What is JacketFlap

  • JacketFlap connects you to the work of more than 200,000 authors, illustrators, publishers and other creators of books for Children and Young Adults. The site is updated daily with information about every book, author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry. Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers, publishers and fans.
    Join now (it's free).

Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Comments

Recently Viewed

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Tag

In the past 7 days

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Google Book Settlement, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 5 of 5
1. News Flash: Google Settlement Rejected

STATUS: Talk about chat in the blogosphere. Rumors has it that internet ePublishing phenom Amanda Hocking might be on the verge of accepting a 7-figure deal with a major traditional publisher and traditionally published Barry Eisler is foregoing SMP deal and moving to digital only.

What’s playing on the XM or iPod right now? SYMPHONY No. 3 –LARGO by Gorecki with Royal Philharmonic Orchestra

In the other big news flash of the day (she says facetiously) is that the Judge Denny Chin rejected the Google Book Settlement. In the end, he said is main issue could be ameliorated by changing the settlement from an opt-out process to an opt-in.

As this issue hasn’t been actively discussed in 13 months, I suggest reading the article and re-familiarizing yourself with all the arguments, issues, and objections. This case is definitely not dead. I imagine we’ll see a something new put forward in the not so distant future. As Judge Chin points out, such a settlement would give Google an unfair competitive advantage (definitely not a news flash for anyone following this case), and Google won’t want to let go of that easily.

In an interesting side note, Scribd has the rejection filing posted in its entirety for reading on their site. This alone might underscore Judge Chin’s position on unfair advantage.

12 Comments on News Flash: Google Settlement Rejected, last added: 3/24/2011
Display Comments Add a Comment
2. Good News from the Book Liberation Front – Michelle Lovric










I opted out of the Google Book Settlement for the same reason I became a vegetarian: not for my personal well-being, but because I couldn’t stomach the exploitation of innocent creatures.

Sometimes I worry that compassion fatigue has set in, now that everyone knows about the Google Settlement, by which the internet supremo (annual profits of $21.79 billion) seeks to ‘streamline’ the copyrights of authors (whose annual profits rarely trouble the tax man).

And if Google does get away with a ‘peaceful liberation’ of the frontiers of copyright, what next? History teaches us that appeasing Google will only inflate Google’s power. In a darkened future, Google might end up deciding which literature is fit to live – the criterion logically being whether its continued existence is profitable to Google – and which literature is to face … well, another fate.

But who cares?

After all, the only people who stand to be hurt are authors?

I believe not. Something that seems to be largely forgotten is that whatever is taken away from authors by Google might also be ‘liberated’ from publishers and booksellers. Google’s streamlined access to copyrighted works will inevitably – because of the complications and obscurities about what constitutes ‘an edition’ or 'an orphaned work' – include books in print, books that are in publishers’ warehouses and in bookshops.

What do we authors and publishers and booksellers have to help us in this situation? We don’t have might or much money, but we have wit. And creativity. Even if Google were to devour all our rights and spew them out digitally on flat screens – we still have a trump card, an option, a way forward.

This is for the publishers to make printed books that are indispensable to people’s happiness. Printed books can survive if we emphasise and reinforce the positive difference between on-your-screen and in-your-hand.

How to do this?

Not with price. Each printed book is a palatable pellet that distils years of work by many individuals: writer, illustrator, designer, editor, copyeditor, picture researcher, publisher, production team, printer, transporters, warehousers, sales reps and booksellers. All these people physically and mentally handle the printed book along its way. Therefore a printed book can never compete on cost against an automated free download, with the ‘sale’ supported by online advertising.

So the way forward – for those who want to preserve printed books – is to emphasise the value and desirability, rather than cheapening the price.

Beautifully produced books are easier for booksellers to hand-sell to three-dimensional human beings, many of whom, bless them, still love to feel a book in their hands, turn the pages, sniff the paper, and display them proudly on a shelf, curl up with them, take them to bed, even.

It really makes sense. Are books not the pathway to the imagination? Shouldn’t that pathway be a delight to go along? Shouldn’t it appeal to the senses? Shouldn’t it show, not tell, about the promise of pleasure inside the covers?

My background is in book packaging. I’ve spent most of my professional life designing

10 Comments on Good News from the Book Liberation Front – Michelle Lovric, last added: 3/7/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
3. Notes from The Book Liberation Front - Michelle Lovric




I opted out of the Google Book Settlement for the same reason I became a vegetarian: not for my personal well-being, but because I couldn’t stomach the exploitation of innocent creatures.

Sometimes I worry that compassion fatigue has set in, now that everyone knows about the Google Settlement, by which the internet supremo (annual profits of $21.79 billion) seeks to ‘streamline’ the copyrights of authors (whose annual profits rarely trouble the tax man).

We need some fresh analogies for our pain. I suspect many authors feel like the citizens of Tibet in the autumn of 1950. They know the threat is real, but they cannot quite believe the world will stand by and let it happen.

When China invaded (calling it ‘a peaceful liberation’), only El Salvador stood up for the Tibetans at the UN.

And if Google does get away with a ‘peaceful liberation’ of the frontiers of copyright, what next? History teaches us that appeasing Google will only inflate Google’s power. In a darkened future, Google might end up deciding which literature is fit to live – the criterion logically being whether its continued existence is profitable to Google – and which literature is to face … well, another fate.

But who cares?

After all, the only people who stand to be hurt in this ‘peaceful liberation’ are authors?

Something that seems to be largely forgotten is that whatever is taken away from authors by Google may also be ‘liberated’ from publishers and booksellers. Google’s streamlined access to copyrighted works will inevitably include books in print – books that are in publishers’ warehouses and in bookshops.

What do we authors and publishers and booksellers have to help us in this battle? We don’t have might or much money, but we have wit. And creativity. Even if Google devours all our rights and spews them out digitally on flat screens – there remains one course open.

This is for the publishers to make printed books that are indispensable to people’s happiness. Printed books can survive if we emphasise and reinforce the positive difference between on-your-screen and in-your-hand.

How to do this?

Not with price. Each printed book is a palatable pellet that distils years of work by many individuals: writer, illustrator, designer, editor, copyeditor, picture researcher, publisher, production team, printer, transporters, warehousers, sales reps and booksellers. All these people physically and mentally handle the printed book along its way. Therefore a printed book can never compete on cost against an automated free download, with the ‘sale’ supported by online advertising.

So the way forward – for those who want to preserve printed books – is to emphasise the value and desirability, rather than ch

2 Comments on Notes from The Book Liberation Front - Michelle Lovric, last added: 3/4/2010
Display Comments Add a Comment
4. Tick the box if you do NOT want your book in our digital library… Katherine Roberts


As I write, the Google Book Settlement is gearing up for its fairness hearing in the US courts. This Settlement will affect authors and publishers worldwide, and in recent months authors have been bombarded by information that is at best confusing, at worst contradictory, and is still making my head spin even though one important deadline has now passed – that for “opting out” of the Settlement entirely.
Any author who had a book published in the US before 2009 and did nothing is now a part of the Google Settlement, like it or not… which is uncomfortably similar to having to remember to tick those tiny boxes hidden away in the small print if you NOT want your details shared with third parties (i.e. so they can sell them behind your back). Clearly, there is some advantage here for Google along the same lines. The trouble being I can’t quite work out what it is. Yet.

The other way of looking at the Settlement is that it involves some payment for the digital use of our books. That has to be a good thing, surely? Google claims to be building a digital library, so in future we might well look upon these payments with the same kind of gratitude as we do our share of the Public Lending Right for printed versions of our books. So I have broken a personal rule, and this time I did not tick the box. I “opted in”.

To me, you see, the Google Book Settlement is not about the stealing of copyright. It is about libraries. Since the advent of the written word, there have been libraries to collect and store knowledge. From the Great Library of Alexandria, to the British Library in London and other national libraries around the world, to the humble library in your local town, these are places where books in various formats are kept safe and loved. Whether these books are ancient scrolls, paper pages between glossy covers, or digital versions of our words, the important thing is that they are made available to the public because - correct me if I'm wrong - that is the whole point of publishing them in the first place. If our words are to survive the centuries, we NEED our books stored in more than one place, and preferably stored in more than one format.

The key word in the Settlement is “non exclusive”. Google won’t be the only digital library in the digital age, and nor should it be. Some of these libraries might choose to make their collections free to the public; others might charge a fee. But as long as systems exist, like PLR, to reward the creators of such works fairly for their efforts I don’t see the problem. The real issue seems to be setting up such a fair system in the first place, and that seems to rest in the hands of one man, Judge Denny Chin, who will preside over the fairness hearing in New York on 7th October.

I just hope I won’t regret not ticking that box!

1 Comments on Tick the box if you do NOT want your book in our digital library… Katherine Roberts, last added: 9/7/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment
5. You’ve Got Google Questions? Authors Guild Has Got Answers.

STATUS: Google on my mind.

What’s playing on the iPod right now? I DON’T WANNA TALK ABOUT IT by Indigo Girls

Because I’m a glutton for punishment, I’ve spent the last 2 days thoroughly reading the 140-page Google Book Settlement. Yes I’ve talked to my attorney about it. Yes, I’ve discussed it with other agents. Yes, I have even talked with the Authors Guild General Counsel about it. But despite those many wonderful and revealing conversations, nothing beats a thorough understanding that comes from actually reading the settlement. For me, I felt like I needed all the pieces in place before creating my own Google letter that went out to clients today.

And you thought I was purposely avoiding my slush pile and email queries these past couple of weeks!

If you’ve been following this story, you’ll know that the Authors Guild was a named Plaintiff in the initial suit back in 2005 when the copyright infringement first began. And they have continued to be active in how this settlement will unfold and the creation of a new entity called the Book Registry.

In other words, they’ve been a strong advocate for authors’ rights in this matter.

And they are making available many valuable resources regarding the suit and the upcoming settlement and what you need to know about it on their website, for free, even for non-members.

That’s a heck of a public service. If you’ve got Google questions, chances are you can find the answers.

Hum… maybe you should think of joining the Authors Guild if you aren’t already a member. With a $90 annual fee, I’d say that’s money well spent.

And if you haven’t looked at the Google Book Settlement site, you might want to take a peek. It also has an informative FAQ page there.

If you are an author with in print or out of print books, the AG recommends that you do opt in for this settlement and claim ALL your books—even foreign editions. You can always change your mind later about allowing or not allowing display rights or even if you want to remove a book forever from being included in the Book Registry.

If you do nothing, you are automatically included and bound by the settlement and you won’t have a say in how your books are handled because you must claim them through this formal process to have control of how the content is handled via the Book Registry.

You can opt out of the settlement but AG only recommends that if you want the fun of suing Google yourself. Better have deep pockets is all I’m saying…

So find out what you need, get the answers to your Qs, so you can decide if you want to opt in.

ps. If there is any part of the settlement that you plan to read, I'd recommend Attachment A: Author-Publisher Procedures.

5 Comments on You’ve Got Google Questions? Authors Guild Has Got Answers., last added: 4/6/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment