STATUS: Was all set to potentially launch something cool on Friday and lo and behold, ice storm in Seattle. Trust me, this makes sense because we are based in Denver but our tech person, who manages all things digital, is in Seattle. She had no electricity or internet for 3 days. Shudders.
What’s playing on the XM or iPod right now? FREE by Graffiti6
Last week, the Vice President of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America reached out to SFWA members about Dorchester Publishing.
Dorchester's probationary period is scheduled to end on January 31, 2012 and SFWA would like to evaluate their progress in meeting the benchmarks SFWA set for them.
By their request, members could contact them with any information that the Board should consider.
Well, let me tell you, I was happy to oblige. I wrote a letter clearly outlining my stance that that Dorchester should remain on probation or be delisted altogether based on not making any progress whatsoever on benchmark 1: That it fulfills its contractual and financial obligations to the authors it has already published, including full and accurate accounting of royalties per contract, with scheduled payment of any royalties outstanding.
Despite repeated requests for updated accountings and the thousands of dollars still owed in back royalties to NLA authors who used to be with Dorchester, we've received excuses, delays, and no good faith efforts to resolve their obligations.
And I have no problem making my sentiment on the situation public.
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: SFWA, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 3 of 3

Blog: Pub Rants (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: publishers, royalties, royalty statements, SFWA, Dorchester, Add a tag

Blog: Pub Rants (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: romance, publishers, self publishing, RWA, electronic books, SFWA, Add a tag
STATUS: Heading off for Thanksgiving Break. I won’t be back to blogging until Monday. Seems like bad timing with all that’s going on but don’t worry. We haven’t heard the last of it yet. If I hear any breaking news, I’ll try and update the blog.
What’s playing on the iPod right now? Nothing at the moment.
Today, Thomas Nelson Publishers joins the Harlequin hoopla in a ridiculous blog post. Ashley and Carolyn Grayson posted their response—to which I whole heartedly agree. I find it laughable that Hyatt believes that agents are speaking out against the ripping off of writers via vanity publishing arms because we see “self-publishing” as a threat.
As many commenters have already noted in my blog comments section, vanity publishing and self publishing are not the same. A distinction that Hyatt does not seem to understand. I suppose he also believes that venerated writing organizations such as RWA, MWA, and SFWA, all of which have a long tradition of helping and protecting writers, are similarly trying to keep the status quo by vehemently speaking out against such blatant ripping off of writers.
I also want to make this distinction.
When I spoke to an editorial director from Harlequin last week, the editor mentioned that “several other publishers were doing it.” The only difference was they didn’t announce their vanity publishing arm.
Incredulous, I had asked “like who?”
The editor could not respond with a list of names.
I’m wondering if the editor was erroneously comparing Harlequin Horizons to a legitimate publisher such as Vanguard Press or Harper Studio.
They are not remotely the same.
At Horizons, the writers are forced to pay for their work to be "published." And forced to pay for “marketing” or anything else from a fee-oriented “menu” of choices. The writer foots the entire cost.
At VP and HS, the publishers pay for publication. The authors are not out any money from their pockets. Vanguard and Studio also commit a certain percentage of monies to the marketing/promotion as part of the plan. In lieu of the advance, there is an equal split of royalties between Publisher and Author.
And another key factor, at VP and HS, the books are available for wide distribution via traditional sales outlets just like a traditional publisher.
None of these things are true at Harlequin Horizons (or whatever they are calling it now).
And the most egregious part of Horizons? The fact that Harlequin planned to refer rejected authors to this option as a “viable” alternative.
As RWA, MWA, SFWA have all pointed out. That’s not legitimate publishing, it should not be advertised as so, and it’s just plain wrong.

Blog: Pub Rants (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: funnies, RWA, electronic books, SFWA, publishing, romance, self publishing, Add a tag
STATUS: I’m done for the night.
What’s playing on the iPod right now? LANDSLIDE by Dixie Chicks
Considering all the chatter over the last two days, today has been relatively quiet. SFWA (Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America) did issue a statement. You can find that here.
Also, the Ashley Grayson agency blogged with their response.
On a wholly different note, I have a Friday funny—sort of. Do you remember my blogging about an Eddie Murphy movie being shot on our street about two summers ago? For two days in a row they had the extras and the movie crew filming. Sara and I remember it vividly as a car alarm kept going off incessantly. With our windows open on a nice summer day, it was all we could hear for two days running.
Can’t imagine why if you don’t remember. That was a year and a half or two years ago. I only remembered a couple of weeks ago when my husband said he caught the film while on an airplane trip.
The movie is called IMAGINE THAT and no, neither Chutney or I are in the film. In fact, I can’t imagine what they were doing on our street for all that time because in the film itself, there is a brief flash of the front façade of our office in the SH Supply Company building in the scene where Eddie Murphy is fumbling in his briefcase for something while driving. About 10 seconds later, the car drives down the alley behind the building.
Exciting stuff I’m telling you. Grin.
There is one big scene where Mr. Murphy dances on a concrete wall and there is a beautiful lit up staircase behind him. This leads to the bridge that goes over the railroad tracks and into lower downtown. Very noticeable by the bridge support which looks like a ship’s mast. (You can actually see that scene in the movie trailer.)
Well, that takes place right in front of the Platte River Park where Chutney and I often go walking on nice days.
Anyway, highly amusing to watch a movie set in Denver and in Lodo where our office is located.
I’m out. Have a great weekend.
I can't imagine how hard and frustrating that must be for you and your clients. Knowing you can put in so much hard work, only to not get paid is the worst.
I didn't know that SFWA puts publishers on probation. I've learned something valuable today besides avoiding Dorchster.
I hadn't heard of any publisher being on probation before either. Sounds like these guys need to stay that way, for sure!
I've known to avoid them for a couple of years now, but it's refreshing to see an agent be so open about the reasons why Dorchester should be delisted from SFWA.
Gee, another reason why I'm looking at agency representation before I submit work directly to e-publishers. I can't be on top of every controversy, but a great agency will know far more.
Thanks for voicing your concerns, Kristin.
At what point can/will anyone take Dorchester to court?
The path to publishness isn't exactly covered with rose petals and scented with potpourri. There's work involved...a lot of it. It's sad that good faith was put into this company and they are refusing to reciprocate good business manners and proper recompense as they should.
Pretty serious stuff there. Thanks for the warning, Kristin.
I would NOT like to be one of those authors not getting paid properly right now...
I interned at Dorchester before moving over to Random House children's, so whenever I hear about all this craziness...Wow. I agree with your stance, Kristin. If tDorchester is still not fulfilling their obligations, they should remain on probation.
http://bklovin.blogspot.com/
I'm curious how many lawsuits are pending against them, or other legal means. If I were a roofer who never got paid for a job by the homeowner, I would at a minimum file a lien against their home and possibly consider small claims court.
Are the Dorchester authors just being quiet about what they are doing, or is everyone settling for writing angry letters?
Thank you for your personal update. This isn't good news but I'm glad we know it.
M. and Trisha,
SFWA has put at least one publisher on probation before, Night Shade Books. They quickly got their act together, and the probation was dropped. Night Shade is, in my opinion, now a top rate outfit publishing some of the best fantasy around and was number 2 on my list of publishers to read in 2012. Too bad Dorchester is not responding in a like manner.
This sad tale is just another piece of evidence why authors in the modern age need to abandon publishers for being the tyrant dinosaurs they are.