Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Blog Posts by Tag
In the past 7 days
Blog Posts by Date
Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Walking Dead, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 26 - 40 of 40
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Walking Dead in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
This is either a zombie renaissance, or a comic book renaissance for TV, as The Walking Dead has officially been greenlit for a second season or a whole 13 episodes after record ratings. As the President of AMC put it:
“No other cable series has ever attracted as many Adults 18-49 as ‘The Walking Dead.
That’s called making an impact. The second episode, which aired last night, w as down only a tick from the premiere’s record breaking ratings.
Congrats once again to Robert Kirkman and company. PR below.
AMC announced today the renewal of “The Walking Dead” for a 13-episode second season. Since debuting Sunday, October 31, “The Walking Dead” has broken ratings records, with the series reaching more Adults 18-49 than any other show in the history of cable television.
Today’s announcement also includes Fox International Channels’ (FIC) global renewal for a second season, following record-breaking premiere ratings in 120 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East. “The Walking Dead” was the highest-rated original series premiere ever to air on FIC simultaneously worldwide.
“The ‘Dead’ has spread!” said Charlie Collier, President, AMC. “No other cable series has ever attracted as many Adults 18-49 as ‘The Walking Dead.’ This reaffirms viewers’ hunger for premium television on basic cable. We are so proud to be bringing back ‘The Walking Dead’ again, across the globe.”
Ratings Highlights for The Walking Dead – Episode 2, which premiered on AMC Sunday, 11/7:
• 10pm airing – 3.1 HH rating with over 4.7 million viewers;
• Adults 18-49 – 3.3 million viewers;
• Adults 25-54 – 2.8 million viewers;
• Men 18-49 – 2.1 million viewers.
Ratings Highlights for the The Walking Dead – Episode 1, which premiered on AMC Sunday, 10/31:
• 10pm airing – 3.7 HH rating with over 5.3 million total viewers;
• Adults 18-49 – 3.6 million viewers;
• Adults 25-54 – 3.1 million viewers;
• Men 18-49 - 2.0 million viewers.
“I wish all programming decisions were no brainers like this one,” said Sharon Tal Yguado, SVP Scripted Programming. “‘The Walking Dead’ is a TV masterpiece on so many levels. We want at least 10 seasons, if not more. Kudos to AMC!”
AMC’s “The Walking Dead” is based on the comic book series written by Robert Kirkman and published by Image Comics. Kirkman serves as an executive producer on the project and three-time Academy Award-nominee Frank Darabont (The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile) serves as writer, director and executive producer. Gale Anne Hurd (The Terminator, Aliens, Armageddon, The Incredible Hulk), chairman of Valhalla Motion Pictures, serves as Executive Producer. David Alpert from Circle of Confusion and Charles “Chic” Eglee (Dexter, The Shield, Dark Angel) serve as Executive Producers.
“The Walking Dead” tells the story of the months and years that follow after a zombie apocalypse. It follows a group of survivors, led by police officer Rick Grimes, who travel in search of a safe and secure home. The comic goes on to explore the challenges of life in a world overrun by zombies who take a toll on the survivors, and sometimes the interpersonal conflicts present a greater danger to their continuing survival than the zombies that roam the country. Over time, the characters are changed by the constant exposure to death and some grow willing to do anything to survive.
Shot on location in Atlanta, “The Walking Dead” is led by a cast that includes Lincoln (“Teachers,” Love Actually)
4 Comments on The Walking Dead shambles to another season, setting ratings records, last added: 11/9/2010
The Walking Dead premiere last night was the highest rated cable series premiere of 2010, and its highest rating EVER on AMC for an original series, Deadline reports. The premiere drew 5.3 million total viewers, and the second showing increased the total audience to 8.1 million. “It’s a good day to be dead,” said AMC president Charlie Collier “We are so proud of this series, its depth of storytelling and the remarkable talent attached.”
AMC heavily promoted the show, and the nerd-related internet played right along with a barrage of promo. Reviews have been generally very, very positive.
This first season of The Walking Dead is only six episodes long, making it really more of a miniseries. However, a contest to be a zombie during the show pretty much gave away that a second season is planned, hopefully one that is a little longer.
As for the folks at Stately Beat Manor, we watched and greatly enjoyed the show, finding the tone highly reminiscent of Darabont’s polarizing The Mist. (The scene with the dad and zombie wife in particular.) The biggest complaint about it is the slow pacing but the franchise is really all about survival and character — let it unfold so we care.
If we can get a little analytical for a moment, the appeal of both The Walking Dead and Y: The Last Man have always seemed very similar: strongly written stories about the nitty gritty of post-apocalyptic survival through highly relatable characters. Both comics feature low-key art that emphasizes storytelling and character. Both have been huge hits in collected form. Y has been rumored for a movie for a long time, but for many of the same reasons that TWD is a potentially great TV series, Y would also be much better as a TV series than a movie…the fact that TWD is so similar may mean that we will never see a Y movie or series, we’d guess.
One final note: it was recently pointed out that the WALKING DEAD books have over three million copies in print. That is an amazing number. (For some perspective, the Stieg Larsson books, the biggest phenomenon in publishing since Harry Potter, have sold 15 million copies in English.) This is a hugely popular multimedia franchise that looks to have real legs. Congratulations to Robert Kirkman, Tony Moore, and Charlie Adlard for achieving this and also doing it on terms that favor the creator. It’s a good day for creator-owned comics.
16 Comments on Walking Dead was a hit!, last added: 11/2/2010
Great news…Now greenlight Season 2, AMC! We need to keep this series on the air long enough to reach the Governor storyline.
Francis said, on 11/1/2010 1:28:00 PM
I think they are following the Breaking Bad model. That started out with 7 and got a bump to 12 or 13 the next season. Now Breaking Bad might have been cut short by the strike not good planning. Maybe AMC wanted to test the waters with something so dark.
Can’t wait for the parent groups to start crowing about protecting the children from the gruesome images.
Jason Green said, on 11/1/2010 1:48:00 PM
I don’t think that The Walking Dead and Y are so similar that the success of the former precludes the latter from being a movie or TV series. Other the general idea that both are post-apocalyptic, the two series don’t really have that much in common, and I think that swapping horror for the sexual politics angle of “a world that’s all women except for one man and his monkey” would appeal to an awful lot of people who would never, ever watch something with zombies in it, regardless of how successful and well-liked it is.
Raffaele Ienco said, on 11/1/2010 1:50:00 PM
I enjoyed it very much. Best thing on TV.
Erik Scott said, on 11/1/2010 2:06:00 PM
While characterization is strong in Y, it’s still very much plot based with a beginning, middle, and end. While most fans will likely watch it, knowing a large amount of the plot from reading the books could lessen the effect of translating it to the screen.
Walking Dead seems to have less of that problem. Being much more character based then plot based, it seems this show has less of that problem. I loved the pilot, but a huge amount of it was pulled from vol.1 of the series. Introducing new characters and situations (as seen as casting Michael Rooker and Norman Reeder as new characters not seen in the book) is the thing that excites me more as a fan of the books. I’ve read the book already. I’ve got no problem with them doing their own thing with the show as the tone and spirit of the books are most definitely in the series. While it would be nice to see what they do with a character like the Governor, if it ruins what they are trying to set up to create a great series, I’d much rather have no Governor, than one forced into the show to line it up more with the books.
Moubius44 said, on 11/1/2010 5:10:00 PM
or 2.
Moubius44 said, on 11/1/2010 5:10:00 PM
Remember that other big hit,called Lost. Maybe we should just stick to 1 season.
Russell Lissau said, on 11/1/2010 5:47:00 PM
I loved it. LOVED, LOVED, LOVED!
And I even got the wife to sit and watch it with me. As a testament to how good it was, she watched it all the way through and really was into it, even while she was complaining about how gross it was in parts.
maggie said, on 11/1/2010 6:06:00 PM
I thought the creators of the show did a really good job expanding the father and son character who, in the book, are only on a couple of pages and whose back story is essentially missing. Where once they felt like throwaway characters put on the page in order to fill Rick in on what has been happening, the show allows us to get much closer to them, to great emotional effect.
Steve Horton said, on 11/1/2010 7:20:00 PM
Russ, my wife probably made the exact same complaints about the exact same grossness.
AudioComics said, on 11/1/2010 8:20:00 PM
I FREAKIN’ LOVED IT!
Lance Roger Axt
The AudioComics Company
Web Behrens said, on 11/1/2010 8:38:00 PM
Jason wrote, “I think that swapping horror for the sexual politics angle of ‘a world that’s all women except for one man and his monkey’ would appeal to an awful lot of people who would never, ever watch something with zombies in it, regardless of how successful and well-liked it is.” I think he’s absolutely spot-on.
James said, on 11/2/2010 2:35:00 AM
Yeah, I’ve just watched it and really enjoyed it.
I dont think it was too slow, it was setting the scene for the rest of the series.
I even got a little emotional near the end in the scene with Morgan(?).
It was also nice to see the rest of the cast, as I thought I was going to have to wait an extra week to see them.
Its just a shame this first season is only 6 episodes.
kuo-yu liang said, on 11/2/2010 7:24:00 AM
Let’s hope WALKING DEAD’s cable TV success will pave the way for many more comics-based TV projects.
BTW, all the reviews I’ve read so far is treating it as a zombie series. That’s like calling Mad Men a series about advertising. Silly silly mainstream media.
Barry Buchanan said, on 11/2/2010 8:31:00 AM
Thank you angry badger Jesus!I was praying it would be well made and it was. Glad to see it was a success.
Russell Lissau said, on 11/2/2010 8:39:00 AM
@SteveHorton:
Direct quote from that night: “Ewwww, are they gonna eat the horse?”
She was OK with eating the people, mind you — but the horse was over the top.
So, does The Walking Dead (premiering this Sunday, Halloween, on AMC at 10:00/9 PM C) live up to the hype?
One Word Answer: Ewwwwwwwwww!
Gross (Photo courtesy of AMC)
It’s definitely the grossest basic cable show of all time and possibly the grossest TV show ever. Seriously, even the gorier episodes of True Blood or Keeping up with the Kardashians don’t come close. Definitely don’t plan on handling meat of any kind after watching it.
Is it groundbreaking and amazing? Only in the sense that you can’t believe something that gnarly is on TV. The storytelling is very good and the style and pace of the first two episodes are great. The show was either shot with a warped lens or something was done in post-production to create an unsettling, claustrophobic 3D space for the viewer. There’s not a wasted minute in either the first or second episodes. Both move quickly and maintain suspense for their entire running times. Series Writer, Director, and Executive Producer, Frank Darabont left nothing to chance and it shows. His teleplay is tight and the production is meticulous yet epic in scale.
Rick checks out of the undead hopsital (Photo: Courtesy of AMC)
But where The Walking Dead really succeeds is in how well it realizes the source material while reinventing it. There are new survivors who don’t seem tacked on and whole new scenarios for old familiar survivors that are tweaked just enough to be different without straying too far from the original template. The Walking Dead has always been a typical zombie set up but it’s never been a typical zombie story. Just like in Kirkman’s comics, there are significant stretches where the survivors don’t interact with (or even say the word) zombies. The real investment for readers of the comic has always been seeing how the characters adapt in the face of zombie adversity and the TV incarnation seems to be setting viewers up for the same kind of payoff.
I’m cracked out crazy about AMC’s other dark, more character driven dramas, Breaking Bad and Mad Men, but I didn’t realize I wanted to see some decent, unassuming TV folks faced with making indecent, inhuman choices until I saw The Walking Dead. This is a dark, plot driven story that pummels its characters mercilessly as opposed to a dark, character driven plot where the characters pummel themselves and everyone around them. These are uncomplicated characters who, prior to the Zombiepocalypse, were living simple lives. And right now, putting straightforward, salt of the earth types in a bad, total gross out situation is a TV twist that will still appeal to the current zeitgeist’s taste for the distasteful. People might cringe with self-recognition and secretly want to be like antiheroes Don Dr
2 Comments on Review: The Walking Dead delivers stylish gore, last added: 10/30/2010
Can’t wait to for the series to start— and to see if Darabont and co. does an “Alan Ball/TRUE BLOOD” take on the original Kirkman comics source material…
It’s Halloween Week AND Walking Dead Week and this if freaking radical: special limited edition artwork by four indie art stars, available at Secret Headquarters in LA.
The four prints were designed by Jordan Crane and hand-printed by Jordan Rae; each was illustrated by a different accomplished artist (Lisa Hanawalt, Jon Vermilyea, Johnny Ryan and Jordan Crane). Inspired by shooting range targets, the prints pay homage to the acclaimed comic series. Available individually or as a set of four, the archival-quality prints measure 23 x 35 inches on acid-free 70lb. paper. Each print is limited to a run of 100 copies and will be signed by both the artist and Kirkman; single prints are $40 and the set of four is $150.
Dave Pifer, owner of The Secret Headquarters, says “We’re big fans of The Walking Dead comics, and we’re thrilled to be able to mix it up with the varied style of these rad artists.”
Robert Kirkman, creator and writer of The Walking Dead, says “I’m astounded by the talent involved and couldn’t be happier with how this turned out. I think people are going to love these prints and I hope it brings people into The Secret Headquarters in droves because it’s a great store.”
Want to get your own? Either get down to Secret Headquarters (3817 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles / 323.666.2228) tomorrow or go to the website walkingdeadprints.com.
Jordan Crane
Lisa Hanawalt
Johnny Ryan
Jon Vermilyea
0 Comments on 31 Days of Halloween BONUS: The Walking Dead via Secret Headquarters as of 1/1/1900
The premiere for The Walking Dead tv show was thrown last night and the after party was held at the Hollywood Forever Cemetery and it sounds frigging awesome:
The party was pretty phenomenal. They were serving Zombies (the alcoholic kind, not the dead kind), and they had some of the show set pieces outside as decoration. There were also a number of zombies roaming around on the walk up to the party. There’s nothing quite walking through a dark cemetery with a near full moon, a strong breeze and copious amounts of the undead shambling their way towards you.
Creator Robert Kirkman was also tweeting about the fête this morning — co-creator Tony Moore was also on hand.
There were also AMC sponsored Zombie walks across the US WORLD yesterday morning, and a lot of photos are going up, here are some on Facebook. We especially like the one of the undead and the Eternal City.
Just as a reminder, The Walking Dead TV show premieres on AMC on Halloween, Sunday, October 31 at 10 p.m. ET/9 p.m.
4 Comments on Party Poop: The Walking Dead Premiere party, worldwide zombie invasion, last added: 10/28/2010
I wonder if the centurion cosplayers (the ones who pose for photos with tourists) battled the zombies at the Coliseum?
spike said, on 10/27/2010 4:04:00 PM
I’ve seen the first episode. It really was amazingly done. I was surprised how good it was!!
Jeff Rector said, on 10/28/2010 9:33:00 AM
The Premier of The Walking Dead at the world famous Cineramadome (LA’s first 70mm theatre) was fantastic! The Afterparty at The Hollywood Forever Cemetary was both creepy and cool (especially inside the Mortuary) where they were serving blood red Zombie drinks. I was taking a poll to see what the (walking dead) zombies thought of the Premier, but most of their reactions were just, …uhhhhhhhhhhh…
I also got a chance to talk with the writer, director and executive producer of The Walking Dead, Frank Darabont (Shawshank Redemption), HUNG star Thomas Jane, and (Emmy-winning) Mad Men writer, director and creator Matt Weiner.
The only other thing that will top this night will be when AMC picks up this amazing new series for a second season. Don’t miss this thrilling new zombie incarnation Premiering this Sunday Night on AMC (check local listings).
At any publishing convention, the gigantic sponsor banners hung in the rafters provide a glimpse at coming trends and stories people will be talking about this year. We’ve put together a collection of the biggest banners at New York Comic Con today.
Embedded above, Disney’s Tron remake had a humungous banner supporting the Tron book, Betrayal—hanging directly over the convention floor entrance. See more banners below. Check out our New York Comic Con tag for more coverage.
Too early for Halloween plans? Not really. The Walking Dead TV show debuts on Halloween at 10 PM ET with a 90-minute opening episode. Based on Robert Kirkman’s comics, the show follows the adventures of the survivors of a zombiepocalypse, and stars Andrew Lincoln, Jon Bernthal, Shane Walsh, and Sarah Wayne Callies. The four-and-a-half minute trailer previously seen at Comic-Con was also released, and we would absolutely set our DVR for this while we were out trick or treating!
15 Comments on Walking Dead to debut on Halloween, last added: 8/25/2010
It definitely has been looking good. The production has been top notch.
Nathan Aaron said, on 8/24/2010 2:46:00 PM
I find it interesting how many zombie/post apocalyptic movies begin with someone waking up in a deserted hospital room.
Looks interesting, though!
Larry Robertson said, on 8/24/2010 2:54:00 PM
I guess I’m just a HUGE geek but it is a bit of a let down that they just HAD to say “based on the graphic novel”. Is it sooooooooo hard to say based on the comicbook series?
William George said, on 8/24/2010 2:59:00 PM
“The video you are trying to watch cannot be viewed from your current country or location.”
Way to lose an interested viewer, AMC.
Peter Krause said, on 8/24/2010 3:06:00 PM
No mention of the artists in the trailer–you know, the people who DREW the original comics…
Army of Dorkness said, on 8/24/2010 7:31:00 PM
“No mention of the artists in the trailer–you know, the people who DREW the original comics…”
Probably because Kirkman holds all the rights to the property. It also probably has to do with the deals that were signed and how the money was paid out. I wouldn’t assume it’s intended as a slight, and I’m not saying that’s what you’re assuming. It’s just the way things work.
As essential as an artist is to the creation of a comic book and to the process of selling the rights to that comic book property in film/TV/etc., I know I would prefer to retain full ownership of what would essentially be my creation. Just because an artist can draw and I can’t doesn’t automatically entitle said artist to half of my creation. If a writer/creator decides to cut an artist it, great. If not, I don’t see a problem.
Bob Mitchum said, on 8/24/2010 11:34:00 PM
“I guess I’m just a HUGE geek but it is a bit of a let down that they just HAD to say “based on the graphic novel”. Is it sooooooooo hard to say based on the comicbook series?”
It occurs to me that it makes total sense for the source material to be referred to as a “graphic novel,” as anyone prompted to check it out will be more more likely to seek the trade or hardcover in a mainstream book store, rather than a comic book shop. That’s just the reality of it.
Russell Lissau said, on 8/25/2010 12:56:00 AM
Dollars to doughnuts, I’d bet Walking Dead has sold more in graphic novel form (tpbs and those marvelous hardcovers) than in monthly form.
mario boon said, on 8/25/2010 2:36:00 AM
in Hollywood, no-one knows what a “comicbook” is.
Really.
They only buy graphic novels.
Barry Buchanan said, on 8/25/2010 6:23:00 AM
I can’t wait. Sad thing is, like most movie trailers, they show way too much in this promo. Though considering I’m a fan of the “graphic comic novel book” don’t confront me none. What’s really gonna be interesting is in one of Kirkman’s interviews he said that the shows story and the books story are gonna diverge somewhere down the line. If the show has a long enough run.
Jon Stump said, on 8/25/2010 9:28:00 AM
Really can’t wait for this to come out.
Maybe for whatever reason people can take “Based on a Graphic Novel” seriously over “Based off of Critically Acclaimed Comic Series.” Even though comics are more socially accepted, thanks to movies and TV shows based off of them. Maybe people are able to swallow the Graphic Novel pill before the Comic one.
Regardless does it really matter since we’re getting an awesome comic in TV form?
Peter Krause said, on 8/25/2010 9:31:00 AM
Army of Dorkness,
I assume, as you do, that Kirkman holds the rights, and that’s why Charlie Adlard’s name wasn’t mentioned in the credits. Just wanting to give some props to my fellow illustrators.
However, I disagree with the statement in your second paragraph:
“As essential as an artist is to the creation of a comic book and to the process of selling the rights to that comic book property in film/TV/etc., I know I would prefer to retain full ownership of what would essentially be my creation. Just because an artist can draw and I can’t doesn’t automatically entitle said artist to half of my creation…”
Is it YOUR creation? Once the decision is made to do the project as a comic book, I would argue that it is no longer the sole creation of the writer. All the artists–including the colorist–bring that idea out into the world.
If you want to be known as the SOLE creator, in my opinion you should write a short story or a novel. Then sell that to Hollywood!
It is a fascinating turn over the last handful of years where the writer has become the focal point of comics from the public’s perspective. I think, for the most part, this is a positive development. We need great scripts.
But I can’t think of the original “Swamp Thing” without thinking of Len Wein AND Bernie Wrightson. Or “Fantastic Four” without thinking of Lee AND Kirby.
Just arguing for a bit of balance, that’s all.
Eric H. said, on 8/25/2010 10:51:00 AM
Barry, I agree that they tip their hand a bit too much. If you hadn’t read the books, but were paying close attention, there are actually a couple sizable spoilers.
But yeah, show looks like it’s going to be top notch and at least for now it looks to be staying pretty close to the source material. There are a couple of shots lifted right off the page.
Army of Dorkness said, on 8/25/2010 2:00:00 PM
“However, I disagree with the statement in your second paragraph”
Of course you do. You’re an illustrator.
“Is it YOUR creation? Once the decision is made to do the project as a comic book, I would argue that it is no longer the sole creation of the writer. All the artists–including the colorist–bring that idea out into the world.”
Depends on how you look at it. I see no problem with splitting profits from a comic book with an artist 50/50, but as far as giving that same 50/50 deal for other media, that’s a different story. It IS “my creation” because before you can draw anything I have to tell you what to draw. You’re not suddenly an equal partner where the rights to the property are concerned because you can draw pretty pictures. The writer is still the only one that brings the idea into the world, but the writer and artist bring the comic book to the masses.
There are lots of artist/writer collaborations that are much more involved than “I write, you draw” and that’s great. A lot of times something is created by two people talking about wanting to work together and so on. I’m not talking about those instances.
“If you want to be known as the SOLE creator, in my opinion you should write a short story or a novel.”
And if you want to own a piece of a comic book property, I suggest you create your own and not expect half ownership of every property you work on.
“It is a fascinating turn over the last handful of years where the writer has become the focal point of comics from the public’s perspective. I think, for the most part, this is a positive development.”
As long as you get half the money?
Wanting to write comics doesn’t equal wanting to give half my creation away.
As an example, Fear Agent is copyrighted by Rick Remender and Tony Moore not Rick Remender, Tony Moore, and Jerome Opena even though Opena seems to draw as many issues of the book as Moore. That’s because he wasn’t part of the process of actually creating the book.
I’m not saying that every artist/writer contract/agreement should follow the same rules and guidelines. I’m actually saying the opposite. Each deal is its own thing subject to its own rules.
If you want to talk about bringing balance to the subject, how about this. Writers write on spec for most, if not all, of their “creations”, but it seems like all artists (remember, I said “seems like”)walk in with some sense of entitlement where they get a page rate AND half the rights to the property. That’s just plain unreasonable. It’s no different than if an artist creates a bunch of characters and a general setting and tries to find a writer to write a story about them. The original concept belongs to the artist as should the rights and the decision to release any portion of those rights to another person.
It’s almost pointless to talk about this hypothetically. In the end, all I’m getting at is artists don’t assume you get half the rights for working on a book. It’s not like the old days where an artist gets a paragraph about what happens in the book and the artist basically creates the story and then the writer fills in the stuff each character says along the way. Then again, it might still be that way in some artist/write collaborations, hence the need for each agreement having its own rules.
I am absolutely not arguing for the “superiority” of the writer over the artist.
Eh, whatever. It’s the internet. By this point, people either want to hang me or shake my hand and no further discussion will sway either side.
Scott Chantler said, on 8/25/2010 2:33:00 PM
“You’re an illustrator.”
No, he’s a COMIC BOOK ARTIST. Do you also think of film directors as “photographers”?
More acclaim for The Walking Dead: "Gerald Seymour's latest novel, The Walking Dead, is reminiscent of a patchwork quilt. At first, you start with many dissimilar items arrayed before you, with no idea how these unrelated bits can possibly be sewn together into a final product. Eventually, however, after much time and effort and connecting this piece to that, you end up with a gratifying result. The "pieces" in The Walking Deadare the array of seemingly unrelated characters and plot lines that Seymour ultimately crafts into a satisfying thriller. . . What makes this novel noteworthy is Seymour's attention to the book's underlying themes. He delves into the question of how young men get into situations where they willingly risk their lives for their ideals, drawing parallels between the suicide bomber and a young volunteer fighting in the Spanish Civil War seventy years earlier. Other sub-texts explored are the efficacy of intelligence gathering and old-fashioned detective work, and the roles chance and coincidence play in events.The book is well paced, starting slowly and gradually picking up speed before barreling through to the end and some of the plot twists are truly shocking. Readers are advised to have a contiguous block of time available for the last third of the novel; once started, it's difficult to put down." - BookBrowse.com
0 Comments on BookBrowse.com on Gerald Seymour's THE WALKING DEAD as of 7/10/2008 10:26:00 AM
Nothing better for Dad on Father's Day than a great book, and The Winged Elephant has a few suggestions for weekend shoppers. For the outdoorsman, How to Fishby Chris Yates. For the history buff, The Plot Against Pepysand The Imperial Capitals of China. For the inquisitive, philosophical Dad, we recommend The Secret History of the World. And for all those Dad's just looking for a little quiet time with a great novel, we recommend Gerald Seymour's The Walking Deadand Warren Adler's Funny Boys, both page-turners, hot off the press.
0 Comments on Great Gifts for Father's Day as of 6/13/2008 1:13:00 PM
Master thriller writer Gerald Seymour is back with a new tale of heart-stopping international suspense: "The Walking Deadis compulsively readable but also highly complex and, perhaps, overly contrived. Like the vest filled with explosives and a detonator, the book has many threads. Several seem to have little to do with the plot, but, curiously, those threads are among the most compelling. One concerns the diary of a British volunteer in the Spanish civil war, and Seymour uses it to ruminate on whether one man’s freedom fighter is another’s terrorist. Timely, topical, and gripping.”— Booklist
0 Comments on More Praise for Gerald Seymour's THE WALKING DEAD as of 4/28/2008 2:11:00 PM
Gerald Seymour's new thriller Walking Deadhas been given a starred review in Kirkus: "Gerald Seymour (Rat Run, Traitor's Kiss, etc.), a genuine master of the modern thriller, brings together old-line British spies, a brilliant war-maimed American spook, a couple of classic crooks, a bankrupt professor, the literary ghost of a doomed idealist in the Spanish Civil War, a cell of disaffected young British Muslims, a brave but alienated copper and a half-English-half-Arab villain with a hatred for the West. Heroics, religion, sex, torture, doubt and ever-increasing tension in a cerebral blend. A thriller for all sides of today's war."
0 Comments on Gerald Seymour's WALKING DEAD Gets **** in Kirkus Reviews as of 4/8/2008 8:58:00 AM
2008 is the Year of the Rat, and what better way to start the new year than with Gerald Seymour's Rat Run, a terrific political thriller from one of the best espionage writers in the world. Seymour has a brand new novel, Walking Dead, coming from Overlook this summer. To celebrate Chinese New Year, we're offering a free copy of Rat Run and an advance reading copy of Walking Dead to one lucky person. To enter the drawing, send us an email with "Rat Run" in the subject line to: [email protected].
0 Comments on HAPPY CHINESE NEW YEAR! as of 1/1/1900
I stopped into the MLK Library quite a few times when I was at ALA last year, and the impression I got (and perhaps this is sad enough) is that they were doing a lot with very little - much as many inner urban libraries.
The grand open space on the first floor struck me as odd - I am sure it is conceived as a meeting place (there was a grad piano in that area), but it seems to be not very convenient!
kati said, on 12/31/2007 1:16:00 PM
I have tried all I could to get in contact the Save DC Libraries people and got nothing.
Regarding your photos, you should have stopped in the children’s room. It’s the best room in the library!
I was in Seattle over the weekend. Sorry I didn’t call you. I went to a wedding and then got a terrible cold and spent the last day and a half on my friend’s couch reading comic books until flying home on a red eye the day before yesterday. I am recovered now, mostly. The one thing on my to do list was to see the new library. When I left Seattle four years ago, it was just a hole in the ground and a loose frame but not yet open to the public. I had really liked the old library — though understood why it needed updating — and I even liked the temporary library. I can’t say the same for the new library.
Now, there are many great things about the new library. I connected to the wifi/internet no problem. All the people I asked for advice and directions were super friendly and helpful. I liked having the option to get a cup of coffee and have a dozen interesting places to hang out with it. The place is fun to look at and explore. I enjoyed getting to pore through bound volumes of old periodicals that were right there on the shelves. The online catalog has finally improved to the point where it’s easy to use and makes a fair amount of sense; at SPL in particular that was not always true.
However, I saw a real disconnect beween the lovely outside and grand entry spaces to the library, plus a few other very design-y areas, and the rest of the building. Materials were hard to find. VERY hard to find. Signage was abysmal, often just laserprinted pieces of paper, sometimes laminated and sometimes not. Doors to areas that may have been public were forbidding and unwelcoming. There weren’t enough elevators. There weren’t enough bathrooms. There wasn’t a comfortable place to sit in the entire building. There were lots of “dead spaces” that, because of architecture, couldn’t really be used for anything and they were collecting dust. The lighting was bad. Stack areas were dim and narrow. The teen area seemed like an afterthought. Bizarre display areas with a table and some books on it were in the middle of vast open areas. Most of the place felt like it was too big and then the stacks felt too crowded and I had to climb around people working to find things. Shelvers shut down the entire “spiral” concept with booktrucks. The writer’s area in this library is a shadow of the glorious writers room in the old downtown building where I had a desk briefly.
Did I think it was going to be different? Maybe a little. I left Seattle specifically because its idea of progress and mine were fundamentally at odds and I didn’t enjoy the destabilizing effect of a city always under construction and didn’t get enough from the things that were eventually constructed. This library looks like it was built for a bookless future where we get all of our information from the internet and the digital realm. For now, we’ll just keep the books on hand because people will bitch if they don’t get to read them, but they’re no longer the reason for the library, and they’re no longer honored and appreciated as the things we love and build libraries to house.
Ah the bookless future…the twisted dream of people who still don’t grok the entirety of L2.0. And to top that off, the overweening hubris of architects in love with their own brilliance, who nevertheless remain clueless as to very human elements of a full service library. It sounds like SPL was a re-hash of SFPL, but with the F removed, if only partially.
