How to use this Page

Yes. The Junkies - I collect them! So far, I have over 300, and am willing to share: http://deborahfreedman.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/the-junkies/

I often get names by leafing through my TOTAL BASEBALL encyclopedia. Which is like a cemetery for retired ballplayers, on their tombstones is engraved their final stats.

James Preller

add Chantay Branner.

ladydisdain,

That's a great list, thanks!

I can never think off the top of my head like that.

everyone seems to be limited to people they met last week - so TRENDY! How about someone who has lasted without the hoopla? Another vote for Lowry and/or Macaulay. (Though Pinkwater is great too)

I second the Kate DiCamillo nomination. She's an amazing communicator, and the picture Roger posted recently could be a "hand-off."

Rick Riordan is awesome with kids. He would be my choice!

Kate DiCamillo would be fabulous. Mo Willems would also be wonderful. Cynthia Rylant appeals to a pretty diverse range of readers. Christopher Paul Curtis is amazing, too.

I agree with the idea that given the number of females in the children's literature field, following Jon with a woman would be fair.

I was glad to see my first pick, Kate DiCamillo already on the list.

My colleague suggested Judy Blume and I think she has really earned the honor, too.

Daniel Pinkwater! LOVE HIM!

IF he says no, Judy Blume or Lois Lowry.



Sorry, Mo & Kate, I'm not buying it. Maybe in 10 years.

I think it is turn for the ladies to take the crown ...

Jane Yolen, hand down!

Ooooh this is tough. I say Daniel Pinkwater, though I admit I am totally biased because I am his agent. As such, of course, I think that everyone should give him honors and prizes and shiny medals and crowns to wear. (There is a crown involved, right?)

But... then again, I can't imagine ANY writer wanting to do all the schlepping around that our current Ambassador does. When would they have time to write?

So actually, I vote: KEEP JON. He's the only person with the energy for it!

How about:
Maurice Sendak
Faith Ringgold
Tomie dePaola
Vera Williams
Todd Parr
or Rosemary Wells?

Richard Peck!

SHANNON HALE because she's awesome and HILARIOUS in person.

Marla Frazee
Andrew Clements
Jane Yolen
Cynthia Rylant
Christopher Paul Curtis
Linda Sue Park
Mark Crilley
Katherine Applegate

Does s/he have to be American? Neil Gaiman would be great and has written on many different levels and could attract more than just people already in "in the loop" James Kennedy would be funny (funny seems important), Carmen Deedy (would be the BEST! automatic love from the librarians and storytellers and is funny, and not a gringo...), John Green (funny and winning, writes YA but is familiar with kids lit. as well), Daniel Pinkwater (obviously), Jane Yolen (has written just everything), David Shannon (is funny and engaging), Tommie dePaola (great pick), Mo (natch), Jarrett J. Krosoczka (again w/the funny), Dav Pilkey (wonderful).

Mitali Perkins would be a wonderful ambassador.

Laurie Halse Anderson

Okay, I have a few more suggestions and then I'm going to stop (but this is really fun to think about):
Marc Brown
Chris Van Allsburg
Byrd Baylor
Steven Kellogg
Judith Viorst
Russell Hoban (although I think he currently lives in England)
James Howe
E. L. Konigsburg

Megan Whalen Turner. She is charming, relates well to both kids and adults, and her Queen's Thief books appeal to a wide range of ages.

Katherine Paterson-- she's had a long career, is dedicated to children's books and literacy, is an amazing and graceful speaker, and has a natural ability to connect with kids.

If elected, I will not serve--not that I do not meet all the criteria spectacularly. The thing is, I prefer not to have contact with the adults connected with children's literature, except the ones who use bad language...like my agent.

Daniel Pinkwater

Megan McDonald. She is magic with kids.

KATHERINE PATERSON, please. No one deserves it more. Substantial contribution to children's literature? Stature: respect and admiration of peers? etc.? Excellent and facile communicator?

You bet.

Katherine!

leda

Jane Yolen
Linda Sue Parks

ooh, what fun to be a kingmaker! but who else is on the selection committee? is this a children's book committee? slj? Junior lit guild? how many judges? maybe you are a solo judge?

Katherine Paterson would be the perfect choice - she meets every single one of your criteria. I've seen her bring a huge crowd to its feet, cheering what she had to say about kids books. And she does this with grace and intelligence - just what's needed in an ambassador.

I second (or third) Mo Willems. He's a hoot and a wonderful communicator. Some of his books are so original and creative.

Katherine Paterson
Linda Sue Park
Laura Amy Schlitz

Judy Blume, of course!

I'd love to see POETRY recognized.
I'd love to see someone like J Patrick Lewis receive such an honor. Not only is great working
with childen, he has done such a
wide variety of work, including
several outstanding picture books.

Has anyone done more for children
than Lee Bennett Hopkins over his
50 years of working with and for children?

Another vote for Kate DiCamillo or Daniel Pinkwater.

Probably too much travel and such for Ashley Bryan, but man, would he be great.

Kimberly Willis Holt--she has a wide range of fans and appeals to many. Plus she is a National Book Award winner!

Jack Gantos!

A woman please. Let's allow our industry a step into the modern age.

Also a long term person who has paid their dues to earn this title. Let the newbies stand in a line behind them and await their turn. No pushy pushy here.

NO to Mo! Have you ever met him in person? Made a very rude remark the first time I did. Will never will talk to him again without an apology. Do not put the ASS in ambassador.

Anon 10:34

I don't think the job should go to the person who has waited the longest in line. It should go to the person who can do the job best-- and for that reason, I think a newbie might not be best for the job. I also think the newbies are a bit too busy for the job.

It depends on what the job is supposed to be. If the jobholder is an Ambassador to the Children and is going to be going on a million school visits and encouraging reading programs and inspiring librarians-- then it may as well be someone like Rick Reardon, fairly new but high profile.

If it's someone who is supposed to have instantiate the best of literature for children--not just great reading, but great writing -- and someone who is supposed to go argue with the powers that be on behalf of children and literature--then pick someone like Katherine Patterson.

What did Jon Sciezka do in the job? Does anybody know?

And I'd like to hear more about how the Ambassador gets picked.

Anonymous at 9:13 asked, "but who else is on the selection committee? slj? Junior lit guild? how many judges? maybe you are a solo judge?"

I think we can safely assume that if Roger is on the committee, the Junior Lit Guild will have some input. They sign his paychecks, after all.

Most of the names listed above are wonderful, but many are in their seventies or older and may not have the energy or desire to do the extensive traveling required for this position.

Mordicai Gerstein has a wonderful body of work--humane, beautiful, funny. With kids, he's gentle and completely alive--and he listens to every word a child says. And he's sane enough not to let the publicity ruin him.

Putting myself in Mr. Pinkwater's good graces, here's a big fuck you to troll@12:00PM. One employer or another has been signing my paychecks for 35 years. Maybe you will get a real job someday, too.

The website linked in the post has not updated the names on the selection committee but we are: Rita Auerbach, Betty Carter, Diane Roback, Angela Sherrill and me, with Ambassador Scieszka advising. I was told to come to the meeting with several possible names, and that's all I know.

The gloves are off! It's strangely satisfying. That was a trolling sucker punch, indeed, and deserved to be called out as such. Though the idea that this is all a rigged game, possibly with the Freemasons and SLJ huddled together offstage, is amusing in its own right.

I'm casting my vote for Katherine Paterson. Humor, grace, wisdom, and an ability to connect with readers young and old ... oh, and she can write terrific books. Sounds like an ambassador to me.

Hmmm.

I immediately thought of Jack Gantos (for his range, humor, energy and dedication to the field...and for his work with the prison population)



Kate DiCamillo has shown serious dedication to libraries and children and her books are written for many ages.

Vera Williams is amazing with children.

Jacqueline Woodson has the range, personality and ability to speak to all sorts of folks.

I do wonder how you will balance the accomplishments and talents of the possible ambassadors with their abilities to serve. Some of the names mentioned live outside the US for a good part of the year or are very very busy writing and speaking already.


I hope you and your talented committee have a ball with this enviable task.

I do know who Roback is, but otherwise am at a loss. Who are those other ladies? (I mean, of course, occupations and/or affiliations)
Clearly an interest in books - which is what I've brought to this "dialogue" - doesn't qualify me to ask questions. Do you have an entrance requirement or screening process?

I had planned to log on just to say, c'mon, you guys, we need someone who will get TV coverage etc and using a name I've never heard of (which applies to a few of the names above) or, I'm sorry to say, a poet, won't cut it. A major purpose of this position is to garner publicity for the cause and books we have all devoted our lives to. And a lot of people, I'm sorry to say, turn off when they hear the word poetry. Couple that with the people who turn off when they hear "children's books" and you are defeating the purpose of the role.

But now I want to say, Anon 12:00, what you wrote is both hugely obnoxious and hugely uninformed. Though it does make me laugh that you think that the corporate bosses at Roger's parent company would even know the names of most of the candidates for the Ambassador. But you haven't followed Roger's work at all if you suppose he lets others tell him what he should think. It's Roger's conscience that informs his actions, and he can only be swayed by reasonable argument from those he respects. Roger wouldn't be swayed by personal gain anyway, but you know nothing of how our field works if you think there's any pressure on this committee from their bosses.

I would like to tell you what I think of you, and now, well, being a Christian woman -- I can't say it!

Signed,

Elizabeth Law

Daniel Pinkwater would be fun. I also find Brian Selznick to be a real swell guy.

Daniel said way back in the comments that he didn't want anything to do with us.

My choices:
Judy Blume or Chris Crutcher
Best wishes. This is a tough selection and a tough job.
Sincerely,
Cathy Norman

LOVE Mo Willems
also,
Peter H. Reynolds
Jon J Muth

I assumed that wasn't Pinkwater, but maybe it was. I noticed the Troll, but didn't feed it. It was the comment about the job going to someone who'd "paid his dues," that got a rise out of me.

I suppose the intersection of the two sets-- "those who you want to have the job" and those who are willing to take it" would be very small.

Good luck with that.

11:50

Roland Smith - incredibly engaging


T Hager

My word! Comments like 'a poet
won't cut it!' One over 70 won't
have the energy? Who are you people?

I am a poet, can cut it, am over
70 and have more energy than half
the people I know. It's not that
I am nominating myself, it's just
that I'm a wee perpelxed at such
idiocy!

Lee Bennett Hopkins

Lee, I'm the person who said a poet won't cut it, and I said why. The reason we have an Ambassador is to trumpet the cause of children's literature. And, as I said, many people already turn off when they hear "chidlren's literature." And many people turn off at the word "poetry." We want someone who will draw new converts, and I will be honest and say someone who is advertised and introduced as a "children's poet" is going to not be an immediate slam dunk at drawing attention to our cause. I am saying this as someone who considers Bill Martin Jr. and Shel Silverstein to be two of the people who made the greatest contribution to our field in the last 50 years.

In other words, I'm talking about where I perceive American popular interest to be, not about personal preference. And so, though I didn't say it before, having someone who is "mediagenic" would be a good idea, too.

--Elizabeth Law

Jack Prelutsky didnt' fare well?

Wow, the idea of Roger consulting JLG on who to vote for would be hilarious if it wasn't so insulting.

I'd go for Christopher Paul Curtis if the living in Canada thing isn't a problem. He's certainly made substantial contributions and The Watsons Go to Birmingham and Bud, Not Buddy are both popular with kids. I do think varying the type of author is important in reaching different groups of kids, plus he's a good speaker and charismatic.

