Last weekend the Independent reported on Jacqueline Wilson's comments on a Random House survey of British youngsters and their habits. The survey found the following: " Seventy-one per cent of parents said they allowed their children to drink alcohol at home and fifty-three per cent admitted they let their children stay out past 11pm. A third of parents allowed pre-teen children to pierce their ears, and 57 per cent allowed them to watch 18-certificate films." According to the article in the Independent, Wilson responded to the survey stating, "With television and the internet playing a bigger and bigger role in their lives, children are being introduced to ideas and issues which used to be kept away from them. Rather than having fun for the sake of it, and going out to play, they're receiving the adult world in a largely unfiltered form."
Well, not so fast, says Winifred Robinson in today's Telegraph. Robinson states, "Call me cynical but might Random House be offering a platform to its most popular children's author - always guaranteed to generate column inches - because she has a new book out?" And then Robinson questions the content of Wilson's own books, writing, "In the past, though, the adults who were humiliated and destroyed were evil caricatures, whereas in many of today's children's books they tend to be ordinary, flawed mortals simply trying to do their best."
It's an interesting argument, but one I believe has nothing to do with books at all. What say you?
new posts in all blogs
By: Kelly Herold,
on 3/4/2008
Blog: Crossover (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: innocence, on teen books, innocence, on teen books, Add a tag
Viewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: innocence, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 1 of 1
By: Kelly Herold,
on 3/4/2008
Blog: Crossover (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: innocence, on teen books, innocence, on teen books, Add a tag
0 Comments on The Innocence Wars as of 1/1/1900
Add a Comment
Kelly,
I agree with you, it's not about the books. I also agree with Wilson, that we are allowing our children to be exposed to things way too soon! At my house, my 12 year old daughter is not allowed to watch PG or PG13 unless I screen it first. Same way for books. She has a great appreciation for middle grades literature because of it. She also has friends whose parents feel the same way as I do, so she's not being ostracized. She is, first and foremost, a child. And my job as parent, is to teach her to enjoy her childhood while preparing her for adulthood.
I think the main problem is that we forget that we are the parents. We make the decisions. Let's start making them wisely!