John Gehner said, on 8/2/2007 8:30:00 AM
I snapped a bunch of digital pics of the Seattle Public Library when I was there back in January. I, too, found it ironic that so much dough was spent on the building but that the ref desk “Ask Me” and computer lab signs (and equivalents) were just laser print-outs taped to the wall. Har. I guess Koolhaas didn’t worry himself over the smaller details for a consistent aesthetic … the way Wright used to not only design houses but even the tableware in the dining room. SPL would be a great site for a laser-tag or paintball tournament.
Amanda said, on 8/2/2007 11:25:00 AM
I no longer live in Seattle either (I moved back to my home state about 18 months ago), but I visited this library in late December, 2004, about six months after it opened. A friend (also in library school at the time) and I got a behind-the-scenes tour of the RFID sorting system. That was impressive, but we did not care for the rest of the building. All that glass is nice, but artificial lighting is poor, and as you know, it can be very dreary in Seattle much of the year. It was gray and raining that day in December and the library was dark, dark, dark.
This was the Christmas break and the children’s area was full of kids and LOUD. Not that children’s areas are supposed to be quiet, but with only glass, steel, concrete and wood (that “greenhouse” feel that the PUBLIB post refers to), there is NOTHING in the area to absorb sound. It reverberated everywhere.
With the weird color schemes, lack of signage, and terrible flow (One-way escalators? How would you like to be caught in the top of the spiral during an earthquake?), this is an incredible user-unfriendly building.
You’ve perfectly describes my feelings of “Meh.” when I visited in January. I think I had just ascribed it to being winter time and my mind on other things, but I wasn’t in love with the warehouse design of the stacks, and the overall feeling of the space, despite having a glass exterior, being dark. As I picture it in my mind, the pervasive sense is of dimness, and really, do we want our institutions of learning to leave such an impression?
sharon said, on 8/2/2007 1:50:00 PM
James Howard Kunstler, author of several books and the blog Clusterfuck Nation, gave the SPL his Eyesore of the Month award several months ago. Your observations confirm what I had suspected, that the interior is just as devoid of character as is the exterior. As for me, I prefer the neo-classical turn of the 20th century Carnegie style library, and I believe that books will still be around long after I’m gone.
Jamie Anderson said, on 8/2/2007 3:59:00 PM
Yes, ‘meh’ really sums it up. I wanted to like the building but I can’t. I also visited on a typical Vancouver/Seattle pissing-rain November day and it had this odd feeling of being a cold cave with the walls closing in on me.
elswhere said, on 8/3/2007 12:01:00 AM
Yeah. What everyone said. I like the sorting system and the concept of the spiral (though not the seedy way they’ve done it) and not much else. And the children’s section is particularly un-child-friendly.
Have you ever been to the downtown Vancouver (B.C.) library? It was also controversial and expensive to build, but I think they did a much better job of making the library beautiful and impressive *and* making it work as a library.
Carlos Ovalle said, on 8/4/2007 7:00:00 AM
Hmm… what comic books? ^_^
Unique Custom Design Resources said, on 8/18/2007 11:01:00 PM
Unique Custom Design Resources…
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting…
Programming Tutorials said, on 8/19/2007 1:10:00 PM
Programming Tutorials…
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting…
tuwa said, on 8/19/2007 5:31:00 PM
Bloody vikings!… show up everywhere.
tuwa said, on 8/19/2007 9:32:00 PM
I think this is the spam technique you’re being hit with … apparently akismet doesn’t catch it (yet?).
Michael blogged about this last week I figured I’d add some more information. These are two students of mine that I visit irregularly at the Tunbridge Public Library. They’ve got pretty good computers and sharp minds but don’t know the first thing about how to navigate a file system or compose a message to save for later. We sit down and talk about how to do the things they want to do. The last time I was there, I made a little video and you can see it on YouTube.
I feel like I can just say “blah blah insert digital divide lecture here” but really, the library is doing an invaluable service here, and the job I have isn’t even paid for by the library. I’m an employee of a local technical high school that happens to take its outreach mandate very seriously and sends me to these places that happen to be libraries. If I had any tips for people wanting to do this same sort of thing, here they are.
Encourage people to get laptops. I’m not a real Dell fanatic, personally, but because of them laptops aren’t as fiendishly expensive as they used to be. I really liked that my students were both using Macs because a) it’s the same kind of computer that I have and b) I find them much easier to use for someone who has never used a computer before. No need to start a flame war, but I’ve been doing this for several years and I’ve observed that my Mac students are happier with their computers. You can save people serious money if they have a laptop and they can use the library’s internet service occasionally and not have to pay to get broadband at home.
Invest in wifi. If students have their own computers then you can teach them about the internet using their own computers. No matter how awesome our public access computers are, they’re not identical to the computers our patrons have at home, they’re just not. Students can learn things on the computers and then take them home and practice the exact same things.
Solve problems. I used to teach a basic email class at the public library I worked at. It went great. However I would find that time and time again people would come to the class and sit through it because they had one loosely email-related question to ask. They didn’t even need an email class but there was no other way to get five minutes of dedicated staff time to ask a computer question. Consider being available in a way so that people who want a class get a class and people who just have questions can ask them. Also stress that they should come in with a problem to be solved, not just “I want to learn about computers” People who just want to learn about computers should probably go to a class.
