Category: All | Writer | Agent | Publisher | Editor | Librarian | Bookseller | Reviews | Illustrator | News | Industry

Sort Blog Posts

Sort Posts by:

  • in
    from   

Suggest a Blog

Enter a Blog's Feed URL below and click Submit:

Most Commented Posts

In the past 7 days

Recent Posts

(from Scott Westerfeld)

Recent Comments

JacketFlap Sponsors

Spread the word about books.
Put this Widget on your blog!
  • Powered by JacketFlap.com

Are you a book Publisher?
Learn about Widgets now!

Advertise on JacketFlap

MyJacketFlap Blogs

  • Login or Register for free to create your own customized page of blog posts from your favorite blogs. You can also add blogs by clicking the "Add to MyJacketFlap" links next to the blog name in each post.

Blog Posts by Date

Click days in this calendar to see posts by day or month
new posts in all blogs
Viewing Post from: Scott Westerfeld
Visit This Blog | More Posts from this Blog | Login to Add to MyJacketFlap
Blog Banner
Scott Westerfeld is the author of five science fiction novels for adults. He has also been an occasional ghost writer.
1. Nano Tip #3: Dialog Spine Analysis

nanotips

After all your great responses to Monday’s Nano Tip post, I though I’d spend one more post looking at the story. So many of you had cool interpretations and in interesting questions, so I thought I’d give you my own version.

(For those of you who haven’t read the Dialog Spine Story, and most importantly the comments, you should go do that now. And don’t forget Justine’s Nano Tip #2 from yesterday.)

Now, the author’s interpretation is privileged in some ways (people tend to give it extra weight) but that doesn’t mean that my version is “right” and any that differs from mine is “wrong.”

But here’s what I was thinking as I wrote the story:

1) Yes, there is a dead person and a live person. The dead one has no quote marks.

2) I kept the genders non-specific. Either of the two could be male or female, and they could be a hetero pairing or not. I sort of had a picture in my mind, but I don’t see the point in declaring it, given that there was no clear consensus in your comments. The rest works no matter which way you fall with the gender stereotypes/readings.

3) Yes, the live person was driving in the accident, which was few days ago. The ghost was in the passenger seat without seatbelts. And it’s the day of the ghost’s funeral.

4) The live person is having lunch in town, skipping the funeral out of shame. (You didn’t expect to see anyone in town today. Least of all me.)

5) It’s not a huge town, but it’s a 30-60-minute drive from the funeral, which is out in the country.

6) No one else can see/hear the ghost. (Tell him black.//“Black, please.”)

7) They were having an affair. (And I’d have worn one if you’d asked. I did a lot of things for you.)

8) The affair was secret, because the living person is somewhat older, and was friends with the ghost’s parents (as stated). Some markers of age: drinking gin, eating cold salmon, general fussiness, and mostly: “But it’s not as though . . . you’re eighteen, after all.”//Ah. You’ve been practicing that line, haven’t you?//“Don’t be crass.”

9) The affair was more or less revealed because of the crash, even if the ghosts’ parents haven’t said anything about it yet. So the living person feels guilty about a lot more than just driving that night.

10) The ghost is plotting the living person’s death. (I wish I could hold a knife.//You’ll have to drive fast.//Drive safely.//etc.) This is partly out of a need for revenge (a dish best “Served Cold”) but it’s mostly that the ghost is still in love and is angry that the living person’s survival has separated them. (Don’t let me go down there alone.)

11) You can also read the story as being entirely inside the living person’s head. It doesn’t seem as though anyone can hear either side of the conversation, after all. So maybe the survivor is changing their mind about going to the funeral, and convincing themselves to do something dramatic and unsafe to make amends.

12) You should always wear your seatbelt.

Okay, that’s all I got. Thanks again for being such good readers.

Also, note that I didn’t even notice the resonance of “Don’t let me go down there alone” until El pointed it out in Comment 14. w00t!

See you in Montreal tomorrow!

Wednesday, November 4th 7:00PM
Chapters Pointe-Claire
6321 Trans-Canada Highway, unit 1410
(514) 428-5500

Click here for all tour details. And click here to buy Leviathan.

11 Comments on Nano Tip #3: Dialog Spine Analysis, last added: 11/3/2009
Display Comments Add a Comment