Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Buffalo Dusk, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 1 of 1
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: Buffalo Dusk in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
Some years back, I came across "Buffalo Dusk" by Carl Sandburg. The poem is in
The Random House Book of Poetry for Children: A Treasury of 572 Poems for Today's Child (1983) selected by Jack Prelutsky and illustrated by Arnold Lobel. Here it is:
The buffaloes are gone.
And those who saw the buffaloes are gone.
Those who saw the buffaloes by thousands and how they
pawed the prairie sod into dust with their great hoofs,
their great heads down pawing on in a great pageant of dusk,
Those who saw the buffaloes are gone.
And the buffaloes are gone.
Sandburg was wrong, but is that what he thought when he wrote the poem in 1920? How many people, in 1920, thought "those who saw the buffaloes" were gone? It wasn't true then, and it wasn't true in 1983 when Jack Prelutsky chose the poem for the collection... Did Prelutsky think so in 1983? And when Lobel was drawing the buffalo herd that accompanies the poem, did he think so?
I think I read the poem slightly differently-- it sounded to me as though the poem meant the actual, individual people who saw the herds of buffaloes were dead too. My first reading was that Sandburg was indicating that it's been at least a generation or two since all the buffalo died and no one currently alive had seen the herds. He was therefore was trying make an impact with how much we had lost when no one alive today has seen "the buffaloes by thousands".
Not to say your reading is inaccurate. I think the wording is ambiguous enough to support both or either reading.