Critics pretty much couldn't stand Adam Sandler's videogame vehicle, but who couldn't see that coming?
Add a CommentViewing: Blog Posts Tagged with: Chris Columbus, Most Recent at Top [Help]
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Blog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Feature Film, Adam Sandler, Pixels, Talkback, Chris Columbus, Patrick Jean, Add a tag
Blog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Feature Film, Adam Sandler, Donkey Kong, Videogames, Pixels, Chris Columbus, Pac-Man, Patrick Jean, Add a tag
Blog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Chris Columbus, Pac-Man, Centipede, Patrick Jean, Kevin James, Josh Gad, Animators, Adam Sandler, Donkey Kong, Pixels, Add a tag
This quintet of posters came out today for "Pixels," the big-budget Hollywood feature based on a two-and-a-half-minute French animated short.
Add a CommentBlog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Chris Columbus, Pac-Man, Centipede, Patrick Jean, Kevin James, Josh Gad, Feature Film, Adam Sandler, Donkey Kong, Pixels, Add a tag
This quintet of posters came out today for "Pixels," the big-budget Hollywood feature based on a two-and-a-half-minute French animated short.
Add a CommentBlog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Business, Melody, Studios, Haim Saban, Chris Columbus, Abominable, Ghostforce, Jeremy Zag, Michael Barnathan, Zag Animation Studios, Add a tag
Zag Animation Studios is a new feature animation outfit that plans to release two family-oriented films per year—one fully-CGI and one live-action/CGI hybrid—beginning in 2017.
Add a CommentBlog: Kid Lit Reviews (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: 5stars, Greg Call, Denver Kristoff, Himalayan monks, House of Secrets #2, Wind Witch, Middle Grade, Favorites, Series, Ned Vizzini, Books for Boys, Rome, dystopian novel, Balzer + Bray, Chris Columbus, HarperCollins Publishers, Add a tag
.
.
House of Secrets, #2: Battle of the Beasts
by Chris Columbus & Ned Vizzini
Greg Call, illustrator
Balzer + Bray 3/25/2014
978-0-06-219249-3
Age 8 to 12 480 pages
.
“Since the siblings’ last adventure, life in the Walker household is much improved—the family is rich and the Wind Witch is banished! But no Walker will be safe until she is found, and summoning her to San Francisco brings all the danger that comes with her and puts the Walkers in the crosshairs of a mysterious journey through Denver Kristoff’s books. As the Walkers travel from ancient Rome to World War II to Tibet, they’ll be tested in ways that cut deeper than before, by Denver Kristoff, the Wind Witch, and each other.”
Opening
“Brendan Walker knew the package would be there by eight a. m. It had to be.”
The Story
Eleanor, Brenda, and Cordelia Walker return, but not ready to take on more novel-dictated adventures. Dr. Walker (dad) is secretly—and quickly—tossing away all the fortune Eleanor arranged for the family at the end of book 1. Despite defeating the Wind Witch and safely returning home to finding mom and dad alive, none of the kids is faring well. Then Denver Kristoff appears as Dr. Walker and kidnaps Eleanor, taking her to the Bohemian Club in downtown San Francisco. He really wants Cordelia, but she ran off. Soon Brendan and Will arrive and finally Cordelia. Thus begins their adventures with the Wind Witch.
The kids land, house and all, outside the Roman Coliseum, once again in the middle of a Denver Kristoff novel. Brendan envies Emperor Occipus, ruler of Rome, and stays to live—and die—as a powerful, greedy Roman Emperor-in-training. Cordelia, Eleanor, and World War I pilot Will leave without Brendan. The trio deal with three Denver Kristoff novel changes. They face robotic World War II Nazis, odd Himalayan mountain top monastery monks with a wild frozen beast to defeat, the Romans once again, and then the Wind Witch once more.
Off all the battles, that with the Wind Witch proves to be the most difficult. She may lead the kids home, but what she says in the process will shock them, mostly Cordelia, as they try to understand and accept their fates. Book 3 is the final installment of House of Secrets.
Review
I looked forward to Battle of the Beasts and torn into once it arrived. I was immediately put-off by Brendan’s attitude and that carried into the Rome story. He behaves like a spoiled, whiny, rich kid. Leaving him in Rome suited me fine. After that, the story picked up and began to zoom just as book 1 had from almost the beginning.
Not as many of the secondary characters stood out as they had in the first book. World War I pilot Will returned to San Francisco with the kids but then became homeless and lost. I do not understand the reasoning behind this and find this storyline unnecessary, especially considering how quickly Cordelia found Will (though the kids had looked for a year prior to the start of book 2). Will easily returned to his old self.
