A good song to get dressed to. I recorded this TWENTY years ago. YIKES!
http://soundcloud.com/inkless-music/where-oh-wheres-my-underwear
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: position, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Blog: Barney Saltzberg Noodlings (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Underwear, Music for children, Kids songs, Add a tag

Blog: The Excelsior File (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: ruth freeman swain, non-fiction, captain underpants, 08, farting, holiday house, underwear, john o'brien, Add a tag
What We Wear Under There by Ruth Freeman Swain illustrated by John O'Brien Holiday House 2008 A picture book history of undergarments over the ages that provides some basic coverage but nonetheless has a few holes. This was a book on my radar some time ago that dropped off and resurfaced mysteriously. All I could remember going in was how I thought this was the perfect subject for a

Blog: La Bloga (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: gps, stalking, underwear, panties, jealous, hoax, art project, Add a tag
First of all, thank you so much for the lovely panties. They are so comfortable and cute too! I have to say, though, I’ve been concerned about your behavior lately. I mean, when I was jogging in the woods and you were suddenly there, it kind of creeped me out. And then when you burst into that job interview it was pretty humiliating. I mean, how did you know I was there? It was a good thing I had determined I didn’t want the position (though I was still really nervous…always am at those things) because I’m pretty sure you freaked out the CEO and he wouldn’t have hired me anyway.
I found the site by mistake, I was searching for the phone number for my favorite shop in Johnson, Vermont—the Forget-Me-Not-Shop—and I pulled up this site: http://forgetmenotpanties.com/ The first thing I saw was the seductive photo of the panty clad woman with the ray-emitting flower appliqué. As you can imagine, I was intrigued. And that image…was the flower giving off heat? Massaging her hip? Despite these questions I was about to head back to google when the tagline “protect her privates” caught my eye. Needless to say, I read further.
“Ever worry about your wife cheating? Want to know where your daughter is late at night?”
And my personal favorite:
“Need to know when your girlfriend’s temperature is rising?”
Turns out, it is a pair of attractive brief-cut cotton underwear with a decorative flower that is actually a GPS device that can provide the wearer’s location, temperature and heart rate. Temperature and heart rate…I felt my own ticker pickup its pace with a touch of anger.
“Make sure you will never be forgotten,” it promises.
Now being a marketing professional, I delved further. How does one sell this kind of despicable, personal-liberty-stealing product? The section called “testimonials” give two examples. Th

The second testimonial was from a man who suspected his wife of cheating on him, which of course, she was. I mean, how creepy would it be to hear about a guy who tracked his wife through her panties and found out she was faithful? That wouldn’t sell too many bloomers, I’ll tell you that!
Okay, so as you’ve surmised, this is not a subject I’m on the fence about. It’s not the GPS, I mean we give our kids cell phones we can track, but it’s the deception that bothers me. Truth be told, I find this whole thing so disturbing it is almost beyond comment. I mean, why not added a banner that says, “Great for the stalker on your Christmas list!” or, “Paranoid? Delusional? Have we got the product for you!”
At this point I find myself asking, what is my raison d’etre for this blog entry? Is it enough to rant and rave about a bizarre and offensive product? Perhaps, but as I reflect on my need to tell you about this find I realize that it is more than that, more than a sociological study. I fear that we risk losing our dignity, our humanity when we give in to our darkest thoughts. There are always marketers out there to prey upon our anxieties,

I’m being preachy you say? Yes, you’re right, and I apologize. I had intended this to have more humor, but honestly the forget-me-not panties frighten me. As they should you. And ladies, if your husband or partner gives you a pair of lingerie with an odd little appliqué on them, put them on the dog and set him loose through the neighborhood. But be sure to invite me to watch when the gift giver finds out he has been monitoring a mutt’s adventures through the neighborhood streets. I’m sure I could sell tickets, in fact.

Blog: OUPblog (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Law, Politics, American History, A-Featured, rights, amendment, 2nd, interpret, civil, mark, militia, tushnet, arguments, judgments, upheld, position, proponents, Add a tag
Yesterday, Mark V. Tushnet author of Out Of Range: Why the Constitution Can’t End the Battle Over Guns, introduced us to the gun-rights argument. Today Tushnet takes a closer look at the gun-control position. Be sure to check back tomorrow for part three in this series.
Gun-control proponents support their position with several arguments. First, the text: The Second Amendment does refer to the militia, and the gun-rights position deprives the Amendment’s preamble of any operative significance, which is unusual in constitutional interpretation. But there’s more to the textual argument. The Constitution refers to the Militia in two additional places. It gives Congress the right to laws providing for the calling forth of the Militia, and it reserves to states the right to appoint the officers of the Militia. These references clearly deal with the state-organized Militia, and we ought to interpret the Second Amendment to use the term in the same way. The Second Amendment would then prohibit Congress from disarming the state-organized militia – and would thereby preserve the ability of those militias to resist an oppressive national government. (more…)
Haven't seen this one but will have to take a look. My students love How underwear got there : a brief history by Kathy Shaskan. Perhaps that would be a better book for you.