new posts in all blogs
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: amanda hocking, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 26 - 40 of 40
How to use this Page
You are viewing the most recent posts tagged with the words: amanda hocking in the JacketFlap blog reader. What is a tag? Think of a tag as a keyword or category label. Tags can both help you find posts on JacketFlap.com as well as provide an easy way for you to "remember" and classify posts for later recall. Try adding a tag yourself by clicking "Add a tag" below a post's header. Scroll down through the list of Recent Posts in the left column and click on a post title that sounds interesting. You can view all posts from a specific blog by clicking the Blog name in the right column, or you can click a 'More Posts from this Blog' link in any individual post.
David Baldacci, Stephenie Meyer and the originally self-published author Amanda Hocking have all joined the Kindle Million Club, selling more than one million copies of their books on the Amazon.com Kindle Store.
They join 11 other authors in the "Club" - Stieg Larsson, James Patterson, Nora Roberts, Charlaine Harris, Lee Child, Michael Connelly and Kathryn Stockett, as well as Suzanne Collins, John Locke, Janet Evanovich and George R R Martin.
read more
NY Times Magazine had an article/interview with Amanda Hocking, the 26-year-old e-book wunderkind who recently signed a $2 million contract with St. Martin's for her next four books.
In the past year, Hocking has self-pubbed 10 e-books and made about $2 million
from them, even though she prices them between 99 cents and $2.99. She now averages 9,000 downloads per day. While she says she thinks about each book for up to a year, she spends just two to four weeks writing them.
“Hocking is at a loss to explain the phenomenon. “I’ve seen other authors do the exact same things I have, similar genre, similar prices” — like many self-published authors, she prices her books radically below what traditional publishers charge; typically hers cost between 99 cents and $2.99 — “and they have multiple books out. And they all have good covers. And they’re selling reasonably well, but they’re not selling nearly as well as I am.””
She started with fan-fiction, then moved on to writing her own stuff. She started self-publishing because she couldn't get an agent. She has signed with a print publisher because only 15% of people owns e-readers and she wants to reach the other 85%. She's already a million-dollar author. For me to be a billion-dollar author, I need to have people buying my books at Wal-Mart.”
Read more about her here.
This week in Hogwarts...
Yes, the big news about Pottermore was revealed!! Sort of! Okay just a bit! It's actually not coming until July for some people and October for everyone else!
This week J.K. Rowling announced that Pottermore would be an online site that will where you go for Harry Potter e-books, and a unique online reading experience that seems to involve some reader participation. The response was swift and breathless about what this means for the world of books. Is J.K. Rowling self-publishing her e-books? Has she cut out booksellers and Amazon in one fell swoop? If Rowling doesn't need a publisher, what are publishers for?
Slooooooow down, everyone. First off, the Wall Street Journal reported that Scholastic and Bloomsbury UK are receiving a portion of e-book sales and are providing marketing support, so while you could argue that this is a form of self-publishing, it's not exactly cutting traditional publishing out of the loop. And the WSJ also confirmed that Amazon is working with Pottermore to make sure the books will be available on the Kindle, and Sony may be selling branded e-readers through the site.
So yes - it's somewhat unique for a book to be made available through a dedicated site, but let's not go and declare world of publishing completely upended. All the major players will be sitting at the Pottermore table.
Meanwhile, in true self-publishing news, John Locke is the first self-published author to sell one million Kindle e-books, but since he's selling them at $0.99, the LA Times' Carolyn Kellogg asks, "At what cost?"
And the New York Times magazine has a nice profile on eminently sensible self-publishing-turned-traditional-publishing star Amanda Hocking.
GalleyCat picked up our poll on what e-readers should cost and then had a cool post that featured arguments for $0.99, $1.99, $2.99, $5.00, $6.99-$7.99, $9.99 and $12.99-$14.99 price points from industry luminaries. Moby Lives weighed in as well.
And finally (swear) in publishing and e-book news, disaster consultant (yeah) Ray Nagin self-published his memoir and appeared on the Daily Show. He says he self-published because "when you turn your manuscript over to a publisher you never know what's going to happen." Not sure whether he means "They might not make me an offer" or "They might try to edit it," but at the very least this is probably a template for future politicians and authors who want to get their book out quickly. Get it written, get it out there as fast as possible by self-publishing, go on the Daily Show to promote it.
And speaking of speed, agent Rachelle Gardner has a post on
27 Comments on This Week in Books 6/24/11, last added: 6/27/2011
Much has been written about, discussed, dissected and scrutinized about self-publishing phenomenon Amanda Hocking and her reported $2 million deal with St. Martins. Before that there was the news that bestselling author Barry Eisler turned down a six-figure deal and opted to self publish. Both authors are receiving significant press and publicity. It’s hard to say if Eisler would be such a household name right now if he hadn’t chosen to self-publish or if Hocking’s books would be downloaded at such an intense rate if she hadn’t just translated her self-publishing success into a multi-book deal.
We have witnessed success in self-publishing from many different angles and seen the success an author can acquire by building their platform through self-publishing and attracting mainstream attention. In some ways, self-publishing can be a great way to get your foot in the door, show publishers what you are capable of, and build a strong and supportive readership. With the multiple outlets for social networking and exposure that we have at our fingertips, it does change the rate at which authors can get the word out about their work and build a strong buzz.
Here’s what I like about Amanda Hocking, she writes! She’s written more than 15 books. She blogs regularly, constantly recording her side of the story, her views on publishing, her life as a writer. She actively and enthusiastically self-promotes.
Self-publishing offers writers the opportunity to jump right into the thick of things, to get their feet wet and get their words published. It is a risky and dangerous jump but it can have great rewards. Amanda Hocking offers her readers good stories at a cheap price and available at the click of mouse. These are all opportunities that were not available to writers a few years ago.
The changes we are witnessing in the publishing industry are complex and constantly shifting but they are showing us one thing, writers are being given more and more opportunities to do what they love, write and have their words read. Self-publishing is not going to harm or take business away from traditional publishers. Most writers, even those who have chosen self-publishing, still have the ultimate goal of being picked up by a traditional publisher. Traditional publishers can offer greater opportunities to authors immediately, the support and reception that comes from being with a recognizable publishing house can give an author a leg up. While self-published authors can steadily build significant careers (see JA Konrath) it can feel more like an uphill battle. There are many book review websites, magazines, and newspapers who will not review a self-published title.
There tends to be a stigma attached to self-published work that it is poorly edited, was rejected by publishers and is an authors “last resort.” However, with stories like Eisler’s and Hocking, as well as our clients Brunonia Barry and Lisa Genova, self-publishing can prove extremely fruitful and part of an authors journey towards a successful and fulfilling career. For many, self-publishing is a step towards a specific destination, the goal of being traditionally published. For others, it is a way to fulfill a simple dream, to see their words in print. Whether self-publishing is part of your journey or the culmination of a dream, it is up to the author to build their name and get exposure for their work. Traditionally published authors have the same goal, bring their work to the attention of readers.
What I love about Hocking and Eisler and Konrath and Barry and Genova is that they make people talk about publishing, about books about an industry that has been around for hundreds of years and continues to grow and change, thrive and inspire.
The online retailer recently participated in the auction for best-selling novelist Amanda Hocking, making its most aggressive move yet into traditional publishing territory.
Amazon.com, the online bookselling behemoth that has sometimes rubbed book publishers the wrong way, has just put its big foot someplace new.
In its most aggressive move yet into territory traditionally occupied by the major New York houses, the Seattle-based e-retailer took part last week in a heated auction for four books by self-published bestselling novelist Amanda Hocking. Executives at several houses said they knew of no other instance in which the company had competed with major publishers for a high profile commercial author.
Amazon has done deals directly with authors and agents in the past, but usually for backlist titles or specialty projects. It has used those exclusive offerings to distinguish its Kindle e-bookstore in an increasingly competitive digital market.
It’s believed that Amazon would have seen Ms. Hocking as a natural fit because of her roots in the e-publishing world, where she has sold more than a million copies of her nine titles in the category of young adult paranormal romance.
An Amazon spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.
To beef up its offer, Amazon brought in Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, which would have published the print editions of Ms. Hocking’s books, according to insiders. Part of a company that has gone through two debt restructurings in recent years, the venerable trade house would also have lent Amazon the aura of a traditional house.
A Houghton Mifflin Harcourt spokesman was not available to comment.
St. Martin’s Press ended up winning the auction, paying $2 million for the series of four novels, but Amazon actually made the highest offer of the six bidders, according to insiders. Its failure to acquire the titles demonstrates some of the difficulties the company may have if it continues to pursue potential blockbusters as part of a strategy to maintain its Kindle store’s dominance.
Amazon had insisted on exclusivity for the e-book edition, said a high level publishing executive familiar with the deal. That made the offer less attractive to the author and her literary agent.
“[Amazon] has less than 65% share of the e-book market and dropping, and 20% to 30% of the print market,” the executive said. “[The author and agent] would have anticipated significant lost sales.”
Steven Axelrod, Ms. Hocking’s agent, declined to comment.
Amazon would also have been at a disadvantage to the other publishers when it came to the print edition, the executive said.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt was brought in with the aim of ensuring that Ms. Hocking’s books would be carried by Barnes & Noble, the No. 1 brick-and-mortar retailer. But there was a question whether the bookstore chain would stock a book published by its biggest rival, even if the title carried the logo of a respected trade house.
“I’m not sure that head fake would have been enough,” the executive said. Referring to the rough tactics that Amazon has employed in its battles with publishers, he added, “Barnes & Noble plays hardball, too.”
Today Crain’s New York published a bombshell report that Amazon had put a a bid for more than $2 million to publish a four book series by self-publishing superstar Amanda Hocking. It is not an April Fools’ joke.
Here’s an evocative passage: “To beef up its offer, Amazon brought in Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, which would have published the print editions of Ms. Hocking’s books, according to insiders … St. Martin’s Press ended up winning the auction, paying $2 million for the series of four novels, but Amazon actually made the highest offer of the six bidders, according to insiders.”
