Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Blog Posts by Tag
In the past 7 days
Blog Posts by Date
Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Austen, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 26 - 50 of 58
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Austen in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
This should get us caught up to where we ought to be before I had my stomach virus the other day - tomorrow will be the 27th and we'll be up to Chapter 27. Huzzah!
Today's chapter accounts for the passage of time for us in an interesting way - with letters. Or rather, with an indication that a bunch of correspondence is going back and forth between Elizabeth and others, mostly with a summary about what's going on.
Remember how the last chapter closed with Mrs Gardiner vowing that she was going to speak to Elizabeth about Wickham, so here she is:
Mrs Gardiner: You're too smart to do something just because I tell you not to, so I feel free to share my opinion with you. You should steer clear of Mr Wickham. I mean, he seems nice enough, but he hasn't got two sovereigns to rub together, and so you'd do best to choose someone else.
Elizabeth: Goodness, but you're being serious.
Mrs Gardiner: I call it as I see it.
Elizabeth: I promise not to let him fall in love with me if I can help it.
Mrs Gardiner:You are not be serious.
Elizabeth: Let me take another crack at it. I understand your point. And the truth is, although I think Mr Wickham is sexy, I'm not in love with him - yet. Damn Mr Darcy for robbing him of his inheritance! Still, there are lots of people who get engaged and have to wait for money, so while I will do my best to avoid becoming entangled, I certainly wouldn't be the first person we know to make an imprudent love match if I married him. Still, I'll try to be less flirtatious when I'm in company with him.
Mrs Gardiner: Maybe you should also stop inviting him around so often - at least, don't remind your mother to invite him.
Elizabeth: You mean the way I did the other day. I understand your point, and I'll try to do what's best. I hope that's good enough to satisfy you.
Her aunt assured her that she was; and Elizabeth having thanked her for the kindness of her hints, they parted; a wonderful instance of advice being given on such a point without being resented.
Charlotte Lucas takes a moment the day before her wedding to pay a call on the Bennets - she'll be taking her leave after the wedding and returning to Kent with Mr Collins. Her nervousness about her move is displayed through her remarks, as she practically begs Lizzy to keep up a correspondence with her and to come visit her. When Elizabeth says she will come, Charlotte urges her to come in March - not even three months hence, saying that Elizabeth will be as welcome to her as her own father and sister.
We then hear about letters:
Charlotte's letters: There's less real intimacy between Charlotte and Lizzy now. Charlotte (as expected) only says good things about her house, the neighborhood, and Lady Catherine, and of course, Lizzy is curbing her tongue (her pen?) as well because she can't stand Mr Collins and is still questioning Charlotte's decision.
Jane's letters:
1. I'm here in London safe and sound.
2. I've been here a full week and haven't heard from Caroline. I guess the letter I sent her went amiss?
3. My aunt is heading over toward Mr Hurst's neighborhood tomorrow, so I'm going to pay a call on Caroline Bingley.
4. Caroline seemed out of spirits, although she said she was happy to see me. I was right about both of my letters going missing, since she said she had no idea I was in Town. Unfortunately, she and Mrs Hurst had something else to do so they threw me out our visit was a short one. I'm sure they'll pay me a return cal
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume II, chapter 3 (ch 26) as of 1/1/1900
Mr Collins leaves and two of my favorite side characters in all of Austen arrive: Mr and Mrs Gardiner, come from London to spend Christmas. Austen flat-out tells us that they are refined, polished people who would not be supposed to be "in trade" even though Mr Gardiner is, in fact, a merchant of some sort who earns his money that way. He is intelligent and educated and everything his sisters are not, and his wife is lovely and smart and entirely proper. They are well-mannered, well-dressed and well-spoken. We are told that Jane and Lizzy are very close to them, and one cannot wonder at it - Jane and Elizabeth are (as has been established) well-mannered, sensible girls themselves. And it seems to me that their time with the Gardiners may, in fact, account for why they are so much better-mannered than their younger siblings, since their mother certainly wasn't a slave to their education and their father was no better.
The Gardiners have come to stay over Christmas. They are undoubtedly going to be at Longbourn for at least a week, since it was then quite common for "Christmas" to mean the entire period from the 24th or so until January 6th. Not long after arrival, Mrs Gardiner hands out her presents, and then settles in to listen to all the various reports and complaints of her relatives - much as Anne Elliot did in Persuasion, when she arrived at Uppercross and was subjected to everyone's complaints about everyone else.
Mrs Gardiner pulls Elizabeth aside to talk about Mr Bingley, proving herself to be (a) a good friend to her nieces, (b) a good judge of character (more on that in a minute) and (c) a kind-hearted, sensible soul:
"It seems likely to have been a desirable match for Jane," said she. "I am sorry it went off. But these things happen so often! A young man, such as you describe Mr Bingley, so easily falls in love with a pretty girl for a few weeks, and when accident separates them, so easily forgets her, that these sort of inconstancies are very frequent."
"An excellent consolation in its way," said Elizabeth, "but it will not do for us. We do not suffer by accident. It does not often happen that the interference of friends will persuade a young man of independent fortune to think no more of a girl, whom he was violently in love with only a few days before."
"But that expression of "violently in love" is so hackneyed, so doubtful, so indefinite, that it gives me very little idea. It is as often applied to feelings which arise from an half-hour's acquaintance, as to a real, strong attachment. Pray, how violent was Mr Bingley's love?"
"I never saw a more promising inclination. He was growing quite inattentive to other people, and wholly engrossed by her. Every time they met, it was more decided and remarkable. At his own ball he offended two or three young ladies by not asking them to dance, and I spoke to him twice myself without receiving an answer. Could there be finer symptoms? Is not general incivility the very essence of love?"
"Oh, yes! -- of that kind of love which I suppose him to have felt. Poor Jane! I am sorry for her, because, with her disposition, she may not get over it immediately. It had better have happened to you, Lizzy; you would have laughed yourself out of it sooner. But do you think she would be prevailed on to go back with us? Change of scene might be of service -- and perhaps a little relief from home, may be as useful as anything."
Mrs Gardiner is an excellent judge of her nieces' characters here - she knows that Jane will be long affected and seeks to ameliorate it. She also opines that it would have been far better for Elizabeth to be the one thwarted, since her temperament is such that she'd get over it more easily. Her comments about Mr Bingley are good ones in
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume II, chapter 2 (ch. 25) as of 1/1/1900
The extremely short version, and really I see no need to belabor today's chapter with a longer post:
Mrs Bennet is annoyed with Elizabeth, Mr Collins is annoyed with Elizabeth and behaving in a sulky/surly/churlish manner toward her (but appears to have captured Charlotte Lucas's sympathetic ear), and everyone has left Netherfield to follow Mr Bingley to town, whence they shan't return until spring, and where (hopefully) Bingley shall marry Georgianna Darcy.
And Caroline has sent a letter that reads roughly as follows:
Dearest Jane,
We've packed up the household to chase Charles to London so we can keep him caged up there for the winter. That Georgianna Darcy is SO talented and SUCH a sweet girl and we all ADORE her and Charles is going to marry her, m'kay? It would be SO nice to see you in London, but we know you won't be there. Please write. Kiss kiss, Caroline P.S. Have a merry Christmas. P.P.S. Just kidding. I don't give a rat's ass about your Christmas.
With a mere two chapters to go until the end of Volume I, you can count on something big going down - else why pay the library fee to borrow Volume II? (If that question confused you, I refer you to my post on three-volume novels in the 19th century.)
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume I, chapter 21 as of 1/1/1900
This chapter is almost entirely given over to comedic characters, as it's primarily Mrs Bennet and Mr Collins doing the talking.
Mr Collins is entirely certain that things with Elizabeth are going swimmingly well, which almost makes me feel sorry for him. Almost. Because really, how clueless can one man be? (A question that has plagued womankind since the dawn of time, yes?)
Mrs Bennet, however, is gobsmacked to hear that Elizabeth turned him down flat - she knows her daughter well enough to believe her, and therefore hints to Mr Collins that his happy bubble may have a hole in it before racing off to bludgeon Mr Bennet into forcing Lizzy to marry Mr Collins.
"Oh! Mr. Bennet, you are wanted immediately; we are all in an uproar. You must come and make Lizzy marry Mr. Collins, for she vows she will not have him, and if you do not make haste he will change his mind and not have her."
Mr. Bennet raised his eyes from his book as she entered, and fixed them on her face with a calm unconcern which was not in the least altered by her communication.
"I have not the pleasure of understanding you," said he, when she had finished her speech. "Of what are you talking?"
"Of Mr. Collins and Lizzy. Lizzy declares she will not have Mr. Collins, and Mr. Collins begins to say that he will not have Lizzy."
"And what am I to do on the occasion? -- It seems an hopeless business."
"Speak to Lizzy about it yourself. Tell her that you insist upon her marrying him."
"Let her be called down. She shall hear my opinion."
Mrs. Bennet rang the bell, and Miss Elizabeth was summoned to the library.
"Come here, child," cried her father as she appeared. "I have sent for you on an affair of importance. I understand that Mr. Collins has made you an offer of marriage. Is it true?" Elizabeth replied that it was. "Very well -- and this offer of marriage you have refused?"
"I have, Sir."
"Very well. We now come to the point. Your mother insists upon your accepting it. Is not it so, Mrs. Bennet?"
"Yes, or I will never see her again."
"An unhappy alternative is before you, Elizabeth. From this day you must be a stranger to one of your parents. -- Your mother will never see you again if you do not marry Mr. Collins, and I will never see you again if you do."
Elizabeth could not but smile at such a conclusion of such a beginning; but Mrs. Bennet, who had persuaded herself that her husband regarded the affair as she wished, was excessively disappointed.
"What do you mean, Mr. Bennet, by talking in this way? You promised me to insist upon her marrying him."
"My dear," replied her husband, "I have two small favours to request. First, that you will allow me the free use of my understanding on the present occasion; and secondly, of my room. I shall be glad to have the library to myself as soon as may be."
Mrs Bennet nevertheless tries to change Lizzy's mind (to no avail), even attempting to get Jane in on it. To her credit (and, I confess, to my surprise, given her pliant nature), Jane refuses.
At the end of the chapter, Charlotte Lucas arrives and is regaled by Lydia, Kitty and then Mrs Bennet with the story. Mrs Bennet's comment on Elizabeth's appearance - "'Aye, there she comes,' continued Mrs. Bennet, 'looking as unconcerned as may be, and caring no more for us than if we were at York, provided she can have her own way'" - obviously means that Lizzy doesn't care about them, but the phrase "if we were at York" may have had a specific meaning at that time. Still, York is far in the north of England, not near Hertfordshire, the county in which Longbourn is situated. And Richard of York was considered to be on the "wrong side" of the Battle of the Roses, between the houses of York and Lancaster, so it's possible that she's implying that Elizabeth shows them active disregard or dislike, such as was shown to Richard
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume I, chapter 20 as of 1/1/1900
I seriously considered reproducing the entire chapter within this post, because it is 100% solid comedic gold. Instead, I will sum up, and link you to the appropriate page at Mollands.net where you can (and, I hope, will) read Mr Collins's proposal in full.
The Setting
It is Wednesday, the day after the Netherfield ball. Knowing that he's got to get home by Saturday, Mr Collins decides to make his move. He corners finds Elizabeth when she is alone with her mother and Kitty after breakfast.
The Wind-Up
Mr Collins: May I, in the most pompous way possible, seek a private audience with Miss Elizabeth?
Mrs Bennet: Of course you may! Kitty and I were just . . . off! To do . . . anything!
Elizabeth: Mom! There's no need for privacy - I'm sure that Mr Collins can't have anything to say that cannot be said in front of the family. Come to think of it, I'm going to get up and go elsewhere myself.
Mrs Bennet: Sit and stay. That's an order.
Elizabeth: [Loud eyeroll.]
The Pitch
Mr Collins: Your desire not to be alone with me adds to your many perfections. Obviously, you know why we're here. "Almost as soon as I entered the house I singled you out as the companion of my future life. But before I am run away with by my feelings on this subject, perhaps it will be advisable for me to state my reasons for marrying -- and moreover for coming into Hertfordshire with the design of selecting a wife, as I certainly did."
Elizabeth: [Is torn between two options: crazed laughter or *headdesk* - opts for stifled laughter, giving herself a had pinch to make sure she does not actually burst out laughing in his face.]
Mr Collins: I have several reasons for marrying. I feel a list coming on:
1. I'm a clergyman, and clergymen should set a good example by marrying. 2. I am convinced it will add to my happiness. (I do not, actually, care if it adds to yours.) 3. Now that I think of it, this should be first. But Lady Catherine told me I should get married.
Those are the reasons for why I'm getting married. And now, why I decided to come to Longbourne to find a wife:
1. I am going to inherit Longbourne 2. I figured if I had to get married anyway, why not do you all a kindness and make sure your entire family still has a place to live once your father died, since otherwise you will all be out in the street?
Elizabeth: O_o
Mr Collins: "And now nothing remains for me but to assure you in the most animated language of the violence of my affection." P.S. - I hear your dowry isn't all that large, so I will belabor that issue and its full extent or lack thereof now, but I promise that once we're married I won't say another word about it. Probably. Maybe.
Elizabeth: Whoa - talk about putting the cart before the horse. You forget I haven't answered you. So let me just say NO. Thanks, but no thanks.
Mr Collins: [waves her off] Piffle. I know how you young ladies are. You say no when you mean yes.
Elizabeth: NO MEANS NO! " am perfectly serious in my refusal. -- You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the last woman in the world who would make you so, -- Nay, were your friend Lady Catherine to know me, I am persuaded she would find me in every respect ill qualified for the situation."
Kelly: Please take not of this wonderful bit of foreshadowing. Because Elizabeth will, of course, meet Lady Catherine.
Mr Collins: If it were certain that Lady Catherine wouldn't like you, I wouldn't have asked.
Elizabeth: "You must give me
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume I, chapter 19 as of 1/1/1900
It is now Monday, the day after Elizabeth and Jane have returned, and we are told it is November 18th. (In case you've been curious about time's passage . . . well, here you have it. The novel started before Michaelmas (September 29th) and now it's mid-November.)
Mr Bennet reads the first of the letters we see within the text. I am of the opinion that Pride & Prejudice was never written as an epistolary novel, but was Austen's first attempt at a straight narrative in her longer fiction even when it was (in its early drafts) still First Impressions. Perhaps I am incorrect, but I can assure you that if it was ever epistolary, Austen did a superlative job of wiping away her footprints when she switched it over, since it lacks any of the lengthy monologues found in Sense & Sensibility that seemed very much like letters moved into direct speech (such as Colonel Brandon's backstory).
Mr Collins's letter is ridiculous. As Mr Bennet later notes, it's written with a combination of servility and self-importance that tends to indicate that its author must be a fairly silly man. And Mr Bennet delights in the ridiculous, so it stands to reason that he's looking forward to meeting Mr Collins. You'll note that Mr Bennet is quite unperturbed about Collins's pending visit. In fact, he got Collins's letter about a month ago, then didn't answer it for a good two weeks (a fortnight being 14 days, or two weeks). He didn't alert his wife of the need to make a guest room ready or cook a good meal until the day that Mr Collins was due to arrive – this is an example of Mr Bennet being less than diligent about his duties, by the way, as well as demonstrating how unimportant he deems Mr Collins's visit, but I suspect it is also an example of Mr Bennet avoiding listening to his wife go on and on about the visit for weeks prior to its actual occurrence. (One can understand his desire to avoid that, having seen Mrs Bennet in action in prior chapters.)
Mrs Bennet may not be smart, but she certainly is quick to catch Mr Collins's meaning when he says in his correspondence that he is ready to make every possible amends to the Bennet daughters. None of the other Bennets seem to have sussed out what Mr Collins is hinting at here. Have you?
In the novel, Mr Collins is described as tall and heavy. Although Tom Hollander is short and thin, he was absolutely brilliant as Mr Collins in the 2005 movie, as was David Bamber in the 1995 BBC/PBS series. Sadly, I cannot find either one's arrival available online, but here is Tom Hollander commending the excellence of the potatoes – it cuts off before Mrs Bennet can assure him that they have a cook:
Truly, that exclamation pretty much sums up this chapter. I feel a list of her transgressions coming on:
1. She brings Lydia and Kitty with her when she comes to check up on Jane. She's doing her motherly duty, coming to see how ill her daughter truly is, but there's no good reason for her two most foolish daughters to come as well - it's just them being curious about Netherfield Park. Possibly not a massive faux pas, but decidedly a demonstration of her lack of good judgment. Truly, with Lydia being merely 15, she ought not be "out" at all, and therefore should not be paying social calls. Especially since nothing truly good can come of it.
2. She is such a conniving matchmaker. She wants Jane not to be terribly ill, but she also wants her not to get well too soon - she wants Jane to stay at Netherfield as long as possible.
3. She oversteps when talking to the Bingleys, and does worse still when addressing Mr Darcy. When speaking about Jane, she is "profuse in her acknowledgments" - both overstating Jane's condition and being obsequious while (over)stating the extent of their kindness, all while practically flashing a "Marry My Daughter" sign at Bingley the entire time.
To Mr Darcy, she is downright insulting. She is not clever enough to understand his comment to Bingley about the want of variety in the country, and she not only mounts her high horse but also tramples him underfoot with it.
4. She gossips about the Lucases (who are old family friends) to the Bingleys and Mr Darcy, insulting the wonderful Charlotte Lucas's looks and implying that the Lucases are either ill-bred or lack sufficient funds. It was so improper for so many reasons - (a) gossiping was then (as now) a vice; (b) she is behaving in an overly familiar manner by engaging in gossip with people who are practically strangers to her; (c) her comments about the Lucas girls working in the kitchen comes awfully close to discussing the Lucases' finances, which was then (as now) not acceptable in this setting; (d) she insults the Lucases' decisions regarding child-rearing and criticizes their lack of servants.
5. She boasts about Jane. Not only does she boast, but she also mentions a past suitor.
Poor Elizabeth!
Imagine the mortifications she suffers, listening to her mother. Even though Elizabeth is twenty, she still owes obedience and deference to her, so she can't drag her off or tell her to shut the hell up, however much she must want to. Still, Lizzie's a bit forward in this scene as well - as when she comments on Mr Bingley's personality. She is, of course, better acquainted with Mr Bingley than her mother, but still, the comment about his character is not quite the done thing - it is, however, in keeping with her spirited nature and is also her attempt to turn her mother's conversation in the first instance.
She tries hard to cover over her mother's rudeness and explain Mr Darcy's meaning to her mother and steer her to new topics, but Mrs Bennet not only mounted that horse, but it has quite run away with her. And, to continue with horse-related metaphors and rush right into cliché, there's little point in shutting the barn door once the horse is gone.
Elizabeth comes close to rudeness in interrupting her mother the second time, but it's to cut her off from blathering on about Jane's past suitor(s). Being a bit of a poet myself, I love this exchange, which is a bit charming, really. Lizzie speaks just after Mrs Bennet comments that Jane's prior suitor wrote her several lovely verses:
"And so ended his affection," said Elizabeth impatiently. "There has been many a one, I fancy, overcome in the same way. I wonder who first discovered the efficacy of poetry in driving away lov
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume I, chapter 9 as of 1/1/1900
Elizabeth spends her day nursing Jane. She joins everyone for dinner, then returns to the sickroom.
No sooner is she gone than the Bingley sisters start in, abusing her appearance that morning (her hair was blowsy, her petticoats covered in mud, and they even mention that her gown had obviously been let down. Gowns at the time often had quite deep hems to allow for modifications in length if they changed owners or if the owner grew or if the fashion was for a longer or shorter hemline. It was not unknown for an existing gown to be made over in whole or in part for another gown, either, so that as the waistline rose or sank, additional fabric at the hemline came in handy to adjust for the latest fashion. The More You Know*. The Bingley sisters could either afford new gowns at all times or were just being bitchy; I suspect the latter, frankly.
Mr Bingley agrees that Louisa Hurst might be correct in her assessment, but he essentially implies that she is being mean-spirited by defending Elizabeth based on her fondness for Jane. And then, when applied to for his assessment of Elizabeth's conduct, he allows that he would not want his sister to walk three miles in the country without a chaperone (Georgianna is a good five years younger than Lizzie, however) but declares that Elizabeth's eyes were made brighter still by her exercise – a compliment that shuts down Caroline Bingley and Mrs Hurst for a few moments. You can just picture Caroline stewing about it, though. And you can tell she's got it in for Elizabeth now because she's worried that Darcy is truly interested in Lizzie, since the next attack is on the Bennets' relations – something certain to give Darcy pause. Nevermind that the Bingley family's origins are no better than Mr Gardiner's; in fact, they are "worse", since Elizabeth and Jane have a gentleman for a father, not a tradesman (albeit a wealthy tradesman).
Cheapside is a part of the "old city" in London, historically linked with the marketplace. It was not a bad section of town, really, but was not considered a "fashionable" address during the Regency era, when the area around Hanover Square and Grosvenor Square was more highly prized. Miss Bingley and Mrs Hurst are amusing themselves by abusing Mr Gardiner, a man they know nothing of apart from his participation in trade. Mr Bingley professes not to care that the Bennets have relatives in Cheapside; Mr Darcy does not say whether he cares or not – he simply observes that their connections would render difficult a highly advantageous marriage (as to, say, a titled peer – and he's correct in his observation, by the way).
Caroline Bingley goes on the attack
When Elizabeth rejoins the party after Jane falls asleep, she chooses not to play cards with them because the monetary stakes are too high. Rather than say so, she uses Jane as an excuse – probably a good call, although Caroline Bingley nevertheless attacks her. First she implies that Elizabeth is a bluestocking (a term for an intelligent, intellectual woman that morphed into a sort of insult – bluestockings were considered unfashionable, frumpy and as something to be avoided), then she and Elizabeth get into a bit of a tiff over the meaning of the word "accomplished."
I was vastly entertained by this video, which is patched together with bits from three different movie versions: 1940, 1995 and 2005, but here's this scene from 1995 (complete with a sexually suggestive billiards shot by Mr Darcy):
Miss Bingley and Mrs Hurst work to establish a friendship with Jane, and they allow that her sister Elizabeth is okay to socialize with as well. They are pretty much horrified by Mrs Bennet and the younger three sisters, however. Jane seems to like both of Mr Bingley's sisters just fine, although Elizabeth can't really stand them because they consider themselves so superior.
Charlotte Lucas on love and flirtation
Now, we've already established that Charlotte is an intelligent, pragmatic sort of woman with a keen sense of observation. She is also seven years older than Lizzie, who we will learn is twenty somewhere in Volume II. (I don't consider the main character's age to be a spoiler, do you?) We can therefore assume that Charlotte has a somewhat better understanding of the workings of the world than Lizzie does, even if we don't agree with all her opinions.
When Lizzie tells Charlotte that Jane seems to be in the early stages of falling in love with Bingley, she also mentions how happy she is that it's not blatantly obvious to everyone around them. Charlotte begs to differ:
". . .[I]t is sometimes a disadvantage to be so very guarded. If a woman conceals her affection with the same skill from the object of it, she may lose the opportunity of fixing him; and it will then be but poor consolation to believe the world equally in the dark. There is so much of gratitude or vanity in almost every attachment, that it is not safe to leave any to itself. We can all begin freely -- a slight preference is natural enough; but there are very few of us who have heart enough to be really in love without encouragement. In nine cases out of ten, a woman had better show more affection than she feels. Bingley likes your sister undoubtedly; but he may never do more than like her, if she does not help him on."
On the one hand, I'm pretty certain that most of us laugh at Charlotte along with Lizzie; on the other, if you stopped that quote before the "In nine cases out of ten" line, I'm pretty sure most of us would agree that there is a lot of truth in Charlotte's words: they might move from regular conversation to flirtation, for instance, early on - but without actual encouragement from the other party, most people move on, figuring the other person is uninterested.
Charlotte's end point is that Jane is so reserved that, given the limited amount of social action she and Bingley have together, he might not realize that she likes him, since he can't come to realize how reserved she actually is to realize that her showing any preference is quite a big deal. You can sort of hear the troubled string music starting under Charlotte's words, if you listen carefully to this particular passage - another example of foreshadowing done so very well that some people don't realize it's here.
Speaking of foreshadowing, let's look at Charlotte's and Lizzie's final exchange:
"Well," said Charlotte, "I wish Jane success with all my heart; and if she were married to him to-morrow, I should think she had as good a chance of happiness as if she were to be studying his character for a twelvemonth. Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance. If the dispositions of the parties are ever so well known to each other, or ever so similar before-hand, it does not advance their felicity in the least. They always contrive to grow sufficiently unlike afterwards to have their share of vexation; and it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life."
"You make me laugh, Charlotte; but it is not sound. You know it is not sound, and that you would never act in this way yourself."
To which I (and possibly Charlotte) say: "Oh really?"
0 Comments on Pride & Prejudice, Volume I, chapter 6 as of 1/6/2011 9:45:00 PM
The Lucases turn up to discuss the dance with the Bennet women.
Remember me mentioning how the Bingleys' father earned his money in trade, but they don't have a title? Well, the father of the Lucas clan - at one time a Mr Lucas - likewise earned his living in trade, only he now has a title - he is Sir William Lucas, having been knighted by King George III. Sir William didn't feel it was right to continue living in the town of Meryton (quite possibly above a shop) once he received his title, so he removed his family to a house outside the town, now called Lucas Lodge. He's not at all stuck-up about having his title, however - he's a courteous, amiable sort of guy who tries to be kind to everyone (as we shall see a bit later).
His wife is a huge gossip, just like Mrs Bennet, and "not too clever to be a valuable neighbour" to her. (With that economy of words, Austen gives us a pretty good idea that Lady Lucas is cut from pretty much the same sort of cloth as Mrs Bennet, does she not?) And just see how the gossip about Mr Darcy is already being blown out of proportion - Mrs Bennet reports that he refused to speak to a Mrs Long, when in fact he did respond to a comment she made to him. He simply didn't openly engage in conversation, which is not the same thing as sitting there refusing to speak at all. Ah well, we shall have to let this run its course, shall we not?
Meet Charlotte Lucas, spinster
Charlotte is said to be 27 years old, an age that Austen evidently feels is pretty much "on the shelf", although she rather makes sport of that notion much later in life with Anne Elliot in Persuasion. She's rather plain (as Mrs Bennet mentioned last chapter), but she's intelligent and full of common sense and quite a good friend of Lizzie's. Having established intelligence and good sense as Charlotte's credentials, it seems to me we ought to pay close attention to Charlotte's judgments, including what she thinks of Mr Darcy:
"His pride . . . does not offend me so much as pride often does, because there is an excuse for it. One cannot wonder that so very fine a young man, with family, fortune, every thing in his favour, should think highly of himself. If I may so express it, he has a right to be proud."
You may notice that Elizabeth agrees with Charlotte, to a point, and expresses that she'd be willing to forgive him his pride, except that he injured hers by saying she was merely "tolerable", but not good-looking enough for him to want to dance with her.
In a stroke of ironic foreshadowing, Elizabeth makes a rash promise to her mother about Mr Darcy: "I believe, Ma'am, I may safely promise you never to dance with him."
There are those critics and commentators who believe Austen didn't use foreshadowing, to which I say "pish." Also, that they ought to learn how to read more carefully.
Even a marvelous writer needs a good editor. A professor has been studying Jane Austen’s original works, written in her own hand, and discovered that despite her brother’s contention that “Everything came finished from her pen,” in truth, Austen writing contained “terrible spelling, grammatical errors and poor (often nonexistent) punctuation.”
My last three books have been a 670 page life of the agricultural labouring poet John Clare, a two and half thousand page edition of the complete works of Shakespeare, and a 500 page “intellectual biography” of Shakespeare in the context of his age. So how could I resist an invitation from OUP to write a VERY SHORT book! Mind you, it was a ludicrous proposition to introduce a subject the size of English Literature in a mere 50,000 words (I pushed them up from the standard 40k limit for the series by cunningly asking for 60k and splitting the difference…). But the series guidelines were very helpful: “The text should not read like an encyclopedia entry or a textbook; depending on the topic, it may be more comprehensive or more idiosyncratic in its coverage. Don’t be afraid to express a point of view or to inject some style into the prose. Focus on issues, details, and context that make the subject interesting; you should draw your reader in with examples and quotations. Give the reader a sense both of your subject’s contours and of the debates that shape it.” Good principles, which have made for a great series – so many people have said how much they like these little books.
So how did I set about the task? Being a Literary History Man, I began by looking for literary historical precedent.
In 1877 a chaplain to Queen Victoria called the Reverend Stopford A. Brooke published a primer for students and general readers called English Literature. By the time of his death, half a million copies were in print. 160 pages long and produced in handy pocket format, it is the Victorian equivalent of a VSI. Brooke surveyed a vast terrain, from Beowulf and Caedmon to Charlotte Brontë and Alfred Tennyson, with admirable tenacity and vigour, if a little too much patriotic uplift and Anglo-Saxon prejudice for modern taste. But his even-paced chronological march and his desire to give at least a name-check to every author he considered significant meant that his little book too often reduced itself to a parade of the greatest (and not so great) hits of English literature. Faced with a similar task to Brooke’s, and more than one hundred further years’ literary production to cover, I adopted a more varied and selective approach. I made no attempt to offer a historical survey of English poets, novelists, playwrights and non-fiction writers. Frequently I skip over generations in a step; I loop forward and back in time as I identify key themes.
I devote a good deal of attention to questions of origin. From where do we get the idea of literature as a special kind of writing? What could justifiably be described as the first work of English literature and when did the conception of a body of national literature emerge? Which practising novelist wrote the first self-conscious defence of the art of the novel? These are some of the questions I have tried to answer.
Sometimes, I slow the pace and tighten the focus, exploring, for example, a scene from Shakespeare’s King Lear, an instance of the technique of “free indirect discourse” in Jane Austen’s Emma, a poignant stanza of nonsense by Edward Lear, a compositional change of mind on the part of Wilfred Owen, and Seamus Heaney’s preoccupation with prehistoric bodies excavated from Danish peat bogs. I make no apology for these moments of “close reading”: if the study of English Literature is to be true to its object, it must attend to particular words and phrases, verse lines and sentences, movements of thought and structures of writing. My sampling of passages, works, and forms of attention is eclectic – deliberately so, for there is no other body of writing upon earth more varied and inexhaustible than English Literature. That thought makes any attempt to write a “very short introduction” to the subject both deeply
0 Comments on How do you write a Very Short Introduction to English Literature? as of 1/1/1900
In Chapter 3, we meet Fanny Dashwood's brother, Edward. As the eldest son, he is the heir presumptive. We already know that his mother is stingy, based on what Fanny said in chapter 2, and that she controls the purse strings - something that is repeated in this chapter, just so we don't forget about it. This means that Edward is likely to be well-off eventually, but also that he is likely to have to marry well, since his mother will have to approve the match. We're told that his mother and his sister both want him to make a splash, somehow earning a name for himself in politics or as one of the great men of the times. His sister's desire for him to have a barouche is a desire for him to engage in ostentatious display, since a barouche at the time was the equivalent of a luxury convertible now.
Edward is a nice, quiet guy who hits it off with Elinor, and they form an obvious emotional attachment. Mrs. Dashwood is only too happy to think of Elinor being married and settled, and it suits her romantic nature just fine to jump to conclusions as soon as Elinor says a favorable word about him. Marianne, who is still more romantic than her mother, is less certain that she approves Edward as a suitor. He's not sufficiently heroic for her - she wants a Mr. Darcy, and not Mr. Darcy the prig at the beginning of P&P, and probably not even Mr. Darcy at the end of P&P, but the Mr. Darcy everyone concocts for themselves, who is tall, dark, handsome, rich, well-educated, well-dressed, and refined, and also caring and exceedingly "into" his lady love. It is not enough that Edward approves Elinor's painting - Marianne believes he ought to know all about painting, and finds him deficient for saying nice things just because it was Elinor's artwork. Marianne complains about his flat reading of the poems of William Cowper (pronounced Cooper, incidentally), who is best known for his poem The Task and for " ". Marianne wants a far more dramatic rendition of the poem, you see.
You'll note that we don't learn what Elinor thinks of Edward in this chapter, apart from her observation that he's not at all like his sister - a big plus!
A few points
1. House visits in Austen's time sometimes lasted for months on end. A family visit such as this at a country house put everyone there in close proximity with one another. They would have seen each other at meals, spent most evenings together, often in a group activity such as a shared musical event (one or more persons played and sang for the group), reading aloud (from such things as religious tracts, Shakespeare, novels, poetry or one of the popular travelogues of the time), games of cards, chess, or backgammon, and so forth. Well-off gentry did not often engage in most household chores - they had servants to haul wood, fix fires, milk cows, work in the fields or forests, do the cleaning, cooking and laundry, etc. So they probably saw a good deal of one another during the days as well, when occupied reading books and newspapers, writing letters, talking a walk, riding horses, receiving visitors or paying visits to others.
All of Austen's original readership knew exactly what day-to-day life was like for the landed gentry, and all of them knew exactly how days among family were spent, and how likely it was that Edward and Elinor were spending a great deal of time together, whether they got along well or not. I mention it to you now, because it's something that we as modern readers often do not give much thought to, and since Austen does not relay all that many conversations between Elinor and Edward, it would be easy to assume that perhaps there's little on which to build a relationship. My point is that there is MUCH on which to build a relationship, but it's contained between the lines here.
0 Comments on Sense & Sensibility, Volume I, chapter 3 as of 9/26/2010 7:27:00 PM
You'll note that this entire chapter is composed of a single conversation between John and Fanny Dashwood. John wants to keep that promise he made to his dying father and Fanny . . . does not.
Mrs. John Dashwood now installed herself mistress of Norland; and her mother and sisters-in-law were degraded to the condition of visitors. As such, however, they were treated by her with quiet civility; and by her husband with as much kindness as he could feel towards anybody beyond himself, his wife, and their child. He really pressed them, with some earnestness, to consider Norland as their home; and, as no plan appeared so eligible to Mrs. Dashwood as remaining there till she could accommodate herself with a house in the neighbourhood, his invitation was accepted.
A reminder: Mrs. John Dashwood is married to Mrs. Dashwood's step-son. And as we are about to see, she is a stingy woman, and we are all destined to despise her from here to eternity. More or less.
Behold the genius manipulation of Mrs. John (aka Fanny) Dashwood:
John Dashwood: I think I'll give £3,000 away, £1,000 a piece to each of my half-sisters.
Fanny: WTF? Just think what a horrible depravation that will be for our fat son who is only about 5 years old right now. Besides, everyone knows your sisters can't have real affection for you, since you and they have different mothers.
John: But I promised my dad!
Fanny: Yeah, but he was dying, so we should assume he had no clue what he was saying. I'm sure he didn't want you to give away half of your fortune.
[N.B. – There is no way in hell that £3,000 is anywhere close to half of his fortune.]
John: But I promised my dad! Something must be done!
Fanny: Yes, something must be done. Something that involves far less than £3,000. After all, your sisters will get married and take that money off to God knows where and Henry won't have it WOE!
John: True, Henry might turn out to be a breeder, and the money might come in handy. How's about I give them only half as much? £500 each?
Fanny: You are such a generous man! What brother would give that much to his REAL sisters, let alone these half-bloods?
John: Well, I'd rather do too much than too little. Still, they can hardly expect more.
Fanny: Who knows what they expect? The real question is what you can afford to do.
John: I'm inclined to give them the money – it will add to their inheritance when their mother dies, and make them each somewhat comfortable.
Fanny: Now that you mention it, they will already be SO comfortable that I'm sure they don't need your money.
John: Good point. Maybe instead I should give their mother an annuity of £100 per year while she lives.
