JacketFlap connects you to the work of more than 200,000 authors, illustrators, publishers and other creators of books for Children and Young Adults. The site is updated daily with information about every book, author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry. Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers, publishers and fans. Join now (it's free).
Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Blog Posts by Tag
In the past 7 days
Blog Posts by Date
Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Digital art, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 25 of 26
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Digital art in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
Hace un tiempo les conté del nacimiento de Energías Limpias, un sitio dedicado a la propagación de las energías renovables.
A pedido del anterior gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, este grupo ha realizado un proyecto muy interesante. Gracias a él podemos en unos pocos clicks, conocer el consumo de energía que hacemos en nuestros hogares y si la usamos de modo eficiente.
Te tienta saber cuál es el uso que hacés de la energía? Hacé un click aquí.
Conocer es ir cambiando algo.
0 Comments on Energías limpias y eficientes as of 1/1/1900
Trembled Blossoms is a short animated Prada ad based on some mind-blowing designs from James Jean. Some of the stuff is rendered beautifully, while other stuff seems to miss the mark and land somewhere in the uncanny valley (see above).
These “You Suck at Photoshop” tutorials by Donnie Hoyle have been making the rounds on the blogs for the last couple days. They are dark, hilarious, and surprisingly informative.
So watch them, laugh your ass off, and call it “work”.
“Relive the childhood fun of Etch-A-Sketch by drawing on your television! Simply plug the controller into your TV and explore 4 activity modes: Cool Drawing Tools, Trace A Pic, Super Sketch and Connecting The Dots.”
Simply shake the controller to erase your masterpiece.
Popgadget says you should give one of these to your kid to show him how we used to have fun. “He’ll either be charmed by the simplicity of it or feel sorry for you that this is what passed for fun when you were a kid.”
Next, we need TV Light-Brite! (Whoa, check out this online light-brite).
"Energías limpias" es el nuevo portal que un grupo de jóvenes profesionales ha iniciado con el objetivo de promover y desarrollar fuentes de energía limpias y renovables.
Es un sitio pensado para todos. Porque comprender que es preciso generar energías sustentables y accesibles, es tarea de los gobiernos, pero también de cada uno.
La invitación a participar me llegó de Juan Cruz Mones Cazón, a quien desde aquí le doy las gracias. Y los invito a ustedes a que se den una vuelta por allí. Ser limpios es la tendencia.
This animated music video was created by 64 Communications students from Concordia University in Montreal as part of the Open-Source Cinema project. The students “rotoscoped 1-3 seconds of video each, over a period of three weeks. (Most of them had never used Flash before.)” The results are fantastic - with a variety of engaging styles in the final product.
They say: “We were inspired by Bob Sabiston’s digital rotoscoping (as seen in Snack and Drink, Waking Life, A Scanner Darkly), and our readings and class discussions about copyright and creativity. (Course textbook: Christine Harold’s OurSpace: Resisting the Corporate Control of Culture.)”
Using the VectorMagic web app, Philipp Lenssen took pieces of screenshots from video games and vectorized and enlarged them, creating some abstract, but very familiar, images.
2 Comments on Vectorized video game art, last added: 12/29/2007
How much does this image look like a face? That’s the question you’re asked when you visit Mutating Pictures. Visitors to the site are presented with similar Rorschachesque images generated by a computer and rate the images on how closely they resemble people and animals. The higher-rated images produce slightly-mutated offspring that are introduced into the population of images, and the lower-rated pictures gradually go extinct over time. See the site’s FAQ for more info on how it works. Very, very cool!
Thanks, Phillip!
1 Comments on Mutating Pictures: Darwinsim meets Rorschach, last added: 10/10/2007
I completed an illustration for the Knox Theatre Company's next production today called Run For Your Wife The illustration is appropriate to this week's Illustration Friday theme "juggle" as the play is a comedy about a London taxi driver who is juggling a double life and two wives.
How can that be funny? Well he gets caught out!
