Maybe I'm in a self-reflective mood lately or maybe I'm collapsing in on myself like a character in a Zola novel (that oh-so-literary name-drop just earned me 5 future The Hills references), but I've been thinking a lot about how agents read. One thing that people sometimes ask me, especially with regard to synopses: should I worry about spoiling the ending? Doesn't the agent want to be surprised?
I can only speak for myself personally ("I know myself... but that is all," - F. Scott Fitzgerald -- watch out, we're up to 10 future The Hills references and a Bachelor breakdown), but I wouldn't worry too much about spoiling the ending. I don't read books like a normal person, where I'm waiting to see what happens next and where I need the element of surprise.
By the time I shop around a manuscript I've probably read it at least three or four times, sometimes more. I'm not going to be surprised every time, and I have to be able to see a work "fresh" even if I've read it before. It's a strange process where I basically dislocate my brain and think, "Even though I read this before, would this surprise me if I had read it the first time?"
In other words, no matter how many times I've read something, I'm looking for "what works."
Trying to figure out "what works" is sort of a reading style that I think everyone in publishing develops over time. When you're in college, you read to find hidden meaning. When you're reading for fun, you're reading for pleasure. When you're an agent, you're sort of like an architect searching for design flaws -- it doesn't matter what the building is going to look like in the end if the structure is unsound -- while still keeping the big picture in mind. (BTW, you know what's not "working" these days? THE HILLS)
So when an agent asks you for a synopsis: spill the ending. If they don't want to hear the ending they won't read it. Don't sweat that part. Instead, in the immortal words of Tim Gunn, MAKE IT WORK.
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: literary agents, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 26 - 36 of 36
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: The Hills, literary agents, publishing industry, author resources, Add a tag
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: writing advice, book recommendations, literary agents, Add a tag
Confession time: when I was a kid I really didn't like books written in the first person. Little Nathan Bransford was quite the literal fellow, and he just didn't get the whole first person thing (also he was very short and the girls in his second grade class patted him on the head and called him "El Chiquito" which was HUMILIATING).
I really couldn't wrap my head around who was doing the narrating. Was I supposed to believe it was the author? Was the narrator supposed to have written it all down? Was the narrator supposed to be talking to me? What in the heck was going on? What if a 1st Person narrator died in the end? THEN who was supposed to be doing the talking?
Luckily I outgrew both my aversion to 1st Person and the people who called me El Chiquito (who's El Chiquito now, EL CHIQUITO??), but only after I came to accept the essential weirdness of 1st Person. What is 1st Person anyway?
Well, it's a spectrum, obviously. It can be an imitation of someone definitely telling a story to someone else (THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST), it can be someone definitely writing something down (THE BRIEF WONDROUS LIFE OF OSCAR WAO), it can just be a story told from someone's particular point of view (TWILIGHT), or it can be sort of a hybrid (THE ABSOLUTELY TRUE DIARY OF A PART-TIME INDIAN).
But whatever it is, a first person narrative is unique in language. Whatever form the narrative takes (and it should be consistent), it's not like a real person talking or writing. There's no real-life equivalent. It's something else entirely.
Have you seen a transcript of an actual conversation? I have. IT'S BORING. It's confusing. People don't really make sense. They include a whole bunch of "I means" and "Ums" and "likes" and it's quite annoying to see on the page.
Good first person writers crafting a unique voice create the impression that someone is speaking and the illusion that it sounds like the way someone would talk without it actually being real life dialogue or how it would sound if someone were actually telling a story.
So one common mistake writers make with 1st person narratives is an excess of chattiness of the "I mean" and "No, really" and "like" variety, especially when it comes to young adult literature. Yes, that's how people (and kids) talk. It's even how they blog (GUILTY!). But excess chattiness over the course of an entire novel becomes exhausting - would you want to sit and listen to someone tell a story for six hours? Let alone someone who said "like" after every other sentence?
To be sure, the occasional "I mean" and chatty turn of phrase can be used to great effect in the right hands, as both Sherman Alexie and Junot Diaz demonstrate in particular -- a taste of real life can go a long way toward showing what the character is like and infusing a voice with a unique flavor. But only in very, very small doses. It's ok for a 1st person narrator to sound conversational, but not overly chatty.
