Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Comments

Recently Viewed

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Tag

In the past 7 days

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
<<June 2024>>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
      01
02030405060708
09101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: reporting, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 13 of 13
1. You Ask, We Answer: What’s a “reported essay”?

I get a lot of writers in my Become an Idea Machine workshop who want to write essays.

Scratch that. They want to get paid to write essays. Now there’s nothing wrong with wanting to write — and get paid for — essays. However, if you’re an avid reader of popular newsstand magazines, you know that most of them aren’t packed with essays. Many don’t run essays at all; and the magazines that do run one essay each issue, usually on the back page and often from a writer who’s well known to the magazine and/or the reading public.

I like to encourage students and not squash their writerly dreams, so I gently suggest that they turn some of their essay ideas into something I call a “reported essay.” A reported essay reads like a magazine article — you’ve got your lede, your nut graf, original reporting and quotes from sources and experts — but the article includes those elements of essay writing that writers find appealing; the personal anecdotes, funny stories, teaching moments, and/or resolutions to situations that can help other readers.

Here are a couple articles I’ve written that I consider “reported essays”:

Deciding to Have One Child

Cookery Books: Britain’s Gift to America

I could have chosen essay form to detail my decision to limit our family size to one child or written a funny essay about how I travel to England with an empty suitcase to fill with cookbooks, but I’ve grown to love the marriage between personal experience and reportage.

Why should you consider reported essays?

Magazines buy more reported essays than essays.

Go to your local newsstand and flip through a couple consumer magazines. They’re typically filled with stories written by journalists and freelancers who’ve injected a bit of themselves into their articles. These types of articles are staples for a lot of magazines, whereas these same magazines may buy one (or none!) straight essay for each issue. There’s just a bigger market for reported essays over essays with no reporting.

Competition to place essays is fierce.

It’s simple: you’ve got a lot of writers wanting to sell essays and a limited number of outlets that will buy those essays. If you want to sell more work, you need to broaden your horizons.

You can sell a reported essay on proposal.

If you want to sell an essay, you must write the essay first then send it in to the magazine. It’s one of the rare instances where a writer ‘writes the article first” rather than querying for it. Why? You can’t tell the editor, “I’ll write a touching essay about what it meant to find my birth father after 30 years of searching.” He needs to read your 500 words, to feel what you went through during your search, to see how you changed through the experience, and to find some emotional connection to your story that will not only resonate with him, but will elicit an emotional response with his readers. Only by reading the finished product can he learn if your story is, indeed, touching.

If you reslant your idea and position it as a reported essay, however, you can query for it. You might open your query with a brief overview of how you found your birth father, then explain to the editor that your proposed article will show how three other adults fo

Add a Comment
2. Didn’t Go to Journalism School? Learn All You Need to Become a Pro Freelancer — in 4 Weeks

Carol Tice of Make a Living Writing surveyed more than 200 writers to find out what was holding them back from reaching the level of success they wanted.

The result? Many of you are confused about the nitty-gritty details of journalism — ethics, research, crafting an article, newsgathering, generating salable story ideas, and more.

To help writers gain confidence and earn more, we created the 4-Week J-School. We removed the J-school fluff you don’t need (the history of media? really?) and condensed the rest into four 1-hour sessions that are packed with valuable information. We also made the price tag much nicer: Journalism school can cost up to $30,000, but we’re doing it all for just $295.

You’ll learn:

  • Story ideas that sell: What makes a salable idea — and where to find ideas that will knock editors’ socks off.
  • Newsgathering 101: How to find the best sources for your articles, get the most out of an interview, and find solid statistics to bolster your query or article. (AND — how to avoid misleading statistics and sources with an agenda.)
  • Article writing intensive: How to write an article that will impress an editor, including writing headlines, ledes, sharpening your writing style, deciding on a story type, using quotes, and weaving in experts.
  • Journalism ethics 101: We’ll answer all the questions you have about conflict of interest, libel, plagiarism, accepting gifts from sources, reselling ideas, and much more.

