JacketFlap connects you to the work of more than 200,000 authors, illustrators, publishers and other creators of books for Children and Young Adults. The site is updated daily with information about every book, author, illustrator, and publisher in the children's / young adult book industry. Members include published authors and illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, booksellers, publishers and fans. Join now (it's free).
Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.
Blog Posts by Tag
In the past 7 days
Blog Posts by Date
Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Polls, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 25 of 87
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Polls in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
It finally feels like summer and I am wearing my warm-weather clothes! How about you? Which actress best reflects YOUR summer style? Are you like Judy from K.C. Undercover, Riley from Girl Meets World, or Shelby from Best Friends Whenever?
The Tony Awards ceremony (officially known as Antoinette Perry Awards for Excellence in Theatre) was on Sunday. The awards recognize actors and singers in live Broadway shows, and Hamilton fan that I am, you KNOW I was watching! Which dress would YOU wear if you were nominated for a Tony?
Photos by Larry Busacca, Theo Wargo, and Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Tony Awards Productions
The Ross kids from Jessie are at Camp Kikiwaka in Maine for the summer. Are you going to camp this summer? Which Bunk’dcharacter best reflects YOUR summer style? Are you more like Tiffany, Zuri, or Emma?
Dr. KittyCat is one wacky, totally purr-fect cat and the star of an awesome book series for ages 7-10. Which pet do YOU think should be featured in a mock illustration for Dr. KittyCat Book #1?
Take a look at these striking pets and leave your vote in the Comments below!
The Academy Awards ceremony (also called the Oscars) is coming up, and to be honest, I haven’t seen very many of the movies, but the actresses always wear such pretty dresses on the red carpet! Which dress would YOU wear if you were nominated for an Oscar?
You acknowledge that this is unscientific, but even covering that poll result seems misleading. When two of the choices are diversity, and the only other two relate to the things that a lot of people don’t pay attention to (preview catalogs, press coverage, and interviews), it’s obvious that diversity will finish with a high percentage of the vote.
Consider a poll question like: “What character do you like most?” Choices: (a) Black Widow, (b) Vice, (c) Skateman, and (d) Toad. You couldn’t then write a post saying that 100% of readers prefer Black Widow.
Lack of diversity is and always has been a liability for mainstream comics publishers, and I’d argue that the sales numbers still show that people aren’t buying based on diversity.
(Also, love the site. Really. Keep up the good work.)
jacob goddard said, on 2/9/2016 3:16:00 PM
First and foremost for me is whether it’s a corporate owned intellectual property or a creator owned intellectual property.
Richard John Marcej said, on 2/9/2016 3:21:00 PM
I didn’t vote on that poll on twitter and won’t vote on The Beat’s poll because an important option isn’t included. (and frankly, since The Beat constantly gives sales reports I.m pretty surprised that it was omitted)
Cost.
The cost of single issue comics, most over priced, as compared to buying a collected book or original GN. I haven’t bought a single issue of a comic in over five years now. But not because of diversity, or reviews, or cover or any on that list. I find it’s just more cost effective to buy all the chapters in the book at one time. (and because I feel pretty stupid paying $5 for a 22 page chapter of a story)
jacob goddard said, on 2/9/2016 3:35:00 PM
Also, 95% of what I read is by cartoonists, not a creative team.
Suzene said, on 2/9/2016 9:56:00 PM
Some factors that influence me that were not part of the poll:
– Character. Marvel was my gateway into comics so I do keep an eye on their output. But a couple decades of Marvel’s seasonal events and churned out stories have gotten me to the point where I only really care about a bare handful of the characters, and almost none of them are A-listers. For example, I’m reading Captain Marvel for Alpha Flight, and the moment they exit the book or their treatment reverts to the standard nonsense, I’m gone.
– Cost (mentioned above). I’m more likely to pick up a $3 book by an unknown than a $5 book from an established franchise. $5 first issues are the reason I decided to give Extraordinary X-Men, the last Ant-Man series, and several other of Marvel’s recent offerings a pass. On the other side of things, $1 issues have gotten me hooked on quite a few Comixology Submit titles.
– Publisher. DC’s recent flailing for direction and Marvel’s clunky attempts to synergize their comics with other-media adaptations have both been something of a turn-off over the last few years. It’s one more barrier to getting me to buy their products and has lead me to actively seek output from publishers I feel have something more interesting to offer.
2016 is here! A time for new opportunities and new beginnings. Of course, a fresh start doesn’t always mean everything is going to be hunky-dory . . . and because we love the opportunity for a WOULD YOU RATHER, we are giving you an ultra-tough one for the new year! In the upcoming year, would you rather . . .
1. Make the sports team, but break your leg and spend the season on the bench OR make the sports team but lose every game of the season?
2. Find out your favorite celebrity couple is breaking up OR that your favorite musical group is breaking up? (I SEE YOU, ZAYN!)(I can forgive but never forget!)
3. Find out your crush likes you back, but is moving to another country OR find out that YOU are moving to another country?
4. Go on an epic summer vacation only to find out your worst enemy is also there OR show up at a school dance wearing the same outfit as your worst enemy?
5. Find out your favorite TV show is ending OR that the movie you’ve been looking forward to won’t be released for another year?
6. Have more rainy days than sunny days OR have snow half the year?
7. Outgrow all your favorite clothes OR have your computer crash?
8. Find out your favorite book is being turned into a movie, but the lead actor is not someone you would have picked OR find out a book you really disliked is being turned into a movie instead?
Whew! Those were tough ones. Share your answers in the Comments below, and let’s all hope that none of these horrible things happen to any of us in 2016!
For those addicted to politics, newspapers and magazines have long provided abundant, sometimes even insightful coverage. During the last hundred years, print outlets have been supplemented by radio, then television, then 24/7 cable TV news. And with the growth of the internet, consumers of political news now have access to more analysis than ever.
One analytical tool that the politics-following public will not have access to this year is Intrade, an on-line political prediction market. Political prediction markets work very much like financial markets. Investors “buy” a futures contract on a particular candidate; if that candidate wins, the contract pays a set amount (typically $1); if the candidate loses, the contract becomes worthless. The price of candidates’ contracts vary between zero and $1, rising and falling with their political fortunes—and their probability of winning. You can see a graph of Obama and Romney contracts in the months preceding the 2012 election here.
Organized political betting markets have existed in the United States since the early days of the Republic. According to a 2003 paper by Rhode and Strumpf, during the late 19th and early 20th centuries wagering on political outcomes was common and market prices of contracts were often published in newspapers along with those of more conventional financial investments. Rhode and Strumpf note that at the Curb Exchange in New York, the total sum placed on political contracts sometimes exceeded trading in stocks and bonds.
Political betting markets became less popular around 1940. Betting on election outcomes no doubt continued to take place, but it was a much less high-profile affair.
Modern political prediction markets emerged with the establishment in 1988 of the Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM), a not-for-profit small-scale exchange run by the College of Business at the University of Iowa. The IEM was created as a teaching and research tool to both better understand how markets interpret real-world events and to study individual trading behavior in a laboratory setting. The IEM usually offers only a few contracts at any one time and investors are allowed to invest a relatively small amount of money. As of mid-October, the Iowa markets—like the polls more generally—were predicting that the Republicans will gain seats in the House and gain control of the Senate.
An important feature of political prediction markets—like financial markets—is that they are efficient at processing information: the prices generated in those markets are a distillation of the collective wisdom of market participants. A desire to harness the market’s ability to process information led to an abortive attempt by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2003 to create the Policy Analysis Market, which would allow individuals to bet on the likelihood of political and military events—including assassinations and terrorist attacks–taking place in the Middle East. The idea was that by processing information from a variety disparate sources, monitoring the prices of various contracts would help the defense establishment identify hot-spots before they became hot. The project was hastily cancelled after Congress and the public expressed outrage that the government was planning to provide the means (and motive) to speculate on—and possibly profit from–terrorism.
Another, longer-lived—and for a time, quite popular–prediction market was Intrade.com. This Dublin-based company was established in 1999. At first, it specialized in sports betting, but soon expanded to include an extensive menu of political markets. During recent elections, Intrade operated prediction markets on the presidential election outcome at the national level, the contest for each state’s electoral votes, individual Senate races, as well as a number of other political races in the US and overseas. Thus, Intrade offered a far variety of betting options than the IEM.
Intrade was forced to close last year when the US Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed suit against it for illegally allowing Americans to trade options (by contract, the IEM secured written opinions in 1992 and 1993 from the CFTC that it would not take action against IEM, because of that market’s non-profit, educational nature). The CFTS’s threat to Intrade’s largest customer base very quickly led to a dramatic drop-off in visitors to the site, which subsequently closed. Alternative off-shore betting markets have entered the political markets (e.g., Betfair), but their offerings pale by comparison with those formerly offered by Intrade and are probably too small at present to spur the CFTC to action.
I regret the loss of Intrade, but not because I used their services—I didn’t. Given the federal government’s generally hostile view toward internet gambling, I felt it was prudent to abstain. Plus, having placed a two-pound wager on a Parliamentary election with a bookmaker when I lived in England many years ago convinced me that an inclination to bet with the heart, rather than the head, makes for an unsuccessful gambler.
No, I miss Intrade because it provided a nice summary of many different political campaigns. Sure, there are plenty of on-line tools today that provide a wide array of expert opinion and sophisticated polling data. Still, as an economist, I enjoyed the application of the mechanisms usually associated with financial markets to politics and observing how political news generated fluctuations in those markets. No other single source today does that for as many political races as Intrade did.
Feature image credit: Stock market board, by Katrina.Tuiliao. CC-BY-2.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
Yesterday, NPR posted the results of the Best Ever Teen Fiction Poll. It’s interesting to see how certain YA books fared in this complied 100 Best-Ever Teen Novels list.
Of course since it’s a poll, it’s entirely subjective. I didn’t participate, but I did find some of my favorites on the NPR list.
I’ve read SO many books over the years. I actually keep an inventory of books and I have compiled over 500 books. Maybe I should compile my own 100 top favorite list?
Writer friends, did any of your favorites make the list?
0 Comments on NPR’s Top 100 Teen Novels as of 1/1/1900
Stina Lindenblatt said, on 8/8/2012 10:41:00 AM
Wow, quite a few of my favorites made it to the list. :D
Laura Marcella said, on 8/8/2012 12:47:00 PM
The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton is my favorite teen novel, and also any teen novel by Judy Blume. They were the great YA authors before YA literature was invented!
Linda Jackson said, on 8/8/2012 3:38:00 PM
I really enjoyed Hunger Games. I tried to read Speak but couldn’t quite get into it. I haven’t read anything else on the list. Interesting list though. :)
Karen Strong said, on 8/8/2012 3:41:00 PM
I was surprised so many of my favorites made the list too. :)
Karen Strong said, on 8/8/2012 3:41:00 PM
I remember when I read FOREVER it was like a rite of passage. From a little girl to a young woman. Ha, ha.
Karen Strong said, on 8/8/2012 3:42:00 PM
I’m surprised how many trilogies and series made the list. It’s a good starting point. Lots of good stuff to choose from.
Laura Pauling said, on 8/8/2012 4:24:00 PM
A few of my favorites made it but many that didn’t care for made it too. I guess no matter how you look at it, reading is subjective. :)
This GalleyCat editor reads almost all his digital books on the iPad in a double-sided landscape view (pictured, via).