The Play written by Ray Cooney will be playing in May
0 Comments on Juggling Two Wives Is Funny as of 1/1/1900
studio lolo said, on 9/28/2007 7:59:00 AM
I've actually had 2 friends whose husbands were leading double lives. One even had a child she didn't know about for 12 years! I find that unbelievable.I like your work and the different blogs! Thanks for stopping by.
Toyebot said, on 9/28/2007 9:24:00 AM
Haha! Looks like a funny play. Great illustration! Thanks for your comments. I love that I can view works from all over the world. I've managed to visit Australia (Sydney) last year. Cheers
FRANK M HANSEN said, on 9/28/2007 11:08:00 AM
Fun Illo. Also enjoyed the rest of your Blog. You have a lot of great ideas and helpful things about Art. Very cool.
Kayleen West. said, on 9/28/2007 6:11:00 PM
Thank you all for your considerate comments. Studio lolo, that would be awful for your friends. Like any lie, the truth always surfaces hey?Thanks for having a good look over my blog Frank. It is always good to know the information is useful to others and so makes the time taken to running a blog worth while.
You log in to the site, start a new “sketch”, and after you click the record button, you start drawing on the screen and can even record your voice to go along with it. Once done you click on the stop button and you can then publish the sketch just like a YouTube embed. Put it in a blog entry, send it to friends or co-workers, just anywhere you can put a video, you can put your sketches.
From the boys at Mondolithic Studios (previously), who will be among the judges:
A new NASA contest encourages university art and design students to partner with science and engineering departments to create art representative of living and working on the moon. The goal is for students in the arts, science and engineering to collaboratively engage in NASAs mission to return humans to the moon by 2020, and eventually journey on to Mars and other destinations in the solar system.
The Advanced Planning and Partnership Office at NASAs Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., is sponsoring the “Life and Work on the Moon” contest. Winners will receive cash prizes up to $1,000. Winning artwork also will be exhibited online and across the country. Entries are due no later than December 1, 2007, and results will be announced in February 2008. A high school version of this contest is planned for the spring of 2008.
Why is NASA sponsoring this contest?
Once humans establish a presence on the Moon, the arts will be a desired facet of life there, as they are here on Earth. It is our intention to provoke non-science and engineering students to think about the science and engineering required to achieve the conditions suitable for humans to live and work on the moon. It is also our intention to help the science and engineering communities appreciate valuable contributions from other communities, particularly the arts.
Art and Science together. I always like that. AND the thought of living on the moon! (Does this mean we FINALLY get our flying cars too?)
0 Comments on NASA Contest: Life & Work on the Moon as of 9/5/2007 10:51:00 AM
You use Photoshop, right? Do you like creating custom brushes for your yourself? If you don’t, then please allow me to let you in on a secret. Portland Studios, a South Carolina Illustration and Design house, has just made 5 sets of custom-made Photoshop brushes available to purchase. The sets were all created personally by the remarkable Justin Gerard (see image above) for use in his own work.
You can Justin work with other brush sets here and here. In addition to releasing their Photoshop brush sets, Portland has also begun selling top-notch t-shirts and prints in their online store.
8 Comments on Portland Studios Tools, last added: 8/31/2007
The brushes look great, Gerard has chops, but his wacky commentary on the videos soon got a little trying. I wanted him to say something, ANYTHING informative about the brushes, or about anything at all. There’s nothing wrong with a little humor, but this was relentless. I would’ve preferred that he teach me something, rather than try to lamely entertain me.
It’s not that he doesn’t have a good sense of humor—-that’s not it at all—-and I don’t mean to criticize him personally. I just think the video would be more effective if he had something to say.
I have a relative who does this kind of thing, but he doesn’t confine it to video. Every time you try to talk to him hoping for something that resembles conversation, he comes out with gag after wacky gag, and polite laughter only encourages him. All I ask is that he offer me the bone of an actual concrete subject to nibble on, but he can’t seem to manage this.
So I’m sure that Gerard isn’t like this ALL THE TIME, but what he may not realize is that he has something to offer here besides Photoshop brushes, and he’s not sharing.
TNT said, on 8/28/2007 11:49:00 AM
well- i guess the video is to sell brushes, not to “tutorial” us to do our own. i liked his humor too, but what ticked me off to almost smashing the screen were the one million “ah”s in the sentences.
i really like their work, especially gerards, but a lot of chris koelle´s work looks soooo ashley wood ripped off…argh!
Jed Alexander said, on 8/28/2007 5:48:00 PM
I don’t need a tutorial, but I think it would help to sell brushes if he said something other than nonsense.
Gattung said, on 8/28/2007 7:05:00 PM
“chris koelle´s work looks soooo ashley wood ripped off”
I actually think Chris’s work is more rounded then Ashley’s. similarities are there but Chris relies less on the accidents of his art.
Jed Alexander said, on 8/28/2007 7:20:00 PM
I’m not a huge Ashley Wood fan, but your criticism doesn’t make sense to me. I think it’s very difficult to make accidents WORK in your art. To know when to leave well enough alone, and to know when to not to fix something that doesn’t need fixing, or that’s there to reveal something else you didn’t notice.
However, I have noticed that Wood at his worst fudges in his draftsmanship. Not in a Bill Sienkewitz (sp?) expressionistic sort of way, but in a I can’t be bothered sort of way. If that’s what you mean by relying on accidents. There’s a lot of painterly mess sometimes that doesn’t describe stuff, and isn’t interesting in itself for its own sake.
Ward said, on 8/29/2007 3:02:00 PM
Really, what more could he say about texture brushes, you know? You choose a brush, tweak the size, the tolerance, color, etc. and just work with it. Nothing else really needs to be said about these brushes, if you ask me. It’s just an opportunity to check out what these brushes can offer. And I didn’t mind the humor.
ckoelle said, on 8/31/2007 8:11:00 AM
Hey guys, this is Chris. I’ll be the first to acknowledge that I openly admire Ash’s work–his sense of design, shape, angles, line, etc. and I have obviously tried to emulate his work in some of my art.
At the same time, there are countless other artists whose sense of design and style have inspired my work and even the work of Ash Wood himself. Masters like Klimt, Egon Schiele, Bill Sienkiewicz, Bob Peak, Dave McKean, Phil Hale, George Pratt, Kent Williams, the list goes on. Anyone who’s a fan of one of these guys is a fan of the others.
And there are a thousand other artists whose work has affected the kind of stuff I do. I actually consider myself kind of bipolar when it comes to my art–different ways of working and different styles come from different moods (obsessive compulsive, painstakingly detailed etchings, carefree loose sketches, and so on). In other words, I’ve done plenty of stuff that looks nothing like Ash Wood’s work (or any of the artists mentioned above).
All that to say, great artists (living or dead) inevitably inspire and inform other artists’ work.
Peace,
Chris
Gattung said, on 8/31/2007 11:16:00 AM
Thanks for posting Chris! Everything you said is pretty much what I thought about your stuff.
You guys should check out Chris’s digital/drawn/animated short done for PBS about a battle in iraq from the perspective of a soldier’s blog called ‘Men in Black’.
If you’re familiar with any of Björk’s pre-Vespertine album covers, you’ve seen the inventive handiwork of London-based design firm Me Company. Their site has a portfolio of recent, mostly non-Björk, creations.
0 Comments on Me Company as of 8/8/2007 12:05:00 AM
This is very interesting as a tour of art history’s it-girls - how exactly has the feminine ideal beauty changed over the centuries? Every era has its Barbie doll.
