[Jpegs taken from CHAC Valentine's Day showings, 2010 or prior years.]
This first piece doesn't begin in a "heartfelt" fashion, but bear with.
There's an adage about Life being the cruelest teacher: first it gives the test, then it gives the lesson.
Actually, there's something just as cruel that's omnisciently administered in U.S. public schools, that's called the pre-test. Those of you sans children or who've never personally benefited from this experience and don't know how lowly it can make children feel, well, don't despair; at some point in your remaining life you or yours may yet undergo the uplifting rigor of a pre-test.
Why test children--even five-year-old kindergartners--on something they know little to nothing about? For the sake of the BASELINE, a word teachers and students come to know as well as their daily schedule.
A schoolchild's progress (or lack of) and effectiveness of the teacher's skills (ditto), you see, justify the expenditure of millions of dollars and sustain thousands of jobs for "academic" number-crunchers and bean-counters whose existence depends on providing DATA to politicians, education corporations and administrators with the justification for cutting teachers, jobs and closing public schools so charter schools can be opened.
Even Colorado's entry into Obama's Race to the Top includes monies to be used for software, hardware and more numbers-people to cure our academic incompetence in international teaching standards. The thinking is that, if we're behind countries like Singapore, China and Denmark, it must be the teachers' fault.
Those millions of dollars and thousands of jobs might instead have been channeled into classrooms to teach children. Maybe with more teacher assistant paraprofessionals--try raising the educational level of 32 third graders by yourself all day long. Or more education specialists instructing in the classroom--try finding time to give differentiated one-on-one to a special ed kid in that same third grade room. Or more office staff to support teachers with children's behavioral problems and counseling--yeah, try teaching while one kid is hitting others and then being informed, "He's your fault and problem."
But our society doesn't believe in spending money in something so obviously beneficial because its targeted scapegoats are the teachers. The final solution is DATA and the obligatory pre-test.
In my case, for the sake of whatever self-esteem my first graders might salvage from such gauntlets, I regularly tell them that an answer of "Right now, I don't know." is acceptable. Thus I get many pre-tests with such responses. After all, how much would a six-year-old know about an index?
So, this week this teacher gave one of those pre-tests. Among other questions, was the following:
"Explica lo qué es un diagrama." ("What is a diagram?")
A few students had
new posts in all blogs
Blog: La Bloga (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: teaching, Valentine's Day, teacher, Denver, art show, public schools, CHAC, Milagros del Corazon, pre-test, Add a tag
By: La Bloga,
on 1/30/2010
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: pre-test, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Blog: La Bloga (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: teaching, Valentine's Day, teacher, Denver, art show, public schools, CHAC, Milagros del Corazon, pre-test, Add a tag
6 Comments on Two early heartfelts, last added: 1/31/2010
Display Comments
Add a Comment
Wow, the innocence and creativeness of youth. I suspect F.... will go far. I'm with you in the hope for her future!! As always, you so well articulate the feelings of so many of us. Thanks for sharing.
A heartfelt thank you for sharing this with us. I'm smiling thinking of F's confidence in her answer and reminds me of E.B. White's advice about "if you don't know how to pronounce a word, say it loud." I agree with Alice and suspect that F will go far as she has you for a teacher.
damnit, this is worth waiting all day to read it. felicitas, or whatever f....'s name might be, got the answer right, no question about it. and if the test-makers dispute that they do not know what they're doing.
Using a pre-test as a diagnostic tool is what great teachers use to support children to extend their learning.
Medical doctors use baselines, scientists use baselines; it may be in your best interest to reconsider the position noted.
an experienced educator
I have to laugh at Anonymous--nothing personal mind you. Completely misses the heartfelt point. Head. Heart. Head says, "use the baseline data to index a child's longitudinal growth and design and manage an individualized learning plan." Heart says, "love these kids and do no harm." Head&Heart says, "this test sucks, wonder at the beauty and infinite possibilities of this child, who flunked the test."
Thanks for your posting, Rudy. It made my day! I see the consequences of a lifetime of such testing when students get to college (with scores on standardized tests high on the admissions criteria...) I see students whose only eager participation in college classes often consists of: “Is this going to be on the exam?”
As your posting shows, creativity is what first gets lost on those scores. But children are fast learners... By third or fourth grade most will have learned to opt for “safe” answers and to study “for” tests instead of persevering in asking and understanding “why...” There goes their innate curiosity and experimentation. Then we wonder what is wrong with the way we teach our children...