What is JacketFlap

  • JacketFlap connects you to the work of more than 200,000 authors, illustrators, publishers and other creators of books for Children and Young Adults. The site is updated daily with information about every book, author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry. Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers, publishers and fans.
    Join now (it's free).

Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Posts

(tagged with 'casey')

Recent Comments

Recently Viewed

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Tag

In the past 7 days

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: casey, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 2 of 2
1. Casey Kasem and end-of-life planning

EZ Thoughts

By Edward Zelinsky


The sad story of Casey Kasem’s last illness is now over. Casey Kasem was an American pop culture icon. Among his other roles, Mr. Kasen was the disc jockey host on the legendary radio program, American Top 40. He was also the voice of Shaggy Rogers of Scooby-Doo.

Unfortunately, for many Americans Casey Kasem is now known as the subject of a bitter dispute between his widow Jean and his children from his first marriage. In the face of Mr. Kasem’s debilitating dementia, Mrs. Kasem wanted to continue medical care while his three children from his prior marriage had concluded that care was pointless and should be discontinued. Mr. Kasem’s children prevailed in the California courts based on a document Mr. Kasen had signed in 2007. Life support was accordingly withdrawn and Casey Kasem died shortly thereafter.

At one level, it is surprising is how rarely we hear today of such stories of conflict over end-of-life care. Cases involving Nancy Cruzan, Karen Ann Quinlan, and Terri Schiavo were once prominent in our public discourse.

An unheralded accomplishment of the American political and legal systems is the largely successful privatization of end-of-life health care decisions. Through documents variously denoted as living wills, health care proxies, medical powers of attorney, and health care instructions, an individual while mentally competent can plan for the end of his life. Central to such planning is the designation a medical decisionmaker and the specification of the criteria to be applied by such decisionmaker if an individual becomes incapable of making medical decisions for him- or herself.

Macro of a living will document. © zimmytws via iStockphoto.

Macro of a living will document. © zimmytws via iStockphoto.

These planning procedures, while not panaceas, have largely ensured that end-of-life decisionmaking will be made, not in courtrooms, but where such decisions belong: by the dying individual’s designated loved ones.

Two important lessons emerge from the Kasem family’s unfortunate experience. First, spouses are not automatically medical decisionmakers for each other. Spouses should formally designate each other as medical decisionmakers, if that is what they want.

Unfortunately, debate over same-sex marriage has confused matters, leading many individuals to erroneously believe that, simply by virtue of marriage, spouses are automatically each other’s medical decisionmakers. They are not. For example, Michael Schiavo’s status as husband did not guarantee him the right to make medical decisions for his wife Terri.

It is sensible to require that spouses must formally designate each other as their end-of-life medical decisionmakers. To take the most obvious case, suppose that spouses are estranged and that a healthy spouse will gain financially through an inheritance on the death of a wealthy, ill spouse. We would not want the healthy spouse in this setting to terminate medical care unless the ill spouse had signaled that that was what he wants. Or, to take a more benign situation, spouses may love each other but still think that other persons, e.g., the children from prior marriages, will be better decisionmakers under the stress of an end-of-life situation.

The bottom line is that spouses should execute the formal instrument of their respective state, however that instrument is designated, if they want each other to be health care decisionmakers. Marriage, by itself, is not legally sufficient to make spouses medical decisionmakers for each other.

The second lesson of the Kasem story is that, even if all of the proper documents have been signed, terminating medical treatment at the end of life is a difficult and painful decision. For example, one commonly used formula specifies that medical treatment should be withdrawn when an individual’s condition is “terminal.” Unfortunately, the physicians advising in end-of-life settings do not always agree when a conditional is “terminal.” If consensus exists, it is still painful to withhold medical care even if an ill individual previously authorized such withholding while he was healthy and competent to decide.

Casey Kasem left Americans with wonderful memories. His parting contribution to the American people was to remind us of the need for proper end-of-life planning and to demonstrate that, even with such planning in place, medical decisions at the end-of-life can be painful and difficult.

ZelinskiEdward A. Zelinsky is the Morris and Annie Trachman Professor of Law at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law of Yeshiva University. He is the author of The Origins of the Ownership Society: How The Defined Contribution Paradigm Changed America. His monthly column appears on the OUPblog.

Subscribe to the OUPblog via email or RSS.
Subscribe to only law articles on the OUPblog via email or RSS.

The post Casey Kasem and end-of-life planning appeared first on OUPblog.

0 Comments on Casey Kasem and end-of-life planning as of 7/7/2014 10:14:00 AM
Add a Comment
2. Animal Wednesday: Mimi's Soulmate


I got a frantic phone message one day from an elderly gentleman asking me if I could help him get his dog in the car because he needs to take him to a vet right away and he and his wife were unable to lift him. I called the gentleman back within five minutes, but by then a neighbor helped load the dog and off they went. He did appreciate my call however, and would be sure to keep my number in case he needed me in the future.

The future was two hours later. They had taken the dog to the vet who had painted a grim picture without much advice or hope or compassion. I agreed to meet them and their dog right away and to assess the situation. They said the dog was a Corgi and he was around 10.

I walked in the door and greeted Mimi and Ed. And then I saw Casey and my heart sank. He was nearly twice his normal weight. He had a mouth so rotten you could smell it from across the room. The only thing their vet said was that 'he has kidney disease and that's to be expected for a dog his age and there's nothing we can do except hospitalize him for a few days and give him fluids.' He said it so matter-of-factly but he failed at one of the most important things. He never looked into Mimi's eyes to see the connection between owner and dog. He stayed purely clinical and didn't show patience or respect to these sweet, elderly people who clearly loved their dog. The only thing Mimi and Ed feel that vet did right was to give them my name and number.

Here's what the next ten months meant to Casey.

First and foremost, I made an appointment with my veterinarian. It would be more than a week before we could see her and they were impatient and desperate. They scoured the phone book for other vets who could see him right away, but I convinced them that my giving fluids at home (provided by the other vet) would keep him going until he saw my vet. "She's worth the wait, I promise!" They've thanked me every day for being so insistent.

The first course of action was to treat Casey's kidney disease with a proper, low protien dog food diet. No more croissants in the morning. No sharing dinners with him. We established his age was 14+ years from looking at his records, not 10. Within 5 months we took 13 pounds off of him. I went over every single day to give him fluids under the skin to help keep his kidneys flushed, and to monitor his feedings and his progress. We all went to the vet appointments together. We got his bloodwork in good enough shape to clean up his mouth and he began enjoying his food. He would run around the long table several times a day just because he felt so good to be alive! And as much as a transformation as there was in Casey, so it was with Mimi. I'd walk in the door each day and look at her first because she was my barometer for how he was doing. They were so connected.

Things eventually began to decline a couple of weeks ago. Casey wasn't enjoying his food (which greatly upsets Mimi) and he began to walk funny. He seemed more vague to me as if he left the room but his body stayed. A recent ultrasound showed a couple of masses and funny cysts on his kidneys. And now he was dropping too much weight too fast. They could do MRI's and all sorts of extensive and expensive tests far from home but we all knew his age and other factors would probably go against any treatment.

Yesterday when I saw him we made an appointement for today to have his hind end checked out because of a new swelling. But by last night they called in a panic. Casey couldn't move his back end at all. I went over and spent a couple of hours sitting on the floor and checking Casey, but mostly letting them talk. I gave my honest opinion as I always promised I would. I felt it was time to let him go because he had nothing left to give. Mimi wanted to hold out hope for the appointment and I told her hope is a good thing.

I carried Casey to the car knowing full well that this was the last time we'd all be together. Mimi was singing to Casey in the back seat, mostly about what a sweet puppy he is. Ed was sitting in the front with me, discreetly wiping an errant tear. The doctor came in and examined him and agreed letting him go would be the kindest and bravest thing they could do. He was given a large dose of anesthesia so he'd sleep. The doctor and I let Mimi and Ed have some personal time with him and then we were all there for the final injection.


Casey was a gentle dog. An old soul in a short package. You could tell that he was grateful for the help he was getting. He never, ever complained until last night. That was the first whimper I ever heard from him in ten months.

He adored his family and he savored time in the garden with Mimi.

He lived his life with gratitude and he left us feeling more grateful for small blessings. Like Ed said when it was over, "Imagine that, we gave him 300 more days of a good life."

We sure did Ed. We sure did. And it was my great pleasure to be a part of it.
(This is a stock photo of a Welsh Corgi. Casey was camera shy.)

23 Comments on Animal Wednesday: Mimi's Soulmate, last added: 5/22/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment