How to use this Page

Dennis Baron is Professor of English and Linguistics at the University of Illinois. His book, A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution, looks at the evolution of communication technology, from pencils to pixels. In this post, also posted on Baron’s personal blog The Web of Language, he looks at the difference between scrolls and codexes.

The scroll, whose pages are joined end-to-end in a long roll, is older than the codex, a writing technology — known more familiarly as the book — with pages bound together at one end. Websites have always looked more like scrolls than books, a nice retro touch for the ultra-modern digital word, but as e-readers grow in popularity, texts are once again looking more like books than scrolls. While the first online books, the kind digitized by the Gutenberg Project in the 1980s, consisted of one long, scrolling file, today’s electronic book takes as its model the conventional printed book that it hopes one day to replace.

Fans of the codex insist that it’s an information delivery system superior in every way to the scroll, and whether or not they approve of ebooks, they think that all books should take the form of codices. For one thing, book pages can have writing on both sides, making them more economical than scrolls, which are typically written on one side only (this particular codex advantage turns out to be irrelevant for ebooks). For another, the codex format makes it easier to compare text on different pages, or in different books, which some scholars think fosters objective, critical, or scientific thinking. It’s also easier to locate a particular section of a codex than to roll and unroll a scroll looking for something. These may or may not be advantages for books over scrolls, but it’s not a problem online, where keyword searching makes it easy to find digitized text in a nanosecond, regardless of its format, plus it’s possible to compare any online texts or the parts thereof simply by opening each in a different window and clicking from one to another. In the world of the ebook, codex or scroll becomes a preference, not an advantage.

A few tunnel-visioned readers associate the codex with Christianity, viewing scrolls as relics of heathen religion. Not to be outdone, some people see online books as messianic, and others think they represent the ultimate heresy — but religion aside, there’s no particular advantage for page over scroll in either the analog or the digital world. Finally, although this example of codex superiority is seldom mentioned, the codex can be turned into a flip book by drawing cartoons on the pages and then fanning them so the images appear to move. But then again, a motion picture is really a scroll full of pix unwinding at 24 frames per second. None of this makes a difference if your ebook, iPad, or smartphone won’t play Flash video.

There is one advantage of the book over the scroll that may apply to the computer. According to psychologists Christopher A. Sanchez and Jennifer Wiley, poor readers have more trouble understanding scrolled text on a computer than digital text presented in a format resembling the traditional printed page. But these researchers found that better readers, those with stronger working memories, understand scrolls and pages equally well.

While Sanchez and Wiley’s experiments suggest that for some readers, paging is better for comprehension than scrolling, their results are o

Anne Zaccardelli, Library and Online Sales Assistant

The Oxford Companion to the Book is the first reference work of its kind covering the broad concept of the book throughout the world from ancient to modern times. Edited by Michael F. Suarez, S.J. and H. R. Woudhuyen, it consists of topical essays as well as A – Z entries. Michael F. Suarez, S.J. is University Professor, Director of the Rare Book School, and Hon. Curator of Special Collections at the University of Virginia. H. R. Woudhuysen is Professor of English at University College London. In the post below, I talk about the ebook format compares and contrasts with various book formats throughout history.

This past December, I received a Kindle for my Christmas present. As you can imagine, I’ve been fielding questions and comments from not only my friends and family, but from random people on the subway and at the coffee shop. Often, these conversations become affirmations about how one could never forsake a physical, paper book.

“I could never use an e-reader,” they say, “I like the smell of books.”

“A book is like a trophy—I love putting it on my shelf when I’m done.”

Of course, they stare at me blankly when I tell them that reading just one ebook on an e-reader might make them change their opinion.

With the introduction of another e-reader, the ipad, many of us are contemplating the future of the book. To put these developments in perspective, I decided to see what The Oxford Companion to Book had to say about history of the book. After all, writing once made the jump from the scroll to the codex—did our ancestors really miss the smell of a scroll or rolling it up?

While I didn’t find a list of complaints, though I did come to a better understanding about how the book has changed throughout history. In Craig Kallendorf’s essay, The Ancient Book, he explains that in the Western world the use of parchment to create scrolls left the manuscripts too heavy so fashioning it into a codex was more desirable. Moreover, with the rise of Christianity, it was much quicker to locate a biblical passage in a codex than in a scroll. The same can be said of our e-readers—I can carry my 1,000 page book in a 10.2 ounce container. And while I’m no longer able to dog-ear my pages on my e-reader, if I need to look up a definition of a word all I have to do is rest the cursor in front of a word.

The idea of convenience also turned up in the essay, The Electronic Book by Eileen Gardiner and Ronald G Musto. It turns out that our average paperback book of today may have not been the most desired format for “readers” in the medieval age.

In Europe, the original manner in which books were produced was, of course, by hand. However, these books weren’t just books, they were works of art—each manuscript was an o