Students of the 4-Week J-School also get:

  • Four live, 1-hour phone sessions where you’ll learn from two seasoned freelancers and get a chance to ask them your questions in real-time.
  • Downloadable recordings and full transcripts for each session.
  • A free month of access to the Freelance Writers Den (ordinarily $25), where Carol, Linda, and other professional writers will answer your followup questions and critique your assignments.
  • Guidance to write a 500-word, reported article and have it critiqued by two pros.
  • Dozens of pages of helpful written materials and resource links that will heighten your learning.

If you enroll before Tuesday, May 14, you also get:

  • A free copy of Linda Formichelli’s e-book Get Unstuck! for Freelancers : A 6-Week Course to Boost Your Motivation, Organization, and Productivity—So You Can Do More Work in Less Time, Make More Money, and Enjoy the Freelance Lifestyle.
  • All about Query Letters and Letters of Introduction — A bonus 1-hour recording and handout from Carol and Linda’s Freelance Writers Blast Off class. J-school doesn’t train writers on how to pitch — they assume you’re all getting staff writer jobs. (So 1997!) So we’ll fill in the gap with this training module on how to contact editors and get assignments.

We’re running the 4-Week J-School only twice this year, and we limit each class to 30 students — so if you’re interested, sign up now!

If you want to gain the knowledge and confidence to become an accomplished freelance writer, read more details — plus testimonials for our other course, the Freelance Writers Blast Off — on the 4-Week J-School page.

Add a Comment
3. Journalism is Hard Work: A Video

A few weeks ago I had the honor of attending BEA2010 (no not the BEA that happened last week) which was part of the 2010NAB conference. I was there to celebrate the launch of the BBC College of Journalism Website (COJO) a collaboration between OUP and the BBC. The site allows citizens outside of the UK access to the online learning and development materials created for BBC journalists. It is a vast resource filled to the brim with videos, audio clips, discussion pages, interactive modules and text pages covering every aspect of TV, radio, and online journalism. At the conference I had a chance to talk with Kevin Marsh, the Executive Editor of COJO, and I will be sharing clips from our conversation for the next few weeks. This week I have posted a clip which emphasizes the true hard work that journalism involves. Read Kevin’s blog here.  Watch last week’s video here.

Click here to view the embedded video.

0 Comments on Journalism is Hard Work: A Video as of 6/1/2010 1:11:00 PM
Add a Comment
4. Interview with Dan Baum on Writing for the Big Names — and on the Future of Journalism

Dan Baum has written for Rolling Stone, Playboy, Wired, and other big-name magazines, and is a former staff writer for The New Yorker; on his website, you can download proposals that landed assignments with these magazines. Baum is the author of Nine Lives, and runs a blog called WordWork. The account of his “short career at The New Yorker ran as a series of Tweets in May. Thanks to writer Greg Korgeski, who supplied some of the questions.

Many freelancers fantasize about doing the kinds of pieces that you’ve written. What does it take to succeed in that kind of long-form journalism?

The biggest mistake I see other freelancers make is that they don’t work hard enough. I know that seems odd because if feels like we all work really hard. But it always seemed to me that getting the assignment was the hard part; researching and writing the story is the easy part.

The trick is, proposals have to be really detailed. You have to do a substantial amount of the reporting and the writing just to get the assignment. So you’ve got to be clever about that, because if you spend weeks working on a proposal, you’re going to go broke because you might not sell the story.

On the other hand, if you don’t make the proposal really good, really dense, really packed with information and really well thought out, you’re not going to get the assignments. I’ve been doing this now since 1987, that’s 22 years, and I still write proposals that don’t sell. My website has a bunch of them.

Somebody pointed out on some blog that if you read my proposals that did sell and my proposals that didn’t sell, you’d be hard pressed to tell which is which, because there’s just a lot of luck in this business.

Margaret [my wife] and I used to do freelance for newspapers when we were living in Africa and in Montana, and they would only pay us like $150 per story, but they might also pay a little bit of travel expenses. So we would use the reporting that we did for the newspaper story to finance the writing of a magazine proposal; but it’s always this balancing act between doing enough work on a proposal to sell it but not so much that you’re doing too much work for free.

