“As far as the Moleskinerie logo contest is concerned, we would like to clarify that since the nature of Moleskinerie has always been participative, made up of passionate contributions and voluntary submissions, we decided to let the community participate again in creating the new logo of the blog. We decided to collaborate with Designboom to do so, a leading online design magazine, which is well aware of how to run a contest of this kind.” (via Moleskine’s own Facebook Page) Earlier this week you may have heard a similar story about the Obama campaign asking designers to create posters on spec to help promote jobs creation of all things (feel free to read my steam-blowing-out-of-my-ears rant about that on my Google+ page), and now you can add MOLESKINE to this camp too. I admit, long ago as a young illustrator I too fell for this crap and please believe me when I say it’s a mistake. I will never change my mind about how working artists should never bother supporting such “spec-work-disguised-as-contests.” Contests are one thing, and they can be good. Volunteering your talents is another thing, and it’s good. But creating a logo or any branding collateral for a big company for free, and knowing that the work of the other 99.99% “losers” will essentially be tossed into the trash (and the copyright to their work handed over to those running the contest) is just stupid, and it’s offensive that any company would think it’s OK. It’s a terrible way for you to run your business. And when you freelance you are running a business.
- Moleskine wants you to design their new logo for free
new posts in all blogs
By: John,
on 10/21/2011
Blog: DRAWN! (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: nospec, contest, Moleskine, logo, spec, crowdsource, Add a tag
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: nospec, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 1 of 1

Blog: DRAWN! (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: nospec, contest, Moleskine, logo, spec, crowdsource, Add a tag
0 Comments on "As far as the Moleskinerie logo contest is concerned, we would like to clarify that since the nature..." as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment