Celebrity picture books. The gift that just keeps on giving.
Now in the past I’ve had my say about CPB ah-plenty. Heck, there was an entire chapter devoted to them in Wild Things: Acts of Mischief in Children’s Literature. Today, we’ll switch tactics and tackle a topic that no one ever discusses.
Weeeeeeeeeeird celebrity picture books.
Specifically, the ones based on pop songs.
Here is how I imagine how the process usually goes.
Big publisher with lots of money sits down with the people of big famous celebrity singer. Big publishers offers to get a top notch illustrator (who really needs the cash) to illustrate it. Celebrity singer is keen on the idea, a deal is struck, and the book is made. This happens time and again and usually the results are very normal.
But then . . . once in a very great while . . . the impossible happens. The artist is allowed to be . . . artistic.
What do I mean like that? Okay. Let’s start with the pop novelty song turned picture book. And in keeping with the sheer number of foxes in picture books these days (Travis! You need to add the new version of The Dead Bird by Zolotow & Robinson to your list!) I am showing you this:
Remember that little post-Gangnam Style hit on the interwebs? Currently cresting at 616 million views on YouTube (nope, I’m not kidding) someone at Simon & Schuster decided it could be worth it to give the lyrics book form. After all, it sounds like a children’s song in a lot of ways (right down to the elephant going “toot”). And usually when a YouTube sensation gets turned into a picture book you get something like a Golden Book Grumpy Cat or a Tiny Hamster or a talking shell, and that’s fine.
Then there’s this:
I had to wonder how this happened. Did Ylvis insist on having his own illustrator? How did they get Norwegian artist Svein Nyhus in the first place? How could something this . . this . . this cool be based on a YouTube video? It was Debbie Ohi’s blog post My WHAT DOES THE FOX SAY? obsession, solving a mystery AND the new picture book from Simon & Schuster BFYR that answered all my questions. Turns out, Art Director Laurent Linn may have had a hand in the works. Makes sense. The man has fine taste.
And if you’re saying to yourself, “Fine and all, but clearly this is an aberration” you’d be half right. Certainly it would take an act of God for another Svein Nyhus picture book to appear on our shores (our Norwegian picture book illustrators available here in the States are a bit, uh, lacking, shall we say). But odd adaptations of songs into picture book formats don’t stop there. Consider this:
Yep. That’s a Sting song. Now note the name of the illustrator: Sven Völker. We’re with a German this time around. Of course, the interiors might have given that away . . .
I’m sorry but I kind of love this. Obviously the song isn’t really meant to be for kids, but at least they didn’t cutesy it up. It would have been easy to go the Shel Silverstein route and follow the adventures of a chipper little spot as he traverses the world. Instead we get . . . actually, I’m not sure what we get. Something weird, that’s for sure.
These first two books I’ve mentioned work because the publishers decided to get European artists to do the interiors. So how often do you find a song adaptation that’s a bit on the peculiar side and that’s illustrated by an American? Hardly ever. Of course there are some exceptions:
Dylan gets adapted into picture books on a frequent basis. And he usually gets some perfectly good artists like Paul Rogers or David Walker or Jim Arnosky (that one was a surprise). One time he got Jon J. Muth and I got really excited. But the art was pretty standard stuff. There was a paper airplane motif. Ho hum.
But Scott Campbell? He’s different. This guy has a whole life dedicated to his adult cartoons, which are delightful. Ever see this book?
If not, I think I’m helping you out with your holiday gift giving already. That book is a hoot.
In the case of the Dylan book, Campbell appears at first glance to be doing everything straight. Dogs are running free. That’s really all there is to it. But there’s this undercurrent that’s hard to ignore. See if you feel it too:
It just doesn’t feel like other celebrity song books. There’s a wildness reigned in here. The song isn’t one of Dylan’s better ones, so there’s that as well, but at least the pictures are interesting to look at. The downside is that I haven’t seen Mr. Campbell do any picture books since this and Hug Machine. Boo-urns, sez I. More Campbell, please.
I welcome any other suggestions of odd song-adaptation picture books, though I know they’re not easy to come up with. A goodly chunk of them are dull as dishwater. Very straightforward. Artists doing something rote for a nice sized check. But if you do hear of a case where the artist was allowed to be, y’know, artistic, you just let me know. This is the kind of stuff I really dig. And if you can’t think of anything then just sit back and enjoy this fake picture book adaptation of David Bowie’s Major Tom.
A Toucan Can, Can You?
By Danny Adlerman
Illustrated by Lindsay Barrett George, Megan Halsey, Ashley Wolff, Demi, Ralph Masiello, Wendy Anderson Halperin, Kevin Kammeraad, Pat Cummings, Dar (Hosta), Leeza Hernandez, Christee Curran-Bauer, Kim Adlerman, and Symone Banks
Music by Jim Babjak
The Kids at Our House Children’s Books
$19.95
ISBN: 9781942390008
Ages 3-6
On shelves now
Under normal circumstances I don’t review sequels. I just don’t, really. Sequels, generally speaking, require at least a rudimentary knowledge of the preceding book. If I have to spend half a review catching a reader up on the book that came before the book that I’m actually reviewing, that’s just a waste of everyone’s time. Better to skip sequels entirely, and I include chapter book sequels, YA sequels, middle grade sequels, nonfiction sequels, graphic novel sequels, and easy book sequels in that generalization. I would even include picture book sequels, but here I pause for a moment. Because once in a while a picture book sequel will outshine the original. Such is the case with Danny Adlerman’s audibly catchy and visually eclectic A Toucan Can, Can You? A storyteller’s (and song-and-dance parent’s) dream, the book is is a sequel to the book How Much Wood Could a Woodchuck Chuck but comes into its own as a writing assignment for some, a storytime to others, and a darn good book for everybody else.
Many of us are at least passingly familiar with that old poem, “How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?” But why stop with the woodchuck? What other compound words can you break up in amusing ways? And so we are sucked into a delightful world of teaspoons spooning tea, spaceships shipping space, and ice cream screaming “ice!” Each one of these catchy little poems (which are set to music on the accompanying CD) is paired with art from an impressive illustrator. Part collaboration and part exercise in audible frivolity, Danny Adlerman’s little book packs a great big punch.
For a group collaboration to work in a picture book there needs to be a reason for it to even exist. Which is to say, why have different people do different pieces of art for the same book? To best justify bringing these artists together you need a strong hook. And brother, I can’t think of a stronger hook then a catchy little rhyme, turned into a song, and given some clever additional rhymes to go along with it. Let’s hear it for the public domain! It’s little wonder that the customary “Note to Parents and Teachers” found in books of this sort appears at the beginning of the book rather than the end. In it, mention is made of the fact that the accompanying CD has both music with the lyrics and music without the lyrics, allowing kids to make up their own rhymes. I can attest as someone who did storytimes for toddlers and preschoolers for years that music can often be a librarian’s best friend. Particularly if it has a nice little book to show off as well. So for the storytimes for younger children, go with the words. And for the older kids? I think a writing assignment is waiting in the wings.
I was quite taken with the rhymes that already exist in this book, though. In fact, my favorite (language-wise) might have to be “How much bow could a bow tie tie if a bow tie could tae bo?” if only because “tae bo” makes shockingly few cameos in picture books these days. Finding the perfect collaboration between word and text can be difficult but occasionally the book hits gold. One example would be on the rhyme “How much ham could a hamster stir if a hamster could stir ham?” Artist Leeza Hernandez comes up with a rough riding hamster in cowboy gear astride an energetic hog. Two great tastes that taste great together.
Obviously the problem with any group collaboration is that some pieces are going to be stronger than others. But I have to admit that when I looked at that line-up I was a bit floored. In an impressive mix of established artists and new up-and-comers, Adlerman pairs his illustrators alongside rhymes that best show off their talents. Demi, for example, with her meticulous details and intricate style, is perfectly suited to honeycombs, honey, and the thin veins in the wing of a honeybee, holding a comb aloft. Meanwhile Wendy Anderson Halperin tackles the line “How much paint could a paintbrush brush” by rendering a variety of famous works, from Magritte to Diego Rivera in her two-page spread. Mind you, some artists are more sophisticated than others, and the switch between styles threatens to give one a bit of whiplash in the process. Generally speaking, however, it’s lovely. And I must confess that it was only on my fourth or fifth reading that I realized that the lovely scene illustrated by newcomer Symone Banks at the end of the book is dotted with animals done by the other artists, hidden in the details.
I don’t have to do storytimes anymore. In my current job my contact with kids is fairly minimal. But I have a two-year-old and a five-year-old at home and that means all my performance skills are on call whenever those two are around. I admit it. I need help. And books like A Toucan Can: Can You? can be lifesavers to parents like myself. If we had our way there would be a book-of-the-week club out there that personally delivered song-based picture books to our door. Heck, it should be a book-of-the-DAY club. I mean, let’s be honest. Raise a glass then and toast to Danny Adlerman and his fabulous friends. Long may their snowshoes shoo, their jellyfish fish, and their rockhoppers hop hop hop.
On shelves now.
Like This? Then Try:
Source: Galley sent from author for review.
I have What Does the Fox Say in my work bookcase and those illustrations really work with the text/lyrics. It’s all-around wacky! (As an aside, did you know I work with Alison Morris and Lori Prince?)
I love Scott C. too! Around the same time as Hug Machine he illustrated Zombie in Love 2 + 1 (by Kelly DiPucchio).
And then disappeared into the mist . . . .
Say hi to Alison and Lori for me! Miss those guys tons.
Delightful post.
You know, I would totally buy a board book of David Bowie’s “Kooks.”
Noted on the fox in The Dead Bird – good call there
Those are the lyrics for King of Pain? What was I singing? And didn’t Bowie threaten to sue that illustrator for copyright infringement using his song without permission on the internet? I kind of remember the illustrator thought he was doing Bowie a favor (omg). Cool art for the fox book. Too bad that song went the way of the macarena. Really, what were the publishers thinking? My musician friends on Facebook (with kids) joked about that fox song and not in a good way. They were not going to buy a book about it.
Bowie did threaten to sue so it went down. I Googled it and found it was back up again. I suspect his estate has bigger things on their plate than faux picture books these days.
There was a complete (if digital-only) picture book at one point–I remember seeing the entire thing on his website, beginning to end. I wanted it so badly for McNally I emailed Mr. Kolb to find out if it was ever going to be a physical book. It’s still listed on his website as a “Space Themed Picture Book,” with the Space Oddity title blurred out.
I’m still cranky about how much I wanted to own that book.
I’m telling David Bowie…..oh, wait… Hey Kate, please don’t encourage Mr. Kolb. In fact, if Kolb ever replies please advise him to write his own damn song then illustrate it.
Oh, he totally replied–this was years and years ago, but if I recall the answer was that it was just a labor of love and there wasn’t going to be a real book unless by some miracle the Bowie estate loved it and made it a reality. It was something like extended fan art, albeit from a professional artist?
Admittedly I’m no expert on where the line on acceptable use in fan art is, so I’m not arguing that it was OK. I’m just saying I will forever be sad that David Bowie didn’t see it and fall in love, too, because I thought it was really cool.
It was super cool. And gorgeous at that.
Wows! I am just coming back to this. I believe Bowie (who was living at the time) got wind of it and threatened to sue for copyright infringement. The professional way would have been to approach Bowie first and ask for permission to put it online. Not the other way around. That is probably why it was asked to be taken down. Whether it be a labor of love or of financial reward putting it online opens it up to the world so technically it’s no longer a labor of love to please oneself. I got kicked off an illustrators FB group for saying this same thing when one artist said they create just for themselves…no they don’t… once it goes online.