4 Comments on Women in Art morph, last added: 7/8/2007
It’s interesting that of all the features the eyes remain the most constant.
beckett said, on 7/7/2007 10:00:00 PM
watch the eyes, though. for more than the first third, none of them will meet yours.
airlie said, on 7/8/2007 12:57:00 PM
this is a charming piece! however, I think likening these fantastic works of art to Barbie dolls is disturbing. If it had been a montage of paintings of men throughout history, would we say “every era has its Ken doll?” I doubt it.
p.s. I love Drawn! I just had to put in my couple of cents.
jaleen said, on 7/8/2007 5:53:00 PM
Hi airlie,
Due to Western culture being rather harder on women than men for expecting them to live up to ideals of beauty, I would agree that you are right in saying that we would not remark that every era has its Ken doll. Hence my point. Painting of portraits - and the choices of the person who made this video - reflect those standards and expectations, as does Barbie. There is no insult if you happen to like Barbie ;) .
I wouldn’t normally post a link to something so corporately hyped, but I do think that new imaging technology needs to be grabbed creatively and critically as soon as possible in order to keep it democratic. Especially when said tech is depending on accessing and using everybody’s personal photos, apparently no matter where they are posted on the web. So, since Photosynth is new enough to still only (afaik) exist in Corporateland, I apologize for sending you to a bunch of Microsoft spin-o-matic vids, but Go Forth and Make It Your Own.
Specifically, this stuff is geared to ruling the universe of photography, but as we draughts-people types showed Flickr, we can appropriate tech according to our illustratorly whims. According to a spokesbot, “… we take the the world’s photos and organize them in 3d…” and “the ultimate dream is that we merge the real world and the virtual world until it is ultimately seamless…”. OK, so now imagine doing that with our drawings. Also, this goes some way to providing a solution to the lack-of-detail-available-in-web-images issue I complained about recently. Here’s the MS site, but the link above is of a live presentation and much more watchable.
Awesome, how about a view of St. Peter’s composed entirely of sketches from different views? I’ll get started on that right now :)
Jed Alexander said, on 6/25/2007 4:15:00 PM
This must’ve been so corporately hyped, I missed it altogether. I think this is totally and absolutely mindblowingly awesome.
Beyond just getting really great 3d reference of just about anything you could want, this technology could eventually allow people to virtually transport themselves into a compellingly real virtual location anywhere in the world. And if you can interpolate architecture from a series of still images (and I’m sure, eventually moving ones) you can interpolate a crowd of people, or damn near anything. Everyone will have their own hollywood studio on their PC, and be able to generate realistic virtual environments that look very much like real environments in practically real time. These images will have more fidelity, in some ways, than what we can see with our eyes.
Anyway, this is completely awesome.
joesplanet said, on 6/25/2007 9:28:00 PM
This is based on Photo Tourism, shown at siggraph last year (watch the longer video if you’ve got the bandwidth). Lower resolution youtube variant is here.
Jed Alexander said, on 6/25/2007 9:56:00 PM
excuse the above semi-coherant ramble. Let me just leave it at I was impressed.
tsouk said, on 6/26/2007 4:54:00 AM
…first of all ,i have to say this very cool
but there are some things that can’t be done:
1) it will never work with illustrations, art, …nEver
2) it will never work with people, animals, etc.
…the above two will only work if you do it in a studio or something, which already happens (in studios, with a lot of work, nOt computationally)
to do this automatically, you need a staggering number of pictures, of solid, stable things. Otherwise, image processing tools won’t recognize the same thing, from sLiGhtly (…this is important) different angles. iT only works with a lot of useless picture data, not art.
Well, this came out a while ago, but it’s still fun: the Zoomquilt, a collaborative project by people you can read about here. It’s kind of like falling down a rabbit hole to Wonderland.
Awesome concept. After looking at that for a while the screen doesn’t quite stop moving right away! Its amazing how you can make stuff look 3D as long as everything’s always centered on the same vanishing point.
There’s a Dutch film called, Songs From the 13th Floor with sets that work on a similar principal. All the sets are practical sets[–there is no CGI or post production opticals, but they create these vast spaces with forced perspective and a imobile camera. The sets look disturbingly real, but if they had moved the camera just a fraction of an inch in any direction it would have given away the illusion.
In the same warehouse they make a city street with long rows of shops and traffic (the cars in the distance are actually back lit paper cut-outs; the long corridor of an airport—in this case they actually use mirrors, and a subway station, among many other amazing and absolutely realistic sets—more real than any matte painting. Tthe ending scene is really the only one done outdoors, and in it is what looks like a crowd of thousands, in this case primarily made up of cardboard cutouts of people. It’s an amazing film. And funny too. My favorite scene is one where a bunch of tired looking people riding in a subway car begin to spontaneously sing some kind of opera tune.
A lack of understanding of this basic idea betrayed the unreality of a lot of Hitchcock’s films where he used so much rear projection. One of my favorites is in Vertigo. Jimmy Stewart is sitting in his office, and behind him is a window with a view of a construction site made with practical miniatures. The scene is seen from multiple angles, and at no point is there any regard for a vanishing point, so those miniatures look like nothing other than miniatures, making it a little hard to concentrate on the gravity and suspense of the scene. I think theatrical tricks like this and all that rear projection really undermined a lot of the tension in Hitchcock’s films, causing them to be incredibly stagey. The films where he was still willing to go on location were much more effective, like Strangers on a Train. Even if sometimes it was just a studio backlot, it wasn’t a 12×12 sandbox in front of a rear projected ocean pretending to be a beach.
vincent giard said, on 6/21/2007 9:21:00 AM
“Songs from the second floor” is indeed an ace movie.
Jed Alexander said, on 6/21/2007 10:45:00 AM
Oops. “Second Floor”, not “13th”.
swellzombie said, on 6/23/2007 1:41:00 AM
This is was the first time I’d ever seen any like this. It’s one of the most fantastic things EVER! Brilliant!!! I like going back and forth, slow and fast. It’s not quite sex but it’s pretty damn close. The second one is really remarkable too, but it lacks the ability to control it.
I think the best way to get a grasp of what can be done with graphics software is to view other artist's work. So I wanted to mention a few more digital artists that I keep in my inspiration folder (sometimes called my "why-do-I-bother" folder) All these artists use the same software but create very different work - all of it wonderful.
I said in my last post that it's rather difficult to get a watercolor effect on the computer. But Paula Becker's images are done using Painter. And her fun children's illustration have a nice airy feel to them that reminds me of watercolor washes.
Carlyn Beccia uses Painter and Photoshop to create wonderfully lush images.
John Nez is primarily a traditional artist but also has a nice gallery of digital work on his website created with Photoshop and Illustrator. Go to the studio section of his site for a discussion of how he uses the computer to create his illustrations.
1 Comments on Digital Art for the Traditional Aritist - Photoshop/Painter, last added: 7/7/2007
Jenn, thanks so much for posting all of this wonderful info.! I know that it has helped me understand working digitally better than before (I'm still not anywhere near you or any other artists whose work I love!) Thanks again for your help! I've enjoyed reading and re-reading and re-re-reading! :) TRACY CUNDIFF
I've been slacking on my blogging this week. It's the last week of school for the kiddos and I've been face painting my little fanny off at various elementary school functions.
I've already talked about Illustrator. I'd like to talk a bit about Adobe Photoshop and Corel Painter. Photoshop and Painter differ from Illustrator because they are primarily raster based packages (not vector based like Illustrator) If you are interesting in making images that mimic traditional oil painting or other traditional painting mediums Photoshop or Painter may be a better program to start with than Illustrator. Also if you are interested in manipulating existing images and photographs (maybe collages?) I would also recommend Photoshop or Painter and not Illustrator.
The following is a piece of mine will give you an idea of the smudgy painterly style that you can accomplish using Photoshop.
Photoshop is my tool of choice. I purchased Painter years ago (version 7) and found it ran REALLY slow on my PC compared to Photoshop so that's why I gravitated toward Photoshop. But I've been told Painter it is much better now and in fact I just received my brand new Painter-X CD in the mail last night and I'm going to give it another chance.
Both of these packages let you use brushes and smudge colors in a way that more closely minics the use of real paints. But which one is right for you?
