Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: shifty, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 5 of 5
![Blog Icon](http://images.jacketflap.com/images/t(1).jpg?picon=623)
Blog: Wilde Teen Books (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Christmas, Wilde Woolly teddy Bears, Wilde Woolly teddy Bears, Add a tag
![Blog Icon](http://images.jacketflap.com/images/libnetaboutme.jpg?picon=86)
Blog: librarian.net (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: ala, jobs, ui, usability, shifty, Add a tag
You can get 75K plus decent benefits to be a usability officer at ALA. They say “senior” but to the best of my knowledge there aren’t any other usability officers there currently. I’m not sure where officer actually comes from, maybe some ALA-er can explain? In any case, if I were the Usability Officer after I changed the job listings to not spell Website with a capital W, I would ask very specifically what this requirement in the ad means.
The ability to work in a team environment and between two universes of Information Technology and Librarianship is essential in order to maintain an outcome-oriented, global vision.
I’m curious why those are deemed to be two universes instead of, say, two moons orbiting around one big planet of helping people do the things they want to do and go where they want to go. I’m sure Jenny is asking the same questions. I hope they find someone, but I wonder what affect that person will be able to have on the in-process-for-many-years-already website redesign?
![Blog Icon](http://images.jacketflap.com/images/libnetaboutme.jpg?picon=86)
Blog: librarian.net (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: libraries, gaming, access, shifty, digitaldivide, ala, Add a tag
The Library Link of the Day today is an article in the Chicago Tribune called Training for the Poor Moves into the Computer Age. It’s an odd combination of two points
1. The digital divide is becoming more and more about technology literacy and not about technology access.
2. Gaming on computers is an important part of attaining that technology literacy.
I don’t know much about point #2. I like games generally but I am not a gamer (save online Scrabble which I suspect may not count). With a few exceptions most of the people I hang out with aren’t gamers so I’ve rarely been in a cultural area that is gaming-immersive. I’m curious, but it’s one of those things that falls outside the “things I have time for” circle. Jenny Levine has some good points in the article and I think the fact that ALA is mentioned in the same article as poor people needing technological literacy for finding better jobs and escaping the cycle of poverty is great PR for libraries.
That said, the article is confusing to me somewhat. It seems to be taking two disparate ideas and mashing them together as if it were the most natural thing in the world. I get the points that gaming and teaching technology through gaming is a great way to help kids with critical thinking skills and problem solving. However I strongly do not think that the best way to help older people — perhaps my age and up — learn technology has anything to do with gaming at all. So, the people who are in dead-end jobs and need to gain some level of tech proficiency to move to better jobs, they’re not the gaming demographic. I think, however, that as more younger people engage with technology they will bring gaming with them as they become people in my age bracket and that’s going to be an interesting shift. So, kudos for even talking about poverty and technology literacy, and nice job with xplaining why gaming is important, but I still wish this had been two separate (longer) articles instead of this one.
ala, digitaldivide, gaming, libraries, shifty![Blog Icon](http://images.jacketflap.com/images/libnetaboutme.jpg?picon=86)
Blog: librarian.net (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: access, facebook, shifty, socialsoftware, uiuc, Add a tag
Jenny points out the UIUC library search which is a widget that can be put on any user’s facebook page so they can search the library catalog right from Facebook.
Facebook recently opened up their site to other applications and there has been a huge explosion in what people are sharing on their profile pages. From my own subjective perspective, it seems like these applications are getting more people to Facebook and keeping them there, doing stuff. In my 2.0 talks I have often talked about how libraries could create “presence” using social tools and I’ve pointed to Facebook groups like Awesome Resources which is a group of 30+ librarians doing what librarians do best: sharing resources and helping each other find things.
When I went to Ann Arbor this week, I connected with Ed “Superpatron” Vielmetti on Facebook and it’s one of the fastest and best ways to get ahold of a small subset of my friends. When I was at the Berkman Center event last week listening to them talk about Digital Natives (versus tired old “digital immigrants” like myself) a professor mentioned that they did a show of hands survey of their incoming class to Harvard this year and asked who had a Facebook page. The answer wasn’t “most of them” but every single one of them. Granted Harvard skews in some ways towards the clueful and plugged in, but what an opportunity, knowing the one place that all of your students go online. I’m not totally sure if we know what to there once we get there, and I share the same privacy concerns as others about how much information we’re aggregating and personally identifying there, but I also feel that the UIUC search box is a little breakthrough application, sort of the way LibX was for Firefox. Exciting times, no?
facebook, shifty, socialsoftware, uiuc![Blog Icon](http://images.jacketflap.com/images/libnetaboutme.jpg?picon=86)
Blog: librarian.net (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: blogs, blogz, australia, youtube, second life, library juice, libraryola, secondlife, shifty, twitter, Add a tag
So five days after getting back to the US, I am caught up on my RSS feeds. This is mostly because I prioritized things like getting pictures on Flickr, going food shopping, getting to the pool, arguing about Twitter, and making this little YouTube movie. Here are some things I read that I think you might like to read.