I enjoyed the gladiator Felix. Bravely he leaves Rome with the kids. This new strapping man is not the most educated and misunderstands much of the new worlds he encounters with the Walkers and Will. I wish Felix would have stayed, as Will did, ready to begin the final installment. There are many humorous moments and statements, and twists and turns to enjoy. and loads of miscalculations by the Wind Witch, who can’t decide if she will kill the kids or if a relational endearment she feels, sI enjoyed them all.
spoiler
The strangest occurrence is not Emperor Occipus, robotic Nazis, frost beasts, odd monks, or anything else that occurs, except for one. The Wind Witch’s declaration to Cordelia that they are closely related—won’t say in what way—is the strangest, yet most logical twist. Cordelia found an old diary belonging to the Wind Witch’s mother. In it, she read more than she told the others I think she already knew but hearing it, straight from your . . . witch’s mouth, made this final and real.
That one statement explains the Walkers and their canny abilities to survive. The Wind Witch suffers many miscalculations and fights her own emotions. She wants the Walker kids dead, but her aims fail. Is it possible the relationship that exists causes an endearment toward the kids, which does not allow her to follow through? How this will play out in the final book I cannot imagine, but it should be one of the biggest sensations in middle grade novels when it does. Time will tell.
end of spoiler
The writing is great as it is in book one. I did notice a slight change, imperceptible but there, after the first half of the story. This made me wonder how much of Battle of the Beasts Ned Vizzini completed before his premature death. Something felt off, yet examples or proof elude me. I had to put the book down for a while and read something else. I enjoyed Battle of the Beasts, though not as much as the first book.
Kids who enjoyed House of Secrets, book 1 will enjoy Battle of the Beasts. The action is constant, once it begins, and the adventures unusual and varied, yet play on what seem to be the same field. None of the novels is located far from the others, or so it felt. There is nothing that will give kids nightmares, but the action is imaginative and often intense. Boys will probably like the robotic Nazis best. This group reminded me of the white soldiers in Star Wars. At 480 pages, Battle of the Beasts is a long read, making this a great book for advanced readers and those with long attention spans. Reluctant readers should stay away.
HOUSE OF SECRETS #2: BATTLE OF THE BEASTS. Text copyright © 2014 by
Ned Vizzini and Chris Columbus dba Novel Approach, LLC. Illustrations copyright © 2014 by Greg Call. Published 2014 by Balzer + Bray, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY.
Buy House of Secrets #2: Battle of the Beasts at Amazon—B&N—iTunes—Audible—HarperCollins—your local bookstore.
EXCERPT BOOK 2 BATTLE OF THE BEASTS
video is for House of Secrets, #1
.
.
Filed under: 5stars, Books for Boys, Favorites, Middle Grade, Series Tagged: Balzer + Bray, Chris Columbus, Denver Kristoff, dystopian novel, Greg Call, HarperCollins Publishers, Himalayan monks, House of Secrets #2, Ned Vizzini, Rome, Wind Witch Add a Comment
Blog: Cartoon Brew (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Shorts, Eric Goldberg, Chris Columbus, Chuck Jones, Bill Littlejohn, Mrs. Doubtfire, *Promote Video, Pudgy Parakeet, Tom Ray, Add a tag
This year marks the 20th anniversary of Chris Columbus’ comedy Mrs. Doubtfire. In the opening of the film, Robin Williams plays a voice-over artist who is recording lines for a cartoon that has already been made. (Yes, that’s out of order for a standard cartoon production, but for entertainment’s sake, we’ll let it slide).
The cartoon was supervised by legendary Warner Bros. director Chuck Jones, and animated by a small team of A-list animators that included legends like Bill Littlejohn and Tom Ray, and younger animators like Eric Goldberg. Coincidentally, Goldberg was also animating to the voice of Robin Williams for another animated project around the same period—the Genie in Aladdin.
In the film, we see barely a minute’s worth of animation of the two main characters—Pudgy Parakeet and Grunge the Cat. But in reality, Chuck Jones and his crew animated five minutes of material. This was never publicly shown until it was included several years afterward as a bonus feature on the Mrs. Doubtfire DVD.
While the cartoon doesn’t break any new ground in terms of execution or gags, and doesn’t even have a proper ending (it ends with a repeating cycle of Pudgy enjoying a cigarette for thirty seconds), the short has its moments. Williams voices all three characters, and it’s enjoyable listening to his vocal delivery. The animation, being much more fluid than Jones’ typical output of the period, is lively and filled with the energy of his classic cartoons from the mid-1950s.
The story doesn’t end there, though. Apparently, Chuck Jones wasn’t too keen on the backgrounds, feeling that they were overly detailed. So Jones had the cartoon completely reshot with new backgrounds that reflected a more subdued graphic style. As an added bonus, here’s the alternate version:
And just for good measure, here is a two-minute pencil test:
Add a CommentBlog: Galley Cat (Mediabistro) (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: Harry Potter, Children's Books, Young Adult Books, J.K. Rowling, Scholastic, Bloomsbury, Chris Columbus, Adrian Greenwood, Add a tag
A man and a woman stole a first-edition copy of Harry Potter & the Philosopher’s Stone at the “Art You Grew Up With Exhibition” in Oxfordshire, England. It is estimated that only 300 to 500 copies of this rare book exists; this particular stolen copy was worth over $9,500.
The Sun quoted Oxford book dealer Adrian Greenwood who loaned the book to the exhibit: “It was a first edition that was library stock. A dealer in London had one offered to them by someone who left a fake phone number. It is very unusual. Whoever stole it will have a terrible time selling it. We have photos of where it is restored so it’s easy to identify.”
Bloomsbury UK first acquired the Harry Potter series, publishing Harry Potter & the Philosopher’s Stone in 1997. A year later, Scholastic brought Harry Potter & the Sorcerer’s Stone to the American market. (Via the Economic Times)
New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
Add a CommentBlog: Day By Day Writer (Login to Add to MyJacketFlap)
JacketFlap tags: books, Rick Riordan, screenwriting, writing novels, changes in movie adaptations of books, Chris Columbus, Craig Titley, Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief movie, Percy Jackson book, Add a tag
My husband and I braved the crowds and caught the movie adaptation of Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief last night, and I’ve got some words of advice for writer Craig Titley and director Chris Columbus: Look over Angela Ackerman’s seven deadly sins of novel writing; they’re important for screenplays too.
Now, I’m a big fan of Rick Riordan’s novel series, but I know that movies and books are too very different mediums, and each has different needs as far as storytelling goes. But that’s just technique. Books and movies both need plot points that flow logically from one to the next, dialog that sounds authentic and characters that are unique and real. In the case of The Lightning Thief, the book has those, the movie doesn’t.
It’s nothing new that Hollywood makes changes to books for the movie versions, and if it works for the storytelling on the screen and keeps the intention of the book’s story, I’m all for it. For example, Peter Jackson’s The Lovely Bones begins differently than the original novel (although, Alice Sebold’s brilliant original beginning is used in the movie, just at a different time) and this change works better for the movie. It keeps with the spirit of the novel but introduces the characters in a way that works better when the story is being told visually.
NOTE: Spoilers ahead, so if you haven’t seen the movie yet and want to be surprised, come back to this post after you’ve seen it. Otherwise, read on…
Titley and Columbus made many changes for the Lightning Thief movie, but unfortunately, they don’t seem to be for the good of the story. Instead, and this is just my opinion — I, of course, wasn’t in the room when the Hollywood suits made these decisions — many of the changes seem to be for money. There are the obvious changes, like Percy using the reflective back of an iPod to battle Medusa instead of a glass orb and Annabeth dialing up Luke on her Apple computer for instructions on the flying shoes instead of using an iris rainbow message, which was the preferred form of long-distance communication in the book. But, I don’t think a glass orb and an iris rainbow would have yielded the studio much money in product placement fees.
Display Comments Add a Comment
I am so glad I found this post! I just got back from the movie and I am just so sad for poor Rick Riordan.
I have never in my life seen a worse movie adaptation. As you say, almost everything from the book has been changed, and along with it, the magic of RR’s writing with it. The humor, the layered plot line, the fantastic scenes in which RR weaves greek myth into the 21st century (with a very few exceptions), all of these have been lost.
I was especially disappointed that the makers decided to up the ages of the cast and spoon fed Percy all the info he needed. I found I didn’t root for him as I did in the book–there was no identity crisis over which God was his father, no sense of being adrift and not fitting in. It was all so rushed.
There are just so many brilliant scenes from the book that got the axe. Getting into the underworld? Easy-peasy. And suddenly the plot is all about getting these pearls? A Hydra instead of a Chimera? And I really wanted to see that chihuahua turn into a Chimera, too!
