I know this is a departure from my regular postings, but I read a touching story yesterday, sent from Hope Clark, in the Funds for Writers newsletter. It told the story of a freshman nerd who got bullied and a kind stranger who took action.
The gist of the story: Walking home from school one Friday, a boy noticed another boy (the nerd) carrying a load of books. Watching, he saw a group of kids deliberately knock him down. He felt sorry for the boy and instead of just walking by, he stopped and helped. The boys ended up becoming best friends.
Years later, when graduation came around, the nerd had thrived during high school and was giving the graduation speech. He revealed that the Friday he met his best friend, he planned to kill himself that weekend. That's why he had all his books and belongings from school, to save his mom the grief of having to get them. His best friend, without ever knowing until then, had saved his life with a simple act of kindness and friendship.
This is not the only story about how a kind act actually saved someone's life; there are many such true stories.
The point is: One small act of kindness can turn someone's day around, can turn anger into calmness, can save a life.
And, that act of kindness can have a rippling affect. That high school nerd went on to become a doctor - who knows how many lives he saved or might save. But it doesn't have to be in the form of a doctor, it can be another act of kindness, a smile, a helping hand to someone else.
I recently listened in on a webinar about breaking through your own stumbling blocks, not matter how deep rooted they are. One of the points delved into the fact that each of us is from an original source, most of us consider that source God. Since we're all created by God, we are all basically one.
While this isn't a great revelation, this philosophy has been around a while, it does remind us that we should do unto others as we'd have them do to us . . . since we are all one.
Would you prefer a kind word or an angry word, a smile or a frown, being brought down or encouraged, a slap or a kiss. You get the idea.
Our actions cause reactions in those we interact with - you just never know what that one simple act of kindness or friendliness will cultivate.
The world has many heroes, such as firefighters, those in the military, the police, rescuers, and so on, who risk their lives to help others and save lives. A kind word, an act of kindness, a friendly gesture, while not heroic and on a much smaller scale, has the same capability.
Years ago I listened to a speech about how during the gold rush people worked hard to search through dirt and rock to find gold. It brought out that we should do the same toward people. Rather than quickly finding fault, take the time and effort to search for the good in others. Search for the gold.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Until next time,
Karen Cioffi
Author, ghostwriter, freelance writer, editor
Within the last week I came across two local incidents and the papers' articles about them. They made me wonder what's happening to the world of writing, specifically writing and news.
The first incident occurred last week. A family in a borough of New York City were the victims of a home invasion. The family has 4 children who were fortunately asleep while the invasion took place. The intruders came to the door as police officers and once the door was opened, they pushed their way in. They bound the husband and wife and ransacked the house. While they were gathering what they wanted they repeatedly threatened to kill the family. The couple were left alone at times and the woman managed to untie herself and untied her husband. They were smart enough not to let the intruders know. When the intruders finally left, the husband chased them and called the police. The intruders were captured. This, you would think, is an amazing end to the story, but it isn't the end. The papers reported the incident and listed every article and it's value that was taken. This family happens to be well to do and the items and cash taken were substantial. Was this necessary? This family now has to worry about other criminals knowing exactly what they have in their home and where they live. In my opinion, the papers have put this family's safety in jeopardy. Shouldn't writers have a responsibility to ensure they are not the cause of further harm to the victims?
The second incident occurred a couple of days ago in my neighborhood. A 9-year-old boy was struck by a truck while running across a very large and busy intersection. While the story is graphic and disturbing, the pictures are worse. The front page shows the boy's body lying on the street in a body bag. The picture on the third page is of a man wiping the blood off the street with the boy's body in view. Are graphic words and especially graphic pictures of a 9-year-old's body and blood necessary to convey the story? The boy's friends and classmates will easily see this story and the pictures. And, I can't imagine how the family would feel if they see the paper – hopefully they never will. Again, shouldn't writers have a responsibility to ensure they are not the cause of further harm to the victims?
So, what's the reason reporters and photographers need to be so graphic and use words and pictures that are disturbing to the point of at times being sickening? I know papers are in the business of selling and it seems more and more it's the shock and gore effect that sells. The question is are the reporters leading readers down this path, or are the readers demanding it? Whichever is the case it is creating a world of desensitized people who need more and more horror and gore to get a reaction. When will it be enough? I'm not saying that writers shouldn't write the news; I'm saying there are many ways to tell a story and maybe the shock and gore should be replaced by compassionate and responsible news writing and reporting.
Just needed to vent.
Karen
Good venting and I absolutely agree that sometimes we are getting a lot more from a story than should be told. No one seems to care about reputation or feelings of the ones involved. I personally would rather read a good story and use my imagination than see all the graphic pictures followed by a lousy story.
http://nocturnal-intellect.blogspot.com/
Thanks for the input. It was just so outrageous I had to say something. I also posted it to ezinearticles - have to wait a few days for it to be published though.
Karen
Karen
I absolutely agree with you. Sadly the people who do this will argue tooth and nail that they are not contributing to the desensitising of the public. Movie makers, television bosses, etc. all hold to the same claim of irresponsibility.
Shari
Shari,
I agree. This is a crazy world. I think the real problem is there is little or no consequences attached to one's actions today.
Karen
I agree with you too Karen. I do believe journalists who write for the media are usually sensitive but sensationalism sells. The paper buys the photo separate from the journalists sometimes. Unfortunately in these voyeuristic times where privacy is not respected, we will see more and more of this kind of reporting. I think it is a good topic for a book.
Carma
http://carmaswindow.blospot.com
Hey, Carma. Thanks for stopping by. I think our culture has taken a slippery slide downhill when it comes to invasion of privacy and decency.
That is definitely carrying the "need to report news" too far! Both cases were very insensitive to the families.
Thanks for stopping by, Yvonne and adding to this post.