I second (or third, or whatever) Laurie Halse Anderson. She reaches teens where they are, and she's done a lot for awareness of rape and eating disorders and other issues that affect teen girls. The letters she gets from teens (she posts them to her blog occasionally, and she's talked about them at appearances I've attended) are just amazing, the ability she has to touch lives.

I don't envy the choice you'll be making, Roger--a lot of the names here are great picks, except that some of them I worry might already be too busy to take on the duties. Shannon Hale, for example, is awesome, but she regularly gives up some travel and speaking arrangements to make sure to have enough time for her young family (her two children are still preschool age) and still be able to write. So while I'd root for that choice, I worry that she'd turn it down.

Katherine Paterson is another great choice. She is just delightful. Her wonderful books have also been controversial in the past, and that can get conversations going.

To echo many above, I do hope that this year it might be a woman or a minority or a woman from a minority--so often in this industry men get recognized as outstanding and loveable for being just as awesome as the everyday women who dominate the industry, not just because they're outstanding and awesome but because as men they're rare in this industry. It'd be great to see some of the women who have been dedicating their lives to great children's literature be honored similarly.

the volume of responses makes it all too clear what really matters in the chbk world: PRIZES!!! (or erhaps I should say TITLES)

WINNING ISN'T EVERYTHING - it's the only thing

I nominate :

Lee Bennett Hopkins
J Patrick Lewis
Jane Yolen
Jerry Spinelli

Cynthia Rylant does not like to travel and speak or interact with the public, so as much as I like her work, that's not an option.

No consideration should be given at all to whether a white man is
chosen again, for instance, or
'a minority please,' etc. This should be decided upon merit
and criteria. Period.

I'm all for Jane Yolen - she speaks and writes with humor and wisdom, and appeals to boys and girls of all ages, and, just to put the icing on it, she is a poet as well as an accomplished storyteller. If she doesn't feel like doing the traveling to accomplish all the interacting necessary (and she is a dynamite interactor with readers of all ages!), then I think that Linda Sue Park, Lois Lowry or Katherine Paterson would all be wonderful choices.

Sorry, guys - nothing against men who write for children and teens, but there are a lot of women who do so also, and it would be wise to alternate genders for this ambassadorial honor. (Much as I love the idea of David Macaulay.) It would be a pity if all the girls who love to read (even boy books) got the impression that only men write for young people (possibly because the committee hopes to win over the boy readers who they believe will only read boy books). I understand the need to reach out to boys, but not at the cost of taking the girls, and the women who write for both genders, for granted. And no trolls allowed.

I wish to commend Roger for his use of plain English, and also say that if my services were desired, I would be willing to model for an animatronic robot, (or a flat cardboard effigy), which could do a good job, and also travel as freight.

Daniel Pinkwater

I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind Ms. Law's argument that a "children's poet" will automatically make Americans turn their attention elsewhere, though I do think she is trying to be practical. But consider this: Most Americans are playing video games and watching reruns of THE TERMINATOR; their attention is long gone, and they wouldn't recognize ANY of the people being nominated. Probably true of the media, too. If we're looking for who might capture the most media attention, we should nominate Stephanie Meyer of TWILIGHT fame - that's the only children's writer many adults in this country (including reporters) would have heard of.

I don't mean to question Ms. Law's statement about liking and honoring Bill Martin Jr. and Shel Silverstein; I'm sure that's sincere. I just think that if we used the same yardstick for our political spokespeople - "mediagenic" -- oof! Obama would have chosen Oprah for Secretary of State.

Glad to hear Lee Bennett Hopkins defend his life's work and his ability to match the energy level (and committment) of anyone in the room. I don't care if people faint or check out mentally when they hear the word "poetry" - it's probably from lack of exposure, so I say let's EXPOSE THEM TO POETS. No wonder Europeans think we're oafs when it comes to choosing our heroes.) Give me classy and talented over mediagenic any day.
(And by the way, doesn't our outgoing ambassador, Jon Scieszka, write poetry? SCIENCE VERSE...? MATH CURSE...?)

That said, I still like Katherine Paterson for the job. Perfect choice.

Julie, I appreciate the respectful tone of your comments. But the position of Ambassador as I understand is about publicizing children's books, and I have learned, I am afraid, not to put the word "poetry" on a book jacket in some cases because it will actually cost us sales. (And I am far from the only person who will admit to that.) Jon Scieszka said that what he learned in the role is that the one thing people he meets as Ambassador all want is lists of recommended books, and I would think almost any of the people above would be excellent at that. But, and here's the rub, we want someone who will draw people to come hear him or her speak in the first place--or not switch the channel when he's on TV. So I'm defending the word mediagenic, and I think it's very possible to be classy, talented AND good with the media. I'm really interested to see who the committee comes up with to fill this big list of criteria.

When I first looked at the number of responses to Roger's post I thought...sheesh, that's a lot to slog through. Glad I did. All the names are great! I vote for all of 'em! You could have them do one of those "let's get all the famous writers together to record a children's literature pep song thingy" and just play it ad nauseam on the TV. But seriously, any of the suggestions would be great. Good luck with that Roger.

Barbara Huff
Farmington NM Public Library

Well said, Elizabeth. Classy, talented, AND mediagenic - those are not mutually exclusive qualities. Fingers crossed that such a person can be found and that he or she will be eager & able.

Sherman Alexie or Jack Gantos.

Kevin Henkes
Ian Falconer
Lee Bennett Hopkins
J Patrick Lewis
Judy Blume
Jane Yolen

I think to say poets don't
cut it is just one person's
opinion. I also agree that
most of these names would not
be recognized by the media or
readers. Jane Yolen might be.
But if that is the criteria ...
choose Madonna for Heaven's sake.
No, please no.

I have read but stayed out of this for fear of sounding as if I am trolling for the job. I think it is a great honor and responsibility for anyone who gets nominated as well as hard work and enormous opportunity.

I also chuckled when Lee spoke up for the over-70s poets.

As Roger and others know all to well, we have a plethora of talent out there. Almost all the names I read here are wonderful. (Well, perhaps not Madonna or Stephanie Meyer.) I wish them luck in their search and hope they find someone in the smaller subset of talented/willing/ and able.

Play through.

Oh--and is it somehow significant that the verifying word on my comment is COLON?

Jane

Two names not mentioned yet (or perhaps I missed them). Both great presenters, both great with children, both appeal to a wide age range:

Bruce Coville
Gregory Maguire

WHEN DO THE POLLS CLOSE? It's clear to see what really motivates these enthusiastics.

I don't think it's fair to try to find a "woman or minority" instead of trying to find the best professional for the job. Someone worthy of this honor will represent all of us.

While I think Jane Yolen, Lee Bennett Hopkins and Daniel Pinkwater would be all wonderful in this role, what about Patricia Polacco? Her books engage children at a wide range of ages and she has been promoting literacy for quite a while.

Lois Lowry! Lois Lowry!!

What about Lisa Yee? She's great with kids, pretty much one still herself. She's very funny, not afraid to look foolish. Her books are amusing but have substance as well. And she has a kid-friendly blog.--Hart

Thank you Roger—and the other members of the Unites States Children’s Book Ambassador committee, for taking the time in your hectic schedules, to give service to our kids, to reading, and to books.

When I first entered the world of children’s publishing, I had no idea how many hundreds and thousands of hours librarians across the country gave, serving on award selection committees, reading rights committees, legislative committees, and more. Your work is unheralded by our society, and is totally voluntary.

There has not been a major national literacy campaign to draw the American public’s attention to the importance of reading and children’s books since the post-Sputnik era of the late 1950’s and early 1960’s – a campaign that hugely influenced society and prompted national legislation that not only changed education but gave massive support to libraries across the country, and arguably, influenced children’s book publishing for the better.

