By: Daniel Hall,
on 3/15/2015
Over the past year the number of questionable police use-of-force incidents has been ever present. The deaths of Eric Garner in New York, Michael Brown in Missouri, and 12-year-old Tamir Rice in Ohio, are but just a few tragic cases.
The post The visual, experiential, and research dimensions of police coercion appeared first on OUPblog.
By: Alice,
on 3/9/2015
In February, the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) in Montgomery Alabama released a report, Lynching in America: Confronting the Legacy of Racial Terror. In researching for the report, EJI examined the practice of lynching in twelve southern states between Reconstruction and 1950. The report's conclusions and recommendations provide important lessons about the past, present, and future of society.
The post Racial terror and the echoes of American lynchings appeared first on OUPblog.
By: Heidi MacDonald,
on 12/22/2014
On Friday New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio met with protestors to discuss their demands for police reform after the shocking death of Eric Garner and the controversial grand jury decision that followed. The name of the activists’ organization will sound familiar to any comics fan: Justice League NYC.
That this prominent group of social justice warriors would share a name with DC Entertainment’s leading super-team is no coincidence. Just check out the group’s logo, which features two African-American superheroes flying out of New York City through a graffiti-style logo. Dig even deeper into contemporary activism’s history and we see even more connections: Ferguson protestors formed their own Justice League over the summer, a leading progressive journalist writes at JusticeLeagueTaskForce.wordpress.com, and as pretty much everyone here knows, the Occupy movement made the V for Vendetta Guy Fawkes’ mask a global icon.
The role of comics in recent protests will no doubt be the subject of any number of academic papers, most of which will bear a punny coloned title like “DC Nation: From Social Relevance Comics to Social Change.” Yet before folks explore what all this means at greater length, I want to offer a quick note on how this phenomenon ties into comics’ uneasy relationship with the law.
Before Photoshop and Final Cut made it possible for anyone to transcend their innate limitations, comics offered a cheap and easy way for people to give a visible form to their wildest thoughts. They became pop culture’s analogue to law as the magic mirror of society — photos may have showed us how the other half lives, but in comics we could create the world of tomorrow, free from the strictures of budget, politics, injury, death, and the real world’s ineffective legal system. What’s more, comics also did away with the shadows and fog that even today make inquiries such as the Serial podcast so frustrating — in the comics world we know who is good, who is evil, and who will win; the big question is how good will triumph.
That sensibility is in comics’ DNA, to both good and ill effect. An unreflective transfer of the comics’ approach to seemingly intractable problems would at its most extreme result in moral nihilism, as violence becomes the standard means of removing any obstacle to achieving what is right. At the same time, the comics’ metaphorical blend of constructive critique and unbounded possibility helps explain why the social relevance comics of the 1970s weren’t as much of a break from the past as some might think. We can draw a straight line back from the O’Neil & Adams Green Lantern/Green Arrow through to the Justice League, Shock SuspenStories, Captain America and Wonder Woman — and the same is true moving forward in time to today. Comics have always had the power to show us who we are and what we can be, and they are at their best when they resemble the magic mirror as ideally envisioned by Oliver Wendell Holmes – reflecting not just our own lives, but the lives of all people who have been.
That sounds all well and good but there is still the elephant in the room of the huge black crime rate which no social justice warriors are willing to address.
Justice League NYC is about as relevant as Justice League Detroit. My hunch is that DC may not be too thrilled that the name of one of their top books is being used by some wannabe activist group leading a protest movement becoming increasingly controversial (see recent headlines).
Wow, here I come into the comment thread to thank Jeff for the link to that great Jacob Riis article, and what do I see but some anonymous commenters in need of some of Riis’ perspective on modern events. Funny how that works.
To the first commenter – Activists and protesters are almost always controversial, that’s why they need to be activists in the first place. And if you think that Martin Luther King’s movement, or Malcolm X’s, or Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress were NOT controversial in their time, then you have a poor understanding of history.
Policing use of company trademarks by charities and other nonprofit ventures is a tough part of the corporate lawyer gig. Strategic savvy is a must.
@Kiel – you’re welcome! Riis is an amazing example of how tech can shape social reform – his photos had ripple effects that still continue to be felt in NY law and housing. I think of his stuff often when I walk down Mulberry Street, which is a far different place than it was back in his day. You can also draw a line from Riis through Arab Spring and contemporary US social justice initiatives.