Photoshop is an industry standard tool that has very large user base and very active support forums. It's also a very stable and robust piece of software. I'm amazed an how stable it is. Every publisher I've worked with has been able to accept and sometimes prefer to receive images in Photoshop file format. And there are gobs and gobs of books on the market about how to use Photoshop.
On the down side, Photoshop's primary function is to manipulate photographs. I believe the number of users that use photoshop strictly as a painting tool is a rather small percentage. Many of the new features that are incorporated into the photoshop are more geared to photographers not painters.
Painter on the other hand is designed for digital painting. There are a mind boggling number of options for fine tuning your brushes and papers. Many more than Photoshop has to offer. But there isn't as large of a user base and not nearly the number of after-market books available.
There are many ways to use these tools. One approach is to mimic traditional materials, such as watercolors, pastels or oils. I think watercolors (especially wet, drippy watercolor) is hard to replicate on the computer. But with other mediums, it can be tough to tell if an image was done digitally or with good old paint and turpentine. How much can these tools mimic traditional media? Check out these artist's websites and you be the judge...
Here's a photoshop piece by Brandon Dorman. Check out the rest of his website. I don't know if it's all Photoshop but it IS all wonderful.
Ryan Church's website is another totally amazing artist that uses Painter to create beautiful concept art. Hmmm, according to his website, he has a DVD out explaining his techniques (I think I gots to get me one of those!)
But you don't just have to copy traditional ways of working. Going digital also opens up a new realm of possibilities. Some people feel that a digital image is only successful if you can't tell that it's digital. I don't subscribe to that theory. Yes, there is a lot of bad digital art out there (there was a lot of bad art done before computers too) But the choice of medium doesn't make an image inherently bad.
Check out Scott E. Franson's work for instance. His lovely children's illustrations (done using Illustrator and Photoshop) definitely have a digital feel to them but they are also sweet and fresh looking.
Hopefully I gave you some ideas about where to start exploring the world of digital art and maybe inspired you to start playing with some of these tools. Because, above all, digital painting is really fun (and it doesn't stain your clothes!)
3 Comments on Digital Art for the Traditional Aritist - Photoshop/Painter, last added: 6/10/2007
All of Brandon's illustrations are done in Photoshop.
Sherry Rogers said, on 6/10/2007 8:19:00 AM
Hey Jenn good luck with Painter. I too have been using Photoshop because of it's speed and stability. I bought Painter X and sent it back about 2 weeks later. It is a fantastic program but still can not compete with Photoshop as far as strengths. The day Painter runs smoothly, Photoshop will sit on my shelf and gather dust. I am ready to convert. I love the fact that Painter is made for the artist.
Let us know how Painter works for you.
paula said, on 6/10/2007 3:39:00 PM
Great posting, Jenn! As you know, I use Painter exclusively. Love it as far as what it can do with simulating art mediums. And I'm not having any problems with speed. My worst glitch is that it crashes. I save often and shut the program down often. Yeah, not a small issue but certainly not enough to drive me away from the program.
Artists interested in trying their hand at digital art are sometimes confused about what software programs to buy. With good reason. There are lots of packages out there and it is wicked confusing. Unfortunately, there is no one software program that I can recommend that you start with. It really depends on you. My advice would be to look at digital artist's and work and see what speaks to you. Then find out what software they use. Of course you don't want to copy anyone's work, but you will have a better idea of how you want to transition into digital art.
That said, let me introduce you to an artist that uses Adobe Illustrator. The above illustrations are by my friend Jannie Ho. Using Illustrator she creates colorful children's illustrations that are slightly wacky and really adorable. You can see more of her work at www.chickengirldesign.com.
0 Comments on Digial Art for The Traditional Artist - Adobe Illustrator as of 5/31/2007 1:05:00 PM
I'd like to begin talking about 3 different software applications (Illustrator, Photoshop and Painter) Please if someone has something to add to what I have to say or wishes to correct me feel free. I don't pretend to be the world's expert on this stuff.