The NEA’s “Read Across America” campaign, the ALA’s outstanding literature awards, and the new Library of Congress Children’s Book Ambassador position may not equal the accomplishments of the 1960’s but they are valiant, and in reality, noble attempts that do garner the nation’s attention, at least momentarily—a major accomplishment in a world where Michael Jackson’s death and funeral blanket the airwaves for days on end.

I am so grateful, that you and so many others take the time to serve on the Ambassador committee, the ALA’s many committees, and all voluntary committees that promote literacy, literature, and libraries. The world we live in does not often honor the work of adults who dedicate their professional and personal lives to children-- perhaps the reality is that we as a society to not truly value children—and working in that kind of national atmosphere makes your dedication, and others' dedication, all the more admirable.

Mary Brigid Barrett
The National Children's Book and Literacy Alliance

Amy Krouse Rosenthal

Ann Martin

Jack Gantos.

Can Jon Scieszka just have the position for life? I think he's done a fabulous job, and can't imagine anyone doing better.

If not Jon, I echo the person(s) who recommended Linda Sue Park. She's a great advocate for children's literature of all kinds, and wouldn't just promote her own books.

NOT
A
MAN

And not an actively working writer (male or female) with a family to raise.

-- tovesse

Laurie Halse Anderson is GREAT with students!

People keep telling me that some maniacs are presumably seriously suggesting that I represent anything, so I keep coming back here to see. I may as well voice my own preference: Lee Bennett Hopkins, since he's already doing the job, with plenty of grace, and has been since I can remember.

Daniel Pinkwater

I think Michael Rosen, a poet, kicked some ass and took some names in a similar position in the UK. Is that because it's just different over there?

Ummmm, I'm not sayin' we shouldn't have a poet as ambassador, but there is a children's poet laureate post, originally occupied by Jack Prelutsky and now by Mary Ann Hoberman...
Irene Fahrenwald

Mr Hopkins is more than a poet. He has done novels, professional books, a TV series, had written countless of articles in various
journals and more. And if you ever
heard him speak you'd be lauging
and crying and reveling in his
words. He is magical.

I think a perfect candidate would be Robert San Souci. He's fabulous with kids, has the stomach for administrators and can hold up to a hell of a lot of traveling! Yay Bob!

Here's another vote for Bruce Coville-- the energy and enthusiasm of a ten year old kid, intense passion for children's literature and literacy, and a substantial and very fine body of work.

I vote for Linda Sue Park.

She's charming, kind, gracious, charasmatic and very knowledgeable about writing and about the industry as a whole. Plus she's an incredible writer, of course. I think she'd be a fabulous role model for kids.

Gennifer Choldenko

How about Esme Codell. She is another who is committed to children and reading.

Anonymous 7:19. I was clearly not casting aspersions on the eminent Mr. Hopkins. Get a grip.

Irene, was Anon 7:19 really casting aspersions on you? Grip thyself!

Kevin Henkes.....a contrast to Jon but more importantly, smart/wise/thoughtful about kids, books and kids, terrific with kids, as well as adults, and he is versatile...writer/illustrator/picture book maker, and novelist! Norma Jean

Jane Yolen or Lee Bennett Hopkins.

I know she is new to writting books but Children love her... What about Sabrina Bryan The Cheetah Girl and now co writer of Princess of Gossip. She would be a great for that role.

Judy Blume! She deserves such an honor.

What about a dual Ambassadorship for Ted & Betsy Lewin? They're illustrators, they're authors, they work separately, they work together, they're great with kids, they love to travel (and have no kids to make traveling more difficult)... seriously, the Lewins for the win.

OMG Sabrina Bryan for the WIN. She's mediagenic, Elizabeth! And she's written a BOOK!

W00t.

I'm guessing that is not the real Daniel Pinkwater.

Yours truly,
Arthur Rackham

I heartily vote for Jane Yolen who has not only reached millions of children, but has given so much of herself to mentor authors like me without asking for anything in return.