Fanny: "[P]eople always live for ever when there is an annuity to be paid them." And then Fanny tells us a little something about her mother, Mrs. Ferrars, who we will not meet in person for many chapters, but it says a lot about where Fanny comes from:
An annuity is a very serious business; it comes over and over every year, and there is no getting rid of it. You are not aware of what you are doing. I have known a great deal of the trouble of annuities; for my mother was clogged with the payment of three to old superannuated servants by my father's will, and it is amazing how disagreeable she found it. Twice every year these annuities were to be paid; and then there was the trouble of getting it to them; and then one of them was said to have died, and afterwards it turned out to be no such thing. My mother was quite sick of it. Her income was not her own, she said, with such perpetual claims on it; and it was the more unkind in my father, because, otherwise, the money would have b
0 Comments on Sense & Sensibility, Volume I, chapter 2 as of 1/1/1900
Austen's opening is not what one would call thrilling. Allow me to quickly summarize what's going on here:
The Dashwood menfolk with any ownership rights in the estate in Sussex? Yeah, they're dead. Mr. Henry Dashwood, husband to Mrs. Dashwood, has just died, leaving four children. Roll call:
1. Mr. John Dashwood, the son from a prior marriage, who is married to Mrs. Fanny (Ferrars) Dashwood, who is (as you will quickly see) a bit of a bitch. They are the parents of a fat young lad named Henry. John inherited a crapload of money from his deceased mother's estate, then gained a second huge helping of money when he married Fanny Ferrars.
2. Miss Elinor Dashwood, who, as the eldest unmarried daughter is usually referred to in company as "Miss Dashwood". She is practical and usually rational, and though she has feelings, she tries to do what society expects.
3. Miss Marianne Dashwood, who gets called "Miss Marianne Dashwood" or "Miss Marianne" because she is NOT the oldest unmarried daughter, is a highly "sensible" girl. In Austen's time, that was not a way of saying she was full of good sense; it was instead a way of saying she was highly emotional. She couldn't give a rat's ass what society expects in many cases.
4. Miss Margaret Dashwood, who is still a little girl. She is not technically "out" in society, so she doesn't really get a title so much. She only goes to dinners with relatives, although some of the gentlemen call her "Miss Margaret" to be nice. (Aww.)
Here's the thing about the estate of Norland, where Mrs. Dashwood and the girls have been living: when Mr. Henry Dashwood's uncle died, he inherited only a life interest in the estate, which will pass in full to his male children – in this case, Mr. John Dashwood, who probably only holds a life interest as well (meaning he really can't sell the estate), and fat little Henry Dashwood, who (if he lives to adulthood) will own the estate outright. The uncle left each of the girls £1,000.
Only a year after the uncle's death, Mr. Henry Dashwood dies. He leaves all his money to his wife and daughters, but it's a total of £10,000. What this means is that Mrs. Dashwood and her daughters? Yeah. They're now technically homeless, and they're going to have to live off the interest for the foreseeable future.
As Mr. Henry Dashwood lies dying, he makes his son, John, promise to do something to care for his step-mother and half-sisters. John at first intends to do something rather nice for them, but his wife quickly talks him out of it, in rather hilarious fashion, in the next chapter.
Speaking of his wife, I'm sure you all notice how Mrs. John Dashwood hastens to pee all over her new territory Norland in order to claim the house. (Because she is younger than her stepmother-in-law, she is differentiated when in mixed company by use of her husband's name. So, "Mrs. John Dashwood" is not as important as the elder "Mrs. Dashwood", as pecking-orders go.) Speaking of Mrs. Dashwood (mère), it's important to notice that she has an overdeveloped sense of drama. Like her middle daughter, Marianne, she is a pretty emotional creature, and left to her own devices, she would have rushed out of Norland immediately – nevermind they had no place to go, really, and that such actions would lead to an irrevocable break with her stepson.
Elinor is the voice of reason, who talks her mom off that particular ledge. We're told (not shown) that Elinor has strong emotions but deliberately tempers them, something her mother hasn't managed to figure out yet, and something that Marianne deliberately and willfully refuses to learn: EMO MARIANNE IS EMO! And Margaret? Yeah, she's 13 and a little too prone to emulate Marianne. But since she's 13, we really won't see her all that much in this version of the novel.
WAIT!
0 Comments on Sense & Sensibility, Volume I, chapter 1 as of 1/1/1900
Our reading of Sense and Sensbility starts this Thursday, and I have to tell you all that in some ways, I find Sense & Sensibility to be the hardest of Austen's novels to read. It's certainly the hardest to get into for a LOT of people, and here are some reasons why:
1. Sense and Sensibility was first published in 1811. Yes, that means the 200th anniversary of Austen's first publication is next year, but it also means that Austen was writing using late 18th- and early 19th-century prose. Especially for this book and her second-published novel, Pride and Prejudice, which were first written by her in the 1790s. Early 19th-century prose is different from contemporary prose. Not as different as, say, Middle English or Elizabethan English, maybe, but still . . . the phrasing is a bit different than one is used to in some cases. This is the sort of thing to which one adjusts as a book goes on, and in which one can positively delight if one really gets the hang of it (say, by reading lots of Austen and Brontë and such). Really, it's not that big a deal - it's like reading Shakespeare (or hearing it spoken): a bit foreign-sounding at first, but eventually pretty intelligible if you roll with it.
2. The book opens with a complicated legal explanation about the inheritance of estates, a topic that comes up again throughout the novel. And I mean that sincerely - both that such a thing is quite near the start of the book, and that it is complicated, even for lawyers. I was one. I know whereof I speak. That said, Austen explains it far better than any Property Law professor I've heard, and I've heard some great ones. I promise to hold your hand for this bit, which we do need to discuss because the laws of inheritance are a major inciting event in this novel, and in order to appreciate some of Austen's social activism and protofeminism, we have to know what she is saying the law is, so we can understand why she rails about it. Savvy?
3. The book also opens with a glut of similar-sounding character names, all of whom are female and all of whom are variants on Miss or Mrs. Dashwood. The funny thing is that for me, these character's names sound nothing alike now, but that is because I understand the social niceties of titles used in Austen's time - in part from having read so many Austen novels. (This is one of the reasons I generally recommend that folks read S&S last if they are reading all six of the major novels - the naming seems intuitive if you've done that, and even the legal estate stuff is discussed a bit in Pride & Prejudice, although it's a horse of a slightly different color.) But when I first read this book in the late 1990s, I really struggled to sort it out.
Have no fear, it will all be exceptionally clear as we go along. Meanwhile, at least one person asked me what edition of Sense and Sensibility I recommend. I am personally a huge fan of the Norton Edition, which was edited by Professor Claudia L. Johnson from Princeton, who really knows her stuff. She went back to the first and second editions of the novel, both of which were printed in Austen's lifetime, in order to answer questions about punctuation and the like. (Many other editions rely on the extremely popular editions done by R.W. Chapman in the early to mid-1900s; sometimes, he made stylistic changes that weren't necessary.) I like the Norton Edition because of how Johnson went about working on it, and also for the numerous excerpts of biographical information and related texts in the back of the book, some of which were quite helpful to me when I was researching the Jane Project. (I have Norton Editions of all the six major novels.)
That said, any edition of this novel will work for you. I will be referring to the Volume and Chapter numbers from the original editions, so you ought to be able to keep up fairly easily. Most book stor
0 Comments on Sense and Sensibility - some preliminary thoughts as of 1/1/1900
I tallied up the number of chapters in my copy of Sense & Sensibility last night, and there are 50 of them. Plus I figure I have at least two days of preliminary posts and probably some stuff to say about the book after we're done reading, to say nothing of allowing time to discuss a couple of good screen adaptations. And I figure once we get too close to Christmas, folks will be so tied up with other things that perhaps we ought to wrap up in advance, which is how I decided that I'd like the whole thing done prior to Thanksgiving in the U.S., which is November 25th this year.
I figure I'll actually start the introductory posts on Monday, September 20th, with the goal of tackling Chapter One on Thursday, September 23rd. That will allow us ample time to cover roughly a chapter a day, with the possibility of a day off every now and again so folks can catch up on their reading of the book and/or the posts. (For instance, I foresee the distinct possibility of missing a few days at the very end of September/beginning of October, since I'll be travelling to South Carolina for my brother's retirement from the U.S. Air Force, along with possible college visits for S. I will try not to miss the entire 5 days involved, but we shall see.)
If you are planning on joining the S&S read-along, you have until next Wednesday to get your hands on a copy of the book so you can read Chapter One by next Thursday, September 23rd. If you don't plan to read along, I hope you will continue to stop by, since I will continue to post other content in addition to my S&S posts. And hey, some of the S&S posts may be up your alley anyway.
