I started thinking seriously about this question after reading several books that bugged me enough that I wanted to make a rebuttal (it's hard to set aside old debating instincts). It's not that I had problems with the books themselves as much as some of the ideas in the stories.
Two interesting things happened as I thought about the ideas that bugged me in each story and they ways in which I might handle them differently:
- I was drawn into the "normal science" process of thinking through each idea (that I described last week) and uncovered a host of interesting ideas.
- The different lines of inquiry came together as a fascinating story molecule.
There's another important consequence: as you work through the ideas until you can clearly express what bothers you about the story and how you would handle it differently, you find you have something to add to the conversation.
Deren Hansen is the author of the Dunlith Hill Writers Guides. This article is from Sustainable Creativity: How to Enjoy a Committed, Long-term Relationship with your Muse. Learn more at dunlithhill.com.
0 Comments on Ideas: Rebuttal Theory and Adding to the Conversation as of 9/5/2013 6:12:00 PM
Add a Comment