Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Comments

Recently Viewed

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Tag

In the past 7 days

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: it, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 19 of 19
1. It’s Chaos Walking Week

hosted by Loving Books. Basically, a week dedicated to Patrick Ness’s amazing series, which I found out about from Lisa is Busy Nerding.

Anyway, I have no idea if this is some kind of coincidence or what, but…

screencap of Amazon.com's 3/28/12 Daily Deal - The Chaos Walking series…the Chaos Walking series comprises today’s Kindle Daily Deal. If you have a Kindle and haven’t read the series yet, the books are 99¢ each! You can’t go wrong!

I don’t mean to turn this into a buy-stuff-from-Amazon post, since I’m not a fan of many of their practices (I’m not, nor have I ever have been, an Amazon affiliate), but Melina Marchetta’s Finnikin of the Rock is currently (as of this writing) on sale for $3.49. And wouldn’t you know, last week was Marchetta Madness at Chachic’s Book Nook.

There are some awesome posts there, by the way, like Trish Doller on how Jellicoe Road influenced Something Like Normal. Which makes me want to read Something Like Normal even more.


Filed under: Book News, Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm"

7 Comments on It’s Chaos Walking Week, last added: 3/29/2012
Display Comments Add a Comment
2. Two things

1. Is it just me, or have there been a lot of hockey-playing love interests in YA books all of a sudden?

  • Awkward by Marnie Bates
  • Chain Reaction epilogue by Simone Elkeles
  • The Survival Kit by Donna Freitas
  • Bittersweet by Sarah Ockler
  • Playing Hurt by Holly Schindler

2. Speaking of Bittersweet, on p. 110, a character says, “What kind of hockey team has not one, but three black dudes? No wonder they can’t win,” which just rubbed me the wrong way. I know, it’s not Hudson, the main character*, who says it, but her best friend. And (spoiler?) this team with three black hockey players, among others, does end up winning. A lot. In this sense, it refutes the implication of the original statement. But maybe I’m being too sensitive or humorless here, because it still did not negate the original snarky comment explicitly enough to satisfy me.

I mean, it wasn’t that long ago that black hockey players couldn’t play in the NHL. I’d never heard of Herb Carnegie until this New York Times article last weekend (also very much worth reading), but he was a superb hockey player denied the opportunity to play in the NHL because he was black. And the fact that his race was the only reason he couldn’t play in the NHL hurt deeply.

Not to mention, it’s awfully close from “What kind of hockey team has three black players?” to “What kind of basketball team starts an Asian-American point guard?”**

Race shouldn’t matter, nor should nationality or sexual orientation. After all, if you can play, you can play, right?

(I rarely embed YouTube videos, but since I just did it a couple of sentences ago, why not do it once more?)

* To her credit, Hudson immediately points out how diverse the rest of the team is besides the “three black dudes,” although that’s not the same as defending their ability to play hockey.

** Okay, this argument might have been more effective a month ago, but still.


Filed under: Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm" <

0 Comments on Two things as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
3. Two things

1. Is it just me, or have there been a lot of hockey-playing love interests in YA books all of a sudden?

  • Awkward by Marnie Bates
  • Chain Reaction epilogue by Simone Elkeles
  • The Survival Kit by Donna Freitas
  • Bittersweet by Sarah Ockler
  • Playing Hurt by Holly Schindler

2. Speaking of Bittersweet, on p. 110, a character says, “What kind of hockey team has not one, but three black dudes? No wonder they can’t win,” which just rubbed me the wrong way. I know, it’s not Hudson, the main character*, who says it, but her best friend. And (spoiler?) this team with three black hockey players, among others, does end up winning. A lot. In this sense, it refutes the implication of the original statement. But maybe I’m being too sensitive or humorless here, because it still did not negate the original snarky comment explicitly enough to satisfy me.

I mean, it wasn’t that long ago that black hockey players couldn’t play in the NHL. I’d never heard of Herb Carnegie until this New York Times article last weekend (also very much worth reading), but he was a superb hockey player denied the opportunity to play in the NHL because he was black. And the fact that his skin color was the only reason he couldn’t play in the NHL hurt him deeply.

Not to mention, it’s awfully close from “What kind of hockey team has three black players?” to “What kind of basketball team starts an Asian-American point guard?”**

Race shouldn’t matter, nor should nationality or sexual orientation. After all, if you can play, you can play, right?

(I rarely embed YouTube videos, but since I just did it a couple of sentences ago, why not do it once more?)

* To her credit, Hudson immediately points out how diverse the rest of the team is besides the “three black dudes,” although that’s not the same as defending their ability to play hockey.

** Okay, this argument might have been more effective a month ago, but still.


Filed under: Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm"
8 Comments on Two things, last added: 3/19/2012
Display Comments Add a Comment
4. Am I being too picky?

In writing my review of Michaela MacColl’s Prisoners in the Palace for the Kirkus blog (posted yesterday), I once again realized that while I love a good historical novel, and I love a good romance novel, and I also love a good historical romance, I can’t think of any YA historical romance that I’ve truly enjoyed. Partly this is a matter of perspective—how much romance a book needs in order for me to consider it a romance novel (as opposed to a novel having a romantic subplot) may differ from your preferences—but also because I don’t think many YA historical romances without paranormal elements are published these days. Also, the historical romances that I have tried just did not work for me.

I mean, there are some YA historical novels I’ve loved, and some YA historical romances I…was less than enthused about. And there are times I get annoyed when there *is* a romance in a historical novel, because it feels unnecessary and unconvincing. (Though to be fair, this is not just a problem in historical fiction.)

And I have no idea where I was going with this post. Anyway, go and read the review!


Filed under: Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm"

10 Comments on Am I being too picky?, last added: 2/24/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
5. Maybe I should start a tumblr

tumblog?

Anyway, three books-I-wanna-read things.

1. After Liar, I came to the realization that I’m a sucker for intricately structured YA fiction. Backed up by awesome writing, of course. (See also: Boy Toy; Jellicoe Road; basically everything Megan Whalen Turner) Tim Wynne-Jones’ Blink & Caution probably would have been one of those books I might have gotten around to at some point. But after Kirkus’s review, which begins, “Two teenagers hurt by life ‘with its never-ending snares and pitfalls and dire consequences’ come together in this elegantly constructed noir mystery and love story,” I now have to read it.

2. This morning’s Publishers Lunch mentioned a deal for an awesome-sounding book. So awesome-sounding that I was inspired to hunt down more information about it. And I found the deal report on the author’s blog. Yay!

Jay Kristoff’s STORMDANCER, a dystopian fantasy set in steampunk feudal Japan, to Pete Wolverton at Thomas Dunne Books, in association with Julie Crisp at Tor UK, in a good deal, in a three-book deal, by Matt Bialer at Sanford J. Greenburger Associates (World English).

His blog also includes his query letter, which said the manuscript was YA, though from the looks of this, it’ll be published as an adult book. There was one line in the query that made me pause. Free Willy? Really? Whatever. For now, I’m willing to overlook it for the STEAMPUNK FEUDAL JAPAN part. Because did you notice it’s set in steampunk feudal Japan?

3. Looks like Simon Pulse is granting my wish with this collection.

Also, one book-I’ve-read note. My discussion/review of Neesha Meminger’s Jazz in Love is up at the Kirkus blog. Backstory, in brief: unable to find a publisher for this, her second novel (after Shine, Coconut Moon), Meminger self-published her story about an Indian-American teen’s rocky romantic life. And the book is fun!


Filed under: Asian-Americans in YA Lit, Not Yet Published, Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm" 8 Comments on Maybe I should start a tumblr, last added: 1/31/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
6. Seriously?

Saw this at the bookstore last night and I do not like this cover change one bit.

It loses the magic and vibrancy that make the books so special. Instead, the cover is uninteresting and bland and doesn’t even hint at the colorful imagery that’s so vital to Block’s prose. I mean, lines like, “A kiss about apple pie à la mode with the vanilla creaminess melting in the pie heat. A kiss about chocolate, when you haven’t eaten chocolate in a year. A kiss about palm trees speeding by, trailing pink clouds when you drive down the Strip sizzling with champagne. A kiss about spotlights fanning the sky and the swollen sea spilling like tears over your legs.” (p. 29) Or, “She was crying and blowing her nose with pink Kleenex, and there were wadded up Kleenex roses all over the floor.” (p. 35) Not to mention, it doesn’t reflect some of the main characters…

I didn’t love the previous covers, but they’re much better than this one.


Filed under: Rants, Things That Make Trisha Go, "Hmm"

8 Comments on Seriously?, last added: 10/1/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
7. Covers, Part 2: Orange is the new…

I probably shouldn’t have said “discuss” yesterday. I just want to know, what’s up with all the orange covers I’m seeing these days?

This isn’t including covers with orange accents and all those covers with flames on them (and there enough of those flames, or smoke, covers for another post).


1 Comments on Covers, Part 2: Orange is the new…, last added: 7/3/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
8. miscellaneous non-book reads

Slate on Christian YA fiction.

Brent, the gay teen who couldn’t find LGBT books in his school library, and only one in his public library, is interviewed at School Library Journal. (I’m sure his original post, or the AP article about it, also inspired this article at Salon.com)

An article in the new Entertainment Weekly (which I would link to *if it was available online*) wonders “what would happen if To Kill a Mockingbird—or even J.D. Salinger’s 1951 classic of teen angst, The Catcher in the Rye—were published today?” I don’t think the article says anything new, but for people only beginning to take note of YA literature, it’s a nice read, mentioning the commercial success of YA lit as well as the literary/artistic quality of some books (though it calls The Invention of Hugo Cabret a YA book). As for the original question, what if To Kill a Mockingbird or The Catcher in the Rye were published today, I think the more interesting question is: what would YA literature be like if they hadn’t been published in 1960 and 1951, respectively, but were published for the first time today? Would it be the same regardless, as long as The Outsiders and The Chocolate War were published? (Speaking of the history of YA literature, I really want to read the revised edition of Michael Cart’s From Romance to Realism, but ALA books are so expensive!)

I probably would have skipped Robert Gray’s article in today’s Shelf Awareness because I cannot stand the Lakers. But Bill Simmons’ The Big Book of Basketball is my current lunchtime reading (except today, since we got the new issues of People and EW), because I had nothing to read one day so started flipping through the book and saw the Jabaal Abdul-Simmons thing and decided to keep reading even though I’m not much of a basketball fan. Anyway, the Shelf Awareness article is worth a read (scroll all the way down the page, near to the bottom) and could be the basis a great display. (Well, if your library owns more of the books than mine does.) “Books Phil Jackson recommended to his players this season.”

And your awesome program alert: from Oops…Wrong Cookie, their library’s Yomicon, a manga and anime convention for teens.


0 Comments on miscellaneous non-book reads as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
9. Two Printzes


Full disclosure: Of this year’s Printz winner and honors, I’ve only finished Charles & Emma and read half of Going Bovine and The Monstrumologist. (Also, I apologize to any Spin Doctors fans who may be out there.)

It struck me, as I was commenting at Maureen’s a little while ago, that this year’s Printz winner and honors are very similar to the 2008 list.

The White Darkness = Going Bovine (winners, about crazy people road/ice trips, if that’s not a spoiler)

Your Own, Sylvia: A Verse Portrait of Sylvia Plath = Charles & Emma

Repossessed = The Monstrumologist

The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian = Marcelo in the Real World (lots of buzz, ultimately shut out)

And, okay, the comparison falls apart with 2008 honorees Dreamquake: Book Two of the Dreamhunter Duet and One Whole and Perfect Day and this year’s Punkzilla and Tales of the Madman Underground: An Historical Romance 1973.

Other Youth Media Awards thoughts:

Your thoughts?

ETA: Totally forgot about Jim Murphy winning the Margaret A. Edwards. I mentioned on Twitter that I found this an interesting pick, because they’ve never picked an author of primarily non-fiction before. I&r

10 Comments on Two Printzes, last added: 1/21/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
10. So, furloughs


15 days through the rest of this fiscal year, and another 15 days next fiscal year.

On the other hand, no libraries are closing, no full-time employees were let go, and in terms of this blog, I’m hoping this will mean that with the extra time off (albeit unpaid), I’ll have more energy to post.

Anyway, I’ve had a post comparing the writing styles in Charles and Emma: The Darwin’s Leap of Faith and Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice sitting as a draft for a couple of weeks because I’m having trouble articulating exactly what I want to say.

As far as YA fiction goes, there hasn’t been anything so spectacular that I’ve just *had* to blog about it. The best was probably Shooting Star by Fredrick McKissack Jr., only it was so well-written that I couldn’t actually bring myself to finish reading it. (Also, the half that I did read were more really good than spectacular.) Jomo Rodgers is a high school football player who is starting to attract some attention from recruiters, but he is not quite big enough to be a real blue chip recruit. The only way he can bulk up, Jomo starts to think, is by using steroids. McKissack had me rooting for Jomo and made me so attached to him that I couldn’t bear to read the entire book and see his life unravel.

In brief, here are some books that I did finish reading and which I meant to blog about but never got around to reviewing, starting from back in August.

All the Broken Pieces by Ann Burg
The cover, I have to say, is perfect for the book. I can’t see many teens picking it up with a lot of pushing, but it is beautifully written and very much deserving of all the praise it’s received.

Gray Baby by Scott Loring Sanders
Started off strong, then became muddled, overly ambitious, relied on too much coincidence, and concluded with a resolution that wrapped everything up too neatly and prettily.

Exclusively Chloe by J. A. Yang
A good pick for Robin Palmer fans.

Blood Promise by Richelle Mead
Long. Way too long.

Dragonfly by Julia Golding
I just read this last night, then saw Tasha’s rave review of it at Kids Lit this morning. I am on the fence about this book right now, because there were parts that I liked (royals with a sense of responsibility and duty!), parts that I didn’t (the evil king being just Eeeevil, and his sister, who is cruel, ferocious, can handle a sword, and did I mention ugly?), and a rather slow start (for reasons I can understand) before lots of action and adventure. In some ways, I found it more reminiscent of fairy tale retellings than anything else.

And, um, I know I also read other YA books, but I can’t remember what they are right now.

Finally, two links:

“There is a very big difference between writing for children and writing for young adults. The first thing I would say is that “Young Adult” does not mean “Older Children”, it really does mean young but adult, and the category should be seen as a subset of adult literature, not of children’s books.” – Garth Nix, in an interview at Tor.com

Melina Marchetta’s Printz speech at Likely Stories

4 Comments on So, furloughs, last added: 12/4/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
11. Obviously, I need to pay more attention to celebrity gossip


because I was flipping through the new Entertainment Weekly at lunch today and saw that

Mandy Moore and Ryan Adams are engaged.

Mandy Moore and Ryan Adams.

Mandy Moore and Ryan Adams.

Oookay. I had no idea they were even a couple…

I feel like I need to make this post book or library related, so I’m going to just throw this open for comments.* What is your favorite book (fiction or non-fiction, YA or adult) about music or musicians? Or, you know, you could leave a comment about the Mandy Moore-Ryan Adams engagement.

* WordPress just added comment threading, so leave some comments, people! I want to play around with this feature, and it would be really lame if I had to reply to my own comments.

11 Comments on Obviously, I need to pay more attention to celebrity gossip, last added: 2/21/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
12. Under the radar Printz picks


I was going to wait until the weekend, but Betsy just came out with her ALA Youth Media Award predictions at A Fuse #8, so I’m moving this up. Although I agree with Carlie that I don’t think The Hunger Games will get an honor.

I’m not very good at predicting which books will win awards, but I also think past Printz Award committees have had a tendency to select books no one was expecting to win (either for the top award or an honor), picks that have seemingly come out of nowhere.

I mean, 2001? Angus, Thongs and Full-Frontal Snogging getting an honor? Don’t get me wrong, I think the book is fabbity-fab and an absolute riot, but how many people would’ve predicted it would receive a Printz Honor? 2003Postcards from No Man’s Land over The House of the Scorpion? Okay, so I wasn’t actually a YA librarian back then, and maybe these two examples weren’t shocking to anyone at the time. But then, 2007American Born Chinese over both The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing, Traitor to the Nation; v. 1: The Pox Party AND The Book Thief? I thought, and it seemed to me that most other people thought, one of the latter two was going to win. And, again, last year? Leaving aside personal reactions to the individual works (I’ve already admitted I was not a fan of The White Darkness), how many people saw that set of books coming? How many people had even heard of One Whole and Perfect Day? Was I not the only person shocked that The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian was not recognized by the committee at all?

So with this in mind, here a couple of books that don’t seem to be getting much buzz in the various mock awards and discussions I’ve read, but which I can see receiving the Printz or a Printz Honor. There are a bunch of titles that pop up on most, if not all, of the lists I’ve seen (Octavian II, Frankie, Paper Towns, etc. See this list for a sampling), and I’m going to ignore them for the purposes of this post. I’m also going to limit my picks to books on the final BBYA nominations list, just so I don’t go crazy wracking my brain, and to books that I’ve read.

My I’m-not-saying-these-are-going-to-win-(after-all-I-didn’t-even-get-one-right-last-year)-but-I-wouldn’t-be-surprised-if-the-committee-selected-one-of-these-as-the-award-winner-or-as-an-honor-book picks in alphabetical order:

I Know It’s Over by C. K. Kelly Martin
Because I’m not the only one who thinks it’s great. It received several starred reviews and is a Cybils finalist. The characterizations are vivid and, more than any other book I read last year, real. I might want to be friends with Audrey (from Audrey, Wait!), I might consider Jonah Griggs (Jellicoe Road) and Dane Rafferty (Thaw) the most compelling characters, but Nick felt the most real.

On the other hand: it’s not a finalist for the Morris Award, which makes me think a Printz nod is unlikely.

Jellicoe Road by Melina Marchetta
Yes, it’s a Cybils finalist. Yes, I love this book. Yes, it is now officially my favorite book of 2008 and, at this moment, my favorite YA book ever. But I can still be objective about it. Right?

Because… Okay, have you read this book yet? It is brilliant. It’s complicated, confusing, does not spell things out for the reader, and is ultimately more rewarding because of this. Yet even as you’re wondering what is going on, you’re still drawn into the story, still want to keep reading instead of putting the book down. In terms of its literary quality, I think it stands out in every way: voice, character building and character development, plot, structure, writing.

On the other hand: my favorite book of 2007? The book I loved more than any other from an emotional standpoint and admired more than any other for its literary merit, because of the character development, the narrative voice sounding like that an 18-year-old and dialogue that was realistic and conversational, and the structure, with the flashbacks, not flickers? With a couple of lines that just broke my heart? That had me telling people, “Oh my god, this book was so good! It. Blew. Me. Away.”? That was a Cybils finalist (and eventual winner—not that I’m making any predictions about what this year’s judges will pick)? That received a couple more starred reviews than Jellicoe Road? Boy Toy. Shut out completely!

On the other…hand? foot?: Marchetta is Australian (hi, Judith Clarke, Sonya Hartnett, Margo Lanagan, and Markus Zusak!). And as much as I love and admire Boy Toy, my reaction to Jellicoe Road is like Boy Toy x 10. Except as much as I gush about it, it’s a lot harder to describe to people than Boy Toy.

Skim by Mariko Tamaki and Jillian Tamaki
I’ve only seen it on one mock Printz list, but it is a finalist in the Cybils graphic novel category. To quote the Cybils panel: “Atmospheric and intimate at the same time, this debut graphic novel about an angsty teen avoids the usual cliches through sheer sympathy and grace and the beautiful art lends it an unusual delicacy.” I wouldn’t count it out since a graphic novel has already won the award.

On the other hand: I think it’s been getting more love from graphic novel types than YA lit folks.

There’s also Would You by Marthe Jocelyn (nothing more than my gut on this one), Ghost Medicine by Andrew Smith (which I’m including largely because of the combination of starred reviews + I really struggled to get through it), and Me, The Missing, and the Dead by Jenny Valentine (because it’s on the Morris shortlist and was shortlisted for the Carnegie Medal).

What about you? What are your under the radar picks for all YA fiction published last year, not just the BBYA nominees? Any non-fiction titles?

      

10 Comments on Under the radar Printz picks, last added: 1/26/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
13. I’ve been in a bit of a reading slump


since, um, last Thursday. Which may not sound like much, but it’s the first time I can remember struggling to get into every single book I picked up (and we’re talking, like, ten different books here—YA fiction, adult fiction, adult non-fiction, and graphic novels) for more than a day or two, and I haven’t been able to finish a book even though I really want something to read (as opposed to going 4+ days without finishing a book because I didn’t have the time to read). I can’t blame the Cybils for this, since I actually read seven books the first week of this year. Or maybe it’s a delayed reaction, since there were so many books I wanted to read but couldn’t get to because of my Cybils reading, and not knowing where to start now that I can read them.

Or maybe I should blame this on Rachel Caine, because while I did manage to finish two books after I read Lord of Misrule, it was a struggle to get through both. And then after those two, nothing. I was totally looking forward to Lord of Misrule, and Caine did not let me down. It was just as intense and exciting as the previous Morganville books and, seriously, that preview of Carpe Corpus? 100% worked. I mean, I’d be excited about it even without the preview, but having read it, I’m even more impatient. So, maybe it really is Rachel Caine’s fault for writing such a fast-paced book, compelling book that I’ve been bored and impatient with everything else I’ve picked up since then.

Until I get out of this slump, I think I’ll just entertain myself by blogging about random things like this: I picked up Daniel Ehrenhaft’s Dirty Laundry the other day (post-Lord of Misrule, so I didn’t get past p. 15).

cover of Generation Dead by Daniel Waters

Oops, that’s not the cover.

cover of Cracked Up To Be by Courntey Summers

Nope, not this one.

cover of Leap of Faith by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley

Wait, it’s not this one, either.

cover of Dirty Laundry by Daniel Ehrenhaft

Oh, here it is!

      

8 Comments on I’ve been in a bit of a reading slump, last added: 1/20/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
14. Teen pregnancy/parents fiction?


In the past six days,

  1. a teen girl asked me for fiction books about teen pregnancy;
  2. I read C.K. Kelly Martin’s I Know It’s Over (review forthcoming; basically, it’s excellent and you should read it); and
  3. it was announced that Sarah Palin’s seventeen-year-old daughter is pregnant.*

When I was helping the girl who wanted teen pregnancy fiction, I had a really hard time trying to think of recent books that focus on the girl, not the guy. It’s great that we’re seeing books about teen fathers, but it seems like there are more of these books now (like The First Part Last, Slam, Mahalia, Hanging on to Max, even The Nature of Jade) than there are about the teen who is actually pregnant. And in a way, it kind of bothers me that I could more easily think of the books about guys, because in real life, how many teen mothers will end up raising their child on their own?

Anyway, it’s booklist creation time. Contemporary realistic fiction about teen pregnancy or teen parents published in the last, oh, ten years narrated by/focusing on a girl who got pregnant or the guy who got her pregnant. Besides the books listed above and Linda Oatman High’s upcoming Planet Pregnancy, I’ve found:

  • Baby Girl by Lenora Adams
  • Angel’s Choice by Lauren Baratz-Logsted
  • Gingerbread by Rachel Cohn
  • Butterflies in May by Karen Hart
  • Dancing Naked by Shelley Hrdlitschka
  • My Life as a Rhombus by Varian Johnson
  • One Night by Margaret Wild

What else is there?

* See the Freakonomics blog for some interesting stats about teen pregnancy (via)

10 Comments on Teen pregnancy/parents fiction?, last added: 9/6/2008
Display Comments Add a Comment
15. What are the odds


of reading two novels back to back, one about the princess of Montagne and the other a princess whose cousin is the king of Montaine?

And really, I think that’s what’s going to stick out to me the most about Princess Ben and Aurelia. Both books are enjoyable enough and good enough to finish, and while I will recommend them to teens who like this kind of book, they didn’t really do much for me.

cover of Princess Ben by Catherine Gilbert MurdockI have to give Catherine Gilbert Murdock credit, though, for writing Princess Ben. It’s a huge departure from her previous two books, Diary Queen and The Off Season, and I have nothing but admiration for an author who is able to switch gears like that. In some ways, it’s a very successful change—the prose just sparkles, for example—but in other ways, not so much. The characterizations in Princess Ben never reach the level they do in Dairy Queen or The Off Season, and I say this as someone who didn’t get what the big fuss was until the second half of The Off Season (and I’m a huge football fan!), nor do the plot and worldbuilding stand out in any way. And as for the romance, because of course there’s a romance involved, I thought it mediocre at best.

Ben, short Benevolence, is the coddled only child of the prince (younger brother of the married but childless king) of Montagne. When the king and Ben’s mother are killed, and her father presumed dead, Ben becomes the heir to the throne. Nothing in her life has prepared her for this. At her mother’s insistence, the family did not live in the castle. Ben has had no training in any of the skills a future queen needs. Plus, she’s overweight, a problem Queen Sophia is determined to fix by drastically reducing the amount of food Ben is given. Ben’s problems appear to be solved when she discovers that she can move about through secret passages in the walls of the castle and figures out how to muddle through, or even better, get out of, her lessons without actually learning anything.

