How to use this Page

One of the books I really liked last year was Eric Gansworth’s If I Even Get Out of Here so was happy to see it on this list.

Not to the best of my knowledge, but boy I’d love to see one.

What are we to make of a list that does not include THE ABSOLUTELY TRUE DIARY OF A PART-TIME INDIAN by Sherman Alexie? I know it’s not billed as a children’s/young adult list, but the presence of so many titles from those fields demands its presence on the list. Otherwise, it just undermines the whole thing.

Also, does anybody find it odd that the author with most titles represented–five!–also happens to be one of the contributors to the list. Weird. Another impropriety?

Sorry you feel that way about the list, Mr. Hunt. So many people have critiques or complaints after the fact. What needs to be accounted for here is the fact that this is an arbitrary list, one that was limited to the “top” 100. It’s self-limiting. So it looks as if the only limitations here were the number and the tribal backgrounds of the authors. This list is not limitless. There are authors and books missing, that some think should have been included. However, rather than complaining, maybe it would be better to make your own list with your own preferences and parameters.

Actually that was my bad. There was an update made to the list that removed one of Tingle’s titles. It wasn’t entered initially but I’ve made the correction and it’s back down to four. Sorry ’bout that.

Um . . . “After a year of informal surveys and queries, we offer a list of OVER 100 books that every museum and library should have on their shelves.”

Someone will take issue with any list, no matter who develops it or who is/is not on it. Note that did say the books are amongst our “personal favorites” and that the list is a work in progress.

As Betsy noted, I mentioned the list during the CCBC-NET discussion. She asked permission to put it here on her blog. I asked the other contributors if it was ok with them (it was), and if we could add a handful of books to the list we developed in 2012. They said yes, and I added Tingle’s latest two books, Gansworth’s IF I EVER GET OUT OF HERE, and Boyden/THREE DAY ROAD. If I had thought to ask Betsy “can we have a couple of weeks to work on it a bit more” she’d probably have said yes, but the fact is–a book list is the sort of thing that you can agonize over/add to/sit on forever. Meanwhile, it doesn’t do the good it could do if it were ‘out there’ for public reference.

I’m grateful to Betsy for the opportunity to share it here.

Thanks for posting, Betsy. A great list that will expand my reading choices. I was reminded of several of my favorites (Birchbark House, Counting Coup), and now I know where to go to find more.

I’m very surprised not to see two of my all time favorite authors on this list. David Treuer (Ojibwe) and Ofelia Zepedia (Tohono O’odham) have some indredible books that every library should own.
David has some amazing books including: Little, The Hiawatha, and Rez Life. http://www.davidtreuer.com/
Ofeila has one of my favorite books of poetry Where Clouds are Formed, The University of Arizona Press.

Well, I’m just delighted that you let me post it. And yes, absolutely, a delay would have been fine, but no list will every have everybody’s favorites. I was certainly reminded of that when I recently helped make NYPL’s 100 Great Children’s Books list. Thanks for allowing me to be a part of this, Debbie.

Some observations:
1) Have you met Neal Shusterman? Add him to your list.
2) These books were nominated by readers not compiled by NPR. They culled the list to one we could vote on that included many non-whites. Readers didn't choose them. There are only four on the list I have not read and while I might put some others on, they are probably still white authors.
3) Rather than look at who wrote it, good writing is good writing, look at how things are treated. I can't stand the Twilight series and how the Native Americans are handled but many love it.
4) These are reader favorites. They don't claim to be quality though many on here are. Reader's Choice Awards are always tricky because so many good books are left behind since readers haven't read them.

Well put, Debbie. Not only that, but maybe writers who are not of color can and will do more writing with heroes and heroines who are not white.

A lengthy response from a librarian, sent to me as an email (I'm putting it in italics to distinguish it from my own words):

Really.

Does EVERYTHING in America have to be turned into a race issue?
I can say with total honesty I could care less what color an author is. If I like their book, I like their book and there is no racial issue associated with it.
For 50 years I have been made to feel guilty because I am 'white', and that is just as wrong as discrimination against minorities.