What’s your favorite eBook orientation–landscape or portrait? It’s an important question for publishers, authors and editors to ask. Answer our quick poll below and help us understand how our readers like to read.
Our society votes on everything. Why? Because we’re a democracy! We like to have a voice. We’re born expecting to have one. That’s why we cry as soon as we emerge from the womb. We’re screaming out, “Hear me! Hear me! I want Audrina Patridge to win Dancing with the Stars!” Seriously though, with information sent and delivered at lightning speed, these days we expect to be able to choose everything. From presidents to pop stars to People’s choice awards. So what’s the next logical step?
How about voting on someone’s life? As in, what they wear, who they date, even what they eat for breakfast.
Sounds fun, right? I know your little brain synapses are firing right now. Going, “What? Where? Whose life? I wanna vote!” While your multi-tasking fingers are probably pulling up google on another page and entering possible search terms that are sure to lead you to this polling goldmine.
But I’m getting ahead of myself. Let me back up a year and a half. There I am sitting on the couch in my living room. What am I doing? I’m watching TV, of course. When I probably should be writing. Or staring at my computer screen, waiting for the words of my manuscript to write themselves. Because that method has worked so well in the past.
But TV is research right? Of course it is. So there I am…researching.
I’m embarrassed to admit that the show I’m watching is some cheesy reality show which shall remain nameless in a vain attempt to preserve my “serious writer person” reputation (that was probably already tarnished from the Audrina Patridge reference in the first paragraph) But let it suffice to say that this specific reality show featured a set of beautifully groomed young twenty-somethings gallivanting around a highly-populated city, griping about their catastrophic life problems.
So anyway, I’m sitting there while my boyfriend importantly pursues the latest issue of Entrepreneur magazine, pretending not to be paying attention to my “pointless show” and I think (aloud), “Wouldn’t it be cool if
We’re curious—well, we’re always curious about what you’re reading, but this time we’re asking. What are the last five books you’ve read? Include the one you’re reading right now or not, it’s your call.
My most recent: Blameless by Gail Carriger Vegan Virgin Valentine by Carolyn Mackler Blue Fire by Janice Hardy The Map of True Places by Brunonia Barry Matched by Ally Condie
BLIND DESCENT by James Tabor
ON THIN ICE by Hugh Rowland
SHIP BREAKER by Paolo Bacigalupi
PERFUME by Patrick Süskind
WHITE CAT by Holly Black
Jessica said, on 7/28/2010 7:34:00 AM
Thanks for feeding my nosiness on what other folks are reading! My five most recent, including two I’m reading now:
Victory of Eagles – Naomi Novik
Tongues of Serpents – Naomi Novik
The Windup Girl – Paolo Bacigalupi
The Hakawati – Rabih Alameddine
Dark Curse – Christine Feehan
Miriam said, on 7/28/2010 7:36:00 AM
Oh, I’ve been meaning to read Ship Breaker and White Cat! And Windup Girl, though I think Ship Breaker is a higher-priority Bacigalupi for me. I read and loved The Hakawati last year, though I will admit that I sometimes had trouble keeping track of the many characters named Fatima.
Hannah said, on 7/28/2010 8:26:00 AM
I loved loved loved SHIP BREAKER and WHITE CAT. Highly recommended!
Lenore said, on 7/28/2010 8:32:00 AM
My 5 most recent:
NEVERMORE by Kelly Creagh
THE WHOLE WORLD by Emily Winslow
RESTORING HARMONY by Joelle Anthony
PICTURE THE DEAD by Adele Griffen
JUST LISTEN by Sarah Dessen
Melissa said, on 7/28/2010 8:35:00 AM
Great question!
Hush, Hush by Becca Fitzpatrick
Dark Divine by Bree Despain
Claire de Lune by Christine Johnson
Matched by Ally Condie
Sisters Red by Jackson Pearce
Currently reading: The Replacement by Brenna Yovanoff
Amanda Rutter said, on 7/28/2010 8:37:00 AM
Ooh, this should prove interesting – and probably painful for my wishlist!
My last five were:
By Midnight – Mia James
Wicked Games – Sasha Wagstaff
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? – Philip K Dick
Lucy In The Sky – Paige Toon
Wintercraft – Jenna Burtenshaw
Hmm, fairly eclectic!
Chris said, on 7/28/2010 8:40:00 AM
1. Necromonicon – H.P.Lovecraft
2. Nemesis – James Swallow
3. The Remorseful Day – Colin Dexter
4. Neverwhere – Neil Gaiman
5. The Last Don – Mario Puzo
Miriam said, on 7/28/2010 8:41:00 AM
Oh, Neverwhere is one of my favorite comfort reads, I’ve gone back to it so many times.
GMR said, on 7/28/2010 8:48:00 AM
Last 5 books read….top 3 are currently being read….
THE CASTAWAYS by Elin Hilderbrand
THE CHOSEN HISTORIAN by Randi Ertz
CRESCENDO by Becca Fitzpatrick (ARC)
BEAUTIFUL MALICE by Rebecca James
KARMA BITES by Stacy Kramer
Shannon said, on 7/28/2010 8:50:00 AM
Up From Slavery – Washington
Laws of Thinking – Jordan
The Universe is Inviting You In – Horne
A Song Flung up to Heaven – Angelou
Ignore Everybody – MacLeod
Ole A. Imsen said, on 7/28/2010 8:52:00 AM
I’m in the middle of City of Ruins by Mark Charan Newton right now, but here’s a list of the last five books I’ve finished:
-Stories ,edited by Neil Gaiman and Al Sarrantonio
-The Shining ,Stephen King
-Tome of the Undergates ,Sam Sykes
-River of Gods ,Ian McDonald
-Iron Council ,China Miéville
Noemi said, on 7/28/2010 9:16:00 AM
Good thing I’ve been doing a ton of reading on the commute this summer!
UNACCUSTOMED EARTH by Jhumpa Lahiri
THE GREAT LETTER E by Sandra Schor
THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING by Joan Didion
A VISIT FROM THE GOON SQUAD by Jennifer Egan
THE PLOT AGAINST AMERICA by Philip Roth
…and of course all of the Spring 2010 L&L Books!
stacy said, on 7/28/2010 9:18:00 AM
It’s so hard to remember sometimes! I jump from book to book and sometimes I have 5 or 10 going at once, so it’s hard to remember which are the last ones I actually finished. But I can remember these as actually having finished them recently:
THE AGENCY: A SPY IN THE HOUSE, A.S. Lee
MATCHED, Ally Condie (this one’s showing up a lot today!)
And these are ones that I’m currently reading:
THE AGENCY: THE BODY AT THE TOWER, A.S. Lee
STRANGE ANGELS, Lily St. Crow
THE VAMPIRE DIARIES: THE AWAKENING, L.J. Smith
THE RED PYRAMID, Rick Riordan
THE TRUE MEANING OF SMEKDAY, Adam Rex
I really need to stop letting myself pick up new books before finishing the old, so I can find out how these books end!
Meg Rosoff makes the point that Anne Frank’s trust has every right to be upset (and says that is, in effect, what they’re supposed to do). She points out, however, that writers should be allowed to write whatever they like so long as they do it well, though she herself doesn’t approve of what Dogar is doing. I, too, feel uncomfortable with the notion of Frank being used this way. As someone who’s read and enjoyed one or two Philippa Gregory novels though, I wonder if this reaction is due more to who the fictional character is based on.
So now I turn to you for your opinion: Has Dogar done something wrong, or does she have the right to use Anne Frank’s history and make it her own?
23 Comments on Fictionalizing Anne Frank, last added: 6/23/2010
Personally I don't think there's anything wrong with it. I mean yes she is probably cashing in a little on the name, hoping people will buy it because it's ANNE FRANK'S fictionalized diary rather than an unnamed girl. But writers can write about real life people and events so I think the problem people might have is more to do with Anne Frank's fame or how revered she seems to be rather than with the fact that she fictionalized someone's real life.
Anonymous said, on 6/22/2010 10:37:00 AM
My vote: She has the right. Just because someone died under horrible circumstances or was a historical figure or is put on a pedestal does not mean that their memory is sacrosanct. By this reasoning, Jesus would be off limits, as would Hitler, Ghandi, Sitting Bull, Mother Teresa, Queen Elizabeth I, you name it. In fact, how could you ever justify writing about anyone but yourself, and even then you might be accused of lying. If someone died under horrible circumstances, all the more reason to get it out in the open, to let the "truth" become part of the communal discussion. That said, she does have a responsibility to try to get it right and not misrepresent, as much as possible (depending on how she labels it).
I think the difference between Phiippa Gregory and Anne Frank is time. There are still living people who survived what Anne Frank didn't. Not to mention their children, who were wounded by their parents' horrors. And THEIR children.
Once this gift (yes, heavy sarcasm intended) stops giving, then the time will be better for this sort of thing. But right now?
The wounds bubble too close to the surface, still. We need more time, and then fictionalizing Anne Frank will be as necessary to the understanding for many as is the fictionalizing of Napoleon.
We've fictionalized pretty much all the queens of England, as well as many other historical characters. This is no different. HOWEVER, that said, this may still be a too recent era of history to work with. I don't know.
Anonymous said, on 6/22/2010 10:47:00 AM
On the flip side, would we want to tell people, "There are certain subjects you cannot write about"?
Although I think she has a right to write anything she likes, I wish that she would have written an entirely fictionalized account that didn't feature Anne Frank or Peter van Pels.
Not because people in the past should be forbidden subjects, but because I don't feel that Anne Frank or Peter van Pels are far enough in the past. They have family members and friends still living.
They're not a history lesson to those people, they're loved ones. The fact that only in the last 15 years did we find out that their last name was not van Daan, but van Pels, indicates pretty clearly that this is not yet the past.
I think we *can* write about anything we like. I just think, as a writer and a human being, there are some times when we should show restraint.
Writers can--and should--write about anything they want, but putting it in the marketplace and making money on it can be construed as exploitation. Is it in this case? I'm thinking yes.
Susan, I definitely don't agree with you. While having survivors/children of survivors of the Holocaust alive makes the topic more painful I don't believe it makes it off limits! By that logic we would have to be outraged by all media that describes the Holocaust or the surrounding events, Schindler's List or The Burning Times, The Boy in the Stripped Pyjamas or novels or films about more recent historical events like Apocalypse Now. Should we not have had books like At Risk or the play Angels in America because AIDs sufferers still live among us? The fact is she isn't even rewriting Anne Frank's Diary, she's writing Peter's. What is most insulting perhaps is that the outrage over this book is not because it "desecrates" HIS memory but that of someone he once knew!
What did anyone think of The Boy Who Loved Anne Frank, by Ellen Feldman? The premise was Peter surviving the war and moving to America, so it didn't cover the time of the diary, but Anne was certainly a character (in flashback).
To me, the essence of being a grown up is just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean you should.
Given the fact that every year some people claim that Anne Frank's diary is fictional, I think this was a bad idea.
Anonymous said, on 6/22/2010 12:55:00 PM
For those who say not to write it, not enough time has passed: When you were a kid, were you told, either explicitly or implicitly, "Now, don't you tell anyone about what goes on in this family?" "You SHOULDN'T tell." I've heard that there were German people who knew what was going on in the concentration camps, but they tacitly agreed not to talk about it. When we don't talk about things, that's when they have power. So by saying she shouldn't write this, you're privileging power, control, shame, and guilt over truth, honesty, justice, and societal health.
I was never too fond of fiction based off of real people and their stories.
Anonymous said, on 6/22/2010 6:28:00 PM
Suzi McGowen's comment has the gist of it down.
While writing a fictionalized diary of someone real is not that big a deal as long as it's clearly stated as fiction, Anne Frank's diary is a special case because holocaust deniers are constantly declaring the original fiction to begin with. Here you have something that people refuse to accept as true and something like this complicates matters more.
An author can't be held responsible for what a few crazies do with what they have written, but I feel they do have to responsible enough to be aware of the circumstances surrounding the subject they write about and consider seriously the impact of what they publish.
Hell, the book could mean nothing to anyone and fade out of memory without anyone caring. The idea of it just tickles me the wrong way.
WriterGirl, I'll not argue with your disagreement of my opinion.
I'm just going to say that I don't think you're part of a survivor family whose scars show oh, so clearly. To compare these scars to AIDS or to the attempts to show the greatness of common people (although was Schindler really common? Hmm.) in the face of such horror shows you don't understand the depth of the survivor phenomenon. There is such outrage among the second generation that Jews -- that their RELATIVES -- were led like lambs to the slaughter that books and movies of people who fought back are necessary. The truth remains vital, especially in the face of so much disbelief and distrust the doubters bring to the table.
Heck, author Steven Beeber was brash and brave enough to show how the Holocaust birthed an entire genre of music, one that is still vital and alive today. This is the power of the survivor phenomena. An entire genre of music. Think about that.
As for your other examples, the other Holocaust stories/movies have a validity because they seek to help with the healing process. This book, as I've seen it presented thus far (and frankly, I had a hard time dealing with Holocaust lit before realizing the depth of the dysfunction the event left behind, so I will not be reading this book, either), takes a REAL person and twists things around.
That is where the pain comes in. Remember the fuss over the book The Apple? A survivor made up a story that he passed off as real because he needed to heal, to prove there is kindness in the world, even if he had to invent it.
I'm sorry. The time isn't right. Yes, we should talk about this stuff. Yes, it belongs on its own shelf in the fiction section. Yes, further down the road, we can tout Historical Holocaust Fiction as possessing the same validity that Historical Queen Elizabeth holds.
Once the bulk of the pain has passed. And it is. Studies are showing that the third generation does not wear some of the trauma of their parents and surviving grandparents. Those scars are healing over. But I wonder. The pain, the horror... I thought I'd become immune to it until I heard it out of the mouth of a survivor who means a lot to me. Looking at someone you love and hearing these tales... it changes your life. It truly does.
There will be a time and a place for this sort of fiction. As someone for whom this event, which happened years before my birth, is still so very real, I'm just stating from the trenches that the time is not now.
I've read Meg Rosoff's article and I agree with her. People have the right to write these books, but that doesn't make it right or mean that the families of victims will be thrilled. My biggest fear here would be what another commenter said: that people unfamiliar with the story (and the history) will imagine that Anne Frank's diary is also a work of fiction.
I could give Rosoff a big hug for being another reader who wasn't enthralled with 'The Boy in Striped Pyjamas'.
I don't mind at all reading Shakespeare's Juliet long before she met Romeo or another angle of her that was not part of the original story. I even like Johnny Depp's release of Alice. It will be fun...imaginative...
I'm a bit late to the conversation, but I agree that time is the real issue here. Of course any author has the right to do this, but how soon is too soon to avoid being seen as opportunistic or cruel or any other negative adjective? Caesar and Abraham Lincoln were fictionalized long after their deaths. There are still people alive who went through the same thing as Anne Frank, who knew Anne Frank. Will writing about her in a fictionalized manner ever become tasteful, and if so, how long will it take? The comments here alone show that there's still dissension to the idea that we've already reached that point.
Just as long as nobody writes an "Anne Frank--Zombie"novel. There are lines of taste that I think shouldn't be crossed. Now, I must get back to "Abraham Lincoln--Vampire Hunter."
I'm slightly torn on this one. On the one hand, I think writers should be able to write whatever they like and it's up to the reader to choose whether or not to read it. After all, in in the end, it's the reader's choice, so there's no sense in blaming a writer for writing a book if you're going to pick it up and read it anyway.
On the other hand, I do agree with everyone who's said that the history is too painful and too near still. That said, everyone seems to be writing about and making films about Nazis these days; and people have fictionalized more recent historical figures, even if those historical figures had less horrific stories behind them.
So I suppose in the end, I don't really know. But I am certain that it's a reader's choice to read or not to read.
I don't think you can say that the book shouldn't be written without reading it. Even if it's a paradox, it's a knee jerk reaction. Why are we SO quick to accuse someone of "twisting the story" and "taking advantage"? You need to read the book before you pass judgment on it, especially when the author has gone to such pains to ensure its accuracy as much as she can.
Also, some people are saying its "too soon." Why? Why are we only allowed to discuss (because that's what this book is: a discussion) touchy subjects after everyone who can remember them is gone? Wouldn't it be better for us as a society to bring everything out in the open when there are still people who can contribute to the discussion first-hand? And who decides when "enough" time has passed?
Especially for those of us who aren't Jewish, I think we should welcome anything that brings the Holocaust to the forefront. I know, for me, we read maybe a paragraph in a history book about it and - that was it. Couldn't discuss it or try to figure out how something like that could have been so accepted. Wasn't allowed, wasn't important. Or maybe it was too horrible, too 'real.' Even as a child, it pissed me off. So maybe that's why I'm defending the book now.
I say let the discussion happen. And to be clear, the discussion needs to be about the events, the culture, how this happened and how to make sure it never happens again - not about whether or not someone should have written a book.
Following up on my blog post from last week and based on some of the comments we received, I thought it would be an interesting exercise to ask our blog readers, men in particular, or the women who love them, what it is they'd like to see more of, and/or less of in the marketplace. Reader David Jarrett brings up a good point that a lot of what's published today is derivative of other, successful books or authors, and often not even written by those original authors. But because they've become a household name, it's easier to sell the "branded" version of an author's work than an original work by an unknown writer. I read one of these for our work book club once, and I found it almost unreadable, lacking any depth or originality, a complete by the numbers exercise. It's a frustrating thing that we are all forced to deal with, but it's a reality of the current business model.
So I'd like to know what our male readers really want to read (which categories specifically on the fiction and nonfiction side), what they see lacking in the market, what they see too much of in the market, and what they would feel excited to spend their money on. I'd also like to see positive and negative examples of books they either loved or hated, and why.
Then if I (or any other agents here) sign a new project up that falls into these categories, I will gladly reference this blog post and let editors know there are lots of men out there who are excited to buy and read interesting, original, thought-provoking books in any number of categories, and we need to work harder to find them! As an incentive, I will choose one person who responds at random and send along a copy of a recent DGLM title. Thanks for taking part in our discussion, and in our ongoing effort to make the book biz a better place.
27 Comments on What do men want? A poll--and a prize!, last added: 5/14/2010
There are too many books with the "super-soldier who can run through a shower of bullets and only get a flesh wound while trying to local some missing artifact that will prevent a disaster from some ancient civilization" plot line.
My husband mostly reads nonfiction and really enjoys social science books. Malcolm Gladwell and Michael Lewis, also PREDICTABLY IRRATIONAL by Dan Ariely. He wants a book to give some kind of ground-breaking information that will change the way he sees things, or awaken him to something he's never thought about. But he wants it to be entertaining at the same time.
He's not big into fiction and in fact only reads the fiction I shove in his hands, but he might love Harry Potter more than I do.
I would love to see more books with heroes vs. heroines. Nothing at all wrong with a female who overcomes obstacles, but men face obstacles everyday just as much as women do...let's show more of that!
I'm an 'old-schooler', so I think my favorite male lead would have to be 'Hamlet'...talk about things to overcome! But a more modern example of a great male lead (a boy, but still male) is 'The Story of Edgar Sawtelle'.
And I agree with Todd on examples of 'bad' storylines for men...we love our action heroes, but we love guys who hurt and feel and love just as much.
I have no problem with heroic figures as protagonists in a novel -- in fact the "David and Goliath" plot still holds appeal for me and probably many others as well. However, I want to see the inside of "David" as well as the outside. I want him to have weaknesses as well as strengths, and views and convictions about life and the world that guide his actions. I have read enough books about the superman who can drive a car through city streets at 100+ without cracking up, fight off twelve other men with his bare hands, and demolish an entire squad of infantry firing a submachine gun accurately in each hand, and I'm tired of seeing this guy in print.
Granted, no one really wants to read about the "real world" all the time -- it's just too depressing to be entertaining. However, some extra realism in the protagonist's character would be refreshing.
On the nonfiction side, I love political and social history, especially 20th century. "Young Stalin," "Paris 1919". I also love empirically based books that meld philosophy and science. "Stumbling on Happiness" or "The Black Swan." I also like books that honestly tackle (not caricature) modern masculinity. "The Unforgiving Minute" by Craig Mullaney was awesome.
For fiction, I don't care if the protagonist is male or female, but if something is labeled "women's fiction" or "chick lit" I worry that the male characters will just be window-dressing. I like literary fiction that really gets into the characters. "Amateur Barbarians," for example. Interesting literary voices (like Junot Diaz, Jhumpa Lahiri, Dinaw Mengestu), but not if they have been workshopped to death (at least the case for Mengestu). Also, more science in fiction (not science fiction): "Intuition" (Allegra Goodman). And if you want to make me laugh, more parodies (as opposed to mash-ups).
I do not like YA fiction dressed up for grown-ups. You'll never catch me reading Harry Potter or Twilight. And I don't care to read an expose of the latest scandal du jour. I like a book I can keep on my shelf after I finish it.
(This is what you get by surveying wannabe authors - you get really particular readers. But thank you for asking!)
I miss John D. MacDonalds, Travis MeGee, and I would love to see more book like the early Elvis Cole books by Robert Crais. It seems that publishers have given up up P.I. novels. I want to read a book that excites me enough to go searching for the next book in the series.
Anonymous said, on 5/12/2010 8:11:00 AM
On the fiction side, smart science fiction. I grew up with Star Wars, I want really clever bold big novels that are thinking versions of that. Michael Chabon writing Edgar Rice Burroughs books. Or literary science fiction. DGLM represents The Sparrow. More like that, please. Big ideas, with compelling characters. More books generally that are sciencey because this urban fantasy/wizards/deepak chopra thing has got out of hand.
I'm not a guy, but I share lots of books with my dad, brother and brother-in-law. I seem to like 'guy-ish' books (although I love romance books too!). In fact, I prefer a male protaganist. I like to read about ordinary men who are placed in extraordinary circumstances. I want to see how they react, not just action-wise, but emotionally too, because men do have emotions. They might not wear them on their sleeves, but they aren't machines either. That's why some guy books don't appeal to me. The commando books where the men are overly macho and never afraid. That's boring. I want to see the guys doing the heroic thing even if they are terrified. That's real heroism. They don't have to be afraid for themselves, it can be for their family, their town, country, etc.
From personal experience, I know that agents don't seem to be interested in these kinds of books. It's all about women, YA and fantasy. Mostly young women in paranormal or fantasy settings.