The problem with this is that the greatest emotion I felt during most of the book was sympathy for Sophia. Ben was selfish and self-centered, perhaps predictably so as a result of her upbringing, but by the time she came to her senses and realized that, hey, as future monarch of this country, she needs to know how to rule it, it was too late for me. At that point, I wasn’t reading because I cared about Ben; I was reading to find out what happened to the country.

Despite my antipathy towards Ben, the fact that I found the book somewhat enjoyable is a credit to Murdock’s writing. I’ve said before that I don’t mind unlikable characters, that I don’t need to like a character to like a book, and I still think that’s true. I realize that Ben’s growing up and maturing is the point of the story, but I never found Ben compelling enough to read the book just because of her (perhaps because the POV, of an older Ben looking back at these years of her life, implied that everything worked out so some of the tension was lost?), and as I said before, I didn’t find the other things that were going on particularly interesting, either. In some ways, I actually think this book is better suited for upper elementary readers than it is for teens. I don’t know about others, but I would have handled Ben’s selfishness better when I was younger, maybe fourth or fifth grade, than I would have as a teen. By that point, I would have been all, “What about your responsibility to your people?” like I am now. Not to mention that I probably would have found the romance more romantic.

cover of Aurelia by Anne OsterlundAnother thing I think I think, to quote Peter King, is that superficial is becoming my favorite go-to criticism, and it’s one of my two big problems with Aurelia. There’s a distance to the narration of Aurelia, which too often felt like mere observation, that kept me from becoming involved with the story. Anne Osterlund uses an omniscient third person narrative that describes the emotions of the characters more than it actually gets inside their heads. It’s not that I think the book would have been improved by a first person narration, because I really don’t, but that the characters aren’t fully realized as is. They’re like, I don’t know, actors or placeholders, there to fill a role and not truly Aurelia or Robert or Melony.

Still, I enjoyed Aurelia more than Princess Ben, largely because of the responsibility Aurelia felt for her citizens. She’s the princess of Tyralt, heir to the throne because her father, the king, has no living sons. Unbeknownst to her, she has been the target of several failed assassination attempts, so Robert, son of the country’s former royal spy, has returned to the capital to discover who wants Aurelia dead. Aurelia cares about Tyralt’s citizens, occasionally at some risk to herself, unlike her father, and most citizens feel she’d be a better ruler. Which is why the ending bothers me so much (big problem #2 [highlight to read]: you care about your citizens so much that after learning who wants you dead and realizing no one will be punished, you decide to travel?! WTF?). This is definitely a book I would have liked more with a different ending.

For some actual reviews of Princess Ben, head on over to: Abby (the) Librarian, The Compulsive Reader, Educating Alice, Em’s Bookshelf, Kids Lit, Kiss the Book, Read a Great Teen Book!, and Teen Book Review. And some Aurelia reviews: Dear Author, Kel’s Thoughts.

0 Comments on What are the odds as of 1/1/1990
Add a Comment
16. Yeah, this makes so much sense


Not.

I just finished Reading Matters: What the Research Reveals About Reading, Libraries, and Community yesterday (much, much stronger in the adult and children chapters than the YA chapter, in my opinion), but the cover still bothers me.

For a book that’s about pleasure reading, particularly fiction reading, why is the book on the center of the table called Linear Algebra? (You can just make out the title in this image.) Are there no stock photos of people actually reading fiction? Or some book not called Linear Algebra?

In other news, I was reading ESPN The Magazine while eating today. Last place I would have expected to see the cover of Kate Brian’s Sweet 16, but there it was in Outtakes (is that really what it’s called? You’d think I’d know this). Good one! It doesn’t appear online, but if you turn to the second to the last page of the magazine, it’s there.

0 Comments on Yeah, this makes so much sense as of 1/1/1990
Add a Comment
17. Really? Really?


That’s what I kept on thinking as I read this article about James Patterson’s YA books in the New York Times.

There are a lot of choice quotes, like:

According to market research conducted by Codex Group on behalf of Little, Brown, more than 60 percent of the readers of the “Maximum Ride” series are older than 35.

Also,

Little, Brown has also asked booksellers to shelve hardcover editions of the new “Maximum Ride” title and “Daniel X” in the adult section. Six months after hardcover publication, it will release a paperback version for the young-adult sections of the bookstores, and six months after that a mass-market paperback edition for the adult shelves.

Another NYT article, about product placement in a new tween series, has been making waves. TadMack sums up the issue beautifully, so go read that.

And one more link to the Times. According to a new study, teenage boys’ motivation in relationships is not primarily about sex or physical attractiveness. Which, I must say, is really making me think about how guys and romantic relationships are depicted in YA books.

0 Comments on Really? Really? as of 1/1/1990
Add a Comment
18. Arr! Yahoo, prepare to be boarded!

pirate-flag.gifWith the recent news of Yahoo’s potential acquisition by vile Microsoft and its prior layoff of 1000 hardworking geeks, there was a bit of an air of piracy in the office last week.

Linden Lab is going into another round of recruitment, focusing on web developers, QA folk, and other nerdy types. If any web developers out there (you, yes, YOU Joy!) want to work in a more stable, hilarious, and weird environment, you might want to fill out an application to work at Second Life. Free beer, the Love Machine, and a frightening amount of RockBand can all be yours!

Linden seems to be where the socially-developed nerds go to work. There’s a much larger % of women, extroverts, parents, and charmers working at Linden than is considered industry standard. Which means you tend to not find yourself in conversations with dudes who can’t make eye contact with a girl, or folks who get REALLY EMOTIONAL about their code.

It’s good to be a god, too, even if it’s only in-world. You can read more about our wickedcool office culture in the Tao of Linden.

0 Comments on Arr! Yahoo, prepare to be boarded! as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
19. where it's at

Where have I been? Well, very swept along by extremely rigorous travel and work schedule (and, as many of you know, swept away by a more personal undertow). When will I be back? Well, I'm not sure. But several times this last week I found myself thinking back to posts here, email strings there, and even real-time physical conversations over there (visiting OCLC last Mon-Fri). All of them renewed reminders that I'm striving for sychronicity. And although things are just starting to move from awareness and into practice, one little piece of something did click over and into sync for me this week. So I'll tell you about it, and maybe this can count as back (we'll see):

It started when a colleague of mine said that "social" aspect of what we do is "WOW. sticky. Kewl." We were in a large meeting. Everybody laughed. I laughed too. But then I paused. WOW. sticky. Kewl. That's it! (Later I learned that he had wanted to say "WOW. sexy. Kewl." but his group thought better of saying sexy in a meeting and so they changed it. Sexy. Sticky. Whatever. He captured the concept.) I mentioned it a few times to different people and got different reactions. Most people laughed. Some people got hung up on the sticky. (Is it good to be sticky? Or bad?) But everybody got it. "WOW. sticky. Kewl." is the it factor. It's that thing that's hard to describe, but that everybody knows about and comes back for. Some people have it. Some people don't. Some organizations have it. Some organizations don't. Some libraries have it. Some libraries don't.

Finding, having or being it is about finding, having and being that thing that keeps you, your organization or your library alive. And I don't mean alive that in the you're not dead, so you must be alive sense of the word. I mean it in that verve, vim and vigor sort of way. I'm talking about meaning, relevance and maybe even emotional draw. I'm talking about charisma and magnetism, maybe even charm. No wonder it is often associated with sexy. Should we even wonder then, when wow sticky kewl is associated with social?

I know it can't be the same thing for everyone. And I know I shouldn't try and essentially define it. But I do know that we've lost it when we stop at content or collections. It is dependent on human connection. It might even be about conversation and collaboration. This makes me wonder: are our personal it factors are the same as our professional ones? That's definitely what has happened to me at WebJunction, where this small little business idea (ItGirl) turned from a consulting gig to this real-life community project connecting more than 26,000 of us in libraryland. Putting that idea of connecting people with each other (as well as with information) at the center of my personal and professional life has been part of my and our success there.

So now I have to ask: could your personal it factor be the thing that helps your library find, have, and be alive? Or has it already? And does it (also) have to do with connection? How is that different from what we traditionally do or have done in libraries?

1 Comments on where it's at, last added: 3/20/2007
Display Comments Add a Comment