The 26-year-old author (pictured, via) made headlines around the country for her dramatic sales as a self-published author. Her “Watersong” series sale to St. Martin’s rocked publishing headlines last week.
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
Yesterday I was pleased to do a blogtalk radio interview with crime writing author Jennifer Chase. Instead of doing the usual blog here for Friday, instead, here is the interview. Be patient at opening as it takes a bit to get to the talking points, but it is well worth it as Jennifer asked some probing questions indeed, kept me on my toes.....although I did the entire interview with my feet up at a time when I might well have ought to have been taking a power nap. Still we cover a wide range of book issues, including ebooks, the creative process, my process, various and sundry jokes sprinkled in and much more. I was pleased with this. Find the interview here, enjoy, and come back to leave a comment on my blog space here or drop me a line elswhwere, and if you wish to duplicate and spread the news as to where to find the interview, I would not be opposed. Thanks -- find it here
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jennifer-chase/2011/03/31/acclaimed-thriller-horror-author-robert-w-walkerRob Walker
Titanic 2012 - Curse of RMS Titanic
Children of Salem - a bad time to be in love
By: Kathy Temean,
on 3/27/2011
Blog:
Writing and Illustrating
(
Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags:
Author,
News,
writing,
success,
e-books,
Paranormal,
Young Adult Novel,
millionaire,
Publishing Industry,
Book Contracts,
Amanda Hocking,
Add a tag
A couple of weeks ago we talked about the phenominal success Amanda Hocking has had e-publishing her books. Here is an update:
St. Martin’s Pays a Reported $2M For Four Books By Amanda Hocking, Self-Publishing’s Reluctant Heroine. This year every week in publishing could be considered eventful, but this week in particular had a special kind of symmetry, as the very publishing house Barry Eisler walked away from to publish on his own brought Amanda Hocking into the fold. Despite sources indicating otherwise a few days ago, St. Martin’s emerged the victor of the auction for Hocking’s new Watersong YA paranormal series, reportedly paying more than $2 million for World English rights (which, of course, includes digital rights, too.)
“I’ve done as much with self-publishing as any person can do,” Hocking told the NYT Thursday. “People have bad things to say about publishers, but I think they still have services, and I want to see what they are. And if they end up not being any good, I don’t have to keep using them. But I do think they have something to offer.”
Her comments echoed a blog post Tuesday where she addressed and explained the then-ongoing auction: “I want to be a writer. I do not want to spend 40 hours a week handling e-mails, formatting covers, finding editors, etc. Right now, being me is a full-time corporation.” But in a follow-up post, Hocking reiterated that the deal doesn’t mean she will stop self-publishing: “I have a few titles lined up this year [to self-publish] and I’ll have more in the future.”
SMP publisher Matthew Shear evidently wanted to win the auction “pretty badly,” having first heard of Hocking six months before from her eventual acquiring editor, Rose Hilliard. Shear looks at self-publishing as a way for authors “to perhaps make a certain amount of money sooner rather than later” but a publisher “provides an extraordinary amount of knowledge into the whole publishing process. We have the editors, we have the marketers, we have the art directors, we have the publicists, we have the sales force. And they can go out and get Amanda’s books to a much, much bigger readership than she had been able to get to before.”
The first Watersong book won’t be out until Fall 2012, by which time it may become apparent whether Hocking can continue to sell her self-published books at the same rapid clip of the last few months (monthly sales reports she provided to the AP showed more than 333,000 copies sold of her nine titles available, with another 300,000 sales in February, which roughly dovetail with her claimed total earnings of between $1.4m and $2m.) Her current readership may also use that time to adjust to the eventual price increase from the 99 cents to $2.99 her e-published titles cost to whatever higher agency price Macmillan decides upon.
And Hocking, while obviously excited by her new and parallel career direction, is bemused by the reaction: “It is crazy that we live in a time that I have to justify taking a seven-figure a publishing deal with St. Martin’s,” she wrote. “Ten years ago, nobody would question this. Now everybody is.”
Times they are a changing.
Talk tomorrow,
Kathy
Filed under:
Author,
Book Contracts,
News,
Publishing Industry,
success,
By: Anastasia Goodstein,
on 3/24/2011
Blog:
Ypulse
(
Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags:
New York Times,
MTV,
youtube,
myspace,
Real World,
children's choice book awards,
Ypulse Essentials,
Friendster,
qr codes,
amanda hocking,
rebecca black,
apparel media,
billboard social chart,
synchtube,
Add a tag
The Children’s Choice Book Awards (voting is open, with nominees from Suzanne Collins [Mockingjay] and Stephanie Meyer [The Second Short Life of Bree Tanner]. Elsewhere in YA news, Amanda Hocking, the self-publishing standout, lands a book... Read the rest of this post
The New York Times broke the news that self-publishing superstar Amanda Hocking has landed a four book deal with St. Martin’s Press. Her upcoming series will be called “Watersong.”
Here is an eye-popping excerpt: “The bidding eventually rose beyond $2 million for world English rights, said one publishing executive familiar with the negotiations. (St. Martin’s declined to comment.) Ms. Hocking was represented by the literary agent Steven Axelrod.”
The 26-year-old author (pictured, via) made headlines around the country for her dramatic sales as a self-published author. She wrote a great essay analyzing her success: “And while I do think I will not be the only one to do this – others will be as successful as I’ve been, some even more so – I don’t think it will happen that often.” (Via Sarah Weinman)
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
It's an amazing success story! An unheard of twenty-six-year-old woman sold 900,000 copies of nine different books since she first put her work for sale on April 15, 2010. There are paperback copies that sell for $8.99 and $9.99, but the ebook editions are the ones selling like wildfire at $2.99 and .99. Just check out the local news story in the video below:
Amanda Hocking tried to go the traditional publishing route for eight years but received countless rejections. She never thought of self-publishing as a viable option.
"Everything I'd heard about self-publishing is that is was impossible to make a living, reach readers, or produce a quality product. But last year, I heard about how some others like Joe Konrath and Karen McQuestion are doing well with ebooks. So I thought I had nothing to lose."
So how did she sell so many books? She worked it via social networking, of course!
"I didn't really have a strategy. I think one of the advantages I have is that stuff considered marketing is stuff that I do a lot anyway. I've been active on social networks and blogs for years.
"I also send ARCs out to book bloggers. Book bloggers are a really amazing community, and they've been tremendously supportive. They've definitely been a major force that got my books on the map.
"When I first published, I did do a bit of promoting on the Amazon forums, but they're not really open to that, so I haven't really interacted there much at all in months. I hang out at Goodreads, Kindleboards, Facebook, Twitter, and I blog. And that's about it."
She now has an agent who is working on selling the foreign rights to her books. She plans to continue self-publishing, but isn't turning her back on traditional publishing.
"As amazing as this ebook revolution has been, it's only 20-30% of the market, and I'm not going to ignore the possibilities to reach the other 70-80% of readers. However, it is hard to compete with what my books are already able to do with Kindle and PubIt."
While that may be true, rumor has it that she's been shopping a four-book series to major publishers and attracting bids well over a million.
It seems we are entering a new and inspiring age, where traditional publishing certainly isn't the last word. Being rejected by a publisher isn't the end of the line. If you have the drive to do it yourself, why not? Publishing, marketing, and creating websites is the cheapest and easiest it's ever been. And in most cases it's free. If you have any thoughts on this topic, we'd love to hear them!
To find out more about Ms. Hocking's books, visit her Amazon Author's Page.
Quotes from The Huffington Post interview, Meet Mega Bestselling Indie Heroine Amanda Hocking.
--------------------
Class: Social Networking for Writers: Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and More! Learn how to leverage the power of social media with this four-week e-course.
6NUEPBUWB5VX
I rarely write about the publishing industry, about eBooks and that of-the-moment stuff. Fact is, I’m not that knowledgeable about it. My writing process is pretty unique. Since I’m a major league luddite, I write all my books by nautical flag. I string them up on a schooner that I sail down the Hudson River. The editors at Random House all stand at their windows, eyes to spyglasses, and they take turns calling out what they see:
“Blue stripey one!”
“Like the Swiss flag, only with yellow instead of white.”
Meanwhile the great-great-grandson of Jack London, who interns there, jots it all down and translates.
“…and they all lived happily ever after…except for Darius…on account of the yellow fever.”
Once the book is transcribed, and my schooner finds a favorable tact, they send their edits back by morse code using a naval spotlight. And the process starts over.
It seems hard to believe, but I assure you it’s true. Which also means, of course, that this blog has not been written by me on a computer. I always whisper my thoughts into a tin can attached to a string, which travels across an alley, through a window and into another tin can that’s manned by my best pal Tommy McNulty. Tommy listens, memorizes, and then relays my blog post into his CB radio. A long-haul trucker with the handle Hokum N. Jokum, writes the words on cans of vienna sausages that he delivers to a convenience store about 45 miles south of Boise, ID.
Here’s where things get tricky. There is just one person who eats vienna sausages from this convenience store, a charming senior citizen named Beatrice who also happens to be the widow of Eugene “Porky” Lee of Little Rascals fame. Beatrice’s diet consists almost entirely of milk and vienna sausages, but her appetite is lilliputian. Hokum N. Jokum, who I’m told has the most elegant handwriting in the freight industry, can usually fit a single blog post on eleven cans of vienna sausages. Beatrice only eats one can a day, and since she’s on a fixed income, she only buys one can a day. So it’s usually a week and a half before she’s collected an entire blog post (and people say I should blog more often!). At this point, Beatrice hands the empty cans off to her milk man. He brings them home and gives them to his children to read, because he doesn’t believe in television and can’t be bothered to get a library card. These kids are major brats, not to mention eco-terrorists. The nasty little buggers invariably proceed to proclaim their love of pasteurization, which is about the worst thing you can say in front of your milk man father. Then they throw the cans out their bedroom windows.