0 Comments on Sense & Sensibility read-along as of 1/1/1900
I've always loved a good romance - or at least I have since I was about twelve or thirteen years old. The best romances, I've always thought, are the ones where you just long for the couple to be able to get together, to be together, despite all the odds stacked against them, despite misunderstandings and barriers. The other thing that's important in a really good love story is that it's not just about the relationship- I feel more drawn in and engaged if there's a full and satisfying storyline beside the romance. I mainly read historical fiction, so the following selection will be biased in that direction, but I'll read a romance in any genre. Firstly three recent stories I've loved: Ann Turnbull's No Shame No Fear and the sequel Forged in the Fire. These two novels follow the fortunes of Quaker teenager Susanna in a time when her people were harshly persecuted in the 1600s. These two are an engaging and captivating read, with just the right mix of adventure, action, heartbreak and young love. Wonderful! I also found the Quaker world fascinating. Another beautifully written love story is Sally Gardner's I, Coriander. This was another teen novel that swept me off my feet and kept me reading until the early hours. Here is a handsome prince in a fairy-tale world that runs alongside the real historical setting of Oliver Cromwell's drab and Puritan England. Coriander falls in love with him, but they don't inhabit the same world - until he makes the transition in the most unexpected way, sending a shiver of sheer delight through the reader. This is a exquisitely constructed love story. Thirdly (to turn contemporary) is Sarah Dessen's The Truth about Forever. An American high school romance, this is far out of my usual field of interest, but I was captivated by this slow-moving, almost sensual love story. I thought it was beauifully structured and the device of the truth game that brings the two characters together was genius. By far my favourite Sarah Dessen novel. For my last two choices, I shall turn to the stories that beguiled my own teen years. Firstly Pride and Prejudice. I know, I know, everyone quotes this one, but I discovered it at fourteen and simply adored it. Though it should really not have much to say to modern teenagers, who no longer have love and marriage at the centre of their lives and ambitions, Jane Austen nevertheless taps into such timeless truths and creates such lovable and memorable characters, that the books continue to captivate readers. Having read my way through Jane Austen, and hungry for more, at fourteen fifteen years old, I discovered Georgette Heyer. I feel her books have dated far more than Austen's, although they are written much more recently, but if you can see past the changed meanings of many words, they are still bubbly, witty and delighful love stories. Don't expect any serious issues or deep meaningful engagement here. Think light, frothy but beautifully crafted entertainment. Try These Old Shades, my enduring favourite of Heyer's novels.
2 Comments on My Five Favourite Teen Romances by Marie-Louise Jensen, last added: 7/11/2010
If you saw this post over at LiveJournal, you'd probably say, "Hey Kelly, what's with the Mr. Knightley icon? Isn't he an Austen guy?" Allow me to 'splain, and I promise that, while I open with a bit of a digression, it all ties in later.
One of the key themes in Emma, by Jane Austen, is an exploration of what it is to be a gentleman. The book compares Mr. Knightley (and yes, that name is somewhat allegorical), a model English gentleman, with Frank Churchill (who has adopted a different surname than what he was born with, and whose first name, which might imply candor, is instead associated with "French" manners - though charming, he is secretive and duplicitous and a bit irresponsible; he wants to live a life of idleness and pleasure (like the Prince Regent, whom Austen disliked), and he wants out of England ASAP). Mr. Knightley is honest and actually frank (he says what's on his mind), and he attends to all of his duties as a landowner, whether it's meeting with his tenants or policing and improving his estate or paying the proper calls on people.
A true gentleman, you see, attends to his responsibilities. If he owns an estate, he (like Mr. Knightley) must actively oversee his estate. He must be fair to his tenants. He must help to keep the peace (as Knightley does when the gypsies are in the area or the poultry thieves are about). He should attend to the poor (which Knightley does by indicating his familiarity with his tenants as well as with his generosity to the Bateses). In short, if he has any obligation or responsibility, he should keep on top of things and discharge his duties properly.
This notion of proper conduct comes from a long English tradition, and certainly extends to what was expected of lords and kings centuries earlier. And so we come to Prospero, who is rapidly established as being deficient in the execution of his duties as Duke. (Yes, I know he was the Duke of Milan and not the Duke of, say, Essex, but in Shakespeare's time, one could not create fictional dukes and kings in England and get away with it - one either wrote a "history", gussied up so as to stroke the current monarch's history and beliefs, or one set their play elsewhere.)
Prospero himself tells us that he neglected his duties in Act I, scene 2, when he unfolds his story to Miranda and tells her how he turned his back on his duties as Duke in order to (selfishly) pursue his study of magic - decidedly NOT a proper reason to abnegate one's responsibilities. In order to further his selfish goals, he hands the reins over to his brother, Antonio, who steers the state extremely well.
The abdication of responsibility is a big, bozo no-no, not only in Shakespeare's time, but for a few hundred more years in England and elsewhere. (As stated earlier, proper attention to one's duties remained a key indicator of mensch-hood in Austen's time, which is why characters like Darcy and Knightley and Wentworth and Edmund Ferrars and Henry Tilney and Edmund Bertram are good men - they live up to their responsibilities - whereas characters like Wickham and Frank Churchill and William Elliot and Tom Bertram & Henry Crawford are not, since they do not behave like "proper" gentlemen and they shirk at least some of their responsibilities.)
Add to this the somewhat repressive Christian society (and that was in flux in the time of Elizabeth I and King James, certainly), the practice of magic was also questionable, so the combination of abnegation of duty and the choice to pursue magic tend to mark Prospero as a questionable character.
His decision to cause the shipwreck that begins the play also shows questionable morality, and yet as the play unfolds, his character eventually reveals a strong moral center, apart, perhaps, from his treatment of Ariel and Caliban, although even then, he eventually does the right thing
0 Comments on The Tempest, part 5 - ungentlemanlike behaviour as of 1/1/1900
Georgetown alums will recognize the title of the post as being the source of the team name "hoyas". The phrase is Greek and Latin, traditionally rendered hoia saxa, and literally means "What rocks!" (Of all the Latin phrases I picked up at Georgetown Law, this nonlegal one really stuck.)
Looking out at the sunny day today here in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, I cannot help but think of Elizabeth Bennet's delight in Chapter 27 of Pride and Prejudice at being invited to accompany her aunt and uncle on a tour of England that might take them as far as the Lake District.
No scheme could have been more agreeable to Elizabeth, and her acceptance of the invitation was most ready and grateful. "My dear, dear aunt," she rapturously cried, "what delight! what felicity! You give me fresh life and vigour. Adieu to disappointment and spleen. What are men to rocks and mountains? Oh! what hours of transport we shall spend! And when we do return, it shall not be like other travellers, without being able to give one accurate idea of any thing. We will know where we have gone -- we will recollect what we have seen. Lakes, mountains, and rivers shall not be jumbled together in our imaginations; nor, when we attempt to describe any particular scene, will we begin quarrelling about its relative situation. Let our first effusions be less insupportable than those of the generality of travellers."
And yes, I rather expect that Elizabeth's raptures about nature in conjunction with a mention of the Lake District are a nod to William Wordsworth, whose poem Lines Written a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey, and in particular this effusively meditative (yes, probably an oxymoron) passage pulled from its fifth stanza, were well-known and appear to have been loved by Austen, given that she references this poem in other novels as well, including Mansfield Park:
The picture of the mind revives again: While here I stand, not only with the sense Of present pleasure, but with pleasing thoughts That in this moment there is life and food For future years. And so I dare to hope, Though changed, no doubt, from what I was when first I came among these hills; when like a roe I bounded o'er the mountains, by the sides Of the deep rivers, and the lonely streams, Wherever nature led -more like a man Flying from something that he dreads than one Who sought the thing he loved. For nature then (The coarser pleasures of my boyish days, And their glad animal movements all gone by) To me was all in all. -I cannot paint What then I was. The sounding cataract Haunted me like a passion; the tall rock, The mountain, and the deep and gloomy wood, Their colours and their forms, were then to me An appetite; a feeling and a love, That had no need of a remoter charm, By thought supplied, nor any interest Unborrowed from the eye. -That time is past, And all its aching joys are now no more, And all its dizzy raptures. Not for this Faint I, nor mourn nor murmur; other gifts Have followed; for such loss, I would believe, Abundant recompense. For I have learned To look on nature, not as in the hour Of thoughtless youth; but hearing oftentimes The still, sad music of humanity, Nor harsh nor grating, though of ample power To chasten and subdue. And I have felt A presence that disturbs me with the joy Of elevated thoughts; a sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns, And the round ocean and the living air, And the blue sky, and in the mind of man: A motion and a spirit, that impels All thinking things, all objects of all thought, And rolls through all things. Therefore am I still A lover of the meadows and the woods, And mountains; and of all that we behold From this
Chapter 19 - the very short version Catherine and Henry discuss the love triangle among Isabella Thorpe, James Morland and Captain Tilney.
Chapter 19 For me, this chapter is full of reasons to love Henry Tilney and Catherine Morland, and for rather different reasons. Catherine's part of the conversation further develops her as a kind-hearted, well-intentioned, empathic soul. She worries that Captain Tilney does not know of Isabella's engagement to James, believing that a man who knew of it would not pursue Isabella. She worries that Isabella is not aware of her conduct, believing that her friend would not purposefully lead Captain Tilney on or act in any way that might hurt Catherine's brother. She worries that James either does not see what is happening, or will be hurt by it.
I will remind you of something that Henry Tilney said back in Chapter 16 as a means of looking at Catherine's worries:
Henry smiled, and said, "How very little trouble it can give you to understand the motive of other people's actions."
"Why? -- What do you mean?"
"With you, it is not, How is such a one likely to be influenced, What is the inducement most likely to act upon such a person's feelings, age, situation, and probable habits of life considered? -- but, How should I be influenced, what would be my inducement in acting so and so?"
Henry was correct, you see. Catherine would never flirt with another man when already in love; as we've already seen, once Henry Tilney truly entered the scene, it was all she could do to actually pay attention to John Thorpe (who is so delusional that he probably mistook that for the utmost expression of affection - it is, after all, always opposites day in Thorpeland).
In the present scene, I find these additional reasons to love Henry Tilney:
1. He neither dismisses her fears nor refuses to discuss them, even though it led him to an intimate discussion of the love lives of others.