Generally, by the time I get an assignment, a third of the research is done, and at the very least, I know the parameters of where the research is going to take me and I have a sense of the universe of sources and documents that are going to be available. So I can pretty quickly and easily get the story reported and written.

It may be that you don’t need to do that. I’ve never had much success writing shorter proposals. This is just what works for me, and it’s not necessarily what works for everybody. I don’t want anybody to think that I’m saying that these are the be-all-end-all of story proposals, there are plenty up on the site that haven’t worked.

Well, you’re going to laugh because I cowrote a book called The Renegade Writer about breaking the rules of freelancing, and one of the rules you read in all the writing books is that your queries have to be one page long. But when I started writing longer pitches, I started getting into the national magazines.

Portfolio had a rule that all proposals had to be one page, and Portfolio just went out of business. I don’t think they went out of business because they demanded one-page proposals; I think they went out of business because they didn’t have a very clear vision of what the magazine was. But maybe their insistence on one-page proposals was indicative of a short attention span and a certain amount of panic that things had to move so fast. And that was a monthly, so they could have really taken their time.

Your proposals are a lot of work. When you come up with a proposal idea, do you target it only to one magazine or do you say “if it doesn’t work for magazine A I’m going to send it to magazine B”?

Well, you have to write a proposal for the sensibilities of a particular magazine, so when people tell me “I have an idea for a story,” my first question is “You have an idea for a story for what magazine?” Because you can’t say, “I have an idea for a story, and if I can’t sell it Playboy I’m going to sell it to Rolling Stone, and if I can’t sell it to Rolling Stone I’m going to sell it to Harper’s,” because it just doesn’t work that way.

The story and the magazine go together and it’s very hard to re-write a proposal that doesn’t sell at one magazine for another magazine. I don’t think I’ve ever done that.

If you don’t sell that story to the magazine you originally have in mind, probably the smartest thing to do is put it aside, cut your losses, and go on to the next thing. Some people may try to recycle proposals for different magazines; I don’t think I’ve ever been able to do it.

Do you think that’s only for the type of writing you do? Because if I don’t sell something to Family Circle then I’m tweaking that thing for Woman’s Day.

It may be. I want to keep saying this that this is just my experience. Family Circle and Woman’s Day might be similar enough. In the small number of magazines that I wrote for, you just couldn’t do it. I mean, if you were writing a proposal for Wired, there’s just nobody else you could sell it to. I tried, I’ve tried, I really have. I really have tried and it just never worked for me.

What does it take to make it — what kind of interests and background do you need to be able to do the kind of journalism that you do? What is your background?

I worked for six years in newspapers and then we’ve been freelancing ever since. What does it take? I used to say that for people getting out of college, working at a newspaper is great training, but newspaper jobs are getting hard to get.

I think it takes relentlessness. When I’m starting to work on a story, I’ll start reading about something, and I’ll just follow every link, and as I’m doing it I’ll make a list in a Word document of the people that I need to find.

I start calling them immediately, and talking to them and taking notes on my computer. The expression I use with Margaret is “I had a red dog day today,” which means I had my nose down on the ground and I was going after everything today. Just hoovering in enormous amounts of information. And when I start a proposal, I try to have a series of red dog days where I am just relentless, going after everybody, and as soon as I encounter somebody’s name I pick up the phone and I call. When I finish the interview I say, Who else should I talk to? Then I call those people.

I don’t put it off — I don’t say these are people I’m going to call later — I do it right then. Man, there are times when in one day I can get enough information to write a proposal that will get me a $12,000 magazine assignment.

When you are calling people and you don’t have an assignment yet, how do you convince them to talk to you?

I say, “I’m working on a story for The New York Times Magazine.” Or “I’m working on a story for Wired magazine.”

So you don’t let them know you don’t have the assignment in hand?

No, I say I’m working on a story for Wired magazine and I am. My relationship with Wired magazine at that point is none of their business.

What do you do if they ask when the publication date is?

I say “I don’t know, that’s out of my hands; it’s above my pay grade.”

On to another topic: You have such a broad range of things that you write about. How do you know, when you come up with an idea, that it’s going to fly? If it’s already all over the Internet, how do you know it isn’t already too much in the public consciousness for somebody to want to run it?

Yeah, that’s what you always face. I want to write a story about Masdar, which is this city being built in Abu Dhabi — a zero energy city being built from scratch. I thought this would be a great story for Wired.

It turned out Wired never heard of it but they said they were suffering from Abu Dhabi fatigue — they have too many stories on Abu Dhabi. Then I tried to talk to The New York Times Magazine and didn’t get anywhere. So I dropped it. It’s a great story, but I just dropped it.

I look for stories with interesting people in them, and one of the tricks that I’m always trying to impress upon young writers is that when you’re interviewing somebody, like if I was interviewing the chief solar engineer at Masdar, a big mistake people make is talking to that guy only about solar engineering. You have to throw in questions that have nothing to do with the subject. How many siblings do you have and what number are you? What do you read? What are your hobbies? Are you married? How many kids do you have? Have you ever been divorced? You’ve got to get them talking about themselves. I’m asking these questions that are just none of my business, really personal questions, and I’ll just keep getting in closer and closer and closer.

I’ll ask, What do you earn? And you’ll see this kind of shock of recognition on the person’s face. Sometimes people say “Well, that’s none of your business,” but rarely. I can barely think of a time that’s happened to me. Usually you see the shock of recognition when the person goes, “Oh, that’s the level we’re talking on.”

People like it, when you get them talking about themselves and unrelated stuff. You need time for this, and it’s a hard thing to do on the phone. But when you’re getting all of that then you know this person as a whole person, and then you can fit them into the story in a way that you’re still writing about Masdar and solar engineering, but you can just throw in a few licks to just make that person real.

It’s kind of a New Yorker trick. When you read about people in The New Yorker, they are somehow more three-dimensional than sources in other magazines. They’re not just a font of quotes, or a representative of a point of view — they’re people.

You also mentioned that you pick up the phone and call people. How do you find them?

Oh, people are easy to find. On the net, you can Google them, and you may not find their phone number but you’ll find organizations that they’ve been attached to. It may take two or three calls. I just tracked down Oliver North and it took three or four phone calls.

It takes a certain relentlessness. It takes not being discouraged. Sometimes you’ve got to call 40 people until you find the right one. If you’re looking for somebody’s who’s obscure, you use an online phone book. If you know Mark Riseman lives somewhere in the Midwest, and you look up Mark Riseman and up come with 400 of them, you’ve got to go through and call all the ones that are in the Midwest. That can take an hour and a half and it’s tedious, but you’ll find him. That’s what I’m talking about a red dog day. You just have your nose down on the ground, and you’re on the trail all day.

Do you worry about competition — other writers coming in and horning in on your gigs?

No. For one thing, we’re kind of out of magazines. I think in a way, it’s over. I think the days of being able to make a living as a magazine writer are rapidly coming to a close.

That is so sad.

It is. I’m not boasting here, but I should be able to get work, right? I was on staff to The New Yorker for 3 years, I worked for Rolling Stone for a long time. I have written for the biggest and most prestigious magazines out there and I can’t get work. Magazines are closing, they’re shrinking, they’re going from 12 issues a year to 10 issues a year, and they’re going from 300 pages to 140 pages.

Some of them are cutting their rates.

Some of them are cutting their rates. You know, when we started magazine work in 1989, a dollar a word was middling pay. A lot of magazines are still paying $1 a word.

And for a lot of freelancers, that’s the Holy Grail. “If I get $1 a word, that means I’ve made it.”

Yeah, well that’s what we were getting in 1989. But you know that whole question of dollars per word is a terrible way to judge an assignment.

You really have to think in dollars per hour. Is that how you do it?

I think of dollars per assignment. This is kind of dollars per hour…if a magazine assignment is going to pay me $3000, then I can figure out exactly how many days I can work on that. The LA Times Magazine is a pretty good outlet for me. They paid a dollar a word but they took 5,000-word stories; I could work on that for two or three weeks, and make a living. I don’t care; it’s just as easy for me to write 5,000 words as it is for me to write 2,000 words. In some ways it’s easier. So I don’t worry about competition. People tell me that they like seeing my pitches, and it helps them. If it helps other people, if it improves the quality of writing out there, if it helps younger reporters get started, I’m happy to do it.

