The ALSC Blog and the Friends of ALSC are proud to announce the eight winners of the ALSC Blog Photo Contest. Thanks to everyone who participated, ALSC members are truly very talented individuals! The winners are separated into two prize categories, Newbery-Caldecott Banquet tickets and Barnes & Noble gift certificates. Each of the winners and the photo are listed below.
Newbery-Caldecott Banquet tickets

“Other Jobs as Needed: Seeing if Kids Can Fit in Empty Shelving During Construction” by Kathryn Richert

“Box Day!” by Amy Musser

“Untitled 2″ by Tess Pendergast

“Untitled 1″ by Nadine Buccilli
Barnes & Noble gift certificate

“Paws to Read (IREAD SRC theme)” by Janet Dumas

“Pollock Play @ the Library” by Danielle Carey

“Sesame Street Characters’ Favorite Books” by Bethany Vangrin

“April Fool’s Mustache Storytime!” by Dana Jones

Photos courtesy of ALSC
Show off your creativity! We’re giving you a reminder about the ALSC Blog Photo Contest. Send us your great photos related to children’s librarianship. We’ll even give you some ideas:
- Library spaces
- Programs
- Displays
- Crafts
- Books
- Children’s technology
- Reading
May the best photo win!
Participants must be ALSC members to enter. Anyone, members and non-members, can vote in the final round. Be sure to visit the ALSC Blog to vote for your favorite library photo beginning April 25, 2014.
Prizes include tickets to the Newbery-Caldecott Banquet and $50 gift certificates to Barnes & Noble. Entries must be submitted by 8 am Central Time, Wednesday, April 23, 2014. For rules and entry form, see the ALSC Blog Photo Contest site.
ALSC announced that it will hold a live New Member Forum on Wednesday, April 23 at 3pm Eastern. This hour-long event is free and open to members and non-members. Registration is now open.
As part of the forum, ALSC Membership Committee Chair Amanda Roberson will examine ways of getting involved in with the division. Attendees are invited to discuss these topics and their experiences as members. The forum will take place on Adobe Connect. A recorded webcast of the event will be available following the live session.
ALSC encourages current members to participate in the forum as well. There will be time provided for questions and discussion. The event is free, but registration is required.
By Michael Biggs and Steven Knauss
The BNP’s membership list was leaked in November 2008 by a disgruntled activist who had been expelled late in 2007; he has since admitted responsibility and been convicted. The BNP never challenged the list’s authenticity, merely stating that it was out of date. The list is apparently a complete record of membership at November–December 2007. Of the 13,009 individuals listed, 30 were missing a current address, 138 had a foreign address, and 41 lived in Northern Ireland. Of the remaining members, 12,536 (97.9 per cent) can be precisely located in Britain using the postcode field of their address (Office of National Statistics, 2004, 2008). Postcodes provide exceptionally fine resolution, down to the street level.
The distribution of members diverges significantly from the distribution of voters. The correlation of votes with membership, across the 628 constituencies in Britain, is surprisingly modest (r ¼ 0.46). The party contested only one in five seats, but the correlation is scarcely higher in those alone. Voting also gives a misleading impression of the national distribution of the party’s support. Wales and Scotland provide over three times the proportion of members compared with voters.
Members must be matched with a population denominator. Data come from the 2001 Census, conducted in April. The great majority of members on the leaked list had joined since this date, as the BNP had 2,173 members in November 2001 (Copsey, 2008: 137). The BNP recruited only ‘indigenous Caucasian’ people (Copsey, 2008: 238). We count adults who defined their ethnicity as ‘White British’, including ‘White Scottish’. The proportion of white British adults belonging to the BNP was 0.032 per cent across Britain.
For statistical analysis, we use the finest geographical unit defined by the Census, the ‘output area’. This is a very small neighbourhood; the median covers an area of 6 hectares and contains 280 people. There are 218,038 neighbourhoods (as they will be termed) in Britain: the BNP was present in 10,165 (4.7 per cent) of them. Most of those had a single member; 11 was the maximum. The highest proportion was 5.7 per cent.
We begin with independent variables capturing economic insecurity. These are measured ecologically, as the fraction of people in the neighbourhood with a particular characteristic, though they are proxies for individual characteristics predicting support for the BNP. Education is divided into three categories: no qualifications, qualifications below university degree, and degree (denominated by people aged 16–74 years). Class is divided into five categories, from routine and semi-routine to managerial and professional (denominated by occupied population). The unemployment rate is also measured (denominated by the economically active). Alongside these sociological staples, housing is included because the BNP promotes the myth that foreigners are given privileged access to public housing. Housing tenure is divided into three categories: owned or mortgaged, rented from the local authority, and private rental (including other arrangements). Overcrowding, as defined by the Census, is also measured. (In both cases the denominator is households.) We expect, then, that white British adults are more likely to belong to the BNP in neighbourhoods with lower education, lower social class, higher unemployment, more private renting, and greater overcrowding. Control variables are entered to reflect findings that BNP voters are disproportionately male and middle aged (Ford and Goodwin, 2010; Cutts et al., 2011). Additional controls are population density and the proportion of people living in communal establishments like prisons.
For Hypotheses 1–3, we defin
In her presidents’ report, Linda Braun mentioned that YALSA is now offering gift memberships – that’s true for student memberships as well! As you get ready for the next term, think about asking your family and friends for a YALSA gift membership (or think about giving one to your fellow students). Student membership in YALSA costs $53 and includes ALA membership. Gift memberships can be purchased by contacting Letitia Smith, YALSA membership coordinator, at [email protected] or by phone at 1-800-545-2433, ext. 4390 (you can’t buy a gift membership online).
Before your parents (or aunt and uncle or boss) ask, here are five great reasons why they should consider buying you a gift membership this holiday season.
- When you join YALSA, you become eligible for ALA’s scholarships, which can help you pay for your MLS degree. Applications are accepted October to March. You’re also eligible for travel stipends from YALSA when available (for example, students can apply for the 2010 Young Adult Literature Symposium travel stipend).
- You’ll receive three publications — American Libraries, Young Adult Library Services (YALSA’s award-winning journal), and YAttitudes — with your membership, which you can use to help you with assignments or that you can publish in to get yourself established in the field.
- YALSA membership opens doors for networking: students enjoy discounted rates for ALA conferences and YALSA’s symposium and can propose programs and papers for those events; you can join any of YALSA’s discussion or interest groups for informal discussion on favorite topics in librarianship; and YALSA’s social networking presences give you a place to connect with colleagues for career opportunities and advice.
- YALSA plans to launch a reverse mentoring program, where you can sign up to be paired with an experienced librarian and you can learn from each other.
- YALSA is a well-known and respected organization within the field. Joining the association and listing it on your resume will catch the eye of potential employers.