Whew. Sooo glad I could get that out. Thanks for letting me rant. And thanks so much for mentioning The Bookshelf Muse!
U r right, i have loved pj series because of its good plot, modern greek mythology, i was really disappointd with the turn out of movie, i think 70 to 75% of the story was changed, from the claiming of percy as son of poseidon, the cabins of camp in u shaped, (movie only showed percy’s), where is clarisse?, the capture the flag game was very different as told in the book, where is the oracle? (wherein the movie, a map is given by luke), where is ares? Tartarus was not shown, to give a hint for kr0nos, and chimaera, and others, these are some of the impt parts of the story they missed, u r very right, this is one movie adaptation that is too bad, at first i was too excited to see the movie, but i was wrong and not contented, i just hope they will give justice to book 2, which is one of my 2 favorite books in the series, if they wil b producing book 2
I know, Angela and Ian. A very disappointing movie.
My husband hasn’t read the books, but even he was disappointed with the movie as a movie. He enjoyed the action scenes and special effects — I did too — but he felt that the movie came short, and when I spent our ride home telling him about the book, he said, “That would be so much better!”
I understand that movie adaptations are rarely the same as the book plot point for plot point because of time. Generally, subplots have to be cut to keep the movie within a two-hour timeframe. I get that. But there’s no reason to change the whole story, especially when you’re going to whitewash it into something far less interesting.
Ian, they are planning to produce the other books, I suspect as long as they continue to make money. Judging by the sold out showings at our theater, the movie will make money. The studio suits have probably already greenlit the next one. The interesting thing is whether the movie’s success will continue next week after fans of the book hear about other fans’ disappointment. I’m predicting a big drop-off in week-to-week box office revenue, because it was the popularity of the book that built this opening week’s success. The strength of the movie itself will have to propel it on, and I don’t think it will. That said, this opening week revenue will be enough for another movie.
Angela, my pleasure on mentioning The Bookshelf Muse. Your seven deadly sins of novel writing posts are fabulous. I’m following you on my Google Reader now and have put you in the blogroll here. If only those studio folks had read your blog, maybe Percy Jackson would have been a better movie.
Of course, Chris Columbus should have known better. He did the first two Harry Potter movies. I’ve heard a lot of criticism about the control J.K. Rowling wields over how her books and characters are used, but I say good for her. Those movies are far better and far more respectful of the books than this one.
Oh, and I would have loved to see that chihuahua turn a Chimera! Also, Dionysus. He could have been hilarious.
Well, I take back what I said about good box-office revenue. Despite sold out showings here, Box Office Mojo is estimating that Percy Jackson made only $31 million over the weekend, which isn’t that great for a movie like this. Maybe the bad reviews prior to release stopped some people from coming. Valentine’s Day made $52 million, and I know it was Valentine’s Day, but still. I think Percy Jackson should have done better based on the popularity of the books.
Another thing to consider with box office sales is how they are billing it as ‘the next Harry Potter’. While I agree the book series is just plain brilliant and could be compared in some ways to HP, the movie isn’t even close.
I was shocked to read your comment on how they are planning to continue to roll out the rest of the series. After how they butchered the end, not mentioning the Kronos angle at all, I figured they were planning on only the one movie.
It will be interesting to see how it does in the box office in the coming weeks. Boy I would love to know how RR feels about his movie on the big screen.
I know. I’m with you, Angela. I’d love to know how Rick Riordan feels about it. Rick, got any thoughts?
It’s hard to say how much he was involved. Usually writers aren’t very involved in the movie adaptations. J.K. Rowling pushed for it, and I applaud her for that. I was pleased to read in Publishers Marketplace that Suzanne Collins is writing the screenplay for the movie adaptation for Hunger Games. She’s bound to stay true to her own story.
I’ve read that the studio is planning to do another Percy Jackson, but who knows if it’ll stick. It all depends on how well this one does. But, you’re right. With the changes they’ve made, they’re going to run into trouble with future adaptations. If they ever get enough movies to use the prophecy, they’ll have to either have the characters the same age in all the movies or change the prophecy to 21 or something, which just seems a bit silly. Sigh.
Me and my wife saw it tonight with the kids. None of us have read the book, but we are big Herc/Xena fans so we’re familiar with a lot of the Mythological tropes, so we had fun waiting for each disaster to unfold.
I think it worked pretty well for me, but Act I definitely seemed rushed to me. The kids really liked it though. We’ll have to get the book now and see what we missed
That’s great, Iapetus999. Yeah, try out the books now. They’re a lot of fun.