their beloved space western was canceled, after only one season, by Fox. The network appears to have a personal vendetta against Mr. Whedon, as it also canceled Dollhouse in 2010. Some rumors even suggest that the only reason the new Whedon show is being produced by Disney is so that it can later be canceled as a show of good faith to Fox in their Daredevil movie right negotiations. Fox might be more inclined to return the movie rights to the characters Silver Surfer and Galactus to Disney if they can experience the delight of seeing another Whedon show canceled too soon as part of the deal. In any case, it is clear that drastic action must be taken if fans want to see the show last longer than its ill-fated predecessors.
In the spirit of past grassroots organizations that tried and failed to save Firefly and Dollhouse, Whedon’s prior efforts in the TV arena, this new group will be known as the “Mailshirts.”
15 Comments on The Outhousers starts campaign to save Joss Whedon’s Avengers TV show from cancellation, last added: 8/8/2012
This is funny, unless you consider that dollhouse deserved to be canceled. It was truly awful.
blacaucasian said, on 8/8/2012 9:12:00 AM
I’m still scratching my head around how a man revered for his work at portraying women in a positive light got away with making a “high-concept” show about what was essentially a whorehouse of brainless women.
Thad said, on 8/8/2012 9:16:00 AM
@Paul: I’d say the first 3 or so episodes of Dollhouse were indeed “truly awful”, but it got pretty fantastic once it hit its stride. Not Firefly good, but still pretty good.
I think it botched some things in the ending (bad guy turns out to be Just Friggin’ Crazy; I think it would have worked a lot better if they’d given him some “I’ve seen what’s coming and I need to fight for the greater good” motivation instead) but by and large it worked really well.
Gianco said, on 8/8/2012 9:54:00 AM
Dollhouse had two incredible episodes after 24 lousy ones. Still don’t know if it was worth the effort.
Christopher Allen said, on 8/8/2012 9:57:00 AM
I’m with Thad on Dollhouse. Had its moments, not great. But I think these Outhousers come off as easily dismissable right out of the gate with such a stupid, insulting proposal. Fox has a vendetta against a guy they did two shows with? Really? Neither shows were hits, whatever one’s opinions of them. Ultimately, more people wanted to watch Hell’s Kitchen or whatever, and that’s undoubtedly cheaper to produce as well. As for the speculation about this being a move by Disney to placate Fox to get Daredevil back, why would Disney screw with the guy who directed the biggest Marvel hit in order to get back the rights to a property with a much lower probability of success? Insteat of the aggrieved tone, why not focus on the fact that of all Whedon’s shows, an Avengers-related show has a built-in fanbase and it’s the right time for it?
Dave Hackett said, on 8/8/2012 10:38:00 AM
@Christopher, I’m pretty sure it’s all meant as satire.
Matt Kish said, on 8/8/2012 10:47:00 AM
I have what I fear will be seen as a really dumb question. But I need to know the answer.
I never watched “Firefly” and have no real feelings about it one way or the other. But I see this “It was canceled too soon!” all the time. So my question is, if “Firefly” was such an amazing show, why was it canceled?
Not trying to be a smartass at all. But why? And please, no opinionating or supposition. If anyone knows factually why the show was canceled (i.e. low ratings, too expensive, whatever) could you please clue me in?
Rikk Odinson said, on 8/8/2012 11:08:00 AM
Dave Hackett doth be most wise indeed.
Christopher Allen, not so much.
likefunbutnot said, on 8/8/2012 11:39:00 AM
@Matt Kish,
Firefly was cancelled because its episodes were aired out of sequence and its airdate and time slot changed three or four times during a nine-episode run. Fox took the fact that had very low viewership to cancel the show before it even finished airing the produced episodes.
It was nonetheless somewhere near the absolute pinnacle of televised entertainment.
Thad said, on 8/8/2012 11:39:00 AM
@Matt: Low ratings, likely resulting from airing on Fridays, running out of sequence, and being poorly promoted. Plus it was at the height of Fox’s “cancel everything to make room for more reality TV” period; when Family Guy returned from cancellation it opened with a joke to the effect of “They need to make room for more shows like” — followed by a list of probably 30 different shows — “and Firefly. But if ALL THOSE SHOWS go down the tubes, then sure, maybe we’ll come back.”
So yeah, it REALLY WAS Fox’s fault and nothing to do with the actual merits of the show.
If it had, say, been given the timeslot after The Simpsons and still gotten cancelled, I’m sure people would have been upset, but it would have at least felt like Fox gave it a shot. (Futurama got 4 seasons — spread across 5 years –, and Family Guy and Arrested Development each got 3. They all premiered in the post-Simpsons timeslot, two of them won Emmys and the other got a nomination, and all developed a devoted fanbase which vocally protested their cancellation and eventually succeeded in getting new episodes made.)
Darketower said, on 8/8/2012 11:49:00 AM
@Matt… Here’s the easiest way to explain why the show was doomed: the series is serial. Each episode builds upon the previous, and they must be told sequentially.
Now, based on the “air date” listed on the DVD boxed set:
September 20, 2002: Episode #2 – The Train Job
September 27, 2002: Episode #3 – Bushwacked
October 4, 2002: Episode #6 – Our Mrs. Reynolds
October 18, 2002: Episode #7 – Jaynestown
October 25, 2002: Episode #8 – Out of Gas
November 1, 2002: Episode #4 – Shindig
November 8, 2002: Episode #5 – Safe
November 15, 2002: Episode #9 – Ariel
December 6, 2002: Episode #10 – War Stories
December 13, 2002: Episode #14 – Objects in Space
December 20, 2002: Episode #1 – Serenity
Episodes 11, 12, and 13 were Never Aired.
Matt Kish said, on 8/8/2012 12:00:00 PM
Thad, likefunbutnot and Darketower, thank you all for that. I really appreciate the straightforward answer and the whole thing finally makes some sense to me now.
The Beat said, on 8/8/2012 12:06:00 PM
Fox has always had a thing about cancelling shows too soon. FIREFLY followed in the proud tradition of THE ADVENTURES OF BRISCO COUNTY, another Friday night show with a loyal following that was cancelled way too soon.
It’s pretty amazing that X-FILES didn’t share the same fate, but I’m sure it came close.
Thad said, on 8/8/2012 3:17:00 PM
@Heidi: Ah, you never forget your first unfairly-canceled Fox show. Mine was The Critic.
My fiancee is currently outraged over The Finder. I can’t believe she made it this long before experiencing a case of Traumatic Fox Cancellation.
(And I keep explaining to her, hey, it’s a spinoff; Hart could still finish it off in an episode of Bones, like how Carter used X-Files to finish Millennium and Lone Gunmen.)
Hell, Fox put Simpsons on opposite The Cosby Show in its second season — that’s practically sabotage.
Just revealed at the Image Comics Presents panel was the news that writer Kurtis Wiebe has secured a deal with QT Productions, which could potentially lead his series Peter Panzerfaust to television. Set during the Second World War, the comic deals with the eponymous Peter, an American boy stuck in Europe during the conflict. Trapped with no sign of help, he attempts to raise an army out of the French to fight back. Baguettes at dawn!
The deal seems to be initially only for a motion comic produced in association with the BBC. However – if the motion comic is successful – the comic could then be adapted by the BBC for pilot. The book is still a long way away from getting turned into a series, yet! But this could be very promising indeed.
1 Comments on SDCC 2012: Kurtis Wiebe Signs Deal for possible Peter Panzerfaust TV Series, last added: 7/12/2012
As soon as I hear any news about new cuddly toys, you can bet I’ll let you all know about it! And I’ve already got one such announcement for you already, you lucky cuddlers of the Internet. StylinOnline have unveiled a set of San Diego Exclusive Big Bang Theory plush figures today, available both at their SDCC booth and online, as part of a combo pack.
You have your pick of either Leonard or Sheldon, as presumably people were worried about making a cuddly Penny figure. Each doll comes with a T-Shirt so you can dress up like your nerdy cuddle-buddy. Sheldon, who isn’t afraid of who he is and what he loves, wears a Flash shirt. Leonard, the perpetual worrier/one who looks suspiciously like a male model whenever he takes his glasses off on the show, wears a hoodie.
To the booth, cuddly toy fans! To the booooothh!!!
1 Comments on SDCC 2012: Cuddly Toys! Big Bang Theory Edition, last added: 7/13/2012
School’s out, I’m no longer sick, and the blog is no longer down! In honor of the evolving focus of this column, I’ve changed its title and broadened my scope. But don’t worry; I’ll still be trolling the various databases for hard-hitting research, too. The first month of summer is usually the busy one, in which students are still finishing school, are already in summer school, or have begun to embark on busy summer adventures, like camp and travel. So the ideas I’m offering you are a bit more low-key or focused on the librarian, rather than the patron, since I gather that your patrons are not exactly in the mood yet for anything that requires a lot of commitment.
Last weekend, PostSecret put up a (trigger warning) postcard from someone who dislikes being labeled intolerant for saying that certain types of people are, maybe, hypocritical about oppression. That made me think of a tumblr I found once upon a time called Oppressed Brown Girls Doing Things, whose tagline, “Because we’re still oppressed,” is awesomely readable in a multitude of ways. You might just find this fun to read when there’s a lull in your day, but I know I’d love to see some of these posts find their way into a collage on a library wall, a bookmarks list on a library computer, or into the meeting of any group that meets in your teen room. While the content ranges from NSFW language to sarcastic gifs, the blog also brings up a lot of pertinent points about what it means to be a woman of color.
While definitely NSFW, I have to share this music video based on a Jay-Z and Kanye West song whose title I won’t put here. Two Brooklynites re-set the song to be all about how hard it is to be a cool, reading girl who can’t find a guy to keep up with her tastes or pronounce Proust correctly. If you have an advisory group or teen book club that meets, you might show the video to spark a conversation about what it means to be “nerdy,” who the video is aimed at, or what it means to take a genre so known for its subculture and turn it on its head by making it about something usually so “uncool.”
Judith Butler is widely known for her groundbreaking works on gender identity and the idea that gender is a social construct that is performed by members of society, not a biological, unchangeable aspect of a person like eye color. It is Butler’s ideas that so many feminists, media critics, psychologists, and other professionals grapple with when trying to understand how images and stereotypes in the media affect self image and self performance, as well as how damaging it can be to force someone to perform normatively. But in a fascinating ethnographic study, Olga Ivashkevich discovered that young pre-teen girls are much more willing to play with body representation, drag, and non-normative physical ideals than many researchers think. The girls Isvashkevich studied drew each other as various vegetables, allowing them to skew various parts of their bodies, and other anecdotes in the article reveal how even something as obviously “damaging” as a Barbie doll can lead girls to experiment in cross dressing, mutilation, and more. If you and your children’s librarian colleagues have been searching for a way to reach tweens, as well as younger teens, this might be your in. Try leaving a box of Barbies, paper dolls, fashion magazines, or other objects that support alteration and creation on the body, as well as relevant clothing items and art supplies, with a note explaining that patrons are welcome to experiment with the box and maybe even reflect on what they’ve done by taking a digital photo and writing about it for the library’s blog, or s
Add a Comment
Seriously, the PR is getting so weird it’s getting hard to believe. Here’s another offsite, this one at 1st street and J, which promotes COMA, a TV mini-series by Ridley and Tony Scott, by helping them go through the torment that people in Michael Crichton’s original novel went thought via being “evaluated” for the tour and getting a surgery scar. Make sure you wear your brain-wave activated cat ears when you go through the surgery!
We’re sure this will not be as fun as it sounds. Why couldn’t there be a BLACK JACK carnival at Comic-Con instead?
This year at Comic-Con, fans can partake in an immersive experience into A&Es Coma, a modern day retelling of the Robin Cook novel and iconic film by Michael Crichton. Produced by Ridley & Tony Scott, the two-night event premieres this Labor Day on A&E. Fans walking the grounds outside of Comic-Con can come and join the thriller experience of Coma from Thursday, July 12 through Saturday, July 14 at 11am 9pm on 1st Avenue and J Street right outside of the San Diego Convention Center. Doctors will be handing out patient bracelets for admittance to the 15,000 square foot Jefferson Institute, the ominous leading institute in coma patient care from the mini-series. The Coma Experience is free and will include:
Reception – Participants will be greeted by Jefferson Institute nurses who will admit them into The Coma Experience. The nurses will guide the visitors to the security monitors so they can get a glimpse of what theyre about to step into as well as see exclusive, first-look footage from the mini-series.
Surgery – Nurses will then take fans to the experiential surgery room where theyll meet surgeons who will decide if theyre good candidates for the tour. If so, fans will have the option of getting a 3-D surgical scar tattoo.
Area 2 – As part of the experience, visitors will be allowed to access The Jefferson Institutes highly secured Area 2, where they will get a glimpse of the doctors at work. In this room, Jefferson Institute human specimens will be on display designed with the chilling look and feel thats authentic to the mini-series.
Area 8 Green Screen – Finally, visitors will be able to step into Area 8, which will be the end of The Jefferson Institute tour. Area 8 will offer visitors the opportunity to get an up close and personal view of an actual Coma Pod that was used in the Ridley & Tony Scott production. In addition, visitors may participate in a green screen photo opportunity that places them into the iconic Coma Pod as if they themselves are the victims of the Jefferson Institute.
For a fully immersive experience that extends beyond Comic-Con, fans can go to www.comaconspiracy.com where they can activate a thrilling digital experience. The hacker activists that are trying to take down the Jefferson Institute in the mini-series will invite visitors to join their cause, and opting-in will launch a highly-targeted digital cat-and-mouse game that pulls fans into the heart of the Coma Conspiracy. Here, participants will feel first hand what its like to go up against the all-knowing, all-powerful and heavily fi
2 Comments on SDCC 2012: Yet another off-site helps con-goers experience a coma through the eyes of Ridley Scott, last added: 7/10/2012
I’d rather go to Scott’s ex-collaborator Syd Mead’s appearance/signing at the offsite SEGA Arcade instead…
/SDCC’12 -1
Torsten Adair said, on 7/10/2012 5:01:00 AM
So how soon before someone mashes the cosplay, goes through the Jefferson Institute dressed as Rick Grimes, teams up with a CDC tech named Mark Hall, and then runs the Walking Dead gauntlet?
On Friday, July 13th at 8 pm (ET, PT) the National Geographic cable channel will present Comic Store Heroes, a one-hour reality show set in New York’s Midtown Comics. The documentary-style show will follow the lives of staffers Gerry, Thor, and Alex as they deal with all sorts of geek and enthusiast customers while simultaneously planning their booth at the New York Comic Con.
We’ve always wanted to see a documentary about Thor Parker, so cross that one off the bucket list.
More seriously, this should be a very interesting contrast to Comic Book Men. And of course it airs during Comic-Con when the news is sure to be filled with those words. Set the DVRs!
9 Comments on More comic book men on National Geographic channel, last added: 6/23/2012
Two comic-store reality shows on TV? We live in an age of miracles and wonders.
Best of luck to them!
James Van Hise said, on 6/21/2012 8:13:00 AM
It would be nice if this show is actually about something. Comic Book Men seemed to mostly be about the self-described Geeks mugging for the camera and telling jokes, but it was pretty light on content. The stuff people would bring into the store to sell was seldom very interesting. The Sy-Fy Channel show Hollywood Treasures is much more interesting (and much better produced) as we actually see rarities and meet interesting people. On Comic Book Men they seem afraid of being upstaged all the time. On Hollywood Treasures the people finding things are there but they are clearly second to what they find. Examples are original production drawings from the 1933 King Kong, but the best ever was the complete original art (every page) from Fantastic Four #12 by Jack Kirby where they brought in Stan Lee to comment on the margin notes on the art. I’m afraid that if Kevin Smith ever had Stan Lee on he’d try to one-up him instead of standing aside and letting him talk. Not a big fan of Comic Book Men as the show ultimately seems to have no purpose. When the highlight of the first season was going to a garage sale to score some 1960s DC comics, then they clearly are not being very ambitious, or imaginative.
Jesse said, on 6/21/2012 10:25:00 AM
Here’s a short preview of the episode on Nat Geo’s site
Why is it all east coast shops? When’s the Golden Apple show?
scott said, on 6/21/2012 1:15:00 PM
Actually that would kill their business. Lots of well-known people shop there.
Trev said, on 6/21/2012 2:03:00 PM
good luck finding a hotel that carries Nat. Geo channel in San Diego!!
Hopefully there will be a screening at the con.
Serhend Sirkecioglu said, on 6/21/2012 4:05:00 PM
It’s another pawn stars clone, Pass. I’m still waiting for my project runway for cartoonists/illustrators, that shows the gen public WHY WE LOVE READING and/or MAKING COMICS! Its not to collect them and gawk at monetary values. Somebody make Top Cartoonist already!
Al™ said, on 6/21/2012 5:21:00 PM
Comic Store Heroes looks better than Comic Book Men. I will check out the first episode anyway, and go from there.
my name is Legion said, on 6/23/2012 2:46:00 PM
Huh? “Comic Book Heroes” looks just like “Comic Book Men” ..up to and including the use of the term “Holy Grail”..like 7 times in the clip and over 30 times on “Comic Book Men”..and “Hot Stuff” #1 for real?..really? huh? look on eBay top price 400.00 bucks…. I know everyone hates Kevin Smith but at least he actually writes “Comic Books” that are Good to read…and Comic Book Men is on AMC right after the Walking Dead, also is it true that “MidTown Comics” did a segment on the “Comic Book Men” show that did not air? some one at one of the con’s mentioned that to us, what a bunch of “Rat Bastard’s”. I bet they even have their own “Rob Bruce” can you say “Copy Cats”
It’s not exactly a classic comic in that it ponders the meaning of life and death….but Jean Claude Forest’s BARBARELLA is still one of those iconic Franco-Belgian titles that brings a smile to the face. If the Mad Men-era politics of the original strip won’t do it, young Jane Fonda as the original movie version is guaranteed to do the same.
And you can’t keep a good space explorer down as this incredibly vague story reveals, DRIVE’s Nicolas Winding Refn is going to “bring” Barbarella to TV…whether for a series in France or internationally isn’t spelled out. Nor is “bring” explained…directing, producing? Who knows. It says he’ll “helm” the series but…isn’t that a lot of work for a guy who has two other movies to direct?
“I’m excited for the opportunity to re-invent ‘Barbarella’ with my friends at Gaumont and Martha DeLaurentiis,” said Refn. “And I look forward to bringing this unique character to life for a new generation of fans as I believe she is one of the ultimate counter-cultural characters.”
Anyway Refn = good. Barbarella = good.
Julien Forest and Jean-Marc Lofficier will co-exec produce. We have Lofficier on speed email so perhaps he’ll explain more.
2 Comments on Drive’s Refn to remake Barbarella for French TV, last added: 6/21/2012
A bit surprised that this hasn't had more play: in an interview with Empire last week, Neil Marshall--who directed the penultimate episode of the second season of Game of Thrones, "Blackwater"--has this to say on the subject of the show's use of nudity:
The weirdest part was when you have one of the exec producers leaning over your shoulder, going, "You can go full frontal, you know. This is
Two exciting things happened on the last day of the Jubilee holiday weekend. One of them was going to Birmingham's Book Bash festival and getting to see fancy Aston Hall and meet the Lord Mayor and a bunch of other great book creators.
The other was coming back from Birmingham to lots of nice tweets, texts, e-mails and a phone call from Stuart's Auntie Barbara, saying that they'd enjoyed watching me take part in Rolf Paints on the BBC. Hurrah! I didn't get to watch it on live telly, but Stuart and I watched it later on iPlayer. If you live in the UK, you can watch it for a week here on iPlayer. And the BBC has a Rolf Paints website here showing artwork from all the different artists and gives related links. I'm not sure if I'll be allowed to keep this video up, but I've copied some of the clips showing Rolf critiquing my lino cut print, and added a bit about comics artist Steve Marchant, so you could see his work from the day more clearly.
I've had a lot of people contacting me about a commemorative plate that Rolf mentioned on the show. I don't actually know anything about buying the plate, but I've sent an e-mail to the associate producer, asking her about it, and I'll post the information if I find out. The exhibition of our work runs from today until Sunday in the Old Vic Tunnels. (Details here.)
So more festival fun at Book Bash! I was doing a pirate event for You Can't Scare a Princess! so I drew the book's Captain Waffle doing some book bashing. Well, more like eating its cover off, but it's all in the same spirit.
Oo, and look, it's Nicholas Allan, creator of fabulous book The Queen's Knickers, Cinderella's Bum and loads of other funny picture books. Nick was in the news a lot recently because some glitch at Waterstone's had them accidentally printing out The Queen's Knickers on every receipt.
Heh, this picture made me laugh. It looks like someone made a bad smell.
A lovely visitor named Angela Masterson drew a portrait of me during my event and gave it to me:
Look, it's Peppa Pig! Poor Peppa, she really ought to turn sideways, I think her profile is much more flattering than full-frontal snout.
It was fun meeting Derby-based poet, writer and illustrator Chris White. He's been to Book Bash loads of times, and from the number of kids clustered around his signing table, has a real loyal local following.
Last time I was in Birmingham, I had a total blast with librarian Jen Bakewell. I was sorry not to get more time to hang out with her, but we still had a quick lunch together and swapped over the hat. And here's cookbook writer Fi Bird, who does wonders w
Here in Britain, it's almost the Diamond Jubilee weekend! And what better way to celebrate than to make a lino cut print of a mad corgi? Here you go: In corgis we trust. That's written in my best fake Google-translator Latin. I made this for the BBC! Well, actually, this was a practice run, the night before. I got a call awhile ago from producer Veronica Thorne, asking me if I wanted to spend a full day making a picture of the Queen to celebrate the Jubilee... with Rolf Harris!
Oh my. Funnily enough, because I grew up in America, I didn't really know much about Rolf Harris, except that he had painted a portrait of the Queen. And he's consistantly rated Britain's most popular artist (which irks the fine arts establishment to no end, so hurrah, good for him!).
I thought I'd better look my best for telly, so I bought a new work apron and stamped the corgi onto the front of it. The ink on it was still wet the next morning, so I tried not to touch it, then rub my nose and wind up with a smudgy face on the Beeb.
The Fleece Station studio has a proud history of monarch-related activities, generally involving yarn or silly wigs. So I figured I had everything I needed to do a good job on set.
Oh, and a new fancy hat. With which I surprised Mr Harris when I met him at breakfast.
When I told people I was meeting Rolf Harris, they all reacted very animatedly, and several people mentioned videos I absolutely had to go watch. Here's one from 1969, Jake the Peg. Poor Gary had to listen to me keep accidentally singing this in the studio for the next couple days. So fabulous.
And here's an episode from The Goodies, when they breed Rolf Harrises in captivity and they escape. The guy's originally Australian, but he's a legend here in Britain. (If you like, you can watch that Goodies show from the beginning here.)
So here was our set-up! We filmed in the vaults of the Old Vic, under Waterloo Station. Which was a bit tricky for the camera crew because the trains kept rumbling overhead. But they set up the area like a street party and it looked very welcoming and festive. They'd invited 60 artists in total, one for each year of the Queen's reign.
If you're interested, you'll be able to watch the whole show, Rolf Paints, on Tuesday, 5 June, BBC1, 6:30-7:30pm.
One of these artists was Anneka Rice. She was another person I didn't know much about, but Stuart told me she'd hosted a show called Treasure Hunt and another called Challenge Anneka. (She has a bunch of videos posted on her YouTube channel.)
And another one of the participants was fab comics artist Steve Marchant! Steve was the one who tipped off Veronica to me when s
It seems strange to think that only a few months ago, Smash was being touted as the show that would save network television. As you'll know even if you haven't been following the show, simply from the tenor of the conversation surrounding it, this has turned out to be most emphatically not the case, but if Smash couldn't be excellent, engaging, fun TV, it has at least proved to be the next best
EW has rolled out the first photo of Danai Gurira as Michonne, the sword-wielding zombie slicer from Robert Kirkman’s THE WALKING DEAD TV series.
As for why they cast the relatively unknown Danai Gurira for the pivotal role, Kirkman says, “We looked at a lot of talented people that were really fantastic, but we were waiting for that one spark, that moment where everyone was completely in agreement and completely excited, and we felt like we had found the essence of this fictional character that just randomly appeared in another person, and that person was Danai Gurira. She kind of came in and really just blew us all away. She’s got incredible presence, and she’s got a theater background, and is very physical, and was just perfect for the role.”
Why do we get the feeling that a new character could be added to the pantheon of all-time female badasses?
8 Comments on THE WALKING DEAD TV show’s Michonne revealed, last added: 5/24/2012
Exciting! I’ve been wondering how she was going to look ever since the season finale. Pretty spot on.
blacaucasian said, on 5/23/2012 11:42:00 AM
I can’t wait. Especially with the way they left things last season.
Otaku-sempai said, on 5/23/2012 12:10:00 PM
Danai Gurira. We may have found a lead for a STORM solo film. How is she with African accents?
ralph mathieu said, on 5/23/2012 12:57:00 PM
People who don’t know this character from the comic are going to explode with excitement when they see her on screen (as long as they don’t mind a Kill Bill element on the Walking Dead and why would you mind about that?)!
ron thibodeau said, on 5/23/2012 2:09:00 PM
I’ve been reading Walking Dead since issue #7, and I can honestly say that I have NEVER gotten a ‘Kill Bill’ vibe from Michonne at all…
ed said, on 5/24/2012 2:32:00 AM
FINALLY.
Bye-bye, “T-Dog”?
John D said, on 5/24/2012 6:25:00 AM
Amen to that! Will the writers either do something with T-dog’s character or kill him please? So far he’s just been the manual labor in the show. A far cry from Tyresse from the comic.
Joe Lawler said, on 5/24/2012 9:24:00 AM
@otaku: Her parents are from Zimbabwe and she lived there for several years. So I would guess at least better than Halle Berry.

Pretty much what the headline says. Both shows experienced very good ratings by airing after the behemoth hit THE WALKING DEAD, and both will return, in a similar time slot, but as 16 half hour episodes.
The Talking Dead is a talk show hosted by the Nerdist Chris Hardwick featuring interviews with WALKING DEAD cast and crew members.
“Talking Dead has been an amazing experience, and I cannot pile enough hugs and thanks onto AMC for renewing it,” Hardwick said in a statement announcing the news. “I CAN’T WAIT for Season 3 of Walking Dead, so that we can finally talk about Rick meeting [SPOILER] and [SPOILER]-ing him with a heavy-duty [SPOILER] at the [SPOILER]. And let’s not forget all the rest of the [SPOILER]s getting in on the action! [EXPLETIVE] me! It’s going to be great.”
