After all your great responses to Monday’s Nano Tip post, I though I’d spend one more post looking at the story. So many of you had cool interpretations and in interesting questions, so I thought I’d give you my own version.
(For those of you who haven’t read the Dialog Spine Story, and most importantly the comments, you should go do that now. And don’t forget Justine’s Nano Tip #2 from yesterday.)
Now, the author’s interpretation is privileged in some ways (people tend to give it extra weight) but that doesn’t mean that my version is “right” and any that differs from mine is “wrong.”
But here’s what I was thinking as I wrote the story:
1) Yes, there is a dead person and a live person. The dead one has no quote marks.
2) I kept the genders non-specific. Either of the two could be male or female, and they could be a hetero pairing or not. I sort of had a picture in my mind, but I don’t see the point in declaring it, given that there was no clear consensus in your comments. The rest works no matter which way you fall with the gender stereotypes/readings.
3) Yes, the live person was driving in the accident, which was few days ago. The ghost was in the passenger seat without seatbelts. And it’s the day of the ghost’s funeral.
4) The live person is having lunch in town, skipping the funeral out of shame. (You didn’t expect to see anyone in town today. Least of all me.)
5) It’s not a huge town, but it’s a 30-60-minute drive from the funeral, which is out in the country.
6) No one else can see/hear the ghost. (Tell him black.//“Black, please.”)
7) They were having an affair. (And I’d have worn one if you’d asked. I did a lot of things for you.)
The affair was secret, because the living person is somewhat older, and was friends with the ghost’s parents (as stated). Some markers of age: drinking gin, eating cold salmon, general fussiness, and mostly: “But it’s not as though . . . you’re eighteen, after all.”//Ah. You’ve been practicing that line, haven’t you?//“Don’t be crass.”
9) The affair was more or less revealed because of the crash, even if the ghosts’ parents haven’t said anything about it yet. So the living person feels guilty about a lot more than just driving that night.
10) The ghost is plotting the living person’s death. (I wish I could hold a knife.//You’ll have to drive fast.//Drive safely.//etc.) This is partly out of a need for revenge (a dish best “Served Cold”) but it’s mostly that the ghost is still in love and is angry that the living person’s survival has separated them. (Don’t let me go down there alone.)
11) You can also read the story as being entirely inside the living person’s head. It doesn’t seem as though anyone can hear either side of the conversation, after all. So maybe the survivor is changing their mind about going to the funeral, and convincing themselves to do something dramatic and unsafe to make amends.
12) You should always wear your seatbelt.
Okay, that’s all I got. Thanks again for being such good readers.
Also, note that I didn’t even notice the resonance of “Don’t let me go down there alone” until El pointed it out in Comment 14. w00t!
See you in Montreal tomorrow!
Wednesday, November 4th 7:00PM
Chapters Pointe-Claire
6321 Trans-Canada Highway, unit 1410
(514) 428-5500
Click here for all tour details. And click here to buy Leviathan.





Very interesting story, to say the least.
WOOT !! i WAS right about the alive person being a friend of the parents and having an affair with their daughter!!
Hmmm. I really like this nanno writing. I think im gonna try it for my next assignement as have my eng teacher think im a prodigy.
Oh, exept that it wasnt neccasarily a daughter. But… i still think it is
Awsome story.
Hmmm, usually people have commented everywhere by the time i get here… 2nd, 3rd AND 4th comment? its not ever my birthday.
I really liked that there was that element of unease that was given by the reader not being aware of the setting and people like they usually are.. makes things more… shakey. Wow. Awsome story. Very.. melencolic (is that a word)?
bubbly!
and I like dialogue.
But I was wondering if you or Justine could do a post with hints/suggestions for imagery?
That is so icy!!! Thanks for the tips!
Fawesome story, Scott-sama.
I still think the one that’s dead was a female, because of the way he/she talked, but still.
I hadn’t really noticed the who revenge-seeking part of the story until I read this and saw the little hints. It’s so fun when that happens, because now I get to go read the story and see it from your POV!
I wish I could see Justine’s. But alas, my school computer has blocked it for some reason, so I’ll have to wait until I get home in… eight hours. D:
Also, good job not making the characters gender-specific – i did have quite a battle mentally over who was a girl, boy, or both to either – but I like that any gender works!
Very cool! I guess I got some of the things right…but there were a lot of things I missed! Like the “Don’t let me go down there alone” comment — and to think I thought the dead character was referring to the funeral home down the road!
I like it, and I like the vengeful spite at the end. I hope you had fun reading our interpretations!!
So I picked up on everything except the ghost plotting the live one’s death, whoot! And I still think it’s an older woman and a teenage boy, kinda that old woman affair thing (and why the heck does that make me think of Benjamin Button…).
YAY! 10th comment! I’m at the school’s computer lab wasting my life away on blogging websites when I should be doing work. MMMWWWWWUUUUHHHAAAAA!!
Anyway, I’ll make time 4 reading the tip later. It’s just too risky JK! ^_^
Peace out girl scouts!