Dear Miss Austen - I see what you did there. Our main characters having a discussion about a love affair that appears to be on the rocks is indicative of the main characters drawing exceedingly close together. I applaud you, madam.
2. He hears her out. Even though one might expect him not to, under the circumstances. And he doesn't take offense even when some of her questions amount to "what sort of man is your brother?", which is, after all, rather impertinent.
3. He tries to help Catherine see things from a different perspective, although Catherine is only able to go so far. It begins at the point in the conversation where he draws a distinction between Frederick's attentions to Isabella and her receiving of it.
"And are you sure it is my brother's doing?"
"Yes, very sure."
"Is it my brother's attentions to Miss Thorpe, or Miss Thorpe's admission of them, that gives the pain?"
"Is not it the same thing?"
"I think Mr. Morland would acknowledge a difference. No man is offended by another man's admiration of the woman he loves; it is the woman only who can make it a torment."
Catherine blushed for her friend, and said, "Isabella is wrong. But I am sure she cannot mean to torment, for she is very much attached to my brother. She has been in love with him ever since they first met, and while my father's consent was uncertain, she fretted herself almost into a fever. You know she must be attached to him."
"I understand: she is in love with James, and flirts with Frederick."
"Oh! no, not flirts. A woman in love with one man cannot flirt with another."
"It is probable that she will neither love so well, nor flirt so well, as she might do either singly. The gentlemen must each give up a little."
After a short pause, Catherine resumed with, "Then you do not believe Isabella so very much attached to my brother?"
"I can have no opinion on that subject."
Henry reveals that he understands exactly what the situation is, as do we, the readers. His parting remark, "I can have no opinion on that subject", is very precisely (or, as Henry himself might say, "nicely") stated. Henry is not saying that he does not hold an opinion on the subject; he is saying that under the rules of society, he is not supposed to express his opinion on the subject.
Catherine continues to worry about leaving Captain Tilney behind in Bath with Isabella and James once she and the rest of the Tilneys leave for Northanger Abbey. Henry's response to her is honest, even if Catherine takes it to mean more than what Henry actually says. After all, she believes Isabella still to be kind-hearted and in love with James, as opposed to manipulative and in love with the idea of marrying a large fortune. Still, what he says makes sense no matter how you understand Isabella, and shows Henry to be a man of good sense, as well as a man doing his best to put Catherine at ease even though he understands, as she cannot, what the precise situation is.
He believes what he says in closing to be true: "Though Frederick does not leave Bath with us, he will probably remain but a very short time, perhaps only a few days behind us. His leave of absence will soon expire, and he must return to his regiment. -- And what will then be their acquaintance? -- The mess-room will drink Isabella Thorpe for a fortnight, and she will laugh with your brother over poor Tilney's passion for a month." I should note that in this, Henry is mistaken because he has credited Isabella with being a woman who is intelligent enough to realize that Captain Tilney would only ever marry a woman with a large dowry. Isabella, while not unintelligent, is banking on beauty and flirtation to be enough to land herself an heir, and she's hoping to string James along in case she can't boat this particular whale.
Today's picture, by the by, is by Hugh Thomson, an illustrator from Victorian England who did illustrated versions of Austen's novel. This one is entitled "The Mess Room Will Drink Isabella Thorpe for a Fortnight".
En la mañana: Northanger Abbey or bust! Now, with Gothic tales from Henry!
0 Comments on Northanger Abbey - Chapter Nineteen as of 8/19/2009 3:11:00 PM
Chapter 16 - the very short version Catherine has an extended visit at Milsom Street; the eldest Tilney son turns up and dances with Isabella; next day, Isabella hears from James Morland about expenses.
Character/costume sketch by Margaret Fletcher in 1895 for a stage adaptation of Northanger Abbey written by Rosina Filippi
Chapter 16 Catherine's trip to see the Tilneys at Milsom Street proves to be a bit of a disappointment. Both Henry and Eleanor are subdued for some reason. Check out how clearly Austen tells us that General Tilney's the reason for everyone being so proper and polite and distant, while avowing that "It could not be General Tilney's fault. That he was perfectly agreeable and good-natured, and altogether a very charming man, did not admit of a doubt, for he was tall and handsome, and Henry's father. He could not be accountable for his children's want of spirits, or for her want of enjoyment in his company." Brilliant use of double-speak, and a reader would be hard-pressed to miss out on what was going on here, even though Catherine manages to miss it.
Isabella, you will be unsurprised to learn, is more than happy to tear into the Tilneys at the slightest provocation (having, after all, lost Catherine for the last carriage ride two chapters ago). And check out this bit of commentary from Isabella, who is trashing Henry (knowing, as she does, that her own brother fancies Catherine, being safely engaged to James - so that perhaps Catherine isn't quite so necessary to her - and resenting Catherine's growing attachment to the Tilneys in general):
" . . . And then the brother, he, who had appeared so attached to you! Good heavens! well, some people's feelings are incomprehensible. And so he hardly looked once at you the whole day?"
"I do not say so; but he did not seem in good spirits."
"How contemptible! Of all things in the world inconstancy is my aversion. Let me entreat you never to think of him again, my dear Catherine; indeed he is unworthy of you."
"Unworthy! I do not suppose he ever thinks of me."
"That is exactly what I say; he never thinks of you. -- Such fickleness! Oh! how different to your brother and to mine! I really believe John has the most constant heart."
Isabella on inconstancy I'd like to talk in particular about the bit I bolded. First, we already suspect Isabella of inconstancy, and if you've read as far as the end of this chapter, you've already seen it in action. Second, in the first part of the bolded section, she claims to despise inconstancy, yet in the next sentence, she encourages Catherine to become inconstant toward Henry. Third - and this overlaps with the first point - this is foreshadowing in a big way. We know we can't trust what a Thorpe says, and we shall see Isabella's inconstancy writ large e'er long. Finally, we see evidence of Isabella's inconstancy very soon after. It's plain from how she claims not to want to dance that it's likely she will, and that her saying she wants to keep her engagement a secret (why? who can say?) is obviously a falsehood as well.
At the Rooms Eleanor is wonderful, Henry makes a beeline to ask Catherine to dance, and Captain Frederick Tilney turns up. Catherine "supposed it possible that some people might think him handsomer than his brother, though, in her eyes, his air was more assuming, and his countenance less prepossessing*. His taste and manners were beyond a doubt decidedly inferior". Captain Tilney, it turns out, is a bit of a rogue.
*prepossessing: "tending to create a favorable impression" (according to Merriam Webster)
Discourse between Henry and Catherine One of my favorite quotes from the entire book is in this chapter. Here's the dialogue in which it occurs:
"Your brother will not mind it, I know," said she, "because I heard him say before that he hated dancing; but it was very good-natured in him to think of it. I suppose he saw Isabella sitting down, and fancied she might wish for a partner; but he is quite mistaken, for she would not dance upon any account in the world."
Henry smiled, and said, "How very little trouble it can give you to understand the motive of other people's actions."
"Why? -- What do you mean?"
"With you, it is not, How is such a one likely to be influenced, What is the inducement most likely to act upon such a person's feelings, age, situation, and probable habits of life considered? -- but, How should I be influenced, what would be my inducement in acting so and so?"
"I do not understand you."
"Then we are on very unequal terms, for I understand you perfectly well."
"Me? -- yes; I cannot speak well enough to be unintelligible."
"Bravo! -- an excellent satire on modern language."
"But pray tell me what you mean."
"Shall I indeed? -- Do you really desire it? But you are not aware of the consequences; it will involve you in a very cruel embarrassment, and certainly bring on a disagreement between us.
"No, no; it shall not do either; I am not afraid."
"Well, then, I only meant that your attributing my brother's wish of dancing with Miss Thorpe to good-nature alone convinced me of your being superior in good-nature yourself to all the rest of the world."
Catherine blushed and disclaimed, and the gentleman's predictions were verified. There was a something, however, in his words which repaid her for the pain of confusion; and that something occupied her mind so much that she drew back for some time, forgetting to speak or to listen, and almost forgetting where she was; till, roused by the voice of Isabella, she looked up and saw her with Captain Tilney preparing to give them hands across.
I love the many things Austen does in this bit of dialogue:
1. We learn more about Catherine's good nature, as she infers nothing but benign motives on Captain Tilney's part (when he's more likely thinking "what a fine piece of womanflesh", or something equally - or more - crass).
2. We learn more about Isabella's inconstant nature; having sworn not to dance, she jumps at the first chance to dance with Captain Tilney (the presumptive heir). Later, she babbles about him and indicates how very flattered she was (while stating the opposite, since, as you know, pretty much every day is opposites day in Thorpe-land).
3. We learn quite a bit about Captain Tilney, who is not as well-mannered as his brother, and who doesn't take "no" for an answer but goes after what he wants.
4. We learn more about Henry - how well he understands Catherine, and how very highly he thinks of her. It makes me positively giddy knowing that he appreciates her for her kind-hearted nature.
5. Catherine gets an idea that Henry really likes her; you know - likes her, likes her.
6. The exchange serves as highly entertaining and amusing wordplay on its own, without taking any of the prior points into account. Brava, Miss Austen!
On the marriage between James and Isabella James's letter indicates that Mr. Morland is turning over a living worth 400 pounds a year (not a lot, but enough to start with), and that he and Isabella are going to have to wait 2-3 years before they can marry (since James has to be 21 to own the living); further, Mr. Morland promises to leave James at least that much of an estate as his inheritance.
Isabella is . . . well, pissed because she thinks Mr. Morland is being Ebeneezer Scrooge, and she essentially trash-talks him to his daughter. I love the possible - nay, likely - double meanings in this bit below:
Isabella recollected herself. "As to that, my sweet Catherine, there cannot be a doubt, and you know me well enough to be sure that a much smaller income would satisfy me. It is not the want of more money that makes me just at present a little out of spirits; I hate money; and if our union could take place now upon only fifty pounds a year, I should not have a wish unsatisfied. Ah! my Catherine, you have found me out. There's the sting. The long, long, endless two years and half that are to pass before your brother can hold the living."
"Yes, yes, my darling Isabella," said Mrs. Thorpe, "we perfectly see into your heart. You have no disguise. We perfectly understand the present vexation; and every body must love you the better for such a noble honest affection."(italics added)
First, "Isabella recollected herself" does not mean that she remembers why she's really upset; it means only that she remembers to whom she's speaking (or, more precisely, the relationship between the person to whom she's speaking and the person she's trash-talking). Second, when Mrs. Thorpe says that "we perfectly see into [her] heart", I think she's standing in as a surrogate for the narrator and the reader (and even, a bit, for Catherine, who got an unfiltered look - however brief - at Isabella). We see and understand exactly what has Isabella's knickers in a twist, or at least the primary cause. The delay in nuptials seems decidedly secondary in importance to Isabella, as we'll see in coming chapters. At least she's kind to James when he turns up.
On the morrow - the Tilneys invite Catherine to come stay with them at Northanger Abbey
2 Comments on Northanger Abbey - Chapter Sixteen, last added: 8/19/2009
Chapter 4 - the very short version Catherine looks around for Henry Tilney but fails to find him; Mrs. Allen bumps into an old school friend, Mrs. Thorpe, and Catherine becomes fast friends with her eldest daughter, Isabella
Chapter 4
The Pump Room Giddy after a successful evening out in the company of a nearly-handsome man, Catherine rushes to the Pump Room, sure she's going to run into him.
Mr. Tilney did not appear. Every creature in Bath, except himself, was to be seen in the room at different periods of the fashionable hours; crowds of people were every moment passing in and out, up the steps and down; people whom nobody cared about, and nobody wanted to see; and he only was absent.
First, what the Pump Room is: It is a building constructed above hot mineral springs with water at a constant 49°C/120°F, which has been imbibed for medicinal purposes for centuries (since the time that the Romans settled there, and possibly earlier). In Austen's time, there were also spring-fed hot baths, where people could take the water in order to relieve various aches and pains. As it turns out, there were also Roman baths nearby, but those weren't uncovered until after Austen's death. During the morning*, visitors would stroll about in the Pump Room to see and be seen and to drink the waters while an orchestra played music from a small balcony. Those in good healthy would have a glass as a constitutional; those in ill health would drink however many glasses their particular doctor prescribed for them.
*morning: In Regency England, morning lasted pretty much all day; any time up until dinner, which was served in most towns starting sometime between 6 and 8 p.m. (in the country, it was usually slightly earlier - say, between 4:30 and 6).
Second, what the Pump Room is like. If Bath were a college, the Pump Room would be either the cafeteria or the quad - wherever it is that you're pretty much guaranteed to see everyone on campus on a given day. With the Pump Room, not only did you see pretty much everyone in Bath there, but there was actually a book in the Pump Room where people newly arrived in town would sign their names. That way, were one checking for someone in particular, they could check the guest book to see if they'd turned up in town yet.
About Catherine's reaction Well. We've all been there, haven't we? There's nothing wrong with the day at all, but since Henry Tilney's not there, Catherine decides to write off all of Bath. God bless. Meanwhile, Mrs. Allen (Oh, Mrs. Allen!) is busy opining how delightful Bath is - or would be, if only they had any acquaintance - completely oblivious to poor Catherine's woe.
Note for curious poetry fans: The quoted lines "'despair of nothing we would attain,' as 'unwearied diligence our point would gain'" come from a copy-book for children called A Guide to the English Tongue by Thomas Dyche, first printed in 1707. I rather suspect some of those couplets were akin to the nursery rhyme advice my grandmothers used to quote. (In this instance, upon hearing Mrs. Allen carp about wishing for some acquaintance, my grandmother Stewart would undoubtedly have said, "If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride," a phrase I continue to use to this day thanks to her. But I digress.)
Meeting the Thorpes Dear Jane, I don't mean to alarm you, but your deus ex machina is showing.
Sitting around obliviously in the Pump Room, Mrs. Allen is approached by Mrs. Thorpe, a complete chatterbox who rattles on about her children while Mrs. Allen feels smug about her own superior lace. Only when Mrs. Thorpe's three daughters turn up does Mrs. Allen remember her young charge, and it turns out that the Thorpes know Catherine's brother, James, who is friends with John Thorpe. For now, let us just say that Isabella's seizing on that fact immediately and wishing for Catherine's closer acquaintance smacks of James being rather friendly with Isabella, and leave it at that.
The meeting also smacks of extreme authorial convenience, hence my little note to Miss Austen, above. If you've not read the book before and haven't read ahead, I hope this little tidbit doesn't spoil things for you, but, having shown us two brothers, Miss Austen will undoubtedly produce and use them before the end of the novel (rather like the old advice about using a gun if you've shown it, the precise iteration of which eludes me at present).
Isabella Thorpe Who among us has not had a crush (of sorts) on a slightly older, cooler, more experienced girl who is kind to us and seems to want to be a helpful friend? Such is the case with Miss Isabella Thorpe (who, as the eldest daughter, would formally be known as "Miss Thorpe", whereas her sisters would be "Miss Anne Thorpe" and "Miss Maria Thorpe" - also? Maria was not pronounced like the name of the girl in West Side Story, but rather as in "They call the wind Mariah"). In this instance, Isabella's experience is superior to Catherine's (she's been to balls in Tunbridge Wells, another spa town in west Kent, not particularly far from London, as well as in Bath, and she's apparently been to London recently, where she's taken note of fashions). Isabella's superior knowledge is not of a superior nature, if you catch my drift. She's not exactly widely travelled, and her ability to spot flirtations so easily marks her as a flirt herself, and indicates a certain want of depth on her part.
For the curious, the word quiz, used twice in the lengthy paragraph describing Miss Thorpe's knowledge, indicates a curious person or object who/which invites ridicule or mockery, and not a small sort of test.
The parting lines The narrator steps firmly in to intercede for us, lest one of the characters - in this case, Mrs. Thorpe - feel the need to tell us her story first-hand:
Mrs. Thorpe was a widow, and not a very rich one; she was a good-humoured, well-meaning woman, and a very indulgent mother. Her eldest daughter had great personal beauty, and the younger ones, by pretending to be as handsome as their sister, imitating her air, and dressing in the same style, did very well.
This brief account of the family is intended to supersede the necessity of a long and minute detail from Mrs. Thorpe herself, of her past adventures and sufferings, which might otherwise be expected to occupy the three or four following chapters; in which the worthlessness of lords and attornies might be set forth, and conversations, which had passed twenty years before, be minutely repeated.
I will now take a moment to thank Miss Austen for her kindness here, and to point out to any fellow writers reading here that this is an extremely clever and judicious way of telling, not showing, us the information. No flashback, no conversation. Just a quick summary to set us on our feet so we can keep up with her. Now, I know that the general rule is "show, don't tell," but I rather prefer the articulation I heard in a writing seminar with Rachel Pollack, in which she said "Show OR tell, but don't do both." Because sometimes, telling is appropriate. What Jane Austen did here was totally an appropriate (and, because of how she did it, hilarious) use of telling.
Outlook for tomorrow: Chapter 5 Cloudy prospects for seeing Mr. Tilney, but a high probability of some serious literary discussion.
0 Comments on Chapter Four as of 8/4/2009 8:53:00 PM
I don't have many quotes today, but I like the two that I've got:
Back in April, British author Sir Clement Freud died. And Neil Gaiman posted about his death and his obituary, but it was what he said about his own work and its main character (Coraline, a book of which I am particularly fond) that spoke to me:
I never met him. I loved corresponding with him -- he was funny and dry, and he loved Coraline, although he didn't like the bit where she cried in the night in the empty bed. He thought that, as hero and a brave girl, she should not have cried. And I thought that she was a hero and a brave girl because she cried in the night and kept going anyway.
And a quote from motivational speaker and self-help guru Frank Tibolt, which I think argues quite cogently for the butt-in-chair method of writing, even though his comment is not limited to writing alone, but to any activity, really:
"We should be taught not to wait for inspiration to start a thing. Action always generates inspiration. Inspiration seldom generates action."
Ooh - reminds me of one of my favorite quotes from Emma, the novel by Jane Austen, and this line spoken by Mr. Weston: "What is right to be done cannot be done too soon."
0 Comments on Quoteskimming as of 5/10/2009 1:11:00 PM
great post - I'll look out for those books now. :)