How do you feel about what’s going on in the industry?

My sense is this — and this may be optimistic — I think we writers are in for a few bad years, because right now the public is used to getting everything for free. So the magazines are dying and the newspapers are dying and the quality of work is going to decline because nobody has yet figured out how to get the public to pay for quality reporting.

I don’t know how long it’s going to take for the public to say we really miss reading the results of two and three weeks worth of investigative work, and that’s worth paying for. Somebody will figure out a business model to get people to pay for it. Then I think we’re going to be a golden era in journalism. I think it’s going to be spectacular some day.

When newspapers and magazines and even book publishers are no longer saddled with the expense of manufacturing, handling, and shipping atoms, it’s going to free up a huge amount of money and I think it’s going to let a whole lot more people get into this business — and there are going to be a whole lot more venues to write for, and it’s going to be great.

I think we’re going to go through a swale of no work. Until the public figures out that it has to pay for quality research and writing, we’re going to face some lean years.

I’m being optimistic. Maybe the public will never say that, maybe quality journalism is over. I kind of don’t think so.

The paper The New York Times is going to disappear; all papers are going to vanish. I don’t worry about that — I don’t really care what medium people are reading in, if it’s a Kindle or if it’s a reader, I don’t think that’s the issue. I think the issue is, how do we get the public to pay for quality research and writing? Nobody’s figured that out yet because right now the public is excited about getting all this stuff for free. It’s just going to take a little while and I don’t know how long it’s going to take.

Some day it’s going to be great for us.

I hope it’s soon…I make my living almost 100% from magazines.

Yes, we make our living 100% from our freelance writing. I’m 53, Margaret is 55, and right now it feels like we’re back at the beginning of our careers.

It’s scary, but it’s kind of exciting in a way.

Well, it’s exciting when I think about what’s going to follow this period. Although yesterday the Times had a story about digital book piracy, and that’s going to be a problem.

There’s a lot of interesting stuff out there to write about — we just have to figure out how to get the public to pay for it.

Add a Comment
5. Good queries/bad queries for sources

I’m fascinated by the queries I read on Peter Shankman’s Help a Reporter Out list. I subscribe because as an author, I’m always looking for ways to promote my books, but I admit, I’m also curious how other writers look for experts and sources.

So here are two to compare and contrast. I’ve changed details, but the structure of the queries remains:

Writer #1: “I’m doing a story on the dramatic number of homeless living in public parks in New York.” (Yes, that’s it.)

Versus this:

Writer #2: “I’m looking for social service employees/execs who can talk to me about how they’re handling the increasing number of homeless citizens living in NYC’s public areas. Especially interested in how budget cuts and staff reductions put stress on services. Please use HARO: Homeless in NYC in the subject heading. Thanks!”

I already feel sorry for the editor who gets to work with writer #1. [db]

Add a Comment
6. More on Gaiman's Graveyard Book Reading

(I was asked to report on the event at Child_lit so I wrote a bit more about it and decided to post the report here!)

It was a lovely free event (I got there at 4:30 for the 7:00
event so I did get very good seating!) at the Teacher's College Horace
Mann Auditorium. It seats about 500 and the room (orchestra and
balcony) was filled to capacity. Most of the people in the audience
are Neil's adult fans -- many college/late 20s who obviously are great
fans of Sandman since when he made references to Sandman characters,
the entire room responded. There were, however, a dozen or so
children and when he read (he read the entire first chapter -- 33
pages,) those children responded very favorably -- laughing at the
right moments (also thanks to Neil's skillful and dramatic reading).
I sensed that the audience got slightly restless toward the end of the
chapter since there were a couple of places that we felt would have
made a natural break. but the story kept going, after shifting gears.
However, I imagine that if it is broken down to two readings, no one
would have felt the reading was just a tad "long."

Oh, and we were treated to a very cool, not-before-seen, Coraline
trailer. It IS going to be 3D Stop Motion Animation for the whole
entire deal. Let's hope for the BEST!

His Q&A section was great, talking about his China trip (one month,
researching myths and legends, and breaking a finger,) his haircut,
his characters in books, whether he'll write sequels to Neverwhere,
American Gods, etc. (yes, he WOULD if he had the time -- and yes,
there are stories set in all these worlds.) He was asked if there is
any difference in writing a "more intricate and complex" book for
adults than a "less so" (grumble) book for young adults/children. He
said No. It's all putting one word after another. And then he said
that the only difference was the length it took him to write the books
-- one (American Gods) took longer than the other (Graveyard Book.)

He talked about how he sometimes worries about his characters coming
out of his books to knock on his door and demand to know WHY he
created him and made them live such miserable and dark lives. He
talked about how he indeed is "their maker." He imagines of his own
"meeting the maker" moment after his unavoidable demise: "When I ask
WHY ME, Why NOW? I'm afraid of hearing a booming voice from the Sky
that says, 'Because that makes a BETTER STORY.'" The audience
laughed, of course. (He did the God-Booming voice very well... and my
paraphrasing is nowhere near funny as he was in person.)

I posted a link to the audio file from HarperCollins on my blog. No
pictures or video from me, unfortunately. I believe that the reading
will be (is planned to be) put online soonish -- since he is doing ONE
CHAPTER per city on this tour until the whole book is read through.
(And he also talked about audio book recording and how much he LOVES
doing it even though it is really hard work.)

- AND INDEED the VIDEO of his reading can be found HERE.

0 Comments on More on Gaiman's Graveyard Book Reading as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
7. Neil Gaiman in NYC

I feel strangely obligated and slightly compelled to at least mention that I was one of the audience members (around 500) who went to hear/see Neil Gaiman read the first chapter of The Graveyard Book. He was as always, charming and witty, and the Q&A section where he answered many questions written on index cards went beautifully humorous. And I, as always, did not bring a camera. Oh, well. I am sure that if you google Neil Gaiman Graveyard Book New York City -- you'll see some more enthusiastic and better prepared fans' pictures, videos, and audio clips. Here's an audio file for the entire first chapter as pre-recorded by HarperCollins.

0 Comments on Neil Gaiman in NYC as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
8. Story? What story?

If you’ve been reading the mainstream media, you’re probably unaware that there’s a story brewing with former presidential candidate John Edwards. In a nutshell, a couple weeks ago, the National Enquirer (yes, that National Enquirer) claims its reporters and photographers caught Edwards in LA emerging from the hotel room of his mistress and their “love child.” A keystone-cop chase through the hotel ensued, until staff security rescued Edwards from a bathroom, where the reporters had him cornered for 15 minutes.

I’ve been fascinated by this story, specifically, mainstream media’s handling of it. (Personally, I don’t care who politicians sleep with, as long as they’re not sleeping with my husband or, God forbid, my child. But I’m aware that for most Americans, a politician’s private life is a big deal.)  One LA Times editor forbade bloggers from blogging about this story because it came from the scurrilous National Enquirer (although I believe one blogger didn’t read the memo and blogged about it anyway). Other major news organizations around the country, print and broadcast, haven’t touched the story either, citing the dubious source of reporting and/or taking a wait-and-see position, a position that in my mind that’s essentially a let’s-turn-a-blind-eye stance.

Now the Enquirer has released photos they claim show Edwards holding his “love child.” I’m hearing rumblings that there are even more damning pictures, and the tabloid is waiting until the Democratic convention to release them. Edwards hasn’t denied the allegations. The mainstream media still maintains its wall of silence. I wonder: is the news media being protective of Edwards, particularly Elizabeth Edwards? Do they really believe this is just a garbage story? I’m no fan of McCain’s, but it seems like the venerable New York Times had no problem reporting on a supposed affair he had with an associate with far less evidence to base their story upon.

I’m curious … what do you all think? A media conspiracy or is the Enquirer’s “bust” just not news? [db]

Add a Comment
9. Are you a phone-phobic freelancer?

“I dread days where I have interviews scheduled.” “I’d rather give myself a root canal than call an editor.” “I’m so much better on paper than I am on the phone.” I’ve heard this, and variations thereof, from dozens of freelancers, many of whom are extremely successful professionals with hundreds of clips to their names.

I admit, my pulse rate goes up a little before calling sources, but it’s a good thing for me: I use that energy to project enthusiasm into our interview. Within a couple minutes of talking, my heart rate slides back to normal. Only once did I really and truly dread an interview, and that was because I was cold-calling Jeffrey Steingarten at the behest of one of my editors. If you know anything about Steingarten, you know why my armpits were drenched: mercifully, the interview went well.

If you’re on the path to a long and successful career as a freelancer magazine writer, the phone isn’t something you can avoid. Most writers I know conduct the majority of the interviews with it, and when you need a quick, immediate response from an editor, it can’t be beat. If you’ve been freelancing for awhile and you can’t shake the jitters, some tips from someone who kinda enjoys conversations with interesting people:

  • Your source is probably more nervous speaking to you than you are speaking to him, so focus on putting him at ease rather than focusing on your insecurity. Remember, he’s worrying about how he’s going to sound to you — after all, those are his words that will end up between quotation marks in a national magazine.
  • Schedule interviews for the first thing in the morning. So many productivity experts advise writers to get their creative work done first thing, but there’s another train of thought that says it pays to get your “frogs” out of the way first. I know I feel much more energized when the tough stuff is off my plate (in fact, I always eat the least compelling food on my plate, and save the yummy stuff for last!)
  • Set one day a week to do all your interviews. This can be helpful if you work yourself up into a tizzy before each interview. You get them all done in one fell swoop and relax for the rest of the week.
  • Call sources on the fly. This can work if you spend the week looking in calendar in dreadful anticipation of an interview. I do this a lot, especially with people who can be hard to reach. I ask them for a few minutes of their time, and usually they give it to me. And then I’m done!
  • Identify and write down what it is about phone work that gives you the heebie-jeebies. Do you stumble when you speak? Are you afraid the person on the other end of the line will treat you badly? Is it hard for you to write and conduct interviews at the same time?
  • Now write down some ideas to help you get over those fears. If you feel inarticulate, write out a script for your call, right down to your introduction, and practice it out loud before you call. Write out a sign with the words, “Speak Slowly” and post it in front of you. If someone gives you attitude, you can ask them when it’s a better time to talk — or if it’s a source, you can find someone else (nicer) to talk to. Start taping your interviews, develop some shorthand, or tell sources ahead of time it helps if they speak slowly and that you’ll probably interrupt them to get a quote right.

Do you dread phone work? What tips and tricks do you use to help you get through your phone phobia? Post them below. [diana burrell]

Add a Comment
10. You ask, we answer: Interviews by IM

Katrina asks, “Recently, an interviewee requested an interview be conducted via instant messenger. Ultimately, we conducted a phone interview, but I was left wondering: How would quotes from an instant messenger interview be attributed? Can they be enclosed in quotation marks or should they be paraphrased? For that matter, what about email interviews? The only clear guidelines I can find are for in person, phone, and book sources.”

It’s funny: I know in the last year or so I’ve read stories where I’ll come across a quote that’s followed by, “… wrote John Smith in an e-mail” or “said John Smith during a phone call from his home in Paris.” Speaking of France, I believe I did a story for the Boston Globe in the last six months where I made a similar disclosure (I interviewed the subject of my story, who lives in Lyon, during a phone call. I know the Times’ folks are a little sensitive about truth in reporting, so that’s probably why I did it).

I’d look to my editor to make the judgment call. Some magazines/newspapers won’t give a fig how the quote was obtained, so you’ll be free to say, “… Smith said” and leave it at that. Personally, that’s what I prefer, but I’m not Boss of the Universe. (Yet. I keep telling my husband it’s next on my list of goals.) As long as the source “said” it, who cares how his words were communicated? I suppose if those words got to you by carrier pigeon, that would be interesting. But I digress, yet again.

What say the rest of you? How do you handle quotes gathered from e-mail, IMing, or carrier pigeons? Tell us below!

Got another writing-related question for us? Send it to questions[at]therenegadewriter[dot]com. [db]

Add a Comment
11. Getting the name right

Last week I was sitting in a doctor’s waiting room, waiting for my name to be called. After an interminable wait (I was feverish and in a lot of pain), the door opened and the nurse called, “Diane?” Not me. I turned back to my copy of People. No one else in the waiting room moved.

“Diane?” she repeated, a little louder. Still, no one stirred. She looked at the chart in her hand. “Diane BURRELL?”

Ah, it was my turn. “It’s Diana,” I said as I stood up. “I hope it’s spelled right on my chart.” She checked and it was. “Sorry,” she said as she led me to the examining room. “People are always messing up my name. I should know better.” (I forgot to look at her name tag. I was just so relieved to be making progress toward a medical professional!)

I once read or heard that the most beautiful word in any language is one’s own name. I don’t know how researchers know that — maybe they measure pleasure sensors in the brain as PhD. candidates call out words, who knows? One thing I do know is one of the most embarrassing things that can happen to a journalist is to spell someone’s name wrong in an article that’s gone to print. It hasn’t happened to me (knock wood!) and I wonder if it’s because I’ve spent thirtysomething years pointing out to people that I’m not the Frenchified version of my lovely Latin name.

Misspelling a source’s name in print has happened to many writers I know, and it’s embarrassing on so many levels. So my advice for the week: next time you’re interviewing a source, ask them to spell their name for you. Then repeat the spelling back. Even if you have their book in front of you or you’re absolutely, positively sure they’re a Thomas, ask. I can’t tell you how many times this simple step has saved my butt. I’ve learned a John was a Jon, a Thomas preferred Tom, or an “e” in a name had an umlaut over it. If a name’s spelling is particularly tricky, I let my editor know when I turn the piece in (so they don’t “correct” it, which has been known to happen) and tag it in my factchecking materials.

Have you ever misspelled a name in print? How did you handle it? What tricks do you use to make sure you get names right? Post your answers below. [db]

Add a Comment
12. I wonder...

Hmmm.

The blog lists the Children's Book Council under "support." Do you think that means Titlepage.tv will feature a few children's and YA authors in their online "passionate conversations about books"?

If they do, I hope it's later on, when the show has worked out its kinks. Look at this detailed critique of the first episode...

I'm not much of an intrepid reporter, so I hope Fuse 8 is on this. Or maybe Colleen, since she writes for Bookslut, and they're also listed on the blogroll. Betsy, Colleen, any idea why the CBC is sponsoring this? Bring us the scoop!

In the meantime, if you need a really superb interview, the old-fashioned, written way: Anita Loughrey (via cynsations) talks to Leonard Marcus, one of my heroes. I love this man, and I love him more after this interview.

0 Comments on I wonder... as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
13. George’s Faves

We’re stretching our definition of multicultural just this once to include the imaginary worlds that offer so much creative solace to young children in difficult straits. In Julia Glass’ 2006 novel The Whole World Over, Greenie and Alan are parents of a precocious 4-year-old, George. Set in 2001 as the couple weather a serious marital crisis, the story moves from New York City and Maine to a ranch outside Santa Fe, and back, and throughout, the estranged parents each read to George. Wherever he is, the ritual of choosing from among his treasured favorite books (often subtly appropriate for his immediate situation) gives him security and stability.

Glass even folds a review of Owl at Home into her novel. Greenie is reading to George:
He leaned against her for all five tales, which related the neurotically foolish mishaps of a character who was a literalist yet also a romantic. In Greenie’s favorite, Owl made himself a pot of tear-water tea by thinking up, laboriously, as many sad things as he could: chairs with broken legs, forgotten songs, clocks that had stopped, mornings that no one witnessed because everyone was sleeping. More than sad, they were invisible, neglected, or simply lost to memory.

What better book for a little boy whose mother has just driven across the country from Santa Fe to reconcile with her husband in the intense confusion following 9-11?

Other books read to George in the novel include the Dr. Seuss books and (more…)

0 Comments on George’s Faves as of 6/20/2007 11:38:00 AM
Add a Comment