Larger groups help everyone learn. My two students got along great and it was excellent to have them learn from and teach each other as well as learn from me. Having multiple students (not a ton, maybe just two or three) encourages people to see tech support time as a limited resource, lets people see other people’s computers and their problems in a larger context, and makes computer time more sociable and less like school. Also I think people are less likely to let their technostress get the best of them if they are not in a private session with you.
Keep it regular and keep it brief. Have set times when you offer tech support help. This keeps people queueing their questions to bring to you, can free up other less-savvy staff to refer people to you appropriately and the time limit means people will ask pressing questions first and prioritize their own concerns.
Share with staff, create a FAQ. If I solve a problem that I see frequently (for example: how do I print just part of a web page) I’ll often share the solution with the staff so that they can know how to help people who come in with the same problem.
Know when to say when. Unfortunately, the biggest problem in my area is that people need help at home, figuring out their printer, or their network or their desktop machine. I decided early on that going to people’s houses would not be part of my job. There has been a rare case where a patron got DSL and wasn’t sure how to do the self-install and I’ve traded help for a free dinner or something. Usually I’ll refer people to the professionals when they need help either buying equipment, installing something at home, or fixing a complicated problem with some legacy frankenstein PC. It’s too easy to own all of people’s future problems if you get too involved with some of these situations and I’ve sometimes had to tell people that I won’t be able to keep working with them unless they get a more stable computer or start practicing better computer hygeine.
Those are just some top-of-the-head ideas. My library background doesn’t make me special in this regard. Anyone who is okay dealing with people and knows technical stuff well could be part of an informal tech support program at your library.
Great stuff, Jessamyn! As a big fan of ellipses, I love the end of the video. Way to go, Don!
meeyauw said, on 7/10/2007 3:39:00 AM
I like all your ideas and they will all be useful to me in school.
I have given very few computer/Internet classes (only 1 a semester) but I find that more than two or three students is good. If I help one student and another is patiently waiting, there may be a person in the class that can help. They share information, teaching each other tips and tricks. Two to three students feels like one student; the other one or two waiting for me will be so polite that they may not share problems. I agree that the one-on-one help seems to emphasize stress. It always surprises me.
But. Am I now so old that the people you call “seniors” to me are not? Perhaps I am simply attaching negative connotations to a word I never liked. Watch me: when I reach the age for discounts in restaurants how quickly I will holler “I’m a senior.” But I can’t call these people in the photo “senior” (they can’t be more than 20 years old than you!). OK, nitpicking is over.
Enjoy your work and view points.
jessamyn said, on 7/10/2007 7:34:00 AM
Actually both the people who I was helping are fully 30-40 years older than me. You either think I’m older than I am or you’re swayed by their hip attitudes and sharp minds :)
meeyauw said, on 7/10/2007 9:05:00 AM
Wow. May I be as lovely and happy when I am that age in 10-20 years.
Sarah Washburn said, on 7/10/2007 1:42:00 PM
jessamyn,
i have much to say. i’m so impressed by your concise categorization of how to organize and implement training. many librarians are overwhelmed by the prospect of showing patrons how to use computers, and your suggestions distilled practical tips into manageable chunks. nicely done!
and then i watched the video. at work. with tears–i’m a sap! as a lifelong supporter of libraries (personally and professionally), and as someone whose 70 year old dad teaches seniors (who are likely his junior) how to use computers, i was so touched by your video. i’m sending the link to my dad, to encourage him to capture his students, and to show them the successes of ellipses and file management.
Me at work, seniors learning computers said, on 7/11/2007 9:05:00 PM
Me at work, seniors learning computers…
Great post. Thanks! I’ll add a link to your post….
Glenn said, on 7/13/2007 7:07:00 AM
Excellent points! When I started as the tech trainer at the Genesee District Library last year, I set up a series of classes with these exact points in mind. They work very well in practice. The only thing I can stress is that it’s terribly important to foster a question-friendly environment. I try to act more like a facilitator than a teacher, too. This helps the other students feel more comfortable offering their advice/assistance to other members of the class. My ideal class size is between 5-7 people. Any more than that and you end up lecturing and not facilitating.
One thing I can add here is the item about encouraging people to get laptops. I certainly to advocate laptops over desktops for most of my students, but I encourage them to come into the library and get comfortable using OUR computers first. By the time they are comfortable, a laptop that fits their needs will be significantly cheaper. I compare it to owning a car before you know how to drive. Practice on someone else’s computer before you go and invest in one yourself. May times I have patrons come to the library and tell me how they bought a computer, but they don’t even know how to unpack it. When I ask how long they’ve had the machine, they tell me “oh…about 6 months now, I guess.” Not good.
As for item 5, I have what are called “Open Computer Labs” where I go to branches for a few hours and simply make myself available to patrons on a first-come-first-serve basis for asking questions. These have proven VERY popular (most patrons have difficulty believing that we offer this service for free). My name on this posting is linked to my class web page…take a look. Thanks for such a great list!
YAY!
Whoohoe bring on the collection boxes ……… na, it’s good news all right, finally a good dead show on telly
10+ Seasons! 30 Helens agree!
Kudos, but you gotta read this Wash. Post article on spinning ratings.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/08/AR2010110806145.html