Anonymous who posted at 1103, have you tried Jack Campbell's Lost Fleet series? Six books in all and the author is a former naval officer, so the military aspect is spot on (even though set in the future and in space.) Also, the main character is great as is the premise. The first book is called DAUNTLESS.
I read mostly science fiction, but I particularly enjoy stories where the character is in a situation that puts them under a large amount of psychological and physical stress (Battle Royale, The Long Walk). I love intense action, and it's ok if the character is a super awesome super soldier, but I agree with Todd that they need to be able to feel/endure pain.
I have to agree with Kristoffer and Todd: I want a character to be normal. I don't watch 24 because I got sick of Jack almost dying 3 times in a one day period. I don't like reading books that have a 'superhero' that is indestructible. It's funny, a lot of people seem to think guys want to be tough and feel no emotion/pain. Just because we don't want to feel emotion/pain doesn't mean we don't feel them at all.
Anonymous said, on 5/12/2010 10:54:00 AM
The problem is women control prime time, all our male characters are in essence what women writers would hope and dream the "evolved" male would say.
Example (from FRIENDS): Chandler: That Monica and that Rachel are pretty cute, is there ever going to be the chance that one of us would hook up with them?
Joey: Yes, I agree, they are cute, and smart too, let's show them lots of respect and see how things go.
When in the real world, Joey would have said
Joey: Yes, I agree, they are cute, Monica's got a tight *** and's got that look like she needs to get ****, and Rachel, well, a few beers in her and she's a gimmee. High maintenance, but a gimmee.
Chandler: Let's 'em drunk and see how it goes!
Joey: Yes, that would save about 7 seasons and 200,000 pointless chat sessions.
See? Guys want guy characters that are written like guys, not like emasculated pretty boys.
My reading tastes have changed. In the 90s, when I was heavily reviewing books, I read a lot of mysteries (all kinds: cozies, P.I.s, British cop stuff, and the greats).
Now, I'm publishing a nonfiction collection of writer anecdotes and thinking about a thriller (so I'm biased), and I'm not reading as many mysteries.
Here's what I've been reading for pleasure lately: the Jasper Fforde series (here's a clue: high concept, fun but some social satire) -- and while I haven't read his "Shades of Grey," my wife and son have and they LOVED it; the Invincible superhero comic book collection (really, really done well; I also loved "Soon I Will Be Invincible"); Terry Pratchett (fantasy, but funny and also social satire ... see the connection?).
Naturally, I've been dipping into thrillers, but I haven't found one I liked enough to stick with it. They seem overused: the Device That Can Destroy The World; the Serial Killer From Hell; the Horrible Secret From The Past.
I'm not sure what I'm looking for. I loved "Da Vinci Code" (hated the writing) because that dam thing MOVED. Maybe that's it.
Perhaps there's room for another high-concept Innocent Gets Caught Up In Weird World story. It worked for "Men In Black," didn't it?
Good questions. I can’t help you with categories that I look for, because I read for writing more than for story or topic. I’ll read anything that, by my definition, is well-written. I’ve learned that that rules out adventure (fiction, anyway), thrillers, mysteries, fantasy, action heroes; that stuff all looks the same to me, from cover to blurb to plot. I read little or no fiction these days--I’m not being a book snob, I just like what I like. Last novel--last year--was Deirdre McNamer’s Red Rover. Will start (again) Styron’s Lie Down in Darkness in a day or two. Just finished This Quiet Dust, a collection of Styron's essays, and before that The Balloonists, by Eula Biss; she is, if the word means anything, a writer, as was Styron.
I think that The Lost City of Z (was that really adventure???) is about as poorly written and sloppily edited a book as I’ve seen in years, and I cannot understand its popularity. My wife enjoyed it.
I look for books that are organic--there was a story to tell--not books that capitalize on trends, and I realize that if publishing had to rely on me people would starve.
I’ll read--and recommend and give as a gift--anything literate, again, as I define it. Doesn’t have to be dark. I prefer the real world, which is not without humor and grace.
I like books with neat pictures. To help you figure out what's going on. And books should come with free snacks. Chips and soda. Maybe just a coupon so you can get them from the gas station or something. 24/7. Pictures and snacks.
Tattoos - I mean, really people, what's that gonna look like when you're 45... or 75?
Vampires as romantic figures - Do you think a gazelle would view a lion as a romantic figure?
Angels/Fallen Angels - I know this is the up and coming trend, but I'm tired of it already. Women complain about the impossible-to-live-up-to supermodel stereotype. It goes both ways people.
What I'd like to see more of:
Characters with a brain - I love reading a story where I can "match wits" with the characters. Can they come up with a solution before I do? Or one I didn't think of? Love that.
Realism without Gratuitousness - What I mean by that is stories can be real without being overly vulgar, sexual, or violent. I was very disappointed in GRRM's Feast for Crows. Over the top realism in my opinion. I can't root for any of the characters he's really focusing on any more because they are all depraved, disgusting, etc. Hopefully that makes some sense.
As a creative writing major, I have a lot of male writer friends, and they all seem to be getting on the dystopian train lately. A lot of them are big proponents of The Handmaid's Tale, and books in that vein. Lots of them are sci-fi fans as well, though it seems like they enjoy the more technological-based ones, rather than aliens, space ships, etc.
My best friend will read just about anything that isn't labeled chick lit, but he's got a huge soft spot for mysteries and thrillers. He LOVED Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (which is also an incredible movie, if you don't mind foreign films).
My guy friends also seem to be fans of memoirs. Mary Hong Kingston, Mary Karr, etc. I don't think it bothers them that the protagonists in many of the books are female, but I know a few have commented that they'd like to see more male protagonists.
Oh, and David Sedaris. They (me, included) all love David Sedaris.
I'm into character studies right now, (and I realize the following list is movies) like "There Will be Blood" and "Schultze Gets the Blues." Good satire/social commentary really gets me too. I think Chuck Klosterman is extremely entertaining. I also read a few essays by Heinrich Boell recently that really had me rolling. "Es wird etwas Geschehen" is a must read.
What I want to see the most of is more high concept fiction that breaks every genre boundry. Stuff like Geek Love, House of Leaves and The Raw Shark Texts.
If I can't get that what I would like to see is more horror. Real horror, not Leisure Press horror. Leisure prints mostly man vs. monster fiction where you don't care about the men or the monsters. If I don't care about the characters, make me care about the monster. If I don't care aboue either one -- don't publish it.
What I least want to see is Fantasy. Fantasy is for 14-year old D&D geeks. You outgrow that trend around age 25 and never look back.
YA is all the rage right now, but I think that the genre is about to burn out on itself. Not every book is Harry Potter and you can't make a dumbed down version of Battle Royale interesting for more than one book (ie, The Hunger Games). After reading The Maze Runner, I'm done with YA fiction forever. That book was crap and I can't wait for the trend to burn out and disappear.
Young guy, midwest, fantasy bias, creative writing program influence. This is what I say:
Blending sci-fi and fantasy and realism. A little more mature HIS DARK MATERIALS with a few more machines.
Male protagonists that aren't crippled by their problems. Male protagonists that aren't above their problems.
Female protagonists or characters that have the confidence to be both strong and meek. I'd like to see grace again. Or at least someone aspiring to it.
Characterization. Like, even the small things can change a person.
You know what I'd love? A novel like an intensified 1984 written by Rushdie and edited by Hemingway. That'd be a trip.
Gritty, honorable love.
And, of course, everything Murray Sandman said.
Anonymous said, on 5/12/2010 9:03:00 PM
I love John Steinbeck's work. He had the ability to create male characters who are the real deal with guts, grit and dirt etc - the unsung hero!
I liked the men's adventure magazines like Stag, Argosy, pulp-style stories... I remember reading a great story called "We Sank Tojo"s Monster Sub!," with an illo of a mariner flying boat dropping bombs on a sub the size of a carrier while it was launching manned rocket bombs to attack the plane....Good times...The only place you can find that stuff is at Pulp & Dagger, a website for writers who like stories written "in the Grand Tradition" of the 1930's and 1940's.
I can't presume to speak for all men, but for me, I don't really mind that most realistic fiction is by and for women because I don't want to read about real life. I read fiction in order to escape from real life. I like stories where stuff _happens_. I do not care about gorgeous sentences. I don't mean stuff has to blow up (though I don't mind that) but I don't enjoy contemplative or atmospheric. I like stories. Perhaps this is why I read very little literary fiction.
Anonymous said, on 5/13/2010 3:58:00 PM
Female here, but I prefer male protagonists. Some things I'd like to see:
1) Realistic, contemporary YA. 2) Adult books with YA-like pacing. 3) Historical fiction that isn't a romance. 4) More heroic protagonists in general. Flawed doesn't have to mean depraved or angsty. 5) Stories set in college.
I enjoy fun social &/or political satire, especially if they are quirky and/or sacrilegious. Some authors that come to mind are Christopher Buckley, Christopher Moore, Chuck Palahniuk, Phillip Jennings. Fun, sharp wit and a decent story.
bitter and twisted said, on 5/13/2010 9:59:00 PM
I tend to buy old books from charity stores. Why? because there are so few authors doing anything new. This is, I think, due to agents who are mostly women, (o-kay there are a good few male agents, but most are over 50 and just looking after the clients they already have and not interested in new talent(if I'm not right put a list of ten here))
Publishers no longer look for writers, they sit and wait for agents to bring writers to them. Agents look at what sold big last season because "that's what the market wants." This has been the way of things for over 20 years now and all the while everyone in the industry is crying over falling markets. Of course the market is falling, because the industry is narrowing the market every year. Lets not pretend it is anything to do with the economic climate. Fact is a generally bad economic situation is good for the book industry because a book is the best value entertainment money can buy, work it out dollar per hour and tell me I'm wrong. The lady agent, gets a query letter. Sees it is from a new author and checks the creds. It's from a grad, who has learned from the same teacher as all the other grads to write in the same way as all the other grads. The subject matter, while not exactly the same, is close enough to last season's big seller that the section of the public that read last years blockbuster might well go this year's "refreshing and innovative" new author. And so the great new talent is just like the great old talent.
Why don't guys read books? Because agents don't look at manuscripts that don't have a love interest. Because agents wont take a chance on a book that does not follow formula. This is why the male readership has fallen away, because there is nothing on the shelf to buy. I reckon 40% of the market has fallen by the wayside because no book is better than a bad book.
I'm not saying everything on the shelf today is bad, just it is only suitable to a selective audience.
Someone here mentioned Stigg Larsson's 'Dragon Tattoo, well that's the last new book I've read and if it had been the first book I'd ever read, then I would never have read another book in my life. It's a tired, same old, same old plot, it's obvious after 5 pages the girl is still alive. The characters are over laboured. The seine setting is just plain dull and worst of all there's a hole in the plot that a train can be driven through. As a story it just does not work. But it sticks to the formula and so it gets published.
Most of the guys posted here I agree with, a book needs action, but not super-hero action. Action with conflict of emotion. Human action, when it's dangerous the hero gets scared, when he's with a girl he sometimes gets nervous. And sometimes he does normal everyday things, like take a dump. Heroes with frailties, like real people.
Hemingway, Micky Spillane, George G. Gilbert, Robert A. Heinlein, Raymond Chandler, how many of these would be accepted as a client by an agent today? Easy to answer - NONE. because they didn't write to the formula. Most agents (and I'm not saying the ones who provide this blog, coz I don't know the crack with them, but at least they promise to read everything sent) say they are looking for "a new and strong voice" but what they seek is the old voice in a slightly different pitch. Meanwhile the most part of a generation of male book readers have grown up with nothing worth reading.
We have a winner from last week’s poll! At the end of the business day on Thursday, the author who had accumulated the most votes was K whose “I wondered if the girl at the front desk knew that things like me existed,” garnered a healthy 236 votes!
So K, bring it on! Send me your manuscript, and I’ll review it promptly.
Everyone else, don’t be discouraged if you weren’t chosen as a finalist or if you didn’t win. Do feel free to query me—there were lots of great entries!
18 Comments on First lines: We have a winner!, last added: 5/5/2010
Congrats to the worthy victor and all the finalists, and thanks to Jim for giving props to my first line. It was fun, encouraging and informative to be a part of it.
Like everyone else I just wanted to thank you for having the contest Jim! I never expected to be a finalist so you brightened up my week!
And congrats to the other finalists and the other people who entered. Everyone had terrific lines! Of course the biggest congrats goes to K but that's understood :)
My only regret is that you don't rep young adult. But no worries, I'm sure the rest of the agents at D&G will be just as awesome!
Two thumbs up! One to you, Jim, for such a great contest and to K for taking that coveted prize!!! Hopefully, K, we'll all be able to read your story one day!
Btw, I appreciated all the comments, both positive and negative, about my first line!
There are several reasons I think the internet is made of magic. First, I put out a call for a first lines contest and ended up with 263 comments on the post (some of them were duplicates, but there’s no way I’m counting to find out the exact number of entries). Regardless, that’s a darned impressive tally. Second, some of them were great. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, when I posted the nine finalists, we got my favorite kind of response: anonymous snarkiness.
No seriously, I love the snarky. That the first comment asked me whether I chose the best or worst nine entries made me smile. Interestingly, someone else took the time to critique all nine entries. And while my first instinct was to rip them a new one, on a second read through, I saw that they actually made some thoughtful points, a few of which I didn’t disagree with. So I thought it would be fun/enlightening to go through and offer their critique along with my response to it as well as the entries themselves.
Before that, I want to take a quick moment to say thank you again to everyone who posted an entry. There were so many to choose from, and some really great ones slipped by. There are three in particular that I’m still mentally rotating with some of the entries I chose. A few commenters yesterday mentioned first lines that they admired: I’d love for you to share which you chose, and I’m sure the folks who penned them will be delighted to be discussed!
Now, on to the main event:
“The next time Hermes brought her back from the Underworld, Persephone wept tears of rage.”
Anonymous says: “Feels too close to pre-existing mythology.”
Jim says: Well…yeah. But I love this sentence. Not only am I a mythology fan, but I think there’s real room in the marketplace for more fiction based in Greek and Roman myths. Beyond that, the language feels nicely in tune with the subject matter but also feels effortless. And even if you know nothing about these gods, you’re left with a tantalizing question: why would someone feel rage for being taken out of hell?
"I saw her do it before she did.”
Anonymous wonders: “What does"it" refer to?”
Jim says: I don’t know. But I want to. This sentence hits a sweet spot between vague and specific that makes me ask a lot of questions. Not only what “it” is (which I assume will be answered in a later sentence), but whether this is about a main character with some sort of psychic ability, or if “she” may lack awareness of what she’s doing, in fact whether the speaker is seeing something that hasn’t happened or whether the subject is doing something without “seeing” it. It’s open ended without feeling clumsy, and it pushes me to want to know more.
“I'm pretty sure my sister had decided to become a pagan or a baptist or something before she offed herself so I don't know why we were having a Catholic funeral.”
Anonymous feels: “"Had decided" versus "decided" and the second "or" with "something" dilutes the power of the sentence.”
Jim feels: I’m going to disagree completely on this one. The “or something” is completely crucial to the success of this sentence. It reinforces the narrator’s indifference to their sister making this seem that much more wrong in so many right ways. As for the “had,” I’d keep it. It feels right for the voice which is key in the first person. This line seems to be giving us a tough yet funny narrator who isn’t afraid to tell it like it is. I most defini
34 Comments on Choosing the first lines, last added: 4/28/2010
Great post! I agree with most of your disagreements with anonymous! LOL Captain Stupendous got my vote but they were all good in their own way. Thanks for taking the time to let us know your thoughts on these.
Would love to know what those other three you keep rotating in your mind are!
I didn't get a chance to read them the first time around, but I definitely want to go back now. The reactions to these are fantastic. And I agree; Thomas Buttermore is a great name. :) Thanks for sharing these!
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 8:29:00 AM
I don't know what is more funny.
The fact that Jim acted without any ethic in this contest when he didn't inform the participants he desire a specific genre, because I think that the maximum lines in the contest based on this choices would had been 30 at most, and not almost 300, so... satiric claps for you Jim and a reminder for everybody else, he don't really represent this company, Ms. Jane do, so don't think bad about Dystel & Goderich because usually Jim don't evaluate your queries.Or...
...the fact that he actually respond a anonymous commentary, that said actually... what we all think about the choices Jim made. What shows he was not even sure about the choices he made, and that in my language is lack of charisma.
So...in the end what really matters is:
-If you have any horror story and you trying to publish it, don't chose Dystel & Goderich to represent you because they don't have currently a good employer for you. For the others genres, they are the best.
Sorry about the hard words Ms. Jane, but I really like you agency, but the black sheep's always mess the white reputation.
@anonymous. Jim has given us an opportunity to have our ms read with out any strings attached. I can't believe you can't appreciate that. What you have just written is horrendous in my opinion. Jim has only done us a favour. who ever said he was obligated to take time out of his day to do this for us anyway? I think he deserves applause.
anon 11.29- what are you on about? From where I'm sitting there appear to be several different genres represented among the favourite lines and none of them are horror, or at least the first lines don't indicate whether they are or aren't. Jim offered us a fun competition with a really awesome prize for OUR benefit. I'm sure he has enough work to be getting on with and yet he still gave us this opportunity. How can you be so dismissive of that?
Dear Anonymous: Really, what I see in your post is an emotional reaction to being rejected. Rejection smarts, and I'm so sorry that you're having a rough go of it. But I'm going to give you some advice from a very sincere place in my heart, and this is knowledge I come by the hard way. Also, keep in mind that Jim is my agent - has been for 7 fabulous years - and to say that I ABSOLUTELY ADORE him would be a gross understatement. I can truly say that I consider him one of the best people I know...in other words, I really DO know his character, and I can suggest to you with absolute certainty that he was not motivated by anything other than offering something really cool for burgeoning writers. He acted without prejudice, even though, to you, it seems like he didn't.
The thing you have to realize is that venting hurts YOU. Jim is very likely unaffected by your comments because he's been in the biz long enough to understand that when people take a verbal swipe at him in reaction to a rejection - it has much more to do with them than him. As you can see from the above, Jim's got some serious fans; not one in you, obviously, but I think you can learn a really valuable lesson from this, and that is; when you are given some criticism - do not react. Do not respond. And above all - do NOT post snark on public blog. If it hurts too much to look at it, set it aside, take a few days, come back to it when you won't feel so wounded, because there are likely some precious pearls of wisdom in there that will help you in the long run. In the meantime, just breathe, sugar, just breathe.
All good calls Tracy! And all near the top of my leader pack. Something about the first one kept needling me. I wasn't sure if it read a little forced--I wanted to read more, but I didn't know for sure that I was 100% on board. I have no real critique of the Bacardi line. It definitely works. It just popped sliiiightly less than some others for me. Tess Garibaldi...how close she came! And the birthday wish...I agonized over that one. It felt spot on, but I wondered if it felt too much like it could come from any number of paranormals. But they are all very good lines.
LOL!! As much as I would love to put my first line in here, I won't. :)
Actually the one line that made me laugh (my absolutely favorite) was (drumroll)
"I greeted his tombstone the way I always did—with a swift kick."
I loved the snarkiness of it. I thought it was a great opening to a story that made me want to read more. And I thought it did great at giving a glimpse of the MC's personality.
Don't worry winners. I liked the others too. :)
But the line above would have definitely been on my top nine.
I would like to know if something like the top five runner-ups in this contest. Some one liners that were close but didn't make it for whatever reason. Then I would like to know exactly why they didn't make it.
Once again...Grats to all the winners. Good luck!!
I loved these two, plus number 4 on your list, Jim.
"With the exception of the two uniformed police officers on the front steps puking into evidence bags, Ellen LeeAnn Walsh's building looked like a hundred other slightly run-down Italianate Victorians in San Francisco."
"I greeted his tombstone the way I always did—with a swift kick."
I do think that it's a momentary decision. If something grabs you at that moment - you'll read more. It could well be that if you go back later and examine what grabbed you, it no longer feels the same way to you. But the grab moment? Priceless :)
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 9:49:00 AM
This is anonymous 1:09 and 2:08 from your results post, not the one who posted at 11:29 today.
Thank you for outlining your thought process on what attracts you to these first lines.
In the end what matters is your opinion, and in fact your opinion will hopefully make you and your clients some big bucks.
My point of view is from someone who is now line editing a manuscript and trying to get rid of all the cruft – all the it/there/that/had and awkward and passive sentence constructions affecting readability and pacing. These words are essential to writing but their use in a first line is a red flag for overuse and abuse throughout the manuscript. A manuscript with an overabundance of such words is one which often times needs to be liberated from dead weight and can be improved with more descriptive phrasing.
As Mark Twain once wrote: Substitute "damn" every time you're inclined to write "very;" your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be.
Which perhaps led Nathaniel Hawthorne to follow: Easy reading is damn hard writing.
Anyway, thanks for the contest. Thanks for the blog.
Oh, Jim, I love your "black sheep" sign off. You always make me laugh.
I also love Victoria Laurie's response. So wonderful and sweet.
To Anonymous 11:29- Seriously? Please don't. I'm not represented by Jim and never have been, but I have sent him material before and he's always, without fail, been incredibly encouraging, polite and kind about it. Also, as many people have pointed out already, this contest was a lot of fun for most of us, and it was a very generous thing for Jim to do! Sorry about the vent, but your comment kind of ticked me off.
One of my favourite lines that didn't make it was, like many other people, "I greeted his tombstone the way I always did—with a swift kick." Such a fun line!
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 10:57:00 AM
to anon 11:29:is amazing how somebody that don't have the decency to show us a name(hey!just like me)can make such a revolt in people.i bet he's just a problematic kid that is now laughing at us in front of his computer.
Dear Anyom 11:29, If you feel the need to rant while employing horrific grammar and sentence structure try to do so in a place not littered with word lovers. You know, some place that is not heavily populated by writers, readers, editors and literary agents. Try perhaps your local facebook group or may haps even the neighborhood 7-11.
Thanks for the insight, Jim! That was really interesting. I'm going to add another vote for you to reveal the runners-up. :)
I just read all of the entries, and this is the one that jumped out at me: "Perhaps the hissing should have tipped me off, but honestly, life so far hadn’t prepared me for feral desk accessories."
Thanks for posting these! It was illuminating to see where our thought processes ran along parallel lines and where we diverged completely. Even for the entries I would not have picked (only because there were others I liked better), we had some pretty similar critiques. I think this kind of exercise is very useful for future clients of yours; as writers, we want to find agents who will share our vision for our careers, and being able to peek inside that agent's head in advance can help us figure out whether you could be that agent.
I also want to say that this contest spurred me to go back and look at the first lines of my favorite books as well as the ones I truly loathe. While I mostly find I love the first lines of those books I liked I also find that I would have voted for some of the opening lines of books I can't stand had they been listed here.
I was personally intrigued by this line: "A lot of people still think I'm a terrible person because I didn't call the police right away."
I'm a sucker for horrible events and I want to know what horrible thing happened and just exactly why did they not call the police right away?
I don't know how I missed the 'tombstone' one. That I loved (though I had to wonder if the next line was something about it always resulting in stubbed toes).
My vote for best of your top nine went to "Captain Stupendous fan club" without a doubt. My runner-up was the 'five husbands' line.
Great contest and very entertaining reading overall.
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 3:32:00 PM
Anonymous 1:09 and 2:08 likes:
Jimi Hendrix had a lot of explaining to do. (How do we get the dead to explain something?)
"Mary Kate Stewart secretly hoped that her Calculus teacher would get hit by a taco truck." (the absurdity and alliteration of a taco truck, although strike "that")
I've finally figured out my problem: All these years I've wanted - expected - a full moon, every single night." (a romantic idea, a thoughtful protagonist)
"Perhaps the hissing should have tipped me off, but honestly, life so far hadn’t prepared me for feral desk accessories." (funny, unexpected)
"Salt. He tasted like salt." (two lines technically but so was one of yours; intriguing - what is the person doing)
"What size boots you wear?" the old man hacked as he led Nick through the open-air morgue, his hand already hovering close to the feet of the nearest corpse. (irreverant, like the tombstone one mentioned earlier but the protagonist is more sympathetic than one who does the actual kicking)
Zahra could smell the old ndovu, a great pachyderm; for three suns now, she’d tracked him. (Nice names and unusual word! I search out the dictionary.)
"I pressed my shoulders into a wooden armchair in Mrs. Wintour’s antechamber, clasping my hands together so they would not tremble with cold and anxiety." (strong tension and mood)
I swallowed my Altoid the moment the rebel hottie across the reading room drew his attention away from his book and busted me staring at him. (the addition of Altoid and rebel make the classic situation more unique)
Thanks for giving us your perspective on all the first lines you chose, Jim! I'm so pleased you laughed out loud at mine (even if it could have used an em dash ; ).
1) Note to self: Jim likes mythology. *g* I think what throws me off on this one is the sequencing. "Next time" to me implies future tense, but then we get past tense. And weeping jars with rage, IMO. But I'm definitely curious about why, like Jim said.
2) This comes across as ... not vague so much as tempting. Again, makes me curious. My only quibble is that when I read the sentence, my brain wants to fill in an "it" at the end, which probably changes the meaning!
3) I'm with Jim on this one. Love it. "Or something" fits with "pretty sure" for a casual voice. I want to know more about this character, who capitalizes "Catholic" but not "pagan" or "baptist," and I want to know how her sister got a Catholic funeral if she committed suicide!
4) I love the language play here - the fake-Latin, and then the "to which." The character is sharp and snarkish, and I like that a lot.
5) Absolutely disagree. I love that the sentence starts out in such an ordinary way and gets progressively more zany. This is the one that made me lol! I love the names, I love the voice.
6) I feel like it should be Hakebourne. (Maybe I should quit reading Ludlum? *g*) I am immediately curious about who would say this and why.
7) This makes me wonder two things: what kind of thing is this? and the front desk of what?
8) LOVE this one. Love the brash, confident voice, love the semicolon. Love the setup: she's had other women's husbands, but never one of her own.
9) I like "left-coast." Is it that common to say "left coast" instead of "west coast?" The sentence seems a bit passive, but Thomas Buttermore is definitely a memorable name. A writer who can come up with that, and with "Twinkies and white guilt," has got my attention for at least a little bit more.
Okay Jim, you asked for it! I went back and reread all the entries, including Facebook. I tried to break it down to just a few favorites, but it was so hard! There were around 40 that I really liked, so you can imagine the difficulty to end up with 7! I didn't want to repeat some of the lines which have already been mentioned and happen to be part of my favorites (I, too, like the swift kick, the full moon, the taco truck, Tess Garibaldi, he tasted like salt, Bacardi, etc.). Here goes in no particular order:
"Sixteen years ago I left Balmer, Alabama as a black boy. I return today as a white man." (I'm hooked. How does a black boy become a white man and why would he want to return to Alabama? No offense to anyone living in Alabama!)
"Jocelyn stared at the guy sitting across the table from her, wondering how he’d react later – when he was drowning." (How does she know that he'll be drowning later and why? It got my interest.)
"I never wanted my wedding performed by an Elvis impersonator, yet I found myself standing beside my fiancé and looking at the King." (I like the "voice" here and the irony of the situation; sometimes you get exactly what you don't want!)
"The longest journey of my life began with an argument about chips." (So true! How many times does something that seems so insignificant becomes a major turning point in one's life? I'll read on.)
"Catalina Flores de la Peña's tongue got her in more trouble than any other part of her body, even though there were far more likely candidates." (I like that it's so descriptive without putting it all down in words. Great name, you just know that this woman is trouble, and yes, I want to know more.)
"In the many millennia Gabe had spent watching over his mortal charges, not once had he ever thought of breaking the rules." (It brings to mind "City of Angels" a film I love so I'm intrigued by the subtlety of what may make Gabe think of breaking the rules.)
"It was all fun and games, until Ashley fell over the cliff." (Yep, that will end the fun and games, but now what? How did she fall, was she pushed? Does she survive....is she hanging to a tree limb? I'm interested.)
Anonymous said, on 4/28/2010 12:45:00 PM
Thanks for this, Jim! It's just fun to read the lines, even if (like me) you didn't take part in the contest.
One that nobody mentioned that intrigued me: "He awoke in the dark to the screams again. His hands were automatic spiders for the gun."
We’ll keep the poll open until 5:00 NY time on Thursday, and the winner gets their manuscript considered by yours truly.
And check back here tomorrow for more commentary from me on the contest; how I chose these nine finalists, what my first line pet peeves are, and other first-line-related shenanigans.
For the time being, remember to vote! Discussions of my choices are welcome. Feel free to tell me I’m an idiot if you dislike my picks, but remember to be nice to each other!
46 Comments on First line finalists: It's poll time!, last added: 4/28/2010
It's funny how subjective this whole reading thing is, because I jotted down my Top 10 list last week -- and none of those were the finalists. Not that these aren't some good lines, just not the ones that would have caught my attention the most.
Wait, what, I'm actually on this list? Yikes! *^_^*;;
Some great contenders here--I really like the five husbands one, and the Captain Stupendous fan club one as well! Good luck, all!
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 11:08:00 AM
#1 feels too close to pre-existing mythology In #2 what does"it" refer to? #3 Am I the only one missing a verb? #4 "had decided" versus "decided" and the second "or" with "something" dilutes the power of the sentence *5 better stated if it didn't start with "There" #6 Okay, but classic problem #7 extraneous "that," what is the "thing"? 8) The one I voted for, even though it sounds kind of cheesy like Mae West. Best of the bunch. #9 This sounds more like a right-coastie to me. I don't know any educated Californians who eat Twinkies.
These are all great! I voted :) I also want to add one that I really liked, which didn't make it to this list: The worst part of spending three years in and out of sleep clinics is having to room with the chronic bedwetters. (No, it's not mine!)
Like everyone else, only a few of these caught my eye in the initial read-through; one or two I thought were boring and another one or two too gimmicky. That said, I can see why you would have picked each and every one of them, and how they might hook other readers. And yet I'm shocked by the absence of certain lines I found fabulous. Like everyone else said, it's completely subjective. So while the winner's line will be recognized as fantastic, don't feel discouraged if yours didn't make it this time around. I'm sure someone out there likes it. :-)
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 11:25:00 AM
Maybe it's because I'm on my mobile but I can't find the link to the results. Where are they!? Thanks.
Wow I'm so flattered that mine was chosen. Quite a few of the others had caught my eye when they were posted as well. I don't expect to win but thanks so much to anyone who votes for my line. It's so exciting! (#4)
Wow - so you definitely have a strong preference for first person narrative. Seven of the nine finalists are first person and 5 of the 9 begin with "I" or "I've." I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on first person vs. third. Thanks for the fun contest!
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 1:09:00 PM
No offense but No. 1 is the only decent one in this line up. When I read the entries last week I found so many more that were much better than these!
One of my favorites made it to the list, yay! Regardless of which ones have been chosen, I enjoyed the opportunity to read so many first lines.
I just glanced at some comments and would like to respond to one of the anons. The use of "had decided" in this case is necessary, IMHO. And the "or something" seems to me, is part of the narrator's voice, and I don't feel as if it's diluted the sentence.
And no, I didn't write it and I don't know the writer.
It's a "one persons opinion of the top 1st lines" contest, people!
I think they're all great. Are they my top 10? I have no idea- I'd have to read them all- but seriously, people are questioning his personal top favorites? That's weird.
Heh. Olivia, if you're surprised by how rude people are, you don't spend enough time in internet message boards. :)
I did tell people to let me know if they thought I was an idiot for my choices, so I literally asked for it! I do reiterate my request that everyone be polite to the other writers. Don't single any lines out for your criticism. This should be about supporting each other, not tearing each other down. Literary bloodsport is so last century.
I'll break these down line by line on the blog tomorrow to explain why I chose each one. I'm also going to ask then that people nominate some of their own favorite lines.
Anonymous 3:57, good eye. I don't think I noticed my first person bias here. Will have to think on that and go through my client list to see if that bears out on a larger scale! Expect updates in future blog posts.
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 3:16:00 PM
From Anonymous 3:57:
I think I noticed that first person bias because I write narrative nonfiction and have a journalism/academic background so I typically try to avoid first person. I don't know much about YA, but it seems that the intimacy and immediacy of first person (as opposed to the filtered analysis of third person) would have the most resonance for teens, so your choices make sense to me. Thanks again for the fun!!!
Ah! I like five of the ones out there! Oh no, I can't pick!
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 5:24:00 PM
For what it's worth, I would have given #4 at least 3 pages to see where it went. I was mildly curious about #8, but would bail if the first 3 paragraphs weren't stellar. As for the rest, I probably wouldn't have been looking in those sections of the bookstore anyway. My taste is clearly quite different from Jim's. So, I doubt I'll be querying him.
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 5:30:00 PM
Lots of interesting beginnings here. Can't wait to see what happens. For my money, I'd like to read more of #4 though!
Like some folks, #8 caught my eye -- but only because I've seen it/heard it before and because it's too close to "How many husbands have I had? You mean apart from my own?" (Zsa Zsa Gabor)
Anonymous said, on 4/26/2010 8:59:00 PM
My friendly critique of #8 from a marketing standpoint is that the narrator might not be too sympathetic, especially in this day and age of tawdry celebrity sex scandals. Monica Lewinsky. Rachel Uchetal. Michelle "Bombshell" McGee. Please, we get enough of these sensational confessionals in the tabloids! But maybe I'm too conservative, and want to be both entertained AND enlightened when I read, which may explain my bias toward third person, narrative nonfiction. It's still a great one-liner, though, and goes to show how subjective the publishing world is! A great "take-away" lesson for all of us. Good luck to all the finalists! SE
The five-husbands line is awfully close to the first line of Doris Lessing's "To Room Nineteen," which I seem to recall begins, "I've had so many husbands, I don't need a husband." Probably an innocent case of convergent evolution.
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 7:15:00 AM
Good luck to everyone. I hope the Facebook entries were counted too, this isn't even on FB today so I would have missed it. Will come here directly in the future. Thanks for the contest.
The only two that really grabbed me were the Hermes one and the "things like me existed" one. (Some of the others were pretty short, so I'd read another couple lines before casting judgement.) But we can only vote once...
DGLM- True I don't frequent message boards. I guess I was mostly surprised that so many people posted snarky comments anonymously. I figure if you're gonna say it, own it.
Thanks, Jim, for picking mine among so many great first lines! There were quite a few that made me want to read more....and hopefully, one day I will.
Anonymous said, on 4/27/2010 12:24:00 PM
Eh, mountains of clever in these lines, but clever is to today's publishing biz what HFCS is to food: a poor substitute for real flavor.
Sadly, the two that merit company with Call Me Ishmael, Happy Families Are All Alike, and It Was The Best Of Times have so far received the least of votes.
I have to agree with Anon 8:42. I do think that #8 is a very clever line, but if I remember correctly (and forgive me if I don't), the genre was either a memoir or fact based fiction (or similar) and that made the author deeply unsympathetic to me and the line a complete turnoff.
Anonymous said, on 4/28/2010 1:18:00 PM
Anon 2:55 - Isn't everything subjective, especially in the publishing world? "Don't send your mystery or horror manuscript to an agent looking for romance." "Don't ask an editor to read your YA manuscript when he or she only deals with non-fiction." Just because you're subjective doesn't mean you overlook good writing!
Suze - I went back to look at the genre, she says "....mine is a non-fiction book proposal that I'm working on,...." which doesn't necessarily mean that it's a memoir or an autobiography. For all we know, she could be writing a book about the life of Mae West or Zsa Zsa Gabor!
The biggest news in publishing this week is that the London Book Fair is barely happening because of cursed Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajokull which, thanks to the NY Times, I can now pronounce!
But really, I can only say so much about that, so instead, let’s have a contest!
You’ve all surely heard that agents make decisions really fast, and if we aren’t entranced by your writing within 6.2 seconds or somesuch, we’ll just move on to the next thing. This is, for the most part, entirely true. So let’s see how quickly you can win us (and your fellow blog readers) over. Post the first line of your manuscript in the comments below by the end of the day on Thursday, 4/22. I’ll narrow it down to a select group of finalists, and then we’ll have a poll for you to judge who had the best, most intriguing first line.
The winner gets to have their full manuscript considered by yours truly. You don’t even have to query!
Bring it on! And in the meantime, enjoy this hysterical NPR link about mishaps that has nothing to do with anything.
227 Comments on First Lines: A contest!, last added: 4/23/2010
"Entering the Junior Handlers Dog Show should be fun, may be embarrassing, but Kitty Walker had no idea it would be dangerous, Kitty had bigger worries."
Congratulations on pronouncing the volcano name - I'd need a few more vowels before I even attempt it.
Love the NY Times link, although I'm not sure I'd dare try to pronounce it. We just call it "that bloody volcano" here in the UK, anyway.
Awesome contest idea, and great entries so far! I think it would be pointless/unfair of me to enter, as you're already considering my manuscript. Not to mention my first lines suck. Always.
But, just for fun, here's a first line I'd LIKE to start a novel with:
Lots of awesome first lines posted - many books I'd be interested in reading based on them! Anyway, here is mine, from my YA fantasy The Oracle of Delphi, Kansas:
My mother has been in mental institutions most of my life.
What a fun idea! Here's mine (literary fiction): The summer that Philip Johnston was transformed by the eclipse, wildfires dotted the southern California landscape.
Well, since I already have an agent, I won't be participating, but it will be a lot of fun to read all the entries. Can we still vote if we don't enter ourselves?
**Sorry about that. I forgot to note genre so I deleted the above comment.**
Well, I never would have guessed that's how it's pronounced!
Thanks for the contest opportunity, Jim. 6.2 seconds, well that is reassuring. Lot of great first lines here! I'll give it a go. This comes from my YA Historical/Paranormal fantasy, FATED.
Colin's sign language interpreter flanked him at school like an extra appendage, but between his last class and football practice, he navigated the hallways of Broadview High alone.
Anonymous said, on 4/19/2010 6:44:00 PM
It's hard to believe that such atrocities were committed in such a beautiful place.
Anonymous said, on 4/19/2010 6:48:00 PM
"We heard it fall."
by MAB
Hayleigh Scott said, on 4/19/2010 6:52:00 PM
My first line from my YA:
"Death by tortoise shell. Not very imaginative, but it did the trick."
My completed novel is MG, which you don't seek yet, so I'm submitting the first line from my YA novel. It is unfinished, and I understand if you decide to limit it to finished mss. only.
"Cedar can't decide which is more stubborn: her heart or Finn's mind."
At least the amazing photos of the volcano do justice to that name.
First line from my current Urban Fantasy: The van smelled like potato chips and stale coffee, and the constant but irregular squeak of Junior Agent Alan Michelleti’s chair had killed any chance of sleep.
Well, considering I've been wondering about my first line lately (though I am NOT touching that page until I'm done), this seems a good prospect to dive in.
Thanks, Jim, for such a wonderful opportunity for someone! Like others, mine is a non-fiction book proposal that I'm working on, so I suppose that I don't qualify either, but I wanted to give you my first line just to participate.
Here my first line The closed iron gates stood tall behind the guard, Marjorie Fisher wanted inside those gates but more importantly the great HE wanted her inside the gated community of Glam, Alabama. Happy reading and writing, Annie
Blowin' smoke around the planet causes contest! First line: Hot winds flowed across the desert to Great Salt Lake; cumulus clouds, roiling thousands of feet high, obliterated the moon.
"I’ve seen them before, the men whose white wings sparkled opaquely and glimmered in the sunlight, walking around the same as the rest of the population, blending in eerily well—only because I seemed to be the one person who could see the abnormalities protruding from their backs."
"The lights of the moon still shone on the shores of Lake Deagwn when a little figure covered with a hood and carrying a case with a shoulder strap sneaked out of the castle gates."
"Father had told me that by the time I was ten Great Heats I would know most everything I needed to know, and what I would care about then, I would care about for the rest of my life."
Historical Fiction -- "Great Heats" -- set in the year 1000.
"The wind blew from north in a soft morning of June, the light frost hung up in the hills drawing them white as snow, painted by the shy early rising sun."
I lost my mind today, but it’s OK, I’ve been expecting it to happen ever since I was ten when I overheard my mother tell some of her friends, “When women go through the ‘change,’ they go crazy.”
This is cool, reading everyone's opening line. I don't know how you agents pick between so many creative people. Alright, I know this isn't one line, but if I just posted,"In," it would make no sense. From my novel Proving Ground:
In. Out. In. Out. Breathe Laura, breathe, I chanted to myself as I pulled the massive doors open.
I'm pretty sure my sister had decided to become a pagan or a baptist or something before she offed herself so I don't know why we were having a Catholic funeral.
From MG FREAKY FRANK I have a secret. I know things. Lots of things. About people. Like I know that my math teacher, Mr. Bugg, is going to pick his nose and wipe a boogie on the back of his yellow smiley face tie....
Anonymous said, on 4/20/2010 6:49:00 AM
YA Fiction:
He must have watched me from a safe distance, like a crocodile observing its prey.
"I wasn’t sure if, or how, I liked the way the dim lighting danced over my unclothed body, but was grateful that it was more dark than light in the bathroom."
Thank you, Jim, for the oportunity! This novel might be more Rachel's taste since the protagonist's name is Adelaide! Genre: Fiction based on a true story.
"With the exception of the two uniformed police officers on the front steps puking into evidence bags, Ellen LeeAnn Walsh's building looked like a hundred other slightly run-down Italianate Victorians in San Francisco."
Katie Flanagan said, on 4/20/2010 7:57:00 AM
"Professor Morgan's fingers slid around my wrist and stopped me mid-step."
Perched on the scaffolding, Gabriel felt the walls constrict, remembered each stroke of graphite on parchment, each thwack of setting maul to stone above the nave.
Forty-eight hours ago, the man Elizabeth was willing to sacrifice herself for before this council of vampire elders, had been the very same man who killed her.
"What size boots you wear?" the old man hacked as he led Nick through the open-air morgue, his hand already hovering close to the feet of the nearest corpse.
Among the legion of unfounded, self-manufactured terrors that he masochistically nurtured prophesying his own demise, Emmett's most dreaded and certain prediction had always been that some rapacious, smoke-colored spirit would discover him vulnerable, tease the germ of his glum soul from its mortal tether, and entrench itself in that bleak hollow; and by his letter, it seemed to have happened.
"I pressed my shoulders into a wooden armchair in Mrs. Wintour’s antechamber, clasping my hands together so they would not tremble with cold and anxiety."
Excellent contest! Here is the opening to my manuscript:
Sometimes the brain can’t process what it sees. When something is so wrong, so horrible, the brain refuses to recognize it. That was the case when I walked into the Keeper’s house, intent on getting a nice, steaming cup of tea to warm my cold hands and delivering an invitation to a party.
Does it matter if the MS is finished? Mine isn't. If so, ignore this post, I suppose. My ms is YA fantasy.
"People screamed in the streets, clinging to their loved ones as they tried to escape."
Anonymous said, on 4/20/2010 3:45:00 PM
Thanks for a good laugh Rebecca T.!!! Your first sentence is so true! "Sometimes the brain can't process what it sees."!!! The contest is the first line/sentence of your manuscript, not the opening paragraph. Others have made the same mistake, and I'm not trying to be mean by bringing attention to it, but your first sentence just brings a humorous touch to your error.
I watched from my bed as the snow started to fall; a few light flakes at first, in the blue-black darkness, then sharp gusts of wind pushing the swirls to their final resting place on the barren lawn behind my house.
Anonymous said, on 4/20/2010 7:25:00 PM
Here's mine:
One warm and sultry summer night, long after the lights had been turned down in his room, Vladdie the Lamb opened his bedroom window and began to howl at the full moon.
As Maxfield Parrish Clark crosses Prospect Street, he catches sight of the canal bridge, its rusted girders glazed and shimmering in the rain, and his breathing eases up for the first time all day.
Philip could not believe his eyes. His Amarantha. Sweet Amarantha - a temptress in the silver moonlight.
From FROZEN IN TIME - Historical fantasy.
Anonymous said, on 4/21/2010 9:38:00 AM
For as long as he could remember, Little Jemmy had dreamed of being free to do as he pleased, of raftin' down the Potomac with his brothers and sisters, of climbin' the old Mulberry trees just beyond the stables; he even dreamed of learnin' how to read, but Jemmy wasn't allowed to do any of those things because he was a slave.
I heard my sister’s screams coming from inside the infirmary, and the broken chair in which I sat waiting for her to die, discarded and forgotten, clung to me as much as I clung to it.
A loud, sharp knock at the open doorway startled Lieutenant Derrick “Toons” Hutchinson just as he was finishing a cup of his favorite, blueberry, yogurt.