So as you're writing, keep an eye on those, um, "So"s and "I mean"s and "like"s. Don't write what real life sounds like; write better than real life.
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: literary agents, clients, publishing industry, This Week in Publishing, author resources, Add a tag
This week in the publishing!
Over at MJ Rose's blog Buzz, Balls & Hype, guest blogger and international bestelling author Barry Eisler, who knows himself some things about the publishing industry, has a series of posts about the future of said industry and especially book distribution of tomorrow. Definitely worth checking out.
The writers are a-striking! I thought about shutting down the blog in solidarity, but then I remembered that I don't actually make money from this blog anyway. Ha! But if you want to keep up to date on how the strike is affecting the publishing industry, keep checking Jonathan Lyons' blog, which is your own one stop shop for all things strike related.
My awesome client Jennifer Hubbard provides some of the absolute best writing advice I've ever seen on the Internet, and she's giving it away for free! Definitely check out her recent post on good and evil in books, and peruse her other posts. It's seriously good advice. Seriously.
What if you had a class action lawsuit and nobody came??? Only 1,729 people signed up for a refund in the class action suit stemming from James Frey's book A MILLION LITTLE PIECES, but Random House will still end up incurring over a million little dollars in costs. Here's a handy breakdown:
Refunds for 1,729 people: $27,348
Legal fees: $783,000
Cost of publicizing suit and settlement: $432,000
Donations to Red Cross, Hazelden and First Book: $180,000
I'll keep my mouth shut for fear of incurring a class action suit of my own.
And finally, just in case you're wondering...
Step 1: Spam every agent in town with your query.
Step 2: End up being mocked on Gawker.
It's really very simple, people.
Have a great weekend!
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: literary agents, publishing industry, Add a tag
Over the course of the past year of blogging, I've confessed many things about myself and about the strange and rare species literarius agentus (habitat: offices. food: bagels, free lunches. known predators: aspiring writers, bill collectors.)
But there are actually quite a few things about this job that I don't blog about, and thus one might get the impression that what I do all day is 1) read queries, 2) watch bad tv, and 3) blog about both as much as possible.
This is not the case! I watch some good TV too.
But really, there is a whole lot of my day, in fact most of my day, that I don't blog about, don't really talk about or even reference all that much. Some of it is confidential, some of it is mind-numbingly boring, and some of it is a result of the fact that I'm a paranoid person and would never say anything on the blog that could possibly jeopardize myself, my clients, or our nation's national security.
So in order to get more of a sense of what being a literary agent is like, I thought it might be helpful for me to talk about the things that I don't talk about.
Here are some:
- Interacting with clients. I don't want my clients (or prospective clients) to feel like they are blog lab rats or feel like they have to be circumspect for fear of landing on the blog. So I never talk about them except when I'm promoting their books or when they're guest blogging. I don't talk about it anonymously or vaguely or tangentially. I just don't talk about it. There's nothing bad here, interacting with clients is one of the most fun things I do and I love them all, but I don't blab about it.
- My deals. I may break this rule from time to time, but for the most part I don't really talk about deals I've completed. I wouldn't want to jeopardize any part of a deal by discussing it publicly, even after the fact, and there are other blogging agents who are more forthcoming about these things so I'll let them give the insight into how deals get done.
- Contracts. This one goes without saying. It's proprietary, fool! But working on contracts takes up a whole lot of my time.
- Interacting with editors. Editors are wonderful and amazing people and there is not a bad apple in the bunch. Seriously. You will never find me saying otherwise.
- Nicole Ritchie. She knows what she did.
- Really bad queries. I really wish I could share these with you. But I can't. It would be too mean (and possibly illegal).
- My thoughts on books I've read and authors who are not my clients. I love every book I have read ever since I've become an agent. They're all amazing. Even the ones that weren't.
- How depressed I am about the sorry state of the Sacramento Kings. If I were to impart even 1% of the sorrow I feel about the Kings you would probably drown in a pool of your own tears. I try and avoid that.
- Follow ups. I spend a whole lot of my day making sure things get done. I have an elaborate system that reminds me of when I need to follow up with someone about a contract, a check, a needed piece of information, an article, a response on a submission, a royalty statement, a reversion request... you name it. I'd say at least half of my day is spent checking to make sure things are getting done. This is a lot of what agents do -- keeping track of things so you don't have to. But I don't really talk about it. Because it's not very interesting, really.
- Um. Other stuff.
Ultimately, when I started blogging, I chose to focus on how to how aspiring authors can find an agent, how best to write a query, how to navigate the process... this is all stuff I can talk about freely and openly. There's nothing secret or proprietary about the query process. But the rest of my job is mostly a closed book for the purposes of the blog.
So if you have any questions about things I do during the day that I don't normally talk about, ask away! I may not be able to answer it honestly, but I promise to give you a really vague, noncommittal response.
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: literary agents, You Tell Me, Add a tag
As many of you know it's NaNoNuMuKiWhAtEvErThIsAcRoNyMiS... National Novel Writing Month (the Internet tells me it translates to NaNoWriMo), in which writers everywhere try to write a 50,000 word novel in a month, and during which Sean Lindsay from 101 Reasons to Stop Writing nearly dies from cardiac arrest.
While not everyone will be participating in National Stream of Consc... um, Novel Writing Month, I know there are quite a few blog readers out there who are writing SOMETHING.
So you tell me -- what are you writing at the moment? Feel free to write as much ("here's the plot!") or as little ("um, a novel..") as you'd like, but it would be great to see what genres people are working on and what everyone is writing.
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Query Letters, monkeys, literary agents, Add a tag
In the comments section of yesterday's post, Josephine and I were talking about the types of genres I prefer. Some agents definitely do have very clear genre delineations about what they do and don't represent and you should be aware of these.
Me? Not so much.
I'm open to pretty much anything. This is in large part because in my spare time I read basically anything and everything. This year alone I've read (among other things) WELCOME TO THE WORLD BABY GIRL, THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST, GOSSIP GIRL, THE BRIEF WONDROUS LIFE OF OSCAR WAO, THE NOTEBOOK, and I'm about to start TWILIGHT.
So if you're wondering about whether or not your project will be "up my alley" -- try me. It may not be right for me, but I'd much rather err on the side of seeing everything than possibly miss out on something I might have really liked.
There are some things I pretty much basically definitely don't represent. I don't rep picture books, I probably wouldn't take on a middle grade project unless it blew my mind (or came from an existing client), I don't rep genre romance (but I do rep women's fiction and memoir), screenplays, poetry and totally true alien encounters (even if they involve monkeys).
But seriously: when in doubt, just query me. I like queries, and I usually respond within 24 hours.
The blog is going to be on hiatus tomorrow, so there will be no regularly scheduled This Week in Publishing. Have a great weekend!
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: guest blog, literary agents, Add a tag
After running last week's Largely Indispensible First Paragraph Contest (and, um, people are still entering paragraphs. It's over, man. Let it go.), I am now much in need of some R&R - Rest and Reconstitution-of-the-liver.
So I'm very pleased to have a guest blog post today from my esteemed colleague and fellow Curtis Brown agent Ginger Clark regarding how one should handle themselves when offered the golden ticket of representation. For more information on the genres Ginger represents, her clients, and her submissions guidelines, please visit her PublishersMarketplace page.
Thanks, Ginger!!!
Dear Nathan’s many, many readers:
Nathan very kindly said I could write an entry for his blog about handling an offer of representation. Recently, an author contacted me saying they’d been offered representation by another agency. I congratulated them, asked them a couple of questions…and things went downhill from there. I realized afterwards that perhaps this author just didn’t know how to handle a situation where one agent offers representation and there are multiple other agents considering your work.
So here is what I expect to happen when I contact an author and offer representation:
1. I expect the author will tell me "Great. I need to think about it."
2. I expect the author to ask me a lot of questions, and to do a generous amount of research about me online.
3. I expect the author will then call or email any other agents who are considering their work and let them know they have an offer of representation.
4. I expect the author will, when asked by these agents, tell them that I was the agent who offered representation.
Here’s why:
1. When you are deciding on an agent, don’t rush into the relationship. I never, ever pressure a potential client for an immediate answer. Take a day or more to think over whether you want to work with me. And if an agent is pressuring you to give you an answer that day, be wary. (If an agent ever tells you, “I need an answer today,” just say something like, “well, if you have to have an answer now, my answer is no. I don’t make major career decisions without taking a night to sleep on it.”)
2. Do your research. I have a Publishers Marketplace page, and I’m easily found on Google. Ask me as many questions as you want. If you want to talk to clients, that can be arranged. If you forget to ask me a question on the phone, you can email me later to ask.
3. This happens regularly to me, and while I grumble to myself about having to compete with other wonderful agents, I am perfectly fine with being in a multiple horse race. I'm positive I'd be the right agent for you--but I could be wrong.
4. Several times recently an author whose work I was considering told me they had an offer of representation from another agent, but then refused to tell me who the agent was. Look--I will answer almost all questions a potential client asks me; I'll chat with them at length about my experience and how I’d market the book; I've even let some authors speak to some of my clients (with my foreknowledge and permission, of course). I will be completely forthcoming with a potential client; and yet they would not do the same for me. I am immediately wary when this happens, and hesitant about working with the author further.
Further, I do have legitimate reasons for wanting to know. The first is, I want to make sure the author has not been approached by a scam artist, or a well-intentioned but incompetent agent. Secondly, I admit—I want to know who I am up against in the horse race. And thirdly, I’m probably going to have to bump some clients from the top of my reading pile in order to read work that has interest elsewhere. I want to make sure I’m putting aside work for my clients for something that really does have legitimate interest.
I’m sure most of you know this already, but in case you didn’t, I hope it helps. Really, just be professional, calm, confident, and honest.
Blog: Nathan Bransford (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: The Hills, literary agents, publishing industry, This Week in Publishing, Add a tag
First, before we get to this week's news and notes, the Sherlock Holmeses of the blogosphere might have noticed that I added labels to all of my previous blog posts, so if you want to, say, see posts about "query letters" or you want to easily see "query critiques" you'll be able to do that. And of course, this blog being what it is, I also included labels for "America's Next Top Model," "Cormac McCarthy," "monkeys" and "The Hills." Which is kind of embarassing, really, especially since I ended up tagging posts with "The Hills", um, 23 times.
Annnnnnnnd speaking of The Hills, Spencer gave an extremely hilarious interview with People where he 1) stated he wants to be a billionaire by 30 (I think should patent his homeboy phone), 2) called Heidi "an angel, and 3) says it's cooler to be him than Orlando Bloom because Orlando is just famous for "being some pirate." Words. They desert me. Speechless.
Meanwhile, in book-related news, Christopher Hitchens wrote an article in Slate in praise of the Nobel Prize committee's choice of Doris Lessing, marking the first time Mr. Hitchens has agreed with something in over 25 years.
And in other huge award news, the Man Booker prize went to dark horse THE GATHERING by Anne Enright, which is described as "exhiliratingly bleak." And haven't you heard?? "Exhiliratingly bleak" is the new "uplifting and inspiring." Hooray for 2007!! We're all going to die.
Via Shelf Awareness, ABC News has a somewhat hilarious article on the most-stolen books at the Frankfurt Book Fair. I guess if your book is stolen it means more people will buy it. Assuming they haven't already stolen it. Wait, I'm confused.
And finally, Jonathan Lyons has some fantastically indispensible advice if you hope to get anywhere in publishing: BE NICE TO ASSISTANTS. Whatever you do, do not be rude to them, do not call them secretaries, and do not make fun of them for being underpaid. Unless you want your manuscript to end up in the special slush pile called the "trash can."
Have a great weekend!
Blog: Kidlit Junkie Tells All! (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: literary agents, literary agents, Add a tag
I posted some of this as a comment over at Pubrants , but I want to mention it here as well.
A loser agent is worse than no agent.
I'm not talking about bad agents here, the evil predators who want your money and are just a scam in disguise. I'm talking about the agent who would really love to sell your book - but just because she calls herself a literary agent doesn't mean she is one.
Rachel Vader, an agent with Folio Literary Management, talks a little bit about it here. Your agent needs to be legit. I admit that I can't give you a tremendous amount of intel about what goes on at a literary agency, having never worked at one, but I can tell you some things from an editorial perspective.
Your agent needs to know editors. She needs to know what editors are looking for. She needs to have a relationship with them. She needs to have made previous sales that are decent enough so that when she calls up my boss and says, "I have a YA vampire novel that I think is just up your alley" he will take her seriously and ask her to send it over and have me read it. Because he trusts her judgment and knows that she doesn't usually waste his (or my) time. She needs to be a decent negotiator. When we send her your contracts, she is the one who looks it over and tries to get the best deal for you. I'm not going to lie to you - when we write our contracts, we're trying to get the best deal for the publishing house. We want to be fair to you, no question, but we want to get the most we can. Your agent has to be the advocate who speaks fluent contractese (and believe me, it is a language all of its own) and translates that into how much money and subsidiary rights she can get for you.
That's only a fraction of what your agent needs to be able to do for you.
There are loser agents who troll for naive and eager newbie writers. They show up at SCBWI conferences and give you their card and enthusiastically praise your writing, and bam! you have an agent. They do this not because they are trying to scam you, but because they are loser agents, and they want to build their author base, and they figure, if they sign up enough of you, one of you might make it to the big time for them. What they neglect to tell you is that for all the good they can do for you, you might as well be making it to the big time on your own. They are desperate for new talent, but they can't provide the support and backing that your novel deserves. Loser agents can't do any of the aforementioned things that an agent should be doing for you. They don't have the experience, the contacts, the know-how.
(If you're wondering how anyone gets all experience and know-how to get started in the first place, the answer is, of course, by starting as a junior/assistant lit agent and working their way up. Not by putting out the welcome mat and shiny window sign declaring themselves to be an agent.)
I hate the loser agents sometimes more than I hate the evil agents (okay, I hate them, too.) But loser agents are just not fair to you. You wrote a book. You put your sweat and blood and time and energy into it. And then an agent signs you, and you get all excited, thinking that the horrible submissions process is finally over (on your side, anyway.) Only, your agent is a loser, and instead of spending the energy to find an agent who will actually take your book where it can shine, you're in the hands of someone with as many publishing connections as you have. They're not doing anything illegal. But it's still not fair to dupe you like that.
Reading the slush pile, when I hit on a query letter from a so-called "agent," I always have to fight the urge to track down the author's contact info and send them a letter telling them to drop their loser agent like a hot potato. An agent who submits to slush is worse than no agent at all. If you submit to slush by yourself, you have a 1 in 50billion chance of catching my interest. If your agent submits to the slush, as soon as I see that it's a loser agent, it goes in the trash. Seriously. You can submit to the slush pile yourself. You don't need an agent to do that for you. It doesn't make you look good - it just makes you look duped.
I once did some freelance work for a literary agent. The MSs weren't very good, but I did the best I could to give them constructive critique. Afterwards, the agent said to me, "I've never submitted a children's book before - do you have any tips for me?" It threw up every red flag that I had. Even though she was a paying customer, I never did any more work for her. It just felt wrong.
Blog: A Fuse #8 Production (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Literary Agents, Rebecca Sherman, Interviews, Add a tag
Blog: Saipan Writer (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: blogging, Writing, blogs, Miss Snark, literary agents, Add a tag
Another blogosphere icon of the literary world has hung up her keyboard. Miss Snark's blog is a treasure trove of great advice from a working literary agent. Her voice in present tense will be gone from the blog, and her loyal fans are wandering about, looking for another fix, dropping in at odd corners of the blogosphere, and patting their red eyes everywhere. More than 470 posts in the comments trail of her retirement post are a small testament to her popularity. The video is another.
Oh, what nitwits we will be without her constant refrain.
Write well, query widely.
A fond farewell and best wishes to the one and only MISS SNARK. And unending thanks. [sniff]
I have always wondered how you guys/gals (agents) do this. Once again, thank you for the hidden insight Nathan!
Tom
Kelly Ripa does "Bachelor theater" every Tuesday morning. You should check into that... ;)
And just who is this Tim Gunn person? His photo scares me.
I think from a writing perspective it can be interesting knowing the ending (and the story) when you're reading. It's fun at times to see how the author executes and how something works (or doesn't).
Wait, you like Project Runway too? Excellent.
Gosh. Am I the only person who doesn't watch any reality shows?
Thanks for the post. For some reason, I am scared of writing synopses... something about selling my stories short.
Whoa. You mean I've actually been doing something right all along?
Cool.
New season of Project Runway! So cool! Nathan, if every once in a while you post about Project Runway, instead of the Hills, I would so love it!
I personally would love if every book I want to read would come with a synopsis so that I don't have to skip to the last page to see what happens! But I am weird that way.
Wow... you brought out the heavy artillary... invoking Tim Gunn!
I loved your post on "the other things I do in a day". Very good to know. And, I have a dramatic theory that the Bachelor is not going to pick ANYone this season, but my husband thinks I'm playing right into their hands by believing that.
I've probably read mine a hundred times already. It gets to the point where you have a manuscript memorized and can quote verses from it.
Synopsis= ending.
Yay! I did it right!!
Hi Nathan,
Any thoughts on how to develop the "what works" reading style for ourselves? Short of giving up our jobs and moving to New York to become publishing interns for years, I mean.
I really like what I've written. So does my mom. And a handful of less invested readers. And I know how to read for my own pleasure and for English Lit classes. I'm pretty confident my work passes both those tests. But I can't shake the notion that my baby is going stumble into the big, bad publishing world only to fall on its face without my ever really knowing why.
I'd like to be a savvy parent. So how does the "what works" reading style work?
Dave-
Belonging to a critique group can help, because it forces you to read for quality, but honestly I don't know if there's a substitute for manning a slush pile at some point (whether at an agency, publisher, journal, etc.). It strips away a lot of what you think you've learned about writing, books, etc., and really focuses your readin eyes.
Hey Nathan. Great blog (I've rarely read about the Hills more) that I'm glad I discovered. I actually have a question that I have a great deal of difficulty finding the answer to...
If I want to publish a book under a pseudonym, should I send in query letters using that pseudonym or my real name? I fear if I use my pseudonym potential agents may feel 'duped' when I tell them my real name, and choose not to work with me as a result. Am I being paranoid, or are my instincts correct?
Anyway, thanks for having this forum where these questions can actually be asked and answered.
anon-
I prefer that people query with their real name, although if you want to use a pseudnym you can mention that in the query.
When you find design flaws, do you (or other agents) ever take a moment to tell the propsective client in your rejection note just what it is?
Also, are there some "designs" that you just steer clear of no matter what the subject - like, say, word length, do some turn you off instantly?
anon-
I have to respond to queries with a form letter and can't respond to follow up questions. I would never get through the day otherwise.
On partials, I try and give some sense of why I'm passing, but again, I just don't have the time to get too in depth (and sometimes I'm just going on a gut feeling I can't fully explain)
The only time I can really go in depth is with clients or people I'm hoping become clients. Otherwise I just don't hvae the time.
Nathan,
I agree - The Hills is just not working these days. I no longer find myself anxiously awaiting the next episode.
And I hope I'm not spoiling it for anyone, but I fear the episodes will only get worse with the current strike...
Nathan,
I often find myself with the same architectual slant in the reading and revision of my writing (going so far as to become flawed by perfectionism). Because of this, I think I guard the climactic points and the endings of my books and stifle my queries. Is the ending something I should allude to in the query as well?
I think a critique group can substitute for a slush pile, depending on how many submissions there are per week to the queue.
The one I belong to has a wide variety of queues, each with a different genre. I find that by choosing a few from each queue and reading them through--not to crit, mind you, but just to read--then you can get a good idea at the variations in quality.
I've read several submissions that were technically quite solid, but boring when it came to actual content. OTOH, I've read several that had very interesting ideas, but were technical nightmares, i.e. grammar, punctuation, etc.
Of course when you have to read through a slush pile as part of your job, there exists a pressure to read with a far more judicial eye than one might otherwise employ.
Thanks. I neede a couple YA Christmas gifts.