My daughter has been encouraging me to adopt a vegetarian diet. I do make an effort to eat meatless often, but a completely vegan or vegetarian diet takes a certain amount of commitment that I've never been willing to expend. Recently, this same daughter (she is both environmentally conscious and persuasive) talked me into watching the documentary, Cowspiracy. (I challenge you to watch this and not be affected.) In any case, The Forest Feast for Kids landed on my shelf in time to take advantage of my renewed interest in vegetarianism. Good timing, Forest Feast!
The Forest Feast for Kids: Colorful Vegetarian Recipes That Are Simple to Make
By Erin Gleeson
Abrams, 2016
From the whimsically painted watercolor endpapers and chapter title pages to the lusciously photographed finished recipes, The Forest Feast for Kids is a feast for the eyes as well as the stomach. These are recipes that are as beautiful to present as they are healthy to eat.
Contents in this generously sized book contain cookbook standards - table of contents, index, introduction, and pages of helpful hints and cooking techniques. The chapters run the gamut of gastronomic needs: Snacks, Drinks, Salads, Meals, Sweets, and Parties. Each chapter contains about six recipes, each one displayed on across two pages. The left page has a painted recipe title, simple instructions in a large typewriter font, handwritten notes offering serving hints, "cut into wedges and enjoy hot!" , and hand-drawn arrows pointing to the appropriate ingredient photo (not every child may recognize a cilantro leaf or bay leaf). Photos are not insets or bordered, they are part of a lovely integrated palette of ingredients and text. Beautiful photos of the finished dishes appear on the facing page.
Simplicity of ingredients (most recipes have only four) combined with attractive presentation make these recipes irresistible not only to young chefs, but also to harried caregivers who would love to put a healthy, attractive meal on the table, but have trouble finding the time. I know that I'll be making Strawberry-Cucumber Ribbon Salad soon!
Enjoy!
I've never seen the adult version of the same book. I'm willing to bet that it's equally wonderful!
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: vegetarianism, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Blog: Shelf-employed (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: cookbooks, nonfiction, recipes, cooking, J, Non-Fiction Monday, vegetarianism, Add a tag
Blog: OUPblog (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Online products, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America, #PeanutButterMonth, Peanut Butter Month, Food, peanut butter, America, peanuts, Food & Drink, sandwiches, vegetarianism, vegan, Oxford Reference, food history, *Featured, andrew f. smith, Add a tag
There is something quintessentially American about peanut butter. While people in other parts of the world eat it, nowhere is it devoured with the same gusto as in the United States, where peanut butter is ensconced in an estimated 85% of home kitchens. Who exactly invented peanut butter is unknown; the only person to make that claim was Dr. John Harvey Kellogg, the chief medical officer at the Sanatarium, the fashionable health retreat in Battle Creek, Michigan. Kellogg, a vegetarian who invented Corn Flakes, was seeking an alternative for “cows’ butter.” He thought puréed nutmeats might work, and in the early 1890s Kellogg experimented with processing nuts through steel rollers. He served the nut butters to his patients at the Sanatarium, who loved them. Remarkably, in less than a decade peanut butter would emerge from the province of extremist “health nuts” to become a mainstream American fad food.
America’s elite visited the Battle Creek Sanatarium to recover their health, and many fell in love with the foods served there—particularly peanut butter. It soon became a passion with health-food advocates nationwide, and newspapers and magazines quoted vegetarians extolling its virtues. A vegetarianism advocate, Ellen Goodell Smith, published the first recipe for a peanut butter sandwich in her Practical Cook and Text Book for General Use (1896).
Homemade peanut butter was initially ground in a mortar and pestle, but this required considerable effort. It was also made with a hand-cranked meat- or coffee-grinder, but these did not produce a smooth butter. Joseph Lambert, an employee at the Sanatarium, adapted a meat-grinder to make it more suitable for producing nut butters at home. He also invented or acquired the rights to other small appliances, all intended to simplify the making of nut butters. These included a stovetop nut roaster, a small blancher (to remove the skins from the nuts), and a hand grinder that cranked out a smooth, creamy product. In 1896, Lambert left the Sanatarium and set up his own company to manufacture and sell the equipment.
Lambert mailed advertising flyers to households throughout the United States, and some recipients who bought the equipment started their own small businesses selling nut products. As nut butters became more popular, these machines proved inadequate to keep up with demand, so Lambert ramped up production of larger ones. He also published leaflets and booklets extolling the high food value of nuts and their butters. His wife, Almeda Lambert, published A Guide for Nut Cookery (1899), America’s first book devoted solely to cooking with nuts.
Vegetarians — who at the time practiced what we may now consider veganism — enjoyed all sorts of nut butters, which weren’t simply novel spreads for sandwiches but also sustaining, high-protein meat substitutes. But peanuts were the cheapest nuts, and it was peanut butter that dominated the field. It was first manufactured in small quantities by individuals and sold locally from door to door, but before long, small factories sprang up and peanut butter became a familiar article on grocers’ shelves. The American Vegetarian Society (AVS) sold peanut butter and actively promoted its sale through advertisements in magazines. In 1897 the AVS also began promoting the sale of the “Vegetarian Society Mill,” with an accompanying eight-page pamphlet encouraging vegetarians to create home-based peanut butter businesses. Vegetarians all over the country began to manufacture commercial peanut butter. The Vegetarian Food & Nut Company, in Washington, D.C., sold a product called “Dr. Shindler’s Peanut Butter” throughout the United States for decades. The company also produced private-label peanut butter for grocery store chains, and non-vegetarians quickly adopted the tasty new product.
The Atlantic Peanut Refinery in Philadelphia, launched in December 1898, may have been the first company to use the words “peanut butter” on its label. The term was picked up by other commercial manufacturers, although a New Haven, Connecticut, manufacturer preferred the term “Peanolia,” (later shortened to Penolia), and registered it in 1899.
By 1899, an estimated two million pounds of peanut butter were manufactured annually in the United States, and by the turn of the century, ten peanut-butter manufacturers competed for the burgeoning US market. From its origin just six years earlier as an alternative to creamery butter, peanut butter had established itself as an American pantry staple and a necessity for schoolchildren’s lunch pails.
Headline image credit: Peanut Butter Texture, by freestock.ca. CC-BY-SA-3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
The post Peanut butter: the vegetarian conspiracy appeared first on OUPblog.
Blog: Robin Brande (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Vegetarianism, Vegan, Factory Farms, Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, Veganism, Life, Food, Meat, Farm Animals, Add a tag
Great interview with Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, author of The Face on Your Plate. I’m already sold (since I had to do tons and tons of research for the new novel that’s coming out, and came to these same conclusions), but how about the rest of you? Do any of his points have an effect on [...]
Blog: Under the Covers (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: vegetarianism, scbwi, conferences, writing, politics, wisconsin, Add a tag
I spent this weekend in Racine for the SCBWI Wisconsin's annual retreat (really more of a whirlwind conference/sleepover). It was my first big writer-type event and totally worth it. Highlights:
- The usual assortment of inspiration, information, and encouragement you would expect from the presenters. OK, also some nausea-inducing assessments of the "toughness" of the market these days, especially now what with "economic downturn." And a nothing-to-fear manuscript critique from the gracious and funny Holly Black.
- Meeting my agent Steven Chudney and his Wisconsin clients Julie Bowe and Deborah Lynn Jacobs in person for the first time.
- Meeting many other (mostly Wisconsin) writers and illustrators, all of whom were incredibly friendly and supportive and reassuring and welcoming to this Illinois interloper. A special shout-out to Pat Schmatz and Jenny M. who, in addition to the above folks, were my main buddies for the weekend.
- Getting only one hour of sleep the first night because I was so keyed up. Silver linings: finishing The Hunger Games (so now I know why everyone's talking about it), raiding the abundant snack table at 3 AM, and being up in plenty of time for...
- Walking the labyrinth as the stars faded and then going down to the beach to watch the sun rise and skip rocks. I got a few five-skippers! (i.e., Really good for me.)
(Aside: it was funny, being as close to Lake Michigan as we were, because my apartment is only slightly farther from the shore. I could have dog-paddled 75 miles up the coast to get there if I'd wanted. It made me feel cozily at home. Of course, how often do I go to the beach to watch the sun rise? Um...never? Accursed writing time!)
- Cafeteria food that reminded me of (a) summer camp and (b) being a vegetarian at summer camp. No, I'm afraid there were no vegan biscuits and gravy waiting for me this morning, nor veggie and tofu stir-fry last night. I'm looking forward to ingesting protein that doesn't come in the form of cottage cheese!
- Not thinking about the presidential election for nearly 48 hours.
(Aside: You know you're not in Chicago when you see as many McCain as Obama signs on people's lawns. I mean, my building's on the edge of an historic neighborhood of freakin' multi-million dollar homes, and they've all got Obama signs! Come on, Wisconsin... Gobama!)
Again, all in all, a really terrific time. Some people asked me, will I go again next year? If I had to decide right this second, I'd say yes! I'll just have see how life and finances stand when registration rolls around next summer...
Hi Robin! I left a short comment on your FB status. I should add that in general, articles that lay out the facts as the author knows them without trying to convince me to a certain way of thinking have more of an impact on me than an essay that is a persuasive argument. I’ve grown increasingly resistant to persuasive arguments as so often, it seems that the authors pull out the statistics and anecdotes that support their arguments and ignore contradictory research.
I have friends who are raw foodies who cite all sorts of sources to convince me that everyone on the planet should eat a raw food diet. Some people point out that humans have long digestive tracts which prove that we’re supposed to eat a plant-based diet, while others point out that our teeth indicate that we’re supposed to eat an omnivorous diet. Meanwhile, there are people in parts of the world who are starved for protein (and starving, period) who don’t have an array of diets to choose from, and get what they can get.
Whether it’s about food, the environment, or anything else that triggers high emotions, these days I just want to see the research, not the bias. I know that’s unrealistic, but I do think it’s time to try different approaches than the guilt-based ones.
–Farida
Yeah, Farida, I agree that people don’t want to be barked at. It really gets my back up when someone tells me how to think, as opposed to laying out some facts for me to consider. I like to think I’m the only boss of me.
Thanks for your input! I like to hear how other people come down on this issue.
Changing minds and thinking is for the weak!
I used to think that, too, Patrick, until you taught us all to kibby. And how many lives were changed that day?
Which reminds me: Is it left foot forward, right ear to the shoulder? Or do I have it backwards?
I don’t know - it’s an interesting article, but it’s so full of statements with which I really disagree, presented as if they were absolute and irrefutable, that it does nothing to sway me towards the view that veganism is the only ethical choice. The section on not being vegetarian in Animal, Vegetable, Miracle on the other hand, did make me think and also change my mind a bit.
You know, I think life was really easier in this regard if not others, about 20 or 30 years ago. One simple argument such as the one about it taking too much of the world’s resources to allow for a meat-including diet seemed so straight-forward. I give up eating meat and thereby am doing exactly what’s needed to help the poor in the Third World have enough food! (And I did, for quite some time.) But it really is nothing like that simple, and I don’t think there’s one answer that’s anything like as cut-and-dried ethical as Masson makes it out to be. Well, except for veal. I’ll never eat veal that’s produced the way veal is. And free-range eggs from local farms that really are free range. Okay, I may believe there are some straight-forward answers, but have to keep trying to sort them all out over and over again. It’s a lot of work, trying to live ‘right’, isn’t it?
Kibbying does not require thought or changing of minds, it was simply - here is awesomeness - which was apparent and needed no explanation.
I eat meat simply for the fact that some chickens want to be eaten and without steroid enhanced beef, we wouldn’t have 7ft tall basketball players and who would want to live in a world without 7ft tall basketball players and deny chickens their right to be eaten?
I grew up in farm country, so I’ve been around animals who provide food my whole life and have never had any illusions about where my food comes from. I think there’s a lot to be said for Masson’s point of view, but I think it’s also not that easy. I know a lot of vegetarians and vegans, for instance, who eat a lot of heavily-processed food to supplement their diets, particularly foods supplemented with soy, which is one of the more commonly genetically modified foods on the market, which is problematic on both a personal and wider level. That’s not everyone, obviously, but food is a really complicated issue, and one point Masson makes that I really agree with is that we are separated from our food sources to a degree that is dangerous. Most of the people writing about food these days agree on that point. Industrial farming is scary on an almost sci-fi level, like you can’t even believe some of the things these people do could be real, and that’s true for plant as well as animal farming.
Patrick, I’m just going to leave your food thoughts without comment. But yes as to kibbying.
Lady S: “It’s a lot of work, trying to live ‘right,’ isn’t it?”. Oh, word. To try to eat right for our health, while also not exploiting child labor or putting animals through torture–generally trying to be a good person and do the right thing, and still feed ourselves and generally enjoy our food. Not easy, which is why a lot of people just throw up their hands and say,”Give me another hot dog.”
Adrienne, you’re so right about the junk food vegetarians and vegans–a lot of fake food out there to make up for the animal products people give up. I like Michael Pollan’s simple solution on that one (from In Defense of Food): Eat food. Not too much. Mostly vegetables. His whole section on “eat food” talks about what really is food vs. a “food product.” Very eye-opening.
Anyway, we’re all trying to do our best, eh? Thanks for chiming in here. I like to know what y’all think on this.
Reading this makes me really wish I could go back to being vegan (I can’t, for health reasons). Since I can’t, it makes me feel a little bit guilty for all the times I’ve bought conventional groceries rather than organic and fair-trade because organic and fair-trade cost more. And it makes me a little proud about the (tiny) things I do to decrease my impact on the environment, like using reusable shopping bags and saving my recyclable trash to take to my aunt’s house (because she has curbside recycling, I don’t, and I have no idea how far it is to the nearest recycling center). And since I can’t seem to do much about my impact on the animals (recycled chicken, anyone?) I’m glad that one of the tenents of the faith in which I was raised is that all animals have souls and go to heaven. Still REALLY wish I could do the vegan thing, though.
I’m also curious what Patrick has to say on the subject of recycled chickens. I’m sure it will be entertaining and highly educational.