The cans typically roll around the neighborhood for a day or two, until a boy scout named Bucky Weeks picks them up. Bucky has all the merit badges except for two. The first is the Swearing Badge, which is typically the easiest badge to procure, but Bucky’s lisp is severe and the “sh” sound is one he may never master. The second is the Vienna Sausage Badge, which no scout has ever earned. To receive the Vienna Sausage Badge, a scout must retrieve 15,000 empty cans of Vienna Sausages and mail them to 728 Garfield Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. At last count, there were only 14,327 cans of vienna sausages in distribution in the world, so this badge is basically a fool’s errand. Which makes sense, because it’s something I made up and slipped into the Boy Scout charter during a clandestine infiltration of their h
In a recent interview, novelist Barry Eisler said he turned down a $500,000 book deal and decided to self-publish his work. At the same time, self-published success story Amanda Hocking is chasing a traditional book deal–reportedly receiving bids that top $1 million.
Eisler’s revelation came in a 13,000-word interview with novelist Joe Konrath. Eisler last published with Ballantine Books, but his self-publishing experiment began with “The Lost Coast,” a $2.99 short story.
Here’s an excerpt from the interview: “My wife and daughter and I were sitting around the dinner table, talking about what kind of contract I would do next, and with what publisher. And my then eleven-year-old daughter said, ‘Daddy, why don’t you just self-publish?’ … But I realized from that one innocent comment from my daughter that the new generation was looking at self-publishing differently. And that the question–’Should I self-publish?’–was going to be asked by more and more authors going forward.” (Via Sarah Weinman)
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
By: Kathy Temean,
on 3/7/2011
Blog:
Writing and Illustrating
(
Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags:
article,
earn money,
Amanda Hocking,
awards,
Author,
News,
Interview,
Books,
inspiration,
Self-Publishing,
Add a tag
I was planning on writing a blog about self-publishing when I discovered Amanda Hocking, the 26-year-old paranormal romance writer from Austin, Minnesota, who has reportedly become a millionaire by self-publishing on Kindle. She tried the traditional publishing root for eight years, before self-publishing via Kindle. She collects 70% royalties from Kindle for $2.99 books and 35% on their . 99 cents books. Traditional publishers pay 15% on electronic sales.
Hocking says she’s sold 900,000 copies (mostly electronic) of nine different books since April 2010. If you give her the highest price point and royalty for each book, that would mean she’s made close to $2 million.
The majority of her sales were made since Nov. 2010, and sales exploded around Christmas, when people bought e-readers as gifts. In February, Hocking sold 420,000 copies of her books, which is more than double the amount she sold in the 10 months prior.
Amanda says, “While I do think I will not be the only one to do this – I don’t think it will happen that often. It may be easier to self-publish than it is to traditionally publish, but in all honesty, it’s harder to be a best seller self-publishing than it is with a house.”
“I don’t think people really grasp how much work I do. I think there is this very big misconception that I spent a weekend smashing out some words, threw it up online, and woke up the next day with a million dollars in my bank account. This is literally years of work you’re seeing. And hours and hours of work each day. The amount of time and energy I put into marketing is exhausting. I am continuously overwhelmed by the amount of work I have to do that isn’t writing a book. I hardly have time to write anymore, which sucks and terrifies me.
“I also have this tremendous sense of urgency, like if I don’t get everything out now and do everything now, while the iron is hot, everything I’ve worked for will just fall away. For the first time, I truly understand why workaholics are workaholics. You can’t stop working, because if you do, it unravels all the work you’ve already done. You have to keep going, or you’ll die.
“Or at least that’s how it feels.
“There is so much stress in doing it all yourself. The editing is never good enough. And finding an editor isn’t as easy everyone thinks. People thinking an editor is just having someone read through it a few times, checking for basic grammar and spelling, and while that is part of it, it’s also much larger than that. It’s helping tighten up sentences, watching repeated phrases, helping with flow, etc. My books have all been edited – several times, by dozens of people with varying backgrounds – and people still find errors.
“And just so we’re clear – ebooks make up at best 20% of the market. Print books make up the other 80%. Traditional publishers still control the largest part of the market, and they will – for a long time, maybe forever. Ebooks will continue to gain ground, but I would say that we have at least 5-10 years before ebooks make up the majority. Traditional publishing is not dead. And all ebooks aren’t self-published. Even if ebooks end up being 80% of the market, at least half of those sales will probably come from traditionally published ebooks. So publishers will still control the majority of the market.
“Nobody knows what makes one book a bestseller. Publishers and agents like to pretend they do, but if they did, they would only publish best sellers, and they don’t.
“Self-publishing and
By:
Samantha Clark,
on 2/24/2011
Blog:
Day By Day Writer
(
Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags:
books,
young adult,
authors,
publishing,
self-publishing,
middle-grade,
ebooks,
J.A. Konrath,
amanda hocking,
elizabeth law egmont,
megg jensen anathema,
Add a tag
Going into the Austin SCBWI chapter’s annual conference this weekend — it was great, by the way — I was curious to find out how middle-grade novels are selling in ebooks, as that’s what I write. I’ve seen lots of articles in the Publishers Lunch enewsletter saying that ebook sales are rocketing in adult books and even taking off in young adult, but I suspected that middle-grade was behind. According to Egmont‘s Elizabeth Law, I was right. She said they’re not seeing noticeable ebook sales in middle grade.
Megg Jensen's self-published YA novel Anathema
Even though MG is slower to this technology, it’s great to see ebooks being embraced so quickly. As I wrote in January, sales of ereaders were stellar for the Christmas season, with many places selling out. Although I still love — LOVE — physical books, whether a book is printed on paper or eink, it’s still a story. And if this new technology is enticing more readers to stories, that can only be good.
The new technology also is changing the publishing landscape. With ebooks, it’s easier than ever — and less expensive — to self-publish books. Author J.A. Konrath has written about this extensively on his A Newbie’s Guide to Publishing blog. He had gone the traditional route before he started publishing his books on his own as ebooks, but he gives good arguments of why that doesn’t matter. YA author Amanda Hocking is an example, selling more than 185,000 ebook copies of her self-published novels.
Now, I’m not saying all writers should stop submitting to agents and editors of traditional publishing houses and go it alone. There are definite advantages to being signed by an agent and getting your work published by someone else. Let’s face it, most writers are not so great at the business end. And throwing an ebook on Amazon or Barnes & Noble or wherever doesn’t automatically mean it will sell; there’s marketing, publicity … oh, and the book should be good (editors are invaluable) or repeat sales won’t be much.
But the advent of ebooks has made it easier for writers to take the publishing of their work into their own hands, and blogs and social networking make it easier to build publicity.
YA author Megg Jensen is trying just that with her novel Anathema. And so far, it looks like she’s off to a great start. The book launched on Tuesday, and as of Wednesday, she had already sold 50 copies. She’s hosting a contest right now where people can guess how many books she will have sold by March 11, and the main prize? An ereader. Now that’s what I call promoting future business.
What do you think? Would you be willing to read a book if it’s se
'Slooooooow down, everyone. First off, the Wall Street Journal reported that Scholastic and Bloomsbury UK are receiving a portion of e-book sales and are providing marketing support, so while you could argue that this is a form of self-publishing, it's not exactly cutting traditional publishing out of the loop.'
This is most decidedly true. Nonetheless, it's a fairly significant move on Rowling's part. Watching ... the rest of us are just watching to see how all of this develops ...
Nothing Rowling does has significance for those of us who haven't written a bunch of humongous bestsellers.
So while it's an interesting story, and other bestselling writers may choose to do something similar, it doesn't predict the future of publishing for the vast majority of writers.
That bit about the book being available on the Kindle store was something I hadn't heard about. That makes me feel a lot less queasy about JK Rowling's venture. I had this brief moment of fear where every author decided to only sell their books through their websites. I did not want to live in a future where I had to visit one site after another if I wanted to buy a couple of books from different authors.
But the best part about this is the idea of the book might actually evolve. ePub has bee advertised by many has having a ton of potential for a more interactive, or at least more immersive, reading experience. I've yet to see that happen, however if a powerhouse like Rowling manages to enhance the reading experience, books may finally follow the path of more features like a DVD vs VHS.
Very exciting!
www.jerichoambrose.com
Interesting video collection with Molly Wood - strange things make us laugh.
JKR can call her own shots now, but she's an exception. She's earned her say by producing a line of books that will define a generation's love for reading, reinvigorated by her great imagination.
It's an exciting time to be watching publishing, but for this writer, I just try not to be overwhelmed.
Have a great weekend, Nathan, and all the loyal Bransfordites! (somehow that sounds like a cult).
@Jericho
It will be available in the Kindle format (mobi), not from the Kindle store.
And re. ePub, it does allow you to do a lot more stuff. However, when 70+% of your sales are in mobi (which is very limited) there isn't much point in doing an enhanced ePub.
Plus, the e-readers can't yet display all the things an ePub can do.
The real limitation here is with the readers that are popular (nook, kobo, kindle) not the file format.
I had great hope that Rowling might be ready to publish some new work, but, I will happily buy e-books of Harry Potter to experience whatever she's got up her sleeve this time, even though I already have a shelf entirely devoted to her books in both US and UK editions.
And, David, I beg to differ with you on the fact that what she does has significance for the rest of the authors in the world. It's true that it may never affect you personally, but, since I am a teacher, I cannot ever forget that Rowling's popularity sparked the interest of not only thousands of readers but of hundreds of YA writers as well. Before Rowling, good YA fiction was fairly rare (yes, there was some, such as Susan Cooper's works), but now it is a HUGE genre. I was teacher before Potter was in print, and I assure you that there has been a vast change in YA literature. Now, if that all happened because of one series of books, who knows what may happen with whatever she's got for us this time?
Locke and Hawking, with their huge e-book sales, have impacted the way people think about self-published books -- and that may affect you eventually. Or if not, it certainly has affected a lot of folks already.
As for me, well, I intend to hold on tight and enjoy the ride. :)
Hi Nathan, you mentioned that Rowling isn't exactly cutting traditional publishing out of the loop... But doesn't their role being purely for marketing support in fact point to them not playing a 'traditional publisher' at all in this scenario? Granted, the material she's selling was put out by them in print originally, but if ebooks are taken as a separate market from print, isn't what Rowling's doing now clear-cut self-publishing?
She's directing the operation herself, owning all the rights while outsourcing to others for bits of the ebook pie (an inverted relationship to the normal trad publisher/author relationship). Albeit with a HUGE platform and lots of different experts to outsource work to, what she's doing seems pretty much the same as what ordinary self-publishers who outsource to others are doing, isnt it?... Just on a larger scale...
Okay, labels aside... I think this is going to have a huge impact on the publishing world, maybe even upending it, yes:)... Maybe not immediately, and maybe not in terms of traditional publishers vs self-publishers per se... But for the ebook market generally, I'm guessing Pottermore will hugely open the YA ebook market to new readers cause those who now buy ereaders to read Pottermore's offerings will probably go looking around for other YA ebooks to read once they're done with dear ole Harry:)
Last thought- the nature and build of Pottermore might just provide another working distribution model for authors who are already pretty successful (or their publishing houses) ... which is cool for everyone really... if it happens:)
Anyway, just my 2 cents... and probably a hodge-podge of cents in there from all the discussions going on online that I've been soaking up hehe
I heard a rumor that Amazon was aggressively sending mass e-mails to literary agents across the board, asking them to submit new authors for new Amazon publishing ventures. I have no reason to believe this isn't true, and it could mean several things. One of them being that self-published authors without agents aren't going to be taken as seriously over at Amazon as they think they are, and Amazon is vying to be a publisher, in the traditional sense, like the big six.
But still too soon to tell.
Is anyone else extremely... underwhelmed by the JK Rowling news? I know she said it wasn't going to be a new book, but somewhere, in my heart of hearts, that's what I thought it was going to be.
Took my post down. Guess there's no need to be so blunt about it all.
Be back later to comment on all of these wonderful links! Thanks for everything you do, Nathan!
Thanks for the mention, Nathan.
Oh, yeah! I saw that thing with Ray Nagin in it. It was pretty interesting. He said there were a couple of agents interested in the work but they wanted him to tone this down or that down and it refused to do it. So the best way to get his book out there was to just self-publish it. I think they still have it up on Hulu.
I love the viral videos. I wish it came with links on where to find the original video.
I've read the Crouch and Hendrix article. I thought it less complementary of literary fiction than young adult fiction. It sounds like they are having a great time writing young adult fiction. I've gone back and reread the article three times, and I don't get what was so offensive to the writers and readers of YA. Tahereh Mafi ends her post with haters are gonna hate, but Crouch and Hendrix say that they love writing YA. It looks like the ones blowing a gasket are the haters.
I'm totally mystified as to what the problem is.
Another great blog installment, Nathan!
@Isabella
That's EXACTLY how I see it.
anon-
I think what people are objecting to is the idea that writing YA is essentially an unserious activity. It's fine and maybe even admirable that the authors don't take themselves too seriously, but I don't think most writers of YA are in it just to cash in and capitalizing on a particular cultural moment, which the authors cop to.
Isabella-
No, I don't think it's clear-cut self-publishing. I think it has elements of it, but these books were originally traditionally published and benefited massively from that process, and traditional publishers are at the table. This is a different form of delivery of the product, but not a different form of producing the product.
Personally, I think Pottermore is another watershed moment in publishing, one that marks a real seachange in how things are done. According to The Wall Street Journal article you mentioned, J. K. Rowling is self-publishing her eBooks, retaining all rights to them, and hiring her previous publishing companies for specific jobs she’d like them to do for her. She’s in a position to publish her eBooks however she wants, at whatever price she wants. She’s in charge, not the publishing companies. They might be at the table, but J. K. Rowling’s the boss. That’s hugely different from how things are normally done. Normally, an author can’t set their own eBook prices, are put in a position where their eBooks are two to three times more expensive than their paperback versions (driving away readers who purchase only in eBook format and won’t pay the outlandish prices), have no say in the image on their book covers, etc.
I recently purchased a 99-cent eBook by John Locke, as well as many other inexpensive eBooks by authors who have won book awards and whose books have received great reviews. These aren’t all books by self-published authors, either, as the big publishing houses have been offering some of their eBooks for free as specials, even while they speak out against inexpensive and free eBooks. I find it rather humorous that the article about John Locke talked about how he only made $346,500 in five months on his 99-cent eBooks, but could possibly have made $1 million if his eBooks had been traditionally priced. Hello. Making $346,500 in five months is damn good, and most likely Locke would never have been discovered by readers if his eBooks had been priced at $8, $12, $14, as so many eBooks from traditional publishers are priced. Fans will pay that much money for hugely popular authors like George R. R. Martin, but most readers won’t risk that much money on eBooks by unknown authors.
@David - thanks. love your blog, and agree with what you've been saying too:)
@Nathan - I know where you're coming from in saying the books were produced differently from self-published books. But as I personally no longer distinguish between what trad publishers can produce for their authors and what any outsourced experts can produce for self-published authors in this age, 'production' seems a moot point for me.
The reason I interpret Rowling's move as clear-cut self-publishing is because of her control of all the rights to the ebooks, however they were produced.
'Produced', mind you, not 'published'.
Her trad publishers are not publishing her ebooks. They are marketing and promoting them. She is publishing them. Herself. She is controlling distribution, pricing, the outsourcing of expertise - herself. All the above is the very definition of self-publishing. She could very well have outsourced marketing and promotion to another company altogether. She has that right, and the clout. That they're sitting at her table is I suspect either a gesture of goodwill on her part, or something contractual/business oriented (for eg the advertising she would get from her print books referring readers to the ebooks). Either way, their involvement is something SHE is controlling, as evidenced by the fact that she is paying them for their services, and not the other way around.
Anyway, I understand the industry is in a bit of a flux, and many things are probably open to interpretation right now, so maybe we'll just have to agree to disagree on this ha:)
hmmmm, after reading Marilyn's comment, just realised that quite a bit what I just said was already mentioned by Marilyn in a way. Sorry for the double-ups!:)
@Marilyn - you read my mind:)
Okay, I read all the links ( Thank you!!), and I'm ready.
First, in terms of Pottermore, I hear what you are saying, Nathan - that she can't be called a self-publisher, because she's not. She traditionally published, and the fact that she is self-publishing her e-books doesn't change that.
So this doesn't speak to whether an author can reach blockbuster status and take control if they start from self-publishing alone. That hasn't happened yet.
On the other hand, it does show that authors can take control, at least in some point in the process, which is a great change. I also think it's a matter of time before someone reaches blockbuster status completely on their own.....but time will tell, and it's true that it hasn't happened yet.
So, other interesting links.
Hmmm. I'd like to see Kellog's figures about how John Locke could be making more money and how they compare. I guess if you throw in paper books, that's true. Personally, I think he's pricing his books too low, no reason to only charge 99 cents for a known author, imho. But maybe he has his reasons.
Couldn't get access to the N.Y. times link. :(
That is so cool that Galley Cat picked up on your poll, Nathan!! Is it weird that I'm really proud of that??
So, what happened with Ray Nagin, that's interesting. Very interesting.
Thanks so much for the link on contract things to watch out for!
I thought the Slate article was kind of amusing. Sorry. It used to make me mad that people wrote for money, because I write for ART. But I've learned to accept that not everyone does. Some people just see this as a business, although I really, really, really don't. But that's okay. Room enough for both.
Good comment of the week, funny compilation video - what did we do before youtube?? - and the forumiters are going to Vegas!! Everyone from the blog should come. We'll shut the place down. Then, we'll probably sit around and argue about self-publishing and forget to leave our hotel rooms, because we know how to REALLY have fun.
Vegas, baby!!
Thanks again for the links, Nathan! Interesting times!
@Nathan, Oh. I see. I interpreted it as literary fiction being way too serious. I don't have a dog in this fight as I don't write either YA or literary fiction, so from an objective standpoint it sounds like literary fiction is absolute torture to write with very little reward. As a writer that doesn't appeal to me at all.
As for the Slate article, I think part of what bothered people was that it promoted the idea that adult literary fiction novels (and their readers and reviewers) are more sophisticated (and somehow more valuable) than young adult novels and their readers and reviewers. By stating that she drafts very little and that the "kids" don't care about the quality of the writing, that they just want to read the next book in the series, was insulting to the people who read and write those books and do take the time to draft and redraft. And it treated the Young Adult writing market as a genre instead of an age group. There is a variety of genres within the market that range from very commercial to very literary. You don't see YA literary novelists like Gabrielle Zevin, MT Anderson, Sherman Alexie, or Markus Zusak writing articles that suggest the novels they write for a teen audience are inferior in craft or intellect to their adult work. And I think her joking swipe at Twilight (a book published by Crouch's publisher that generated enough income to allow writers like her the opportunity to write for the YA market) was also taken the wrong way. It was a humorous article, but I think a lot of people in the YA world felt laughed at. And that demographic has a real sense of community.
Anon 5:17
Oh, I see! This wasn't about the writing for money/art thing. It was about the the old: Literary fiction is real writing and commercial writing is trivial writing thing? And they sum up YA literature as commercial writing.
I misunderstood. That debate usually makes me see red. Grrrrr.
And as a commercial writer, I say: ha!
That about sums it up.
What I think is that the Slate writers are actually commercial writers, but they don't want to admit it to themselves.
I shall now feel very sad for them, and hope they come to self-acceptance at some point in their conflicted and twisted journeys. Poor things.
Thanks for the reference to Passive Voice. The entire post is chock-full, but as a writer I find the bit on the non-compete clause especially helpful.
D.G. Hudson--LOL about the cult.
I'm not a Bransfordite--I'm a Bransfordette.
But Nathan, don't invite me to your sweat lodge!
Excellent links. Thank you.
Excellent collection of links, thanks Nathan!
Regarding the John Locke "at what cost" article - she estimates if he'd gone through traditional publishing avenues rather than taking Amazon's royalty rate of 35% on .99 books, or $350K, he'd have closer to $1 million. Don't you think part of the reason he's sold so many books is because of the low price and perceived value of getting a book that is well reviewed and entertaining for such a bargain?
Couldn't the same book(s) have given him a paltry midlist experience at a publishing house? It seems too easy to go back and rewrite the experience with his current level of success. Would 1 million people really have lined up to buy these had they cost $25 each?