Ronnie’s friends noticed the two men entering the yard because they stood out in their black suits, but Ronnie noticed them because she couldn’t poke into their minds to see who they were and what they wanted, and that had never happened before.
It began with a fire, Aisa told me once, and it grew with a kiss.
Anonymous said, on 4/21/2010 2:30:00 PM
Here goes:
"I stood at the urinal staring at the crudely made sign announcing the upcoming company-sponsored blood drive when the man in the stall next to me started talking to himself"
Contemporary women’s fiction (contrary to how the first line sounds, it isn’t a romance novel :)) "She was so beautiful, sitting in the desk in front of his podium, always smiling, asking questions, flipping her long chestnut hair and laughing…the sound so contagious."
Anonymous said, on 4/21/2010 5:39:00 PM
Thanks for a neat contest:
Auntie Jayne with a Y is the root of all my problems.
Almost a year to the day after Didymus's father sold him into slavery, the Nabataean sent the other slave, a Jewish man named Nathaniel, to the great city of Petra to purchase a pair of camels for his caravan.
My husband had circled an unusual newspaper ad, "handsome, young man seeking to escort experienced, wealthy woman" and penciled in: You can have this guy, I get Uma Thurman.
Anonymous said, on 4/22/2010 7:13:00 AM
I certainly hope these multi-sentence "first sentences" are disqualified. I'm sure we all would love to show the first two or three sentences of our manuscript, but those aren't the rules.
Standing fully clothed under a cold shower when you are pissed off is nothing less than stunning.
Anonymous said, on 4/22/2010 2:39:00 PM
From my narrative nonfiction/memoir:
When the sky outside began to darken the neonatalogist entered the room - she had dark brown skin, darker brown eyes, and glided quietly across the room like a shadow.
Ernesto Cisneros said, on 4/22/2010 3:01:00 PM
Here's my first line:
"My biggest fear in life was finding out God didn't exist. But after what I've done, my biggest fear is finding out he just might."
Hope you like it.
Anonymous said, on 4/22/2010 3:53:00 PM
Here's mine:
I was part of a building complex in New York City whose seven buildings were destroyed on September 11, 2001.
I don't know if "end of day" means end of business day or midnight, but here goes just in case:
I was wearing pink Converse at prom.
Thanks!
Anonymous said, on 4/22/2010 7:06:00 PM
From my YA fictional memoir/novel:
We were standing together, naked and shivering, when the heavy metal doors slammed behind us and we heard the gas hissing in, and then suddenly, through the fog, we heard shouts coming from outside - "The twins! Where are the twins?" - and the chamber door opened to reveal Dr. Mengele.
Thanks to all who competed and voted in DGLM's first competition! Robert Kent (of Robertkent.net fame, naturally) is the winner of our contest and this pretty blue DGLM water bottle!
Robert's winning entry in the hilariously bad titles contest was ATLAS HUGGED: A Guide to Encouraging Charity in Your Community.
Congratulations also to runners up Scott Martelle's TWEET JESUS: Bible Passages for the Twitter Age and D. Antone's WHAT WAS THE NAME OF THAT BOOK? Everything Known and Forgotten about Alzheimer's Disease. Your prize is the (dubious) glory of knowing you made us laugh!
Robert, write to me at [email protected] to send your mailing address and claim your prize!
3 Comments on Congratulations, Robert Kent!, last added: 2/3/2010
This is so exciting! I won, I won! I want to thank my fellow nominees with whom I must share this award (but not literally, because sharing a water bottle is gross). And a big time thanks to the good people of Dystel & Goderich. I should also thank Ayn Rand, but somehow I don’t think she would approve of being thanked. She would want me to revel in the glory of my own selfish pursuits, thereby strengthening society as a whole the way our big banks have been doing (I’m sure objectivism sounded much more convincing in the 1957). So no thanks, Ayn. Incidentally, I am currently enjoying Ayn Rand’s The Art of Fiction, if any other writers/book lovers are interested. It is by far the most hilarious writing guide ever written, but I don’t think it was intended to be. Rand routinely lists books she considers not to be in the same league with her own superior fiction. That’s comedy gold!
Welcome back after the long weekend! Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. day is an important one, reminding us of this great man, how far we have come since he had a dream, and how far we still have to go. It’s also a nice opportunity to relax and, for many of us, enjoy a day off.
So, what did you do with your day? Please select as many options as you want, and tell us more in comments!
Winter brings with it a slew of holidays, and most of us have holiday traditions—for holidays we celebrate and, in many cases, for those we don’t. (I am Jewish and do not celebrate Christmas, but woe betide any who come between me and my Christmas Eve French Onion Soup, a tradition my family inherited from a French exchange student). Our authors and illustrators have shared their holiday traditions and memories, and now it’s your turn!
Also, It’s a Wonderful Life. I have a soft spot for Jimmy Stewart.
Emily said, on 12/15/2009 3:26:00 PM
Advent. Candlelight. Smelling Christmas trees. Hanging stockings (still). I grew up in New England, so a green Christmas just doesn’t feel right to me… I love watching snow falling outside. And watching LITTLE WOMEN with my sister in Brooklyn — even though it’s not necessarily a Christmas movie, it is because we say it is.
Chris Jordan-Squire said, on 12/15/2009 6:13:00 PM
As much of my extended family as possible gets together on Christmas eve and exchanges presents between families. (Then each individual family exchanges presents amongst themselves on Christmas day.)
Many business owners interviewed said they were staying strong in this market by employing few workers and keeping their products specialized.
“They tend to be very nimble, even in the downtimes,” said Mr. Kimball. “They can make it through a difficult stretch easier than the bigger players.”
Manufacturing isn't retail, but I can't be the only one to see a parallel to the indie store which can make adjustments and cater to local clients as corporate sellers can't. We ARE all making those adjustments, right?...
* Also in the Times, an article that evokes the great urbanist Jane Jacobs in discussing how internet forums and social networking, especially in New York City neighborhoods, can strengthen local bonds, not increase isolation:
The Web was first seen as a radical alternative to the bricks-and-mortar world, but the truth, it turns out, can be more complicated.
“The original idea of the Internet was to get away from physical geography,” Steven Johnson, a 40-year-old Brooklynite and the author of several tech-related books, said as he sat in the Dumbo loft that serves as the office to Outside.in, a Web site he helped to found two years ago. “The dream was that everybody would be able to telecommute from Wyoming.”
Yet, the Internet has also had the opposite effect by helping to connect people more closely to their physical and political surroundings. And for New Yorkers, whose surroundings are more complex than most, this effect can be particularly powerful, enabling them to take on the long-anonymous, too-big-to-fight city.
There's also an acknowledgement of the gentrification wars that seem to flare up on every neighborhood blog (whose side are you on?!?) -- but this is a good way to think about how a local bookstore can be a part of their online neighborhood as well as their physical one.
* Sometimes, it takes a Nobel-prize winning author to stem the spread of panic and illogic in a publishing corporation. Thanks to a letter from Gunter Grass, Umberto Eco, Amos Oz, Wislawa Szymborska, Jose Saramago and others, beloved and competent editor Drenka Willen has been re-hired at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, after being fired last month. Score one for literature over the suits. (Thanks to Levi for the link.)
* I'm still thinking about the question inherent in Jason Lutes' Berlin graphic novels about how and whether artists and writers should be engaged with politics. Pankaj Mishra has one answer: if writers are there in the shit and they write about it, listen to them. Arundhati Roy and David Grossman are certainly examples of writers whose political ideas and expressions we would be mistaken to ignore.
* The good news about the following kerfuffle is that the backlash happened so fast. To quote Sarah Retger at the ABA Omnibus:
Harvard Business School professor Anita Elberse wrote a stunningly dumb article for the WSJ in which she argued that the only way for publishers to survive is by throwing lots of advance money at projects they hope will be bestsellers. Happily, people more eloquent than me havedone the necessarydebunking, criticizing, and introducing of logic.
My own two cents: there's nothing wrong with hoping for a blockbuster. But shelling out multi-million dollar advances (at the expense of publicity efforts for the rest of the list) ain't gonna get you one. One of the strengths of books as a medium is that they're viable on such a small scale; we're lucky for the books with print runs of 500 as well as those with 50,000, and it would be great to see publishers begin to think critically about how to work those strengths for a diverse, vibrant, long-lived list.
* Ooh, here's a nice one: the National Endowment for the Arts survey, usually a staple of doom and gloom about the state of American literacy, this year shows a substantial increase in the numbers and percentages of readers. I have yet to read through the complete findings, and it will be interesting to hear theories on why the shift occurred, but it does strike a bright note.
* This kind of counts as good news: I'll be speaking at the Brooklyn Business Library's PowerUp! awards ceremony on Wednesday night, in my capacity as past winner. An interesting opportunity to review the past year in the bookstore process. Free eats, also.
What have YOU got going on that's good?
0 Comments on Link-Mad Monday: The Good News as of 1/1/1900
Didn't you just love the piece in Shelf Awareness about the blogger who offered a free burrito to everyone who spent $50 in his mother's bookstore? Don't miss that story!
You acknowledge that this is unscientific, but even covering that poll result seems misleading. When two of the choices are diversity, and the only other two relate to the things that a lot of people don’t pay attention to (preview catalogs, press coverage, and interviews), it’s obvious that diversity will finish with a high percentage of the vote.
Consider a poll question like: “What character do you like most?” Choices: (a) Black Widow, (b) Vice, (c) Skateman, and (d) Toad. You couldn’t then write a post saying that 100% of readers prefer Black Widow.
Lack of diversity is and always has been a liability for mainstream comics publishers, and I’d argue that the sales numbers still show that people aren’t buying based on diversity.
(Also, love the site. Really. Keep up the good work.)
First and foremost for me is whether it’s a corporate owned intellectual property or a creator owned intellectual property.
I didn’t vote on that poll on twitter and won’t vote on The Beat’s poll because an important option isn’t included. (and frankly, since The Beat constantly gives sales reports I.m pretty surprised that it was omitted)
Cost.
The cost of single issue comics, most over priced, as compared to buying a collected book or original GN. I haven’t bought a single issue of a comic in over five years now. But not because of diversity, or reviews, or cover or any on that list. I find it’s just more cost effective to buy all the chapters in the book at one time. (and because I feel pretty stupid paying $5 for a 22 page chapter of a story)
Also, 95% of what I read is by cartoonists, not a creative team.
Some factors that influence me that were not part of the poll:
– Character. Marvel was my gateway into comics so I do keep an eye on their output. But a couple decades of Marvel’s seasonal events and churned out stories have gotten me to the point where I only really care about a bare handful of the characters, and almost none of them are A-listers. For example, I’m reading Captain Marvel for Alpha Flight, and the moment they exit the book or their treatment reverts to the standard nonsense, I’m gone.
– Cost (mentioned above). I’m more likely to pick up a $3 book by an unknown than a $5 book from an established franchise. $5 first issues are the reason I decided to give Extraordinary X-Men, the last Ant-Man series, and several other of Marvel’s recent offerings a pass. On the other side of things, $1 issues have gotten me hooked on quite a few Comixology Submit titles.
– Publisher. DC’s recent flailing for direction and Marvel’s clunky attempts to synergize their comics with other-media adaptations have both been something of a turn-off over the last few years. It’s one more barrier to getting me to buy their products and has lead me to actively seek output from publishers I feel have something more interesting to offer.