Over at Nancy Famolari's blog, there's a discussion going on over what it means to be a "real" writer.
I was flabbergasted when I read that Nancy had dealt with a group who defined "Published Author" as someone who had received an advance from a publisher. This rather snobby definition exclude authors who have been published in magazines, e-zines, e-books, self-published and by small presses who can't afford to offer advances.
Nancy asks the question: "What does it mean to be a real writer?"
Personally, I distinguish the terms "writer" and "author." A writer is one who writes. Anyone can be a writer. A writer becomes an author when he or she sees their work in print. They don't even have to receive a paycheck for their writing. The process of being published, regardless of the terms of that publishing, makes a writer an author.
Although some means of publishing are more socially acceptable than others, they are all valid methods.
What do you think? What makes a "real" writer?
Very true, Crys, there is a fine line between writer and author.
Great response, Crystalee. I have to admit I thought the organization was incredibly snobby and with no particularly good reason! You're right, having your work in print, sharing with others is a good definition of being a real author. Thanks for responding!