It would be nice for Jon (who I adore) to turn the mantle over to a woman.

I also vote for Jerry Spinelli for the same reasons. He once told me to write what I love and stop worrying about what the market is buying. In that way he's been able to reach children who are often ignored or disconnected. I once listened to a local reporter say that she had an unruly Sunday school class. Then she started reading Maniac Magee and the boys came clamoring back each week for another installment. Perhaps Jerry and Eileen in a joint role?

I'd like to see those authors not "hyped" by the media but have managed sustained contributions get the nod. Especially those working with the next generation of children's authors.

...Christine Taylor-Butler

Why not raise the level public awareness through the media with a solid choice instead of catering to the lowest common denominator to please. Haven't we done enough of that in publishing? With all the "great" choices that's been pushed on the public to make a buck, the public seems less involved with reading, not more. Great job people (sarcasm). The road to hell is paved by pleasing others.

Also, no more posing with anti-intellectuals (Laura Bush). Let's have someone with real cajones who will stand up for literacy and not use it as photo op.

NO to Jane Yolen who poo poos nepotism but does it anyway.

Oops - I add to my list Linda Sue Park. She's a genius and I really appreciate her wisdom and willingness to reach out.

I'd like (for obvious reasons) to see children's lit diversify in light of the fiasco going on with the Bloomsbury "whitewashing" covers issue and the lack of any proactive action from other corners of the industry.

It would make a great statement to say that people of different ethnic persuasions can stand up and be recognized. And Linda is great with kids as well!

Anonymous. If you're going to attack another author at least have the guts to post using a real name.

A tag team: Jane Yolen and Lee Bennett Hopkins.

I voted for Gore, I voted for Kerry, and I voted for Obama, but I dislike the cheap shots at Laura Bush, Anon 11:28. She started something great with the annual Texas Book Festival, going strong since 1996, open to all political stripes, and I think her motives sincere, no matter what I think of her husband's legacy.

It really is interesting how many male writers are being suggested, when the field is dominated by women. I wonder if more men write humor or seem "fun" in public . . . you know, like how Dad is always more fun than Mom.

Lisa Yee
Katherine Paterson
MT Anderson (let the man work in his pajamas)
Linda Sue Park

I hereby nominate E.B. Lewis.

They are young, have media attention, write poetry, will not have sex until married...thus I
nominate THE JONAS BROTHERS over all others

Lee Bennett Hopkins

Roger, this description makes me want to resubscribe (I let my subscription expire in a fit of frugality). But resubscribing wouldn't get me this issue, would it? Usually subscriptions start with the next issue? I would like to have this one if possible, as I have a special love for Joan Aiken.

We can start your subscription with whichever issue you wish! Just do it by phone (800-325-1170) rather than the website.

Can I buy just one? I don't have a subscription, but I'd love to order this issue.

~h

About ten years ago, my husband, son, his new girlfriend (now wife),one of my authors--Kara Dalkey--and her then husband John who was writing a book with Aldrin all had dinner together.

Mostly we listened to Buzz talking. And individually we found ourselves thinking--whenever we worried maybe we should be part of the conversation, too, not just audience-- "He's been on the moon!"

We were absolutely awed.

Not a bad thing to be.

Jane

I liked when Ali G interviewed him and kept calling him Buzz Lightyear.

Will we be able to view this sometime on the web? Thousands of us would LOVE to see this!

Jean,
a big G & M fan

...and Walter Lorraune? such a program wouldn't be complete without him!

I'll check, Jean. I think MIT will record it the way they did the Susan Cooper/Gregory Maguire thing I moderated.

I was wondering how your story could be unprintable unless you and Marshall were speaking in Sanskrit. And even then, technically ....

I'm always up for a good, unprintable Marshall story. tee hee!

Brilliant!I've been meaning to re-read Scruples. Haven't read it since I was 14, and how I loved it then!

