By Richard M. Eaton and Phillip B Wagoner
Power and memory combined to produce the Deccan Plateau’s built landscape. Beyond the region’s capital cities, such as Bijapur, Vijayanagara, or Golconda, the culture of smaller, fortified strongholds both on the plains and in the hills provides a fascinating insight into its history. These smaller centers saw very high levels of conflict between 1300 and 1600, especially during the turbulent sixteenth century when gunpowder technology had become widespread in the region. Below is a selection of images of architecture and monuments, examined through a mix of methodologies (history, art history, and archaeology), taken from our new book Power, Memory, and Architecture: Contested Sites on India’s Deccan Plateau, 1300-1600.
-
Raichur. Kati Darwaza gateway (as reconstructed c. 1520)
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-8.jpg
When an important fort changed hands in the early modern Deccan, victors often gave its gates “face-lifts” to publicize their possession of the site. When Krishna Raya of Vijayanagara seized Raichur from Bijapur, he erased features of this gate that were associated with Bijapur and stamped it with architectural markings of his own dynasty.
-
Yadgir Fort, Cannon no. 4 (late 1550s)
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-7.jpg
In the mid-16th century the sultanate of Bijapur made notable advances in gunpowder technology, marking in some respects a local “Military Revolution”. This is seen in the crude adaptation of the idea of small swivel cannons to very large guns that were placed on high bastions and could be maneuvered both laterally and vertically.
-
Hyderabad: southern portal of the Char Kaman ensemble (1592)
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-6.jpg
Though conventionally thought to have been patterned on “Islamic” models of urban design, Hyderabad was actually modeled on the Kakatiya capital of Warangal, indicating that dynasty’s lasting memory. Thus, four portals were positioned around the famous Charminar just as four toranas had been positioned around Warangal’s cultic center, the Svayambhu Shiva temple (see first image).
-
Warangal Fort: Panchaliraya temple, assembled by Shitab Khan (16th c.)
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-5.jpg
In 1504 Shitab Khan, an upstart local chieftain, seized the city of Warangal from its Bahmani governor and at once associated himself with the memory of the illustrious Kakatiya dynasty, which had ruled from this city two centuries earlier. To this end, he made several architectural interventions, including assembling this temple from reused structural elements dating to Kakatiya rule.
-
Bijapur: Inner courtyard of citadel’s gateway
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-4.jpg
Like their Vijayanagara rivals to the south, the sultans of Bijapur also revered the memory of the imperial Chalukyas. This is seen in the twenty-four reused Chalukya columns that, in the early 16th century, they inserted in the citadel’s entrance courtyard, their capital’s most prominent site.
-
Vijayanagara: two-storeyed hall at the end of Virupaksha bazaar
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-3.jpg
To identify themselves with Chalukya glory, rulers of Vijayanagara in the 16th century inserted into this hall’s lower storey finely polished reused Chalukya columns, carved from blue-green schist. By contrast, the hall’s less visible upper storey exhibits columns in the style of Vijayanagara’s own period, crudely carved from nearby granite.
-
Kuruvatti. Bracket figure from the Malikarjuna temple, ca. 11th c.
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-2.jpg
Just as the memory of Roman imperial splendor inspired Europeans for centuries after the collapse of Rome, the memory of the Deccan’s prestigious Chalukya dynasty (10th-12th c.), preserved by material remains such as this stunning sculpture, inspired actors four or five centuries later to identify their own regimes with Chalukya glory.
-
Warangal fort: Remains of the Tughluq congregational mosque
http://blog.oup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-1.jpg
Architecture and power are interwoven in the remains of this mosque, built in the former capital of the Kakatiya dynasty. Foreground: rubble of the temple of the Kakatiyas’ state deity, Svayambhu Shiva, destroyed in the early 14th century by armies of the Delhi Sultanate. Background: one of the temple’s four majestic gateways (torana) that the conquerors preserved in order to frame the mosque.
Richard M. Eaton is Professor of History at the University of Arizona, Tucson. Phillip B. Wagoner is Professor of Art History at Wesleyan University. They are authors of Power, Memory, Architecture: Contested Sites on India’s Deccan Plateau, 1300-1600.
Subscribe to the OUPblog via email or RSS.
Subscribe to only history articles on the OUPblog via email or RSS.
Subscribe to only art and architecture articles on the OUPblog via email or RSS.
The post Contested sites on India’s Deccan Plateau appeared first on OUPblog.