I stock my libraries with all the best books I can find, regardless of the author's race. I try to appeal to a variety of taste and interests and really try to bring in lots of reads by minority authors. Ninety percent of the students here are from a minority group. Records show they predominantly prefer books by authors who happen to be 'white'. This is not a bias, it is a fact. They don't care what color the author is either. They are just looking for good books to read.
At this time in history, most of the better reads in American in are written by people who happen to be 'white'.

I am sure your intent was probably good, but all you have done is make me want to take all those books off the shelves written by minority authors - that the kids don't read -and throw them in the trash. We 'white' people have had enough of this crap shoved down our throats ..... every time we turn around.

Shame on you. Just let people enjoy reading what they want to read!

Hi Debbie,

Thanks for calling attention to the implications of the NPR list. I've followed reactions to the list somewhat on the YALSA list serve and can't help but begin to wonder why it has obtained so much attention. As 'croys' mentioned, the books were nominated by and voted upon by listeners. I think that the list serves as a reminder to people of color that we are players in the game, we have to step up! As I mentioned in one of my own posts, we have to step up and nominate books by authors of color whenever the chance presents itself. If the books we want aren't in our libraries, we have to request them. We cannot expect that white people will know or understand the importance of representing all people in book selections.

Being made aware is not the same as being made to feel guilty, partilulary when we don't control anyone's emotions.

Unfortunately, most things in America are about race. I say unfornately, but that isn't necessarilty bad. Taking the time to view issues from the perspective of someone from another culture to celebrate aspects of life we would normally ignore is what happens when we accept the diversity around us. Racism, omiting works by people of color, that's wrong. Whenever books by people of color are omitted from libraries, bookstores or even from being published in the first place, there is a problem that needs to be addressed. That may make some people uncomfortable but I applaud people such as yourself who fight the fight on the regular. When you speak up, I know you don't do it for your own self interest but rather to honor past and present generations.

Congratulations on your recent award!

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

Actually... your final sentence is statistically incorrect. America is 78% caucasian by the most recent census. America is predominantly white. Now, if POC literature could get even close to 22% of publishing done in this country in order to more accurately reflect the current ratios, I would see it as a great improvement to what is currently done.

I'd like to echo thanks for bringing attention to the list. It's been interesting seeing the development of the list in general, and it's disappointing to see how it turns out for many reasons. (Even if, for some strange reason, we wanted a list of "best books about white people," the list is very skewed to recent paranormal/dystopian/romance.)

It is critical to point out problems such as this one because it points out who is winning in the world of YA literature. We may claim that, since this list is generated by user choice, people simply prefer books by authors who happen to be white. But what does that tell us?

It tells us that stories by/about white people are the ones that get celebrated in our culture. They are the ones that are seen as valuable; they are the ones that people tell each other about. Indeed, I've heard multiple people of color describe the difficulty they've had in getting their books published--publishers say that books that honestly portray the experiences of people of color "don't sell." Clearly, this list shows that this may be a sad fact.

As a white person, I don't feel guilty about that. I feel angry about it. It is not fair that stories about people who look like me are the only ones that count. There is not a single book on this list that features an Black protagonist. Nor is there an Asian American protagonist.

That fact bears repeating: There is not a single book on that list that features a Black or Asian American protagonist.

If the "Best-Ever Teen Novels" do not portray the experiences of roughly 20% of the American population, we are doing a severe disservice. Race matters in this nation, more than most of us are willing to admit. The makeup of this list only reminds me of how deep the problem runs.

Caveats: As croys mentions, Neal Shusterman is a person of color, although his books do not specifically tackle issues faced by protagonists of color. Also, NPR listeners are 87% white, which probably also has a skewing factor on polls. Regardless, this list is a sad show of the pervasiveness of whiteness in a "postracial" American culture.

Where is Walter Dean Myers?

Sharon Flake?

Jacqueline Woodson?

Unreal.

I'm embarrassed to share a profession with the librarian quoted in the third comment. My MLIS program consciously included discussion in many classes on the importance of seeking out different perspectives and representations, both to serve diverse populations and to provide opportunities for people to learn about cultures and experiences different from their own.

That 'readers just prefer books by white authors' is being used as a defense of this list is a more resounding condemnation of such a collection development philosophy than I can make. If a librarian isn't making an active effort to find and promote interesting books by authors of color, the library's patrons are unlikely to get much chance to find out whether they like them! And the operative word there is "active," not "effort," since a wide variety of resources exist to meet that exact need.

Shame on you, unnamed librarian. Really.

NPR simply reported the fact that we're no more diverse than in 1965. Theirs is not the blame.

I believe the biggest problem with achiving greater diversity is that most efforts are a one-way street. They want white people to be more diverse, but don't expect other ethnicities to be more diverse. Campbele is basically correct. Everything is about race --- generally speaking. It's nothing personal, but most people want to associate with people like themselves. Catholics like to associate with Catholics. Democrats with Democrats. African Americans with African Americans, and so on. This is how the average person behaves.

I applaud NPR's efforts to extend their influence to a more diverse audience and meet more diverse needs. But falsely reporting the votes of their listeners doesn't achieve those goals. Quite the opposite. The moment we insist they skew reality for the sake of any political or social desire we create a terrifying precedent. When do the lies stop? History has long since proved that Affirmative Action did more harm than good. Increased diversity should be a consequence of education and civility. It should not echo the iron boots of propaganda.

The truth is, a "best ever" list is never more than a popularity contest. Since such contests are won by accruing 51% of the vote --- and 78% of the vote (at worst!) is white, and just like everybody else, white people tend to hang around with people like themselves, and non-white people almost never write books intended for the Caucasian audience --- then it shouldn't have surprised anyone that 100% of the list reflected a Caucasian world view. I find it amazing that 62% of the nation should be expected to write books to meet the desires of the other 38%, but it's apparently unreasonable to ask the 38% to write books deemed enjoyable by the 62%. They would have made it onto the list.... According to the statistics, a single book written by a Native Indian would have appeared on the list had it been popular with at least 51% of the respondants. Are we sure NPR is to blame?

Blaming NPR for presenting a list short on diversity is worse than shooting the messenger. It's expecting the messanger to lie to save his life. Complaining that NPR's list doesn't reflect enough diversity is no different than complaining that Spanish-speaking radio doesn't play Lawrence Welk music or complaining that 78% of the actors on BET television aren't white. Our nation is made up of people who simply like to be with people much like themselves. My problem with most diversity efforts is that they tend to be more about repatriation than enlightenment. So many of we white people react the way we do because we see everything from children's books to news programs that reflect diversity many times higher than actually exists. And when we agree that it's a good thing and we're all better for it, we're told it's not enough. Sadly, books and programs found within the other cultures rarely include white people. Diversity should not be a one-way street. Respect should be mutual.

Frankly, I'm no more happy with using propaganda to engineer a society where everyone feels equally comfortable with one another (resistance is futile!) than I am with intolerance that leads to contempt and violence. The issue of diversity will be resolved with respect, equality, and education --- not with propoganda --- and expecting NPR to change its list to be more diverse than our nation really is, is using propaganda.

When the issue of diversity is no longer approached as a one-way street, we may finally achieve it.

Wow, quite a few of my favorites made it to the list. :D

The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton is my favorite teen novel, and also any teen novel by Judy Blume. They were the great YA authors before YA literature was invented!

I really enjoyed Hunger Games. I tried to read Speak but couldn’t quite get into it. I haven’t read anything else on the list. Interesting list though. :)

I remember when I read FOREVER it was like a rite of passage. From a little girl to a young woman. Ha, ha.

I was surprised so many of my favorites made the list too. :)

I’m surprised how many trilogies and series made the list. It’s a good starting point. Lots of good stuff to choose from.

A few of my favorites made it but many that didn’t care for made it too. I guess no matter how you look at it, reading is subjective. :)

In fact, I'm guessing that her original mention of you was what brought me here. I've learned so much from reading your blog. Thank you.