But really, why would Chanel product place in a book for Pre-teens? Hardly their target market. Does this person listen to rap music, also a bastion of product placement? And who are these "librarians" asking for the books to be taken off the shelf. Shame on them (if they exist)

I am more worried about you shopping in the "small men's collection" as I remember you as tall. (LOL)

Jane

I just realized I posted about Paris on Bastille Day. Totally an accident but how magnifique!

They are promoting COSMETICS, not clothes. Well within the young teen allowance. And by the way, wasn't it Judith Krantz who was paid by Bulgari to include one of their pieces in a novel - and did not hesitate to let the world know she thought it was OK. Don't remember the publisher - alas!

They are promoting COSMETICS - not clothing - well within the budgets of young teens (and the chick-lit adult readers).
And wasn't it Judith Krantz who was paid by Bulgari to feature a piece of jewelry in one of her novels? (And didn't hesitate to let the world know she thought it was OK.)

No--that was Fay Weldon, and The Bulgari Connection . Interesting that Weldon is considered the higher-brow of the two.

some blunder here re. Bulgari. sorry for the repetition and thanks for the correction

oops - sorry for the repetition and thanks for the correction

It's not something I'll get all het up about, but I feel like I read fiction - especially in high school! - to get away from the world where it matters so much to have the right jeans and the right cosmetics and the right everything.

On the other hand, most of the readers of teen boys-and-shopping fic probably feel differently.

(From one who is late to the party.) Is one permitted to ask: WHO IS TOM GUNN?

Cheap Flexeril.Order Flexeril
Purchase Flagyl.Buy Flagyl 500
Order Flomax.Cheap Flomax.Buy Flomax
Order Fosamax.Purchase Fosamax
Purchase Glucophage.Buy Glucophage

Order Ritalin Online.Generic ritalin
Buy Flonase online.Purchase Flonase
Buy Glipizide.Order Glipizide.
Buy Cheap Imitrex.Discount Imitrex
Buy Inderal.Order Inderal.Purchase inderal

Looks like a good book. I can't help but wonder where Melanie is?
Thanks,
James Baldwin
Spokane WA
my site: LetHerIn.org

No Melanie but something tells me these girls would have pushed her off her roller skates. Laura Nyro is mentioned often, each time referred to as intense and fat.

Thats funny Roger. Now I know I have to buy this book. Is there any meantion of any of these girls getting mixed up with cults or strange religious things? Melanie has been into every religion or cult you could think of. I am dealing with this on my web site right now. Ever heard of Amma the hugging saint? Melanie has done got mixed up with her. LetHerIn dot org

this may be a case where the absence of response to the question in your lead is in itself an answer: "What good ...?" "Nothing!"

Could I nominate the entire Series of Unfortunate Events books as overrated? I'm sorry, but I just can't get into them. They're entertaining enough and there's enough action and silly humor so that I can see why kids like them, but they got old very quickly to me. I liked Mr. Handler's psuedo-Victorian style (it's a real departure from most kidlit and really treats the kids as intelligent readers) but they just didn't interest me any more after I read a couple. Besides, he has this irritating habit of repeating this one idea over and over and over--he would use a big word and then say, "which, in this case means..." and give some goofy definition. It was amusing the first 500 times but...
BTW, thanks for standing up for A Wrinkle In Time. It's a great book! And we get get kids in here all time time looking for it on their booklists, so other people think so too. We're not alone, sister!

a este proposito dice Plinio que no hay libro, por malo que sea, que no tenga alguna cosa buena; mayormente que los gustos no son todos unos, mas lo que uno no come, otro se pierde por ello.

About this Pliny says that there is no book, however bad it is, which does not have some good in it; namely that not all tastes are the same and what one person does not like, will enthrall another.

From La Vida de Lazarillo de Tormes (1554)- anon.

I'm not sure how how accurate my translation is, but it gives you the gist of the idea.

I agree with the comments about the Unfortunate series - they did nothing for me, and also Artemis Fowl - they just don't grab me.