COMIC BOOK MEN is a bit more contentious — the Kevin Smith-produced show about guys standing around talking in a comics shop was the recipient of nearly universal fear and dread, with many finding it more horrifying than the zombie feasts and close-up friend killing of THE WALKING DEAD that preceded it.
“Pinch my fat ass, ’cause I must be dreaming!” Smith said in a statement. “A thousand thank-yous wouldn’t cover the gratitude I’m feeling right now. And as you might imagine, everyone at SModcast Pictures is in love with everyone at AMC today! Rest assured, Walt, Bry, Mike, Ming and I are suited up and ready to hit the ice for our second season with Team AMC.”
“AMC set out to build shows around authentic characters and original worlds, and Comic Book Men really delivers on both of these,” said Joel Stillerman, AMC’s exec vp original programming, production and digital content. “Talking Dead is just great synergy, and it gives our audience a destination to continue the conversation about The Walking Dead. We are thrilled that Chris is back to lead the discussion. He is genuinely knowledgeable about the genre and truly entertaining.”
Previously, Smith has hinted a female would join the all-male store line-up in the second season—which would at least defuse one of the biggest criticisms of the show.
Just guessing here, but the half hour format will probably see the program turn into a more Pawn Stars/American Pickers/Storage Wars type-show that revolves around the value of stuff that customers bring in—stuff most likely planted by the producers but it’s TV after all. As long as they don’t just sit around fantasizing about the Invisible Woman, we’ll be happy.
8 Comments on Talking Dead and Comic Book Men both renewed for a second season, last added: 5/10/2012
JohnByrneSaysOnTwitter said, on 5/9/2012 3:51:00 PM
Really like Chris Harwick but I found Talking Dead extremely hit or miss based on who the guests were. Glad it is coming back and I hope it finds a groove.
Comic Book Men I watched the first two episodes of and then gave up on. I don’t expect much reality but some of those interactions in the store were painfully fake. If they add a woman I may give the first episode a try.
JohnByrneSaysOnTwitter said, on 5/9/2012 3:53:00 PM
Whoops, for liking Chris Hardwick that much you’d think I could spell his name right.
Pete Kilmer said, on 5/9/2012 8:21:00 PM
I like Hardwick, but everything he watches,plays or hears is ‘amazing’.
Serhend Sirkecioglu said, on 5/9/2012 10:39:00 PM
Talking Dead: sure, why not.
Comic Book men: WHY?!
Chap said, on 5/10/2012 7:31:00 AM
Talking Dead: Good.
Comic Book Men: No, God, no!! Quit pissing on me!!!
Glenn Simpson said, on 5/10/2012 7:31:00 AM
I don’t mind the comic book discussion on CBM, I just wish it was more intelligent-sounding discussion. Which might not be doable.
I just don’t like the image of comics as just having value as collectibles. Which is both false and misleading.
Trina said, on 5/10/2012 2:45:00 PM
So few commentors like CBM, no comic book fans I know liked it and I personally didn’t care for it. I can’t figure out who likes this show or is watching it. Perhpas the Pawn Shop crowd and non-comic book readers.
Like a commentors above said, it seems very staged and fake and also it makes it out like collecting and reading comic books is only about money.
Earlier this spring, HBO cancelled Luck, a show set in and around a struggling Southern California horse-racing track from Deadwood creator David Milch, then several weeks into the filming of its second season, following the death of one the horses used on set. Two other horses had already died during the filming of Luck's first season, and in the face of intense criticism following those deaths
The “Upfronts” have taken/are taking place somewhere in Hollywood and New York and although it sounds like a bra convention, what it really means is the networks are parading their new shows for 2012-13 in front of TV reporters. The big comics news was a greenlight for the Green Arrow TV show—minus the arrow—but Marvel stuff also has some motion.
Basically, they nixed the Alias show that had been in development, as well as the Punisher show. The latter is probably a good thing, as it would have forced an imminent shortage of fake blood and bullet wound putty. However, the Hulk show, to be produced by Guillermo del Toro is moving forward. Okay, this is doubtless because Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk was one of the very bestest things about the Avengers, which stunned everyone because the last two Hulk movies were kinda…comme ci, comme ca, you know. But you see there is a problem here. And we’ll spell it out for you.
The reason the Hulk in Avengers was so great is because he was a supporting character not the lead.
Don’t you see? Freed from having to support an actual story, the Hulk becomes a fun, anarchic character. Or: The Hulk is green, like wasabi and also like wasabi, you don’t want a whole meal from it…just a little smear on your hamachi roll/ $1 billion movie.
And if you think about it, The Hulk was kind of a supporting character the last successful TV show, too. Or at least he wasn’t the overt catalyst of the action. Generally he just wandered into some situation, Hulked it up and wandered off, all lonely.
Anyway, maybe del Toro will come up with something good, but we’re in no hurry to see a whole Hulk movie any time soon.
• Now, the Guardians of the Galaxy, that’s another thing. Graeme McMillan pieces together all the information that leads him to suspect that the Guardians might just be that elusive May 16, 2014 Marvel movie.
Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige himself mentioned it as a possibility last month at the Avengers press junket, expressing his fondness for the property and listing it among Inhumans, Doctor Strange and the long in-the-works Ant-Man as non-sequel films being considered. Things started to feel a lot more real following the now-famous mid-credits scene of Avengers, where ****** is revealed as the mysterious force behind Loki's Chitauri army. ****** certainly has a history with the Guardians of the Galaxy crew, and is a big part of the cosmic sphere of the Marvel Universe they inhabit.
Graeme’s evidence isn’t terribly convincing, but that 2014 movie will probably be something offbeat for the reasons he lays out:
Though a Guardians of the Galaxy movie might still seem unlikely by nature, it’s clear that Marvel is looking at lesser-known properties to start widening their scope beyond the world of the Avengers. After all, marquee names like Spider-Man,
15 Comments on Marvel TV update: Hulk yes; Alias and Punisher no, last added: 5/17/2012
The basic problem with the Hulk movies is they treated the character just like the TV show, as a special effect who shows up every so often to break stuff. The Hulk of the comics, at least the good ones, is an actual person who talks and has a personality and desires and fears and all that good stuff. People seem to have forgotten that Stan and company were inspired by Jekyl and Hyde, not The Fugitive.
Mike
MBunge said, on 5/17/2012 8:07:00 AM
And if Marvel is looking to expand their movie line up, I got 4 words for them.
Devil Dinosaur. Rocket Raccoon.
Mike
Dan Mishkin said, on 5/17/2012 8:20:00 AM
This issue of the difference between a lead character and a supporting character is one I brought up in a conversation with some editorial folks at DC a few years back.
No one was convinced, but I argued that the umpteenth attempt to do a Green Arrow or Aquaman series was a waste of their resources. Those characters can work well in support or in the back-up stories where they originated — stories that are only obliged to provide a small thrill by means of interesting action gimmicks or an unusual setting.
Look at what a tremendous asset Aquaman was in Cartoon Network’s Batman:B&B. Since he didn’t have the burden of carrying stories on his own, the writers could build a quirky and interesting (and still heroic) character around his egotism — what would be insufferable behavior in a lead made him a delight every time he showed up in the series.
The Beat Herself said, on 5/17/2012 8:28:00 AM
Dan, I sort of feel that way about Captain Jack Sparrow in the PotC franchise. As the trickster character in the Will/Elizabeth storylines he works great…as a main character not as much, at least dramatically. Of course, in practice, people would and did pay to watch Johnny Depp run around aimlessly for nearly three hours.
Synsidar said, on 5/17/2012 8:50:00 AM
People seem to have forgotten that Stan and company were inspired by Jekyl and Hyde, not The Fugitive.
But if Banner has a depersonalization disorder, he has an obligation to get treatment. Otherwise, he’s as responsible for whatever harmful consequences his actions cause, including property damage, as anyone else who has a treatable mental illness.
In some respects, the story development process for a superhero character is upside down and inside-out. Whatever the idea for a story is, the characters should be developed as parts of the story, and changed as necessary for the story to work. When keeping the characters unchanged takes priority over everything else, including the ending, how often is the story going to succeed?
SRS
Shark Jumper said, on 5/17/2012 8:50:00 AM
As a fan of GotG, I would absolutely love it if they made a movie with this property. They are some of my favorite characters (new version and old). The potential problem however is would Marvel studios want to spend so much money on unknown characters to the public with a premise that would probably need a lot of special effects/money? And then even comic fans didn’t flock to the brilliant Abnett and Lanning books.
But on the flip side, you have to start from somewhere to build a franchise, audiences might be ready for something new in a few years after Marvel’s steady diet of regular superhero movies, and, really, anything of quality that is marketed well should have a chance. And a movie might spark renewed interest in Marvel Cosmic.
But will that tease in the Avengers movie be saved for this or Avengers 2 or 3?
Richard Caldwell said, on 5/17/2012 9:32:00 AM
What, no Woodgod?
alex said, on 5/17/2012 9:55:00 AM
If the stories are good and the storytelling is good, the lead character could be a pair of scissors sitting on a desk or an amoeba floating in a raindrop. Of all people, I would expect comic fans to understand this.
The Hulk can easily be a leading character and to suggest that he is only capable of being support is hilariously absurd.
The reason the Hulk worked so well in the Avengers can be discussed/debated at length but to simply say the character can’t lead is crazy, IMO.
Synsidar said, on 5/17/2012 10:09:00 AM
The Hulk can easily be a leading character and to suggest that he is only capable of being support is hilariously absurd.
Suppose that you’re going to write one story about the Hulk, any version of him. What are you going to say about him that makes the story worth writing?
SRS
MBunge said, on 5/17/2012 10:13:00 AM
“But if Banner has a depersonalization disorder, he has an obligation to get treatment.”
And exposure to gamma rays will give you cancer, not turn you into a super-human powerhouse. There’s a thousand different threads you can pull on to unravel sci-fi/fantasy melodrama, but I don’t think that’s the issue here.
“Whatever the idea for a story is, the characters should be developed as parts of the story, and changed as necessary for the story to work.”
I’ve got an idea for a story to explain Peter Parker’s real motivation for becoming Spider-Man. It involves Peter being sexually molested by Uncle Ben. Should those characters be changed to make my story work? When you’re adapting something for the big screen, you should start with what’s made that thing successful and popular enough to be worth adapting and build your story around that.
Mike
Matthew Fabb said, on 5/17/2012 10:17:00 AM
“Things started to feel a lot more real following the now-famous mid-credits scene of Avengers, where ****** is revealed as the mysterious force behind Loki’s Chitauri army.”
Only that theory falls apart with a recent interview from Kevin Feige and Joss Whedon mentions that it was all Whedon’s idea to put ****** at the end of Avengers. Apparently ****** is one of Whedon’s favorite Marvel villains from one of Whedon’s favorite Avengers comics.
So not apart of some grand plan, but possibly might be the reason for Whedon to come back and do Avengers 2.
Synsidar said, on 5/17/2012 10:25:00 AM
I’ve got an idea for a story to explain Peter Parker’s real motivation for becoming Spider-Man. It involves Peter being sexually molested by Uncle Ben. Should those characters be changed to make my story work?
But why would you write a story about Peter Parker that you can’t sell to anyone? If you’re going to write fan fiction, then you can do whatever you want to with him, but your audience will be limited.
If you want to write a story about sexual molestation, then you go ahead and write one and try to sell it, based on its merits as a story. The basis for writing stories about an existing character is that the story can be sold to that publisher, or that it’s your job to write about that character, not that the character makes the story succeed.
SRS
Terry said, on 5/17/2012 10:41:00 AM
Not excited about a Hulk TV series, but I’d love to have a She-Hulk series. Pay Ruffalo to show up in the pilot to keep this in the movie-verse and then let Jennifer do her thing.
alex said, on 5/17/2012 11:59:00 AM
Synsidar, that question is probably better suited for some of the other readers in here….Paging Mr. Busiek, paging Mr. Palmiotti!! You are needed in a creative capacity, please report to The Beat asap!
I’m not an author (nor am I very creative) but for argument’s sake…
Grey Las Vegas “Mr. Fixit” Hulk:
A story about how the Hulk/Banner helped people with gambling addiction and problems with loan sharks only to find that he personally suffers many parallel issues.
Green “mindless” Hulk:
A story told from the Hulks mindless perspective where the narrative slowly shows that while he started out the story arc as mindless, by mid-way point we see that his mental abilities are improving at an alarming rate. Hijinx ensue.
TV, “Lou Ferrigno” Hulk: Similar things they wrote about previously, over a five season run, where Banner and Hulk were proven to be successful lead characters—troubled Banner chasing down leads and trying cures for his uncontrollable side. And all the fun people he meets along the way. (Especially reporter Frank McGee!)
Again, the idea is that the story is what’s important, more so than the characters. The characters get to come along for the ride.
After a lot of misfires, the WB finally hit the target* with a pilot pick up in the form of ARROW, what they are now calling Green Arrow. We don’t know why the Green part was redacted because as you can see from the cast shot, they do wear green. Guess “**** Lantern is not a phrase that is remembered fondly beneath the water tower.
Anyway here’s the first footage of Stephen Arnell as Arrow.
Can he jump over chain link fences? Check
Can he investigate warehouses? Check
Can he appear shirtless? Check check
Can he peer anxiously through goggles while tinkering with equipment while accompanied by urgent string music? Check
Most important, here’s his archery form:
As you may recall, despite his smoldering demeanor in The Avengers, Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye was a fail for his crappy archery form. To our untrained eye, Arnell has the back arm in good form, but the front one needs to be straighter. You’re missing a lot of power there, dude!
After a violent shipwreck, billionaire playboy Oliver Queen was missing and presumed dead for five years before being discovered alive on a remote island in the Pacific. When he returns home to Starling City, his devoted mother Moira, much-beloved sister Thea, and best friend Tommy welcome him home, but they sense Oliver has been changed by his ordeal on the island. While Oliver hides the truth about the man he’s become, he desperately wants to make amends for the actions he took as the boy he was. Most particularly, he seeks reconciliation with his former girlfriend, Laurel Lance. As Oliver reconnects with those closest to him, he secretly creates the persona of Arrow – a vigilante – to right the wrongs of his family, fight the ills of society, and restore Starling City to its former glory. By day, Oliver plays the role of a wealthy, carefree and careless philanderer he used to be – flanked by his de
9 Comments on Arrow asks “How’s my shooting?” with first video footage of new show, last added: 5/18/2012
Amazing how he put his bags down before climbing the fence and yet they beat him to the other side.
So far so good, but I’ll need more to like it.
Richard said, on 5/17/2012 3:33:00 PM
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think his arrow is on the wrong side of his bow. Can someone confirm?
Sabrina said, on 5/17/2012 7:36:00 PM
Richard,
I’m basing my assessment on this YouTube video (http://youtu.be/zjDSs5qpZCk) which I think is the same one, because I can’t actually watch the embedded video for some reason.
I’m by no means an expert, but I have been shooting with a recurve bow myself for over 20 years. His form is fairly good. It’s some of the better TV/movie archery I have seen lately. It’s hard to really tell based on the way the clip has been cut and the video quality, but I’ve spotted only three things that I would be concerned about:
1. He stores his bow fully strung. If you this with a recurve bow, you’d stretch out the string, making the bow weaker and thus less reliable. Recurves are supposed to be stored unstrung. But to be fair, I have no idea how long that bow was sitting like that. It could also be some magic superhero bow with a string that never stretches for all I know.
2. At full draw around 1:24 it looks like his has both his pinky finger and possibly his thumb on the string. This is generally discouraged (in olympic style recurve, at least) because it makes a clean release more difficult especially when one is shooting barefingered (which is also generally discouraged because it can be hell on the fingers, especially with strong bows).
3. It looks like he has an iron grip on his bow. Good for making sure you don’t lose your bow in the heat of battle. Bad for getting a consistently accurate shot. Gripping your bow that tightly will cause muscle tension in your bow arm which will often cause an archer to “jerk” the bow on release.
As for your question. He is shooting right handed (holds the bow in his left, holds the string in his right) which is why the arrow rest is on the left side of the bow. This is correct assuming he is right-eye dominant or doesn’t have a dominant eye. As far as I can tell, he doesn’t have any type of sighting device on that bow so he is targeting by sighting down the arrow. If the arrow were on the other side of the bow, the bow itself would obscure his view of the target. And the arrow would not go where he wants it to go.
The Beat said, on 5/17/2012 9:53:00 PM
I have replaced the WB video — which has all kinds of blocks — with the Youtube one.
Cary Coatney said, on 5/17/2012 10:40:00 PM
Maybe they’re calling it just “Arrow” because “John Carter” was already taken.
~
Coat
James said, on 5/18/2012 1:00:00 AM
Stephen Arnell?? His name is Amell.
Looking forward to checking this out. He was smoking on Dante’s Cove! :)
Nate C. said, on 5/18/2012 4:55:00 AM
Sabrina – wow! Thanks for all that info. Had no idea this was so complex, and I say this as one who’s wanted to get into archery since he was a boy.
I am willing to give this a shot (ha!).
JimMacQ said, on 5/18/2012 5:18:00 PM
Hi, I’m the guy who wrote that piece about Hawkeye’s bad archery for Wired’s GeekDad blog. (There’s a follow-up piece to it at GeekDad; stuff that looks bad in still photos goes by too fast to notice in the movie, and I think they went in and fixed a few shots, so he didn’t look as bad as I feared he would.)
P.S. Anyone interested in trying archery should contact your local range or archery shop, or look at the USA Archery website (www.usarchery.org); many of them offer free lessons including equipment.
The second part of a two part series of email Q&A’s with some of the indepedent cartoonists working at Cartoon Network. There are so many of them who were so generous with their time and answers that we had to break their answers up into two posts! These Q&A’s were conducted as research for a Publisher’s Weekly article that spotlights the vast pool of indepent comics talent that’s currently rocking Cartoon Network’s world.
Minty Lewis (Storyboarder and Voice Actor, Regular Show)
How did you come to work on The Regular Show?
JG (the show’s creator) asked if I would be interested in taking a storyboard test after he read some of my comics. I thought the name JG Quintel sounded suspiciously spam-like, but once I confirmed that it was the real deal, I was really excited about the opportunity. Some might say a little too excited. So I took the test and then I waited three long months before I got a call asking when I could start. I think it was about a month later that I went down to Burbank and started working as a storyboard artist/writer. I was pregnant the whole time I was working there and when the show went on hiatus last October, I decided to move back to Berkeley to give birth, etc. Much to my surprise, I got a call a few weeks later asking if I would be interested in doing the voice for the Eileen character since they had liked my voice so much in the pitch for “Do Me a Solid.” Obviously I was interested, so now I fly down to Burbank every month or two to record for Eileen.
How has your work in comics informed your work in animation and vice versa?
It’s hard to say how my work in comics has affected my work in animation since I never did any work in animation before I was doing comics. I’m sure the experience writing and drawing was useful, but I don’t think anyone would be hired to work in animation with zero background in either of those areas. I have definitely noticed a difference in how I approach comics now, though. I’m frustrated sometimes by the lack of movement allowed in them and find myself wanting to include things like camera directions and animation cues. My experience in animation has also made me very aware of how motivated I am by deadlines and accountability. The sheer quantity of work I completed at Regular Show amazes me now, and that experience makes it very hard to come up with good excuses about why it takes me so long to finish a comic.
What comics have you made in the past?
A collection of my minicomics called PS Comics was published by Secret Acres in 2009. I have also contributed to several antho
1 Comments on Meet the cartoonists behind Cartoon Network’s hottest shows (Part Two), last added: 5/19/2012
The Star Trek fanzine Spockanalia contained the first fan fiction in the modern sense of the term. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
An entire genre has developed itself over the past 40 years or so. Ever since the original Star Trek warped through space, we’ve toyed with the idea of all those stories that never got written about the characters that intrigued us, who captured out respect and hearts. The movement became known as Fan Fiction.
I doubt any serious TV viewer has passed up an opportunity to fantasize about what would happen if… and brought the conjecture back into the series fold as a full-blown story, whether it was written down or not. I’ve done it for years—had whole scripts with good plots, great characters, and even parts for all the regular characters. And the sad thing is that I could have done something with them, if only as fan fiction and not sent the script to the studio for consideration by that series’ team of writers.
It’s one of those “I should have” things that many of us live with on a daily basis. “I should have” gone to see… “I should have” known better than… Truth is, I had a girlfriend back in ’67 when I lived in LA, who’d just sold her script to Desilu Studios for a Star Trek episode. The day after she got word, she was murdered two blocks from our building. The incident sort of put me off Fan Fiction for a while.
Last year I sat down to write poetry of a minor competition—there were no prizes involved, but critiques. My piece didn’t do very well. The audience was too young. That happens more frequently than older writers want to believe.
I still have the poem, which I’ll share here in a moment. I went back through it and changed a few things here and there. It leaped out of the hard drive this morning, screaming at me to find it a home. Since I don’t have any markets (that I can find), I decided to drop it here in order to create a challenge for those who’re up for it.
Everyone has/had a favorite show from their childhood. Now’s your chance to create a little fan fiction to commemorate that show. Write a story in 200 words or less using your favorite character from that show. Or write a poem about said character in a new situation. Recapture the heart of the character and share it here with us.
There’s no prize involved; no judging either. We are merely sharing bits of imagination for the fun of it. Be sure to inform us at the end of the piece the name of the show and the character’s name if you haven’t used it in your story. That’s all there is too it. Don’t be shy. Branch out and explore some fun. I can hardly wait to see what everyone comes up with.
Here’s my poem and how I approached my character from those long ago days of the 60’s,
Rememberin
0 Comments on Fan Fiction or Fun Pastime? as of 1/1/1900
This is funny, unless you consider that dollhouse deserved to be canceled. It was truly awful.
I’m still scratching my head around how a man revered for his work at portraying women in a positive light got away with making a “high-concept” show about what was essentially a whorehouse of brainless women.
@Paul: I’d say the first 3 or so episodes of Dollhouse were indeed “truly awful”, but it got pretty fantastic once it hit its stride. Not Firefly good, but still pretty good.
I think it botched some things in the ending (bad guy turns out to be Just Friggin’ Crazy; I think it would have worked a lot better if they’d given him some “I’ve seen what’s coming and I need to fight for the greater good” motivation instead) but by and large it worked really well.
Dollhouse had two incredible episodes after 24 lousy ones. Still don’t know if it was worth the effort.
I’m with Thad on Dollhouse. Had its moments, not great. But I think these Outhousers come off as easily dismissable right out of the gate with such a stupid, insulting proposal. Fox has a vendetta against a guy they did two shows with? Really? Neither shows were hits, whatever one’s opinions of them. Ultimately, more people wanted to watch Hell’s Kitchen or whatever, and that’s undoubtedly cheaper to produce as well. As for the speculation about this being a move by Disney to placate Fox to get Daredevil back, why would Disney screw with the guy who directed the biggest Marvel hit in order to get back the rights to a property with a much lower probability of success? Insteat of the aggrieved tone, why not focus on the fact that of all Whedon’s shows, an Avengers-related show has a built-in fanbase and it’s the right time for it?
@Christopher, I’m pretty sure it’s all meant as satire.
I have what I fear will be seen as a really dumb question. But I need to know the answer.
I never watched “Firefly” and have no real feelings about it one way or the other. But I see this “It was canceled too soon!” all the time. So my question is, if “Firefly” was such an amazing show, why was it canceled?
Not trying to be a smartass at all. But why? And please, no opinionating or supposition. If anyone knows factually why the show was canceled (i.e. low ratings, too expensive, whatever) could you please clue me in?
Dave Hackett doth be most wise indeed.
Christopher Allen, not so much.
@Matt Kish,
Firefly was cancelled because its episodes were aired out of sequence and its airdate and time slot changed three or four times during a nine-episode run. Fox took the fact that had very low viewership to cancel the show before it even finished airing the produced episodes.
It was nonetheless somewhere near the absolute pinnacle of televised entertainment.
@Matt: Low ratings, likely resulting from airing on Fridays, running out of sequence, and being poorly promoted. Plus it was at the height of Fox’s “cancel everything to make room for more reality TV” period; when Family Guy returned from cancellation it opened with a joke to the effect of “They need to make room for more shows like” — followed by a list of probably 30 different shows — “and Firefly. But if ALL THOSE SHOWS go down the tubes, then sure, maybe we’ll come back.”
So yeah, it REALLY WAS Fox’s fault and nothing to do with the actual merits of the show.
If it had, say, been given the timeslot after The Simpsons and still gotten cancelled, I’m sure people would have been upset, but it would have at least felt like Fox gave it a shot. (Futurama got 4 seasons — spread across 5 years –, and Family Guy and Arrested Development each got 3. They all premiered in the post-Simpsons timeslot, two of them won Emmys and the other got a nomination, and all developed a devoted fanbase which vocally protested their cancellation and eventually succeeded in getting new episodes made.)
@Matt… Here’s the easiest way to explain why the show was doomed: the series is serial. Each episode builds upon the previous, and they must be told sequentially.
Now, based on the “air date” listed on the DVD boxed set:
September 20, 2002: Episode #2 – The Train Job
September 27, 2002: Episode #3 – Bushwacked
October 4, 2002: Episode #6 – Our Mrs. Reynolds
October 18, 2002: Episode #7 – Jaynestown
October 25, 2002: Episode #8 – Out of Gas
November 1, 2002: Episode #4 – Shindig
November 8, 2002: Episode #5 – Safe
November 15, 2002: Episode #9 – Ariel
December 6, 2002: Episode #10 – War Stories
December 13, 2002: Episode #14 – Objects in Space
December 20, 2002: Episode #1 – Serenity
Episodes 11, 12, and 13 were Never Aired.
Thad, likefunbutnot and Darketower, thank you all for that. I really appreciate the straightforward answer and the whole thing finally makes some sense to me now.
Fox has always had a thing about cancelling shows too soon. FIREFLY followed in the proud tradition of THE ADVENTURES OF BRISCO COUNTY, another Friday night show with a loyal following that was cancelled way too soon.
It’s pretty amazing that X-FILES didn’t share the same fate, but I’m sure it came close.
@Heidi: Ah, you never forget your first unfairly-canceled Fox show. Mine was The Critic.
My fiancee is currently outraged over The Finder. I can’t believe she made it this long before experiencing a case of Traumatic Fox Cancellation.
(And I keep explaining to her, hey, it’s a spinoff; Hart could still finish it off in an episode of Bones, like how Carter used X-Files to finish Millennium and Lone Gunmen.)
Hell, Fox put Simpsons on opposite The Cosby Show in its second season — that’s practically sabotage.
I’m mailing shawarma to the network right now.