I'm going to discuss the applications one at a time. But in reality many artists use a combination of these applications. But if you are a traditional artist just trying to get your feet wet with digital work, it may not be practical to shell out $1500 and buy Illustrator, Photoshop and Painter all at once. I hope to just give you a little overview of each so you have an idea what each does. And maybe have an idea where you might want to start exploring.
This week, let's talk about Adobe Illustrator.
When I dove into computer art several years ago, I was trying to do a very graphic type art. Like this Xmas card design...
It was this very design that I was struggling to do in gouache. And I couldn't get all the deer exactly the same and the stars weren't lining up. And I thought there must be an easier way to do this on the computer. So I bought myself a copy of Illustrator. Which was darn lucky because Illustrator is just the package to do this sort of geometric, hard-edge sort of work.
I was still using a mouse at the time - I hadn't even bought a pen tablet yet (more about tablets later)
I should start by saying Adobe Illustrator is a vector program. Which means it stores it's images as mathmatical calculations. Why do you care? Because that makes it very good at creating images with hard, crisp lines and geometric forms. It also makes it very easy to enlarge vector files without losing any clarity in the image. Ever try to enlarge a digital photo and you can start to see the little squares, or pixels, that make up the picture. That doesn't happen with vector artwork. You can enlarge something to the size of a wall and it will still be nice and clear. Neat - huh?
But vector artwork is not as good at representing blurry lines or subtle shading (like in photographs). That is best left for raster programs like Painter and Photoshop (more about those later) Now some people will definitely disagree with that last statement. There are some artists that do amazing work with Illustrator and are able to create photo realistic images using just Illustrator. And more and more features have been added that allow for such things. But if you want your art to look like an oil painting, Illustrator is probably not the first tool you want for your toolbox.
Here a few other image that I did back when all I had to work with was Adobe Illustrator. As you can see you can do some shading with Illustrator. Incidentaly, I think I did this piece using a mouse also (still hadn't broken down and bought a pen tablet yet.)
I'm certainly not the most proficient Adobe Illustrator artist out there. If you know of any artists that use Illustrator, let me know. It would be fun to share some samples. Also go to the computer graphics section at your local Barnes and Nobles and check out some of the Illustrator books. Browse through them to see what amazing things people can do with the program.
4 Comments on Digial Art for The Traditional Artist - Adobe Illustrator, last added: 5/31/2007
I'm probably Adobe Illustrator's number one fan. Love all the posts you've been doing on digital art.
IllustratorLover said, on 5/31/2007 9:31:00 AM
Here are links to a few other artists/resources that showcase Illustrator content:
http://veerle.duoh.com/
http://www.illustratorworld.com/
http://www.illustratortechniques.com/
And this last one is a link to a bunch of online tutorials that people have created on how to use Illustrator, bookmarked by Adobe
http://del.icio.us/knowhow
They have made this accessible in Illustrator CS3 via a special panel. Find out more by visiting:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/knowhow/
J. E. Morris said, on 5/31/2007 12:43:00 PM
Thanks for the links. Some really stunning work.
Ginger*:)* said, on 5/31/2007 2:25:00 PM
Thanks for all the info, Jenn and I am glad to see these links here. Illustrator is not my program of choice, since when I began looking for a program for digital art, what I needed was something to PAINT with. I do have illustrator, photoshop and Painter, but since I am not proficient in Illustrator I really appreciate learning more about it.
Using the 
Well, this came out a while ago, but it’s still fun: the 
Ay Ceci, José y yo somos unos derrochadores de energía, en especial por el tipo de calefacción y la cocina y nevera de nuestro departamento.
Cuando seamos grandes, vamos a evitar este derroche... por ahora, nos limitaremos a cambiar las bombillas que es lo que cabe en nuestro presupuesto :)
Besote gigante a ti y a Helge :)
Excelente Ceci!! Gracias!!!
(^v^)
Hola Ceci tienes una sorpresa en mi blog...!! Pasa cuando quieras, sin compromiso ya sabes!!
(^v^)