- Chris over at Libraryola does some actual investigating into the hubub surrounding the WaPo article about the library’s weeding policy. He gets a much more well-rounded answer from Sam Clay, the system director, than what the newspaper published.
- Walt asks if SecondLife and social software networks are where our patrons really are. I love the idea of SL, and the immediate potential as a place for geographically spread out people to come together is great (free teleconferencing!) but not a single person I’ve talked to out here uses it… yet. So, for me there’s a difference between going where my users are and trying to make them go someplace I like. I’ll evangelize about the usefulness of the Internet generally, especially for poor rural populations who can use it to save money and save gas, but I’ll wait a little before diving whole hog into SL. The comments seemed to have turned into a Walt vs. Jenny debate, we’ll see if they stay that way.
- Casey (that’s Mad Scientist Mover and Shaker Casey) has reprinted the Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming with a caveat about copyright. My favorite: Treat people who know less than you with respect, deference, and patience, that’s gotten me further than most of what I learned in library school.
- Jenny points to a cool opportunity to be a virtual scholar for the Urban Libraries Council. It’s a little outside my usual interest areas of services to rural populations, but it might be just perfect for someone.
- Rachel at LISJobs ruminates on why online publications still charge for classified ads by the word, and uses the opportunity to mention how LISjobs is still free as in beer.
I had no idea there were so many schools bestowing a Master’s degree in Human-Computer Interaction.
Oh my dog, I pay dues to this organization? Yet another occasion to wonder why I do so …
Really, there are so many things wrong with that job posting, it’s hard to know where to begin. I am, however, a total stickler about spelling Website with that lovely capital W. To further nitpick the ALA, I would point out that later in the same ad they say, “… web site design, web-based usability …” It’s either w or W, but, for heaven’s sake, pick one or the other and ride that horse. The copy in this ad is abominable.
On a more serious level, calling information technology and librarianship (why these are capitalized in the ad begs explanation) two universes just perpetuates several negative stereotypes, and is so out of touch with reality. Sigh.
Two *uni*verses? Oy, I do hope whoever wrote that is kicking him/herself. I’m telling Grammar Girl on them.
I can’t say much about this ad, other than that for me it was far more important to get the damn thing out there than anything else. It’s a lovely starting point for applicants to discuss things they would change. ;-) I’m having to learn to let the whole W/ebsite and e-mail (don’t get me started) thing go, at least for now. Ommmmmmmm….
In the Web Editorial Board (WEB) meetings, I’ve been very vocal that we need to instill real authority in this position, so my hope is that this person will have *a lot* of impact by being able to just “make it so.” We need a strong person, but I’m also ready to put every ounce of support and clout I have behind them, as is everyone else on the WEB (little web, too!).
I think we can all agree that despite the ad’s flaws, this is a “Martha Stewart good thing.” An honest-to-gosh usability company is designing the new home page and navigation (the last iteration before implementation begins will be available during midwinter), and this person will only enhance that work. There is still plenty of time for them to have input into the process, especially during implementation, where it will be more valuable anyway. Where they’ll be really valuable, though, is with all of the day-to-day, web-based services that fail so miserably because of poor language, lack of clear instructions, and obtuse processes.
No doubt this person is in for a long haul (so I was glad to see a decent salary attached), but there are certainly a lot of us chomping at the bit to help and support them. This is very much a positive thing. People have [rightly] been screaming about this for so long and now ALA’s leadership is finally doing something about it, so I have to give them credit for this, even if it did take longer than it should have. This is *exactly* the kind of thing I as a member want my dues to go towards.
Oh, and we’re adding “or in a related field” to the HCI requirement, so that should appear on the ad soon.
I think they are calling “two universes” becasue at ALA, it IS two universes. Much like many libraries - IT and non-IT are in two very separate worlds, and they rarely seem to work together.
Or to answer Jessamyn’s question about “why those are deemed to be two universes” - it’s because they were allowed to do that. The “big boss person” simply needs to say “enough! IT won’t drive us anymore - instead, we’ll drive IT.”
is that a metaphor? if so, they been mixed. it’s been so long since I had to remember that stuff. so they can have two universes but they want to pack them into one global vision? so you’re encouraged to ignore 99.999% of those universes and focus on one globe? just acknowledging that information technology and librarianship are separate universes should be enough to cause a rift that brings golden age Flash into the same comic panel as silver age Flash; and you know what happened then? no? oh, too nerdy for you? well, it was bad.
‘Officer’ always sounds good, I think. I hope it means something. I hope it means that the incumbent will have the *authority to bring about*, as well as responsibility for, usability. But it probably doesn’t.
Re. ‘universes’. As if it weren’t enough that our own professional organization’s Website sucks; now I see that it has no idea what we do. Makes me want to reconsider membership. ‘Cept that *you-all* are so darn cool.