The four-part series will offer a new take on Richard Adams' novel.
The post BBC and Netflix Team Up For CGI ‘Watership Down’ Remake appeared first on Cartoon Brew.
Add a Comment
The four-part series will offer a new take on Richard Adams' novel.
The post BBC and Netflix Team Up For CGI ‘Watership Down’ Remake appeared first on Cartoon Brew.
Add a CommentToday I thought I’d take a closer look at the differences between fables and parables and come up with some recommendations for readers of all ages who enjoy a little learning with their leisure. A fable is: a short story that conveys a moral to the reader, typically with animals as characters. A parable is: a short story designed […]
Add a CommentCriterion is adding another animated to its collection: Martin Rosen's "Watership Down."
Add a Comment
“5 Things About Me as a Young Reader”
1) As a young reader, I wasn’t much of a young reader. I am dyslexic and got off to a slow start. I repeated second-grade and spent the second year in a small special ed. class where they had me read the same few Dick and Jane books over and over again. It wasn’t exactly thrilling reading, but it worked well. I’m pretty sure it took advantage of the high degree of brain plasticity at that age to retrain my neural pathways. Though if you asked my teacher, she just would have said, ‘Practice makes perfect.’
2) And that may be, but the first thing I wanted to practice was the fantasy role-playing game Dungeons & Dragons. This was way before World of Warcraft or other advanced computer versions. D&D was made entirely of words, either spoken or written, and as I became more immersed in the game, I began reading the books. I poured over The Player’s Handbook, The Monster Manual, and though it was technically forbidden for a mere player like me, the impressive, tome-like Dungeon Master’s Guide. I wasn’t reading for the fun of reading, exactly. I was looking for shortcuts and clues and information, anything that could make me a better player and my characters more powerful. Nonetheless, I found myself spellbound (so to speak) by those books for hours at a time.
3) The first book I remember reading for fun was also largely because of D&D. My brother, Matt, was a voracious reader and had named his top character after a character from a book. It was the ultimate compliment in our world (I’d named my top character after a Norse god!), and I had to know how a mere book—like the ones they made us read in school—could be cool enough to cross over into the game that dominated our own fiercely guarded after-school hours. The book was The Book of Three, the first installment in Lloyd Alexander’s Chronicles of Prydian series, and after reading and enjoying it, I understood why Matt named his ranger Gwydion.
4) The next big book for me actually was assigned in school: Watership Down
Add a Comment
An interesting question, John. I think for me it would depend on the context in which I was reading. If it was a bedtime story, where the emphasis was on peaceful enjoyment and close engagement, I'd skip it. If it was the middle of the day (and the child was old enough to engage with the debate) I'd read the sentence and pause, giving them the chance to say something. If they didn't, I'd say something like 'that's a funny thing to say' and comment on passing time, prejudice changing attitudes.
prejudice *and* changing attitudes.
They're different activities/ways of engaging. Maybe better suited for happening at different times? Though your kids are unlikely to need convincing, having grown up with you!
It is indeed a tricky one. Of course, sometimes the publishers have been there before you, which can be problematic in another way. I remember reading the first page of Five Fall into Adventure (1950 - but in a 1980s edition) to my daughter: George's "arms and legs were as brown as a traveller's." Presumably trying to sidestep "gypsy", but toppling into nonsense. You have to be quick on your feet as a bedtime reader!
I think that if your aim was to read and enjoy the book with your children as you describe, you did just the right thing to follow that instinct.
There'll be other times for other - and maybe longer - talks with them, and you can always refer back to that moment in WD if you want to.
I really appreciate all the comments so far! Yes, I usually read to them at bedtime, and perhaps that was one of the reasons I censored.
Yeah, I'v done this with older books, especially old Pulp where there can be a background radiation of mild racism not part of the story.
Well, I'm not a writer. I do though come here occasionally to check out another world from my one.
I actually hate reading something that I know is bowdlerised. I think I would prefer to read it out as it's written. And for kids.., to insert quietly.. "Of course, they don't all fight.." or somesuch..
If they're 10 they seem old enough to learn about prejudgment, not be hidden from it.
That's a fair point, Andrew; and I hope I do teach them about prejudice in other ways. Is there a real difference, do you think, between removing a phrase from the text and adding one that's not in there?
This comment has been removed by the author.
This is all very new to me and this article bridal wedding dress, celebrity dresses, machine tattoos really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.
Fascinating, and I agree it depends on context - if you are reading aloud to kids there are all sorts of things you might omit for all kinds of reasons.
But - to stir a bit - times have changed in all kinds of ways, and Adams may not even have intended any kind of negative connotation? The phrase might imply - have a strong sense of honour and therefore don't back down, even when things get rough - a different code, but not necessarily meant to be derogatory?
I'm with Emma here - I always interpreted that remark as a compliment, referring to